林博荣^1,2, 何勍^1,2, 赵金^1,2, 杨佳^1,2, 石迎珍^1,2, 闫芳芳¹, 席洁¹, 黄昌兵^1,*()

1中国科学院心理研究所, 北京 100101
2中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049

出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30
通讯作者:黄昌兵E-mail:huangcb@psych.ac.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(31400877);中国科学院心理研究所科研启动经费(Y7CX332008)

Transcranial electrical stimulation and visual function modulation

LIN Borong^1,2, HE Qing^1,2, ZHAO Jin^1,2, YANG Jia^1,2, SHI Yingzhen^1,2, YAN Fangfang¹, XI Jie¹, HUANG Changbing^1,*()

1 Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2 Department of psychology of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Online:2018-09-15Published:2018-07-30
Contact:Changbing HUANG E-mail:huangcb@psych.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 经颅电刺激(Transcranial Electrical Stimulation, TES)通过电极将特定模式的低强度电流作用于大脑头皮以调控皮层活动, 是一种非侵入、无创的神经刺激方法。根据刺激电流的模式的不同, TES分为经颅直流电刺激(tDCS), 经颅交流电刺激(tACS)和经颅随机电刺激(tRNS)。TES能对视功能诸如光幻视阈值、视野、对比敏感度、视知觉运动等进行一定程度上的调控, 并且能够与传统的视觉知觉学习训练相结合以调控视觉功能。对于不同的视觉功能, 不同的TES参数和模式的调控效果有所不同。

参考文献

1 Alber R., Moser H., Gall C., & Sabel B. A. ( 2017). Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and vision restoration training in subacute stroke rehabilitation: A pilot study. PM&R, 9, 787-794. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.12.003 2 Alekseichuk I., Diers K., Paulus W., & Antal A. ( 2016). Transcranial electrical stimulation of the occipital cortex during visual perception modifies the magnitude of BOLD activity: A combined tES-fMRI approach. NeuroImage, 140, 110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.034 3 Antal A., Boros K., Poreisz C., Chaieb L., Terney D., & Paulus W. ( 2008). Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans. Brain Stimulation, 1( 2), 97-105. 4 Antal A., Kincses T. Z., Nitsche M. A., Bartfai O., & Paulus W. ( 2004). Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: Direct electrophysiological evidence. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 45( 2), 702-707. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0688 5 Antal A., Kincses T. Z., Nitsche M. A., & Paulus W. ( 2003 a). Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man. Experimental Brain Research, 150( 3), 375-378. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1459-8 6 Antal A., Kincses T. Z., Nitsche M. A., & Paulus W. ( 2003 b). Modulation of moving phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation of V1 in human. Neuropsychologia, 41( 13), 1802-1807. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00181-7 7 Antal A., Nitsche M. A., Kincses T. Z., Kruse W., Hoffmann K. P., & Paulus W. ( 2004 a). Facilitation of visuo- motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19( 10), 2888-2892. doi: 10. 1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03367.x 8 Antal A., Nitsche M. A., Kruse W., Kincses T. Z., Hoffmann K. P., & Paulus W. ( 2004 b). Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16( 4), 521-527. doi: 10.1162/089892904323057263 9 Antal A., Nitsche M. A., & Paulus W. ( 2001). External modulation of visual perception in humans. Neuroreport, 12( 16), 3553-3555. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200111160-00036 10 Battaglini L., Noventa S., & Casco C. ( 2017). Anodal and cathodal electrical stimulation over V5 improves motion perception by signal enhancement and noise reduction. Brain Stimulation, 10( 4), 773-779. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.128 11 Boroojerdi B., Prager A., Muellbacher W., & Cohen L. G. ( 2000). Reduction of human visual cortex excitability using 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology, 54( 7), 1529-1531. 12 Chaieb L., Antal A., & Paulus W. ( 2015). Transcranial random noise stimulation-induced plasticity is NMDA- receptor independent but sodium-channel blocker and benzodiazepines sensitive. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 125. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00125 13 Costa T. L., Gualtieri M., Barboni M. T. S., Katayama R. K., Boggio P. S., & Ventura D. F. ( 2015 a). Contrasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on central and peripheral visual fields. Experimental Brain Research, 233( 5), 1391-1397. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4213-0 14 Costa T. L., Hamer R. D., Nagy B. V., Barboni M. T. S., Gualtieri M., Boggio P. S., & Ventura D. F. ( 2015 b). Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 233( 4), 1213-1223. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4199-7 15 Ding Z. F., Li J. R., Spiegel D. P., Chen Z. D., Chan L., Luo G. W., .. Thompson B. ( 2016). The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on contrast sensitivity and visual evoked potential amplitude in adults with amblyopia. Scientific Reports, 6, 19280. doi: 10.1038/srep19280 16 Fedorov A., Jobke S., Bersnev V., Chibisova A., Chibisova Y., Gall C., & Sabel B. A. ( 2011). Restoration of vision after optic nerve lesions with noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation: A clinical observational study. Brain Stimulation, 4( 4), 189-201. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.07.007 17 Fertonani A., Pirulli C., & Miniussi C. ( 2011). Random noise stimulation improves neuroplasticity in perceptual learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 31( 43), 15416-15423. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-11.2011 18 Gall C., Bola M., Fedorov A., Schmidt S., Michalik R., Brandt S., & Sabel B. ( 2013 a). P 118. A two-center sham-controlled clinical trial of non-invasive alternating current stimulation in optic neuropathy: Sinus pulses are less effective than square. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124( 10), e120-e121. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.04.196 19 Gall C., Federov A., Antal A., Schittkowski M., Kropf S., Mante A., .. Sabel B. ( 2013 b). IS 5. Clinical efficacy of non-invasive transorbital alternating current stimulation in optic neuropathy: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled multi-center study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124( 10), e40-e41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.04.024 20 Gall C., Schmidt S., Schittkowski M. P., Antal A., Ambrus G. G., Paulus W., .. Sabel B. A. ( 2016). Alternating current stimulation for vision restoration after optic nerve damage: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS One, 11( 6), e0156134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156134 21 Gall C., Sgorzaly S., Schmidt S., Brandt S., Fedorov A., & Sabel B. A. ( 2011). Noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation improves subjective visual functioning and vision-related quality of life in optic neuropathy. Brain Stimulation, 4( 4), 175-188. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.07.003 22 Gibson, E. J. ( 1963). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 14( 1), 29-56. 23 Herrmann C. S., Strüber D., Helfrich R. F., & Engel A. K. ( 2016). EEG oscillations: From correlation to causality. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 103, 12-21. 24 Kanai R., Paulus W., & Walsh V. ( 2010). Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates cortical excitability as assessed by TMS-induced phosphene thresholds. Clinical Neurophysiology, 121( 9), 1551-1554. 25 Kasten E., Poggel D. A., Müller-Oehring E., Gothe J., Schulte T., & Sabel B. A. ( 1999). Restoration of vision II: Residual functions and training-induced visual field enlargement in brain-damaged patients. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 15( 2-3), 273-287. 26 Liebetanz D., Klinker F., Hering D., Koch R., Nitsche M. A., Potschka H., .. Tergau F. ( 2006). Anticonvulsant effects of transcranial direct‐current stimulation (tDCS) in the rat cortical ramp model of focal epilepsy. Epilepsia, 47( 7), 1216-1224. 27 Liebetanz D., Nitsche M. A., Tergau F., & Paulus W. ( 2002). Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain, 125, 2238-2247. 28 Matsumoto, H., & Ugawa, Y. ( 2017). Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, 2, 19-25. 29 Medeiros L. F., de Souza I. C., Vidor L. P., de Souza A., Deitos A., Volz M. S., … Torres I. L ( 2012). Neurobiological effects of transcranial direct current stimulation: A review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 3, 110. 30 Merton, P., & Morton, H. ( 1980). Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject. Nature, 285( 5762), 227. 31 Meyer B. U., Diehl R., Steinmetz H., Britton T. C., & Benecke R. ( 1991). Magnetic stimuli applied over motor and visual cortex: Influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movements. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Supplement, 43, 121-134. 32 Moliadze V., Atalay D., Antal A., & Paulus W. ( 2012). Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities. Brain Stimulation, 5( 4), 505-511. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004 33 Neuling T., Rach S., & Herrmann C. ( 2013). P 12. Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances endogenous alpha for 30 min only for moderate alpha levels. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124( 10), e69-e70. 34 Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. ( 2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of Physiology, 527( 3), 633-639. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x 35 Olma M. C., Dargie R. A., Behrens J. R., Kraft A., Irlbacher K., Fahle M., & Brandt S. A. ( 2013). Long-term effects of serial anodal tDCS on motion perception in subjects with occipital stroke measured in the unaffected visual hemifield. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 314. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00314 36 Plow E. B., Obretenova S. N., Fregni F., Pascual-Leone A., & Merabet L. B. ( 2012). Comparison of visual field training for hemianopia with active versus sham transcranial direct cortical stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 26( 6), 616-626. doi: 10.1177/1545968311431963 37 Plow E. B., Obretenova S. N., Halko M. A., Kenkel S., Jackson M. L., Pascual-Leone A., & Merabet L. B. ( 2011). Combining visual rehabilitative training and noninvasive brain stimulation to enhance visual function in patients with hemianopia: A comparative case study. PM&R, 3( 9), 825-835. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.05.026 38 Plow E. B., Obretenova S. N., Jackson M. L., & Merabet L. B. ( 2012). Temporal profile of functional visual rehabilitative outcomes modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuromodulation, 15( 4), 367-373. doi: 10.1111/j.1525- 1403.2012.00440.x 39 Reinhart R. M., Xiao W. X., McClenahan L. J., & Woodman G. F. ( 2016). Electrical stimulation of visual cortex can immediately improve spatial vision. Current Biology, 26( 14), 1867-1872. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.019 40 Richard B., Johnson A. P., Thompson B., & Hansen B. C. ( 2015). The effects of tDCS across the spatial frequencies and orientations that comprise the contrast sensitivity function. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1784. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2015.01784 41 Sabel B. A., Fedorov A. B., Naue N., Borrmann A., Herrmann C., & Gall C. ( 2011). Non-invasive alternating current stimulation improves vision in optic neuropathy. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 29( 6), 493-505. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0624 42 Sczesny-Kaiser M., Beckhaus K., Dinse H. R., Schwenkreis P., Tegenthoff M., & Höffken O. ( 2016). Repetitive transcranial direct current stimulation induced excitability changes of primary visual cortex and visual learning effects-A pilot study. Frontiers in Behaviral Neuroscience, 10, 116. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00116 43 Sherman, S. M., & Spear, P. D. ( 1982). Organization of visual pathways in normal and visually deprived cats. Physiological Reviews, 62( 2), 738-855. 44 Smythies, J. ( 1996). A note on the concept of the visual field in neurology, psychology, and visual neuroscience. Perception, 25( 3), 369-371. 45 Spiegel D. P., Byblow W. D., Hess R. F., & Thompson B. ( 2013). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation transiently improves contrast sensitivity and normalizes visual cortex activation in individuals with amblyopia. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 27( 8), 760-769. doi: 10.1177/1545968313491006 46 Stagg, C. J., & Nitsche, M. A. ( 2011). Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist, 17( 1), 37-53. doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614 47 Stonkus R., Braun V., Kerlin J. R., Volberg G., & Hanslmayr S. ( 2016). Probing the causal role of prestimulus interregional synchrony for perceptual integration via tACS. Scientific Reports, 6, 32065. 48 Terney D., Chaieb L., Moliadze V., Antal A., & Paulus W. ( 2008). Increasing human brain excitability by transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28( 52), 14147-14155. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.4248-08.2008 49 Villamar M. F., Volz M. S., Bikson M., Datta A., DaSilva A. F., & Fregni F. ( 2013). Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). Journal of Visualized Experiments, ( 77), 50309. 50 Zaehle T., Rach S., & Herrmann C. S. ( 2010). Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG. PLoS One, 5( 11), e13766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013766

相关文章 14

[1]	王葛彤, 席洁, 陈霓虹, 黄昌兵. 双眼视差的神经机制与知觉学习效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 56-69.
[2]	成梅, 杨燕, 尹华站. 经颅直流电刺激在注意缺陷多动障碍治疗中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(4): 657-666.
[3]	龚曦紫, 方方. 连续经颅直流电刺激对游标任务学习的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 70-70.
[4]	张恩 吕姣姣 李武. 外源性注意的重映射导致知觉学习的相对位置特异性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 76-76.
[5]	赵金, 何勍, 邱怀雨, 黄昌兵. 缺损视野的自然评估与恢复[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 95-95.
[6]	王思思; 库逸轩. 右后顶叶经颅直流电刺激提升高负荷下视觉空间工作记忆容量[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 43-.
[7]	张琪; 李晟. 真假反馈对运动方向辨别知觉学习的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 83-.
[8]	何勍; 周佳玮; 黄昌兵; Robert Hess. 同刺激不同任务知觉学习特性研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 98-.
[9]	郭恒;何莉;周仁来. 经颅直流电刺激提高记忆功能[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(3): 356-366.
[10]	张大山;史慧颖;刘威;邱江;范丰慧. 经颅直流电刺激在抑郁症治疗中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(10): 1789-1798.
[11]	陈建;袁杰;汪海玲;王妍;傅世敏. C1调制效应的理论评述及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(3): 407-417.
[12]	马小丽;杨彬;钟翔;宋艳. 知觉学习的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(04): 653-658.
[13]	宋艳,曲折,管益杰,高定国,丁玉珑. 视知觉学习的认知与神经机制研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(03): 334-339.
[14]	胡平;陈文锋;焦书兰. 国外知觉学习研究的若干进展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2001, 9(4): 302-310.

PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4456