删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

夏大豆重组自交系群体遗传图谱构建及开花期QTL分析

本站小编 Free考研考试/2021-12-26

曹永策1,2, 李曙光2, 张新草1, 孔杰杰2, 赵团结,2 1 延安大学生命科学学院/陕西省红枣重点实验室(延安大学),陕西延安 716000
2 南京农业大学大豆研究所/国家大豆改良中心/农业部大豆生物学与遗传育种重点实验室(综合)/作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室/江苏省现代作物生产协同创新中心,南京 210095

Construction of Genetic Map and Mapping QTL for Flowering Time in A Summer Planting Soybean Recombinant Inbred Line Population

CAO YongCe1,2, LI ShuGuang2, ZHANG XinCao1, KONG JieJie2, ZHAO TuanJie,21 College of Life Science, Yan’an University/Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Jujube (Yan’an University), Yan’an 716000, Shaanxi
2 Soybean Research Institute, Nanjing Agricultural University/National Center for Soybean Improvement/Key Laboratory for Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General),Ministry of Agriculture/State Key Laboratory for Crop Genetic and Germplasm Enhancement/ Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production,Nanjing 210095

通讯作者: 赵团结,Tel:025-84399531;E-mail: tjzhao@njau.edu.cn

责任编辑: 李莉
收稿日期:2019-07-31接受日期:2019-09-29网络出版日期:2020-02-16
基金资助:延安大学博士科学研究启动项目.YDBK2018-02
陕西省教育厅科学研究专项计划.19JK0959
延安大学科学研究专项计划.YDQ2018-23


Received:2019-07-31Accepted:2019-09-29Online:2020-02-16
作者简介 About authors
曹永策,E-mail:caoyongce@yau.edu.cn。







摘要
【背景】开花期是大豆重要的生育期性状,不仅决定了大豆品种的适种范围,而且对大豆的产量和品质有重要影响。江淮地区是中国重要的大豆产区,目前对该地区夏大豆开花期性状遗传基础研究相对较少。【目的】利用2个夏大豆材料杂交衍生的重组自交系群体对开花期进行QTL定位,为分子标记辅助选择育种和基因克隆提供依据。【方法】以科丰35(KF35)和南农1138-2(NN1138-2)为亲本,构建了含91个家系(F2:8)的重组自交系群体(NJK3N-RIL),在6个环境下调查开花期性状数据。利用限制位点相关DNA测序(restriction-site associated DNA sequencing,RAD-seq)技术对群体亲本及家系材料进行SNP标记分型,并利用窗口滑动法进行bin标记划分。利用bin标记构建该群体的遗传图谱,结合多年多点的表型数据,使用QTL Network 2.2软件中的基于混合线性模型的复合区间作图法(mixed-model based composite interval mapping,MCIM)和Windows QTL Cartographer V2.5_011软件中的复合区间作图法(composite interval mapping,CIM)对开花期性状进行QTL分析。【结果】在大豆全基因组范围内共获得36 778个高质量SNP标记,被划分为1 733个bin标记。利用1 733个bin标记构建了一张覆盖大豆20条染色体遗传图谱,图谱长度为2 362.4 cM,标记间平均遗传距离为1.4 cM。利用MCIM法共检测到9个控制开花期的加性QTL、2对上位性QTL和1个环境互作QTL,3种效应累积贡献率分别为63.9%、4.6%和2.1%。利用CIM法共检测到10个控制开花期的QTL,其中qFT-8-1qFT-11-1qFT-15-1qFT-16-1能在3个及以上环境检测到。综合2种分析方法,共检测到12个开花期QTL,其中qFT-8-1qFT-11-1qFT-15-1qFT-16-1qFT-16-2qFT-20-1qFT-20-2等能够被2种方法检测到。同时qFT-5-1qFT-8-1qFT-8-2qFT-13-1qFT-15-1qFT-20-2等是本研究新检测到的开花期QTL。【结论】夏大豆开花期遗传构成复杂,但加性QTL效应占绝对优势,上位性互作及环境互作效应对开花期影响较小。qFT-8-1qFT-11-1qFT-15-1qFT-16-1能够被2种方法在多个环境中检测到,是NJK3N-RIL群体中控制开花期的重要位点。
关键词: 大豆;开花期;遗传图谱;QTL

Abstract
【Background】 Flowering time (FT) is an important agronomic trait, which determines the planting range of cultivars and has a significant influence on the yield and quality of soybean. The Chinese Jiang-Huai valley is an important soybean producing area. However, little is known about the genetic basis of flowering time in these genotypes. 【Objective】 The objectives of this study were to map mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and identify stable and reliable loci that can be used for molecular marker-assisted selection (MAS) and map-based gene cloning, and then dissect the genetic basis of flowering time in summer planting soybean. 【Method】 A recombinant inbred lines (RIL) population containing 91 lines (F2:8) developed by crossing KF35 with NN1138-2 was planted in six environments to investigate phenotypic data. Restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) technology was used to genotype all lines and their parents. And then bin markers were obtained by window sliding method based on the SNP markers and used to construct the genetic map. The mixed-model based composite interval mapping (MCIM) method in the software of QTL Network 2.2 and the composite interval mapping (CIM) method in the software of Windows QTL Cartographer V2.5_011 were used to reveal the effects of the QTLs of FT. 【Result】 A total of 36778 high-quality SNP markers were obtained in the whole soybean genome, and further divided into 1733 bin markers. A high-density genetic map with 1733 bin markers was constructed that spanned 2362.4 cM of the soybean genome with an average marker distance of 1.4 cM. Nine additive QTLs, two pairs of epistatic QTLs and one environmental interaction QTL were detected by MCIM method. The cumulative contribution of additive, epistatic and environmental interaction effects were 63.9%, 4.6% and 2.1%, respectively. Ten QTLs were detected by CIM method, and four of them, qFT-8-1, qFT-11-1, qFT-15-1 and qFT-16-1 could be detected in three or more environments. Altogether, 12 QTLs controlling FT were mapped using MCIM and CIM methods. Six of them, qFT-8-1, qFT-11-1, qFT-15-1, qFT-16-1, qFT-16-2, qFT-20-1 and qFT-20-2 could be detected by two methods. Six novel QTLs, qFT-5-1, qFT-8-1, qFT-8-2, qFT-13-1, qFT-15-1 and qFT-20-2 were detected in this study. 【Conclusion】 The genetic composition of FT in summer planting soybean is relatively complex. However, the additive effect was dominant, epistatic interaction and environmental interaction had little effect on FT. Four QTLs, qFT-8-1, qFT-11-1, qFT-15-1 and qFT-16-1 can be detected by two methods and in multiple environments, which are important loci for controlling FT in NJK3N-RIL population.
Keywords:soybean;flowering time;genetic map;QTL


PDF (475KB)元数据多维度评价相关文章导出EndNote|Ris|Bibtex收藏本文
本文引用格式
曹永策, 李曙光, 张新草, 孔杰杰, 赵团结. 夏大豆重组自交系群体遗传图谱构建及开花期QTL分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(4): 683-694 doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.04.002
CAO YongCe, LI ShuGuang, ZHANG XinCao, KONG JieJie, ZHAO TuanJie. Construction of Genetic Map and Mapping QTL for Flowering Time in A Summer Planting Soybean Recombinant Inbred Line Population[J]. Scientia Acricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(4): 683-694 doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.04.002


0 引言

【研究意义】大豆是典型的短日照植物,对光温变化敏感,日照长度必须短于一定时长才能开花[1,2]。单一的大豆品种只能适应狭窄的纬度范围,在不同大豆产区都具有与之相适应的生态类型[3,4]。开花期是重要的生育期性状,不仅是大豆光温反应的直接体现,同时对其他的产量和品质性状具有重要影响[5,6,7]。因此,深入解析大豆开花期的遗传基础,对大豆品种的栽培区域合理划分以及培育广适应的大豆品种具有重要意义。【前人研究进展】大豆开花期是典型的数量性状,在遗传上既受主效基因控制,又受微效多基因影响[8]。目前,通过遗传分析报道了E1[9]E2[9]E3[10]E4[11]E5[12]E6[13]E7[14]E8[4]E9[2]E10[15]J[16]E11[17]共12个控制大豆生育期的基因。其中,E1[1]E2[18]E3[19]E4[20]E9[21]E10[15]J[22]位点的功能基因已被克隆或预测。E6还没有被定位,E5可能不是一个真实存在的位点[23]。除了这些被命名的基因位点外,还有许多数量控制位点(QTL)被报道[24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]。目前,在SoyBase数据库中至少报道了100个控制大豆开花期的QTL(www.soybase.org)。另外KIM等[33]通过同源比对分析发现在大豆中有118个与拟南芥生育期相关的同源基因;同时,ZHAI等[34]研究也发现即使E1E4等开花期位点遗传背景相同,群体的开花期仍有分离。以上结果均表明仍有许多未知的QTL/基因控制开花期。【本研究切入点】上述研究使用的材料多为春大豆类型,而江淮地区是中国重要的大豆产区,品种以麦收后夏大豆类型为主,不同于国内外春大豆类型。但目前对该地区夏大豆开花期性状遗传基础的研究相对较少。【拟解决的关键问题】本研究以2个夏大豆材料科丰35(KF35)和南农1138-2(NN1138-2)为亲本杂交衍生的1个重组自交系群体(NJK3N-RIL)为试验材料,基于高密度遗传图谱,对大豆开花期性状进行QTL分析,以揭示夏大豆开花期的遗传构成;同时鉴定出能在多个环境下稳定表达的QTL,为分子标记辅助选择育种和基因图位克隆提供有用信息。

1 材料与方法

1.1 试验材料与田间试验设计

以2个夏大豆材料KF35和NN1138-2为亲本,杂交得到F1代,经单籽传法,衍生的91个家系(F2:8)组成的重组自交系(RIL)群体(NJK3N-RIL)为试验材料。

NJK3N-RIL群体以及2个亲本在2012年分别种植于南京农业大学农学试验站(2012JP)和安徽科技学院凤阳试验田(2012FY);在2013年分别种植于南京农业大学农学试验站(2013JP)和安徽科技学院凤阳试验田(2013FY);在2014年分别种植于南京农业大学农学试验站(2014JP)和江苏沿海地区农业科学研究所(2014YC),共计6个生长环境。采用随机完全区组设计,3次重复,单行区,行长1 m,每行10个单株,株距10 cm,相邻行距50 cm,常规田间管理。

1.2 表型调查及数据分析

在单个种植重复中,NJK3N-RIL群体及其亲本的开花期记录为从播种当日到试验小区有一半以上植株主茎出现花朵的天数,单个环境下表型值取该环境下3个种植重复的平均值,记录单位为“天”[29,35]

利用SPSS 20.0(SPSS Inc.,Chicago,IL,USA)软件对表型数据进行描述性统计,包括性状在环境下的变异范围、平均值、标准差、变异系数和正态分布检验等。使用SAS 9.3(SAS Institute Inc. 2011)软件的Proc GLM过程进行多环境联合方差分析,估计方差分量用来评估性状在群体中的广义遗传率。广义遗传率计算公式如下:

h2=σ2g/(σ2g+σ2ge /n+σ2e/nr)

其中,σ2g为遗传方差、σ2ge为基因型与环境互作方差、σ2e为误差方差,n为环境数,r为单环境下的重复次数[36]

1.3 基因型分型与遗传图谱构建

采用限制性酶切位点相关的DNA测序(restriction- site Associated DNA sequencing,RAD-Seq)技术,对NJK3N-RIL群体进行全基因组SNP开发,然后根据亲本和家系的基因型开发bin标记用于构建遗传图谱,具体方法参考HAN等[37]和HUANG等[38]方法。采用JoinMap 4.0软件构建遗传图谱,以标记间LOD值大于3进行连锁群划分,采用Regression mapping算法和Kosambi函数计算连锁群内标记的线性排列以及标记间的遗传距离(centiMorgan,cM)[39]

1.4 QTL分析

使用QTL Network 2.2和Windows QTL Cartographer V2.5_011对大豆开花期进行QTL分析[40,41]。首先利用QTLNetwork 2.2软件基于混合线性模型的复合区间作图法(MCIM)进行多环境下联合分析,以检测不同效应(加性效应、上位性、环境互作)对大豆开花期的影响。检验时设置参数如下:检测窗口大小及步长分别设置为10和1 cM,排列测验(permutation test)1 000次,以P=0.05为统计检测阈值确定显著性QTL;其次利用Windows QTL Cartographer V2.5_011软件的复合区间作图法(CIM)进行单环境下QTL定位及效应检测,以检测能在多环境中稳定表现的QTL。检验时设置参数如下:采用Zmapqtl模型6(标准模型),窗口大小和步长分别设置为10和1 cM,排列测验1 000次,以P=0.05为统计阈值,判断是否存在QTL。在不同环境或方法下,检测到的QTL置信区间重叠,且加性效应方向一致,认为是同一个QTL。

2 结果

2.1 NJK3N-RIL群体开花期性状表型变异特点

NJK3N-RIL群体及其亲本在多个种植环境下的开花期表型如表1所示。在所有环境下,2个亲本KF35和NN1138-2的开花期平均值分别为40.4和48.1 d, 二者差异显著(P<0.01)。并且NJK3N-RIL群体的开花期性状在单个环境中均呈连续分布;除2014JP环境外,其他5个环境下该群体的开花期表型频率分布的偏度和峰度值(绝对值)均小于1,基本符合正态分布。表明大豆开花期性状为多位点控制的数量性状(表1图1)。

Table 1
表1
表1不同环境下NJK3N-RIL群体及其亲本开花期(天)性状描述性统计
Table 1Results of descriptive statistics of flowering time (days) in NJK3N-RIL population grown in different environments
环境
Environment
亲本 ParentsNJK3N-RIL群体
科丰35
KF35 (d)
南农1138-2
NN1138-2 (d)
均值±标准差 Mean ± SD (d)变幅
Range (d)
偏度
Skewness
峰度
Kurtosis
变异系数
CV (%)
2012JP36.8 ± 2.439.8 ± 1.537.7 ± 1.931.0—41.3-0.50.35.2
2012FY48.3 ± 2.354.0 ± 4.651.1 ± 2.047.7—57.30.3-0.34.0
2013JP40.7 ± 3.150.5 ± 3.744.8 ± 2.440.0—50.70.3-0.45.3
2013FY41.0± 0.051.3 ± 2.047.1 ± 2.543.0—53.70.90.65.4
2014JP40.3 ± 2.347.0 ± 1.349.3 ± 1.937.7—48.7-0.41.04.2
2014YC35.3 ± 0.645.7 ± 1.242.1 ± 2.635.7—48.30.40.16.2

新窗口打开|下载CSV

图1

新窗口打开|下载原图ZIP|生成PPT
图1NJK3N-RIL群体开花期在不同环境中的分布

Fig. 1Frequency distribution of flowering time in NJK3N-RIL population grown in different environments



大豆开花期具有较高的广义遗传率(h2,93.8%),多环境联合方差分析结果表明(电子附表1),开花期性状在家系间、环境间以及环境与家系互作上均存在极显著差异(P<0.001),说明开花期在群体中存在较大的遗传变异,且易受环境影响。但家系与环境互作的均方值远小于家系间的均方值,说明了开花期性状在家系间的差异主要是由遗传变异引起的。

2.2 基因型分型与遗传图谱构建

采用RAD-seq技术对NJK3N-RIL群体及其亲本进行基因型分型。以Williams 82(Glyma.Wm82.a1. v1.1)为参考基因组,经过序列比对和过滤,共获得36 778个高质量SNP标记,分布在大豆20条染色体上(表2)。其中只有第1、12和19染色体的SNP数低于1 000个。根据窗口滑动法,将36 778个SNP划分成1 733个bin标记用于遗传图谱构建和后续分析。

Table 2
表2
表2NJK3N-RIL群体遗传图谱信息汇总
Table 2Summary of genetic map information of NJK3N-RIL population
染色体
Chromosome
SNP数目
SNP numbers
bin标记数目
bin numbers
遗传图谱长度
Linkage distance (cM)
标记间平均距离
Mean distance of adjacent markers(cM)
Chr. 0152857110.31.9
Chr. 021127114146.41.3
Chr. 03352181110.21.4
Chr. 04127290126.41.4
Chr. 0513337394.51.3
Chr. 06149787133.61.5
Chr. 07170085132.11.6
Chr. 081111109144.51.3
Chr. 09103085140.71.7
Chr. 10343595123.91.3
Chr. 11225685126.41.5
Chr. 1273365115.51.8
Chr. 132264104125.51.2
Chr. 1417528180.11.0
Chr. 15200888148.61.7
Chr. 1623848485.41.0
Chr. 17222084118.01.4
Chr. 18451311098.20.9
Chr. 196957196.81.4
Chr. 20139985105.51.2
总计Total3677817332362.41.4

新窗口打开|下载CSV

根据标记间的连锁情况,1 733个bin标记被划分为20条连锁群,同大豆20条染色体相对应。以连锁群为单位,计算标记的线性排列,并估算相邻标记间的遗传距离。最终构建出一张包含20条连锁群,遗传长度为2 362.4 cM的遗传图谱(表2图2和电子附图1)。标记间的平均距离为1.4 cM,平均每条连锁群的遗传长度为118.1 cM。其中,第1染色体对应的连锁群上含有的bin标记数目最少,为57个;第18染色体对应的连锁群上的bin数目最多,为110个。第14染色体所对应的连锁群遗传长度最短,为80.1 cM;第15染色体所对应的连锁群遗传长度最长,为148.6 cM。

图2

新窗口打开|下载原图ZIP|生成PPT
图2NJK3N-RIL群体中bin标记在遗传图谱上的分布

Fig. 2Distribution of bin markers on 20 Linkage groups in the NJK3N-RIL population



2.3 利用MCIM法检测开花期性状QTL

利用MCIM法,在多环境联合分析下共检测到9个控制开花期的加性QTL,分布在第8、10、11、13、15、16和20染色体上(表3图3)。单个QTL的加性效应值在-0.5—0.7 d,能够解释3.0%—12.0%的表型变异。其中,qFT-16-1qFT-20-1的表型解释率均在10%以上,是该群体中主效QTL;qFT-11-1在2013FY和2014JP中与环境互作显著,互作效应值分别为0.6和-0.8 d,互作效应对表型变异的总解释率为4.6%。在检测到的9个加性QTL中,除qFT-10-1外,其他所有QTL的增效等位变异来均来自亲本NN1138-2,这与NN1138-2具有较晚的开花期相一致。

Table 3
表3
表3NJK3N-RIL群体开花期加性及QTL与环境互作效应的分析
Table 3Additive QTLs and QTL-by-environment interaction effect for flowering time in the NJK3N-RIL population
位点
QTL
染色体
Chromosome
两侧标记
Flank markers
位置
Position (cM)
QTL置信区间
Confidence
interval (cM)
物理区间
1-LOD interval (Mb)
加性效应
A (d)
h2A
(%)
加性与环境
互作效应
AE (d)
h2AE
(%)
报道位点
Reported locus
qFT-8-18bin670-bin67198.295.6—102.236.6—41.30.43.2新位点 Novel
qFT-10-110bin875-bin876123.3122.0—123.348.6—49.3-0.54.8First flower 24-4
qFT-11-111bin928-bin92985.884.6—86.514.9—15.60.79.90.6**(2013FY)
-0.8**(2014JP)
4.6First flower 11-2
qFT-13-113bin1093-bin109468.066.8—68.528.4—29.50.43.0新位点 Novel
qFT-15-115bin1289-bin1290130.1128.1—130.148.1—49.00.67.9新位点 Novel
qFT-16-116bin1313-bin131424.221.2—27.73.8—5.00.710.5First flower 13-7
qFT-16-216bin1357-bin135864.362.2—66.231.1—32.00.67.2First flower 9-3
qFT-20-120bin1688-bin168947.746.8—48.334.3—34.50.712.0First flower 21-2
qFT-20-220bin1727-bin172895.895.2—96.844.0—44.50.55.4新位点 Novel
*表示P<0.05;**表示P<0.01。A:加性效应值为正,表示增效等位变异来自亲本南农1138-2。h2A:由加性效应解释的表型变异。h2AE:由加性QTL与环境互作效应解释的表型变异。报道位点:在SoyBase数据库中与本文报道QTL位置相邻或者重叠的位点。下同
*indicates P<0. 05; ** indicates P<0. 01. The positive value indicates that NN1138-2 contributed the allele to an increase in FT. h2A: Phenotypic variation explained by additive effects. h2AE: Phenotypic variation explained by additive QTL and environmental interaction effects. The reported locus indicates the QTLs name for flowering time in the SoyBase database. The same as below

新窗口打开|下载CSV

图3

新窗口打开|下载原图ZIP|生成PPT
图3NJK3N-RIL群体中开花期QTL在连锁群上的位置

方条的长度代表QTL置信区间。空白长条代表使用CIM方法在不同环境中定位到的QTL;黑色长条代表使用MCIM在联合环境中定位到的QTL;虚线代表相连的QTL间具有上位性互作
Fig. 3Locations of QTL for flowering time in soybean linkage map in NJK3N-RIL population

The length of the bar represents the confidence interval of the QTL. The blank bars represent the QTL detected by CIM method in different environment. The solid black bars represent the QTL detected by MCIM method in joint environment. Dotted lines represent epistatic interactions between connected QTLs


在NJK3N-RIL群体中共检测到2对上位性互作QTL,均为加性效应QTL构成(表4图3)。其中,第一对上位性QTL对由qFT-11-1qFT-16-1构成,互作效应值和表型解释率分别为-0.2 d和0.6%;并且该上位性互作QTL对在2013FY和2014JP中与环境互作显著,能够解释0.8%表型变异。第二对上位性QTL对由qFT-13-1qFT-16-2构成,互作效应值和表型解释率分别为0.3 d和1.5%,但与环境互作不显著。

Table 4
表4
表4NJK3N-RIL群体开花期QTL上位互作效应分析
Table 4Epistatic QTL pairs for flowering time in the NJK3N-RIL population
上位性QTL对
Epistatic QTL pairs
位点
QTL
相邻标记
Flanking marker
位置
position
(cM)
置信区间
Confidence interval (cM)
上位性效应
AA (d)
h2AA
(%)
上位性与环境互作效应
AAE (d)
h2AAE
(%)
1qFT-11-1bin928-bin92985.884.6—86.5-0.20.6-0.3**(2013FY)
0.2*(2014JP)
0.8
qFT-16-1bin1313-bin131424.221.2—27.7
2qFT-13-1bin1093-bin109468.066.8—68.50.31.5
qFT-16-2bin1357-bin135864.362.2—66.2
h2AA:由上位性效应解释的表型变异。h2AAE:由上位性QTL与环境互作效应解释的表型变异
h2AA : Phenotypic variation explained by epistatic effects. h2AAE: Phenotypic variation explained by epistatic QTL and environmental interaction effects

新窗口打开|下载CSV

2.4 利用CIM法检测开花期性状QTL

利用CIM法,在NJK3N-RIL群体中共检测到10个控制开花期的QTL,分布于第5、6、8、11、15、16和20染色体(表5图3)。其中,qFT-8-1qFT-11-1qFT-15-1qFT-16-1能够在3个及以上的环境中检测到,是NJK3N-RIL群体中控制开花期性状的环境稳定QTL。qFT-16-1能够在所有环境中检测到,单个环境中的LOD值为4.7—13.9,解释了10.8%—28.9%的表型变异,是NJK3N-RIL群体中的最稳定和主效QTL。qFT-11-1在5个环境中检测到,单个环境下LOD值为8.6—18.2,解释了17.7%—49.6%的表型变异,是NJK3N-RIL群体中控制开花期性状另一个主效位点。qFT-15-1在4个环境检测到,单个环境下LOD值为4.0—9.3,解释了7.6%—23.0%的表型变异。qFT-8-1在3个环境中检测到,单个环境下LOD值在3.2—4.6,解释了6.6%—9.1%的表型变异。qFT-8-2在2个环境中检测到,在单个环境中的LOD值分别为3.8和4.8,表型贡献率分别为5.9%和9.4%。qFT-5-1qFT-6-1qFT-16-2、qFT-20-1qFT-20-2仅能在单环境中检测到,LOD值为3.4—10.3,解释了5.0%—19.1%的表型变异,为环境敏感QTL。在检测到的10个QTL中,除qFT-5-1增效等位变异来自亲本KF35以外,其余9个QTL的增效等位变异均来自亲本NN1138-2。

Table 5
表5
表5NJK3N-RIL群体不同环境中开花期QTL分析
Table 5Detection of QTL associated with flowering time in the NJK3N-RIL population grown in different environments
位点
QTL
染色体
Chromosome
遗传位置
Position (cM)
相邻标记
Flank markers
LOD置信区间
Confidence interval (cM)
加性效应
Additive (d)
贡献率
R2 (%)
环境
Environment
报道位点
Reported locus
qFT-5-1569.4bin398-bin3994.467.5—71.8-0.69.92014JPNovel
qFT-6-16108.3bin482-bin4833.8106.9—109.50.65.02013JPFirst flower 1-1
qFT-8-18105.2bin670-bin6714.599.2—108.20.89.12013FYNovel
107.2bin671-bin6723.2102.9—108.40.56.62012JP
106.2bin670-bin6714.6100.9—111.30.69.02014YC
qFT-8-28123.1bin685-bin6864.8121.4—125.20.79.42012FYNovel
123.1bin685-bin6863.8121.3—125.20.65.92013JP
qFT-11-11184.6bin927-bin92812.784.2—85.81.334.32012JPFirst flower 11-2
84.5bin927-bin92814.283.6—87.51.539.62012FY
87.2bin930-bin93118.286.5—88.41.949.62013FY
88.2bin930-bin9318.686.8—89.21.018.52014YC
92.9bin932-bin9339.489.0—95.61.117.72013JP
qFT-15-115130.1bin1290-bin12919.3127.4—133.50.923.02014JPNovel
134.6bin1291-bin12924.5130.6—136.80.77.62013JP
134.6bin1291-bin12924.6131.0—138.30.68.32014YC
135.4bin1292-bin12934.0130.6—138.80.68.62012JP
qFT-16-11621.3bin1313-bin13145.617.2—26.10.910.82013FYFirst flower 13-7
22.3bin1313-bin13144.721.7—25.00.610.92014JP
23.3bin1313-bin13147.921.1—26.30.918.12012FY
24.3bin1313-bin131411.121.2—26.31.024.82014YC
26.7bin1315-bin131613.923.9—28.01.328.92013JP
32.7bin1320-bin13215.231.9—33.60.711.52012JP
qFT-16-21666.2bin1359-bin13603.465.9—69.60.76.22013FYFirst flower 9-3
qFT-20-12044.8bin1682-bin168310.343.8—45.41.119.12013JPFirst flower 21-2
qFT-20-22097.3bin1728-bin17295.394.7—99.00.711.92014JPNovel
R 2:QTL在单个环境中的表型解释率 R 2: Phenotypic variation explained by QTL in single environment

新窗口打开|下载CSV

3 讨论

3.1 bin标记遗传图谱构建

QTL定位是解析植物数量性状遗传基础的一种有效方法。遗传图谱的质量显著影响QTL定位结果的精度,在特定群体中增加标记密度可以提高图谱的作图分辨率[42,43]。如ZHANG等[44]应用一张包含6 159个SLAF标记的大豆高遗传图谱分析耐低磷性状的QTL,发现同低密度遗传图谱相比,高密度遗传图谱的作图精度会显著提高。目前,下一代测序技术,具有高通量、标记开发周期短等特点,能够方便的、快速的获得全基因组范围内的SNP标记,为高密度遗传图谱构建和数量性状解析提供了方便[45,46,47]。其中,RAD-seq技术近年来被广泛应用于大豆遗传图谱构建、QTL分析和候选基因挖掘等研究中。WANG等[48]基于RAD-seq技术构建了2张分别包含5 728和4 354个bin标记的高遗传图谱,并对大豆花色、花期和种皮色等性状进行了分析,发现大部分的QTL都被定位在小的基因组区间内;CHENG等[49]利用该技术构建了一张包含3 469个bin标记的遗传图谱,将抗疫霉病位点RpsWY定位在约100 kb区间内,并预测了4个候选基因;WANG等[50]利用RAD-seq技术构建的图谱将叶型相关的一些QTL定位在较小的基因组区间内,并对相关位点的候选基因进行分析。以上结果均表明基于RAD-seq技术构建的高密度遗传图谱具有较高的作图分辨率,能够方便地应用于QTL定位和候选基因分析等研究中。而本研究利用该技术构建的图谱包含1 733个bin标记,标记间的平均距离为1.4 cM,可以保证定位到的QTL都有2个或以上的紧密连锁标记(5 cM内),能够在一定程度上弥补作图群体规模较小的缺陷,提高了作图分辨率。相应地,本研究的定位结果也显示了绝大多数QTL被定位在1 Mb的物理区间内。因此,本研究构建的遗传图谱能够有效地应用于大豆农艺、产量和品质等相关性状的遗传解析、分子标记辅助选择育种以及基因图位克隆的研究。

3.2 夏大豆NJK3N-RIL群体开花期的遗传构成

本研究结果显示夏大豆NJK3N-RIL群体开花期性状具有较高的遗传率(93.8%),但多环境联合方差分析结果也表明群体中材料的基因型差异、环境差异及基因型与环境互作效应均对开花期存在极显著影响,说明开花期受许多因素影响。XU等[51]认为大部分数量性状的表型除受主效QTL或基因控制外,还可能会受QTL上位性和环境互作效应的影响。且当QTL作图模型中考虑了这些因素时,QTL的定位精度会大大提高[52,53]。因此,本研究利用了具有加性、上位性及与环境互作效应的完整遗传模型进行QTL分析。结果显示加性QTL、上位性互作QTL及环境互作效应均对开花期表型变异有影响,多个QTL存在环境互作或上位性互作效应,3种效应累积表型变异解释率分别为63.9%、2.1%和4.6%。因此,如果在使用这些QTL进行分子辅助育种时能够充分考虑这些遗传效应,将有利于更加准确地估计育种表型值。但在开花期遗传构成中,加性QTL效应的贡献率要远大于另外2种因素,占绝对优势,暗示了在前期研究中有必要去发掘能够在多个环境稳定表达的加性QTL。

3.3 与前人大豆开花期QTL定位结果的比较

利用MCIM法共检测到9个控制开花期的加性QTL,利用CIM法共检测到10个控制开花期的QTL,且有7个QTL使用2种方法均能检测到。综合2种分析方法,本研究共检测到12个开花期QTL。其中,qFT-6-1qFT-10-1qFT-11-1qFT-16-1qFT-16-2qFT-20-1等分别与SoyBase中报道的控制大豆开花期(first flower)位点First flower 1-1First flower 24-4First flower 11-2First flower 13-7First flower 9-3First flower 21-2的区间相邻或重叠,推测可能是相同的QTL(表3表5),与前人研究相一致,从侧面验证了这些位点的真实性;同时也有6个位点(qFT-5-1qFT-8-1qFT-8-2qFT-13-1qFT-15-1qFT-20-2)是本研究新检测到的开花期QTL(表3表5),尤其是qFT-8-1qFT-15-1能够在多个环境和不同方法中检测到,表明夏大豆NJK3N群体中具有独特的开花期遗传基础构成。另外,本研究检测的QTL与E1E2E3E4E9等一些在春大豆材料中控制开花期起重要作用的位点并不重合,表明江淮地区夏大豆开花期调控方式与春大豆的调控方式具有差异。因此,有必要利用更多的种质资源来揭示夏大豆开花期的遗传基础。

虽然在SoyBase中有100多个与大豆开花期相关的QTL被报道,但大多数位点只能在单个或特定的环境中被检测到。鉴定出不同环境稳定表达的QTL,将方便应用于MAS或基因图位克隆解析大豆开花期分子机制的研究。本研究中,qFT-8-1qFT-11-1qFT-15-1qFT-16-1能够在3个及以上环境和2种方法同时检测到,是NJK3N-RIL群体中控制开花期的环境稳定QTL(表3表5),能够作为分子辅助育种及基因图为克隆重要目标位点。

3.4 大豆开花期候选基因预测

植物开花的过程既受内在遗传机制控制,又受外界环境条件影响,调控机制复杂,有许多基因可能参与开花期的调控。但在大豆中只有少数几个开花期相关的基因被克隆和鉴定,发掘一些可能参与大豆开花调控的基因,能够充实对其分子调控机制的认识。本研究根据QTL区间内基因功能的注释及相关文献,对4个环境稳定QTL的候选基因进行了预测。qFT-8-1区间内发现2个AP2亚族转录因子(Glyma08g38190Glyma08g38800),前人研究结果显示AP2亚族转录因子对花的增殖生长至关重要[54]qFT-11-1区间内发现Glyma11g18940Glyma11g18290参与光周期调节和花形态建成(www.soybase.org)。qFT-15-1区间内有3个基因最有可能参与调控大豆开花期,Glyma15g41740编码一个MYB 家族蛋白,具有序列特异性DNA结合转录因子的活性,可以激活FT的互作蛋白FTIP1,实现促进开花[55];Glyma15g41770编码一个未知功能的蛋白,但该基因可能参与花发育的生物过程(http://www.Soybase.org);Glyma15g41825编码一个NAM蛋白,是植物特异性转录因子,前人研究结果表明NAM结构域蛋白在植物发育过程中发挥着重要作用,包括参与顶端分生组织发育、花的形态建成和胁迫诱导开花响应等[56,57]qFT-16-1区间内包含拟南芥同源基因GmFT5a,KONG等[58]研究表明GmFT5a调控大豆光周期反应。但这些区间内的真正功能基因还需要通过分子生物学等手段进一步验证。总的来讲,这些位点及其紧密相关的分子标记为大豆分子育种及基因图为克隆提供了重要的信息。

4 结论

夏大豆开花期遗传构成复杂,加性QTL效应占绝对优势,上位性互作及环境互作效应对开花期影响较小。共检测到12个控制开花期的QTL,其中4个QTL(qFT-8-1qFT-11-1qFT-15-1qFT-16-1)能够在多个环境和使用不同分析方法检测到,是NJK3N-RIL群体中控制开花期重要位点。

参考文献 原文顺序
文献年度倒序
文中引用次数倒序
被引期刊影响因子

XIA Z, WATANABE S, YAMADA T, TSUBOKURA Y, NAKASHIMA H, ZHAI H, ANAI T, SATO S, YAMAZAKI T, LU S, WU H, TABATA S, HARADA K . Positional cloning and characterization reveal the molecular basis for soybean maturity locus E1 that regulates photoperiodic flowering
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 2012,109(32):2155-2164.

[本文引用: 2]

KONG F J, NAN H Y, CAO D, LI Y, WU F F, WANG J L, LU S J, YUAN X H, COBER E R, ABE J, LIU B H . A new dominant gene conditions early flowering and maturity in soybean
Crop Science, 2014,54(6):2529-2535.

[本文引用: 2]

JIA H C, JIANG B J, WU C X, LU W C, HOU W S, SUN S, YAN H R, HAN T F . Maturity group classification and maturity locus geno-typing of early-maturing soybean varieties from high-latitude cold regions
PLoS ONE, 2014,9:e94139.

[本文引用: 1]

COBER E R, MOLNAR S J, CHARETTE M, VOLDENG H D . A new locus for early maturity in soybean
Crop Science, 2010,50(2):524-527.

[本文引用: 2]

ZHANG W K, WANG Y J, LUO G Z, ZHANG J S, HE C Y, WU X L, GAI J Y, CHEN S Y . QTL mapping of ten agronomic traits on the soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) genetic map and their association with EST markers
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2004,108(6):1131-1139.

[本文引用: 1]

LIU W, KIM M Y, VAN K, LEE Y H, LI H L, LIU H L, LEE S H . QTL identification of yield-related traits and their association with flowering and maturity in soybean
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 2011,14(1):65-70.

[本文引用: 1]

COOPER R L . A delayed flowering barrier to higher soybean yields
Field Crop Research, 2003,82(1):27-35.

[本文引用: 1]

KEIM P, DIERS B W, OLSON T C, SHOEMAKER R C . RFLP mapping in soybean: Association between marker loci and variation in quantitative traits
Genetics, 1990,126(3):735-742.

[本文引用: 1]

BERNARD R L . Two major genes for time of flowering and maturity in soybeans
Crop Science, 1971,11(2):242-244.

[本文引用: 2]

BUZZELL R I . Inheritance of a soybean flowering response to fluorescent-daylength conditions
Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 1971,13(4):703-707.

[本文引用: 1]

BUZZELL R I, VOLDENG H D . Inheritance of insensitivity to long daylength
Soybean Genetics Newsletter, 1980,7(1):26-29.

[本文引用: 1]

MCBLAIN B A, BERNARD R L . A new gene affecting the time of flowering and maturity in soybeans
Journal of Heredity, 1987,78(3):160-162.

[本文引用: 1]

BONATO E R, VELLO N A . E6, a dominant gene conditioning early flowering and maturity in soybeans
Genetics and Molecular Biology, 1999,22(2):229-232.

[本文引用: 1]

COBER E R, VOLDENG H D . A new soybean maturity and photoperiod-sensitivity locus linked to E1 and T
Crop Science, 2001,41(3):698-701.

[本文引用: 1]

SAMANFAR B, MOLNAR S J, CHARETTE M, SCHOENROCK A, DEHNE F, GOLSHANI A, BELZILE F, COBER E R . Mapping and identification of a potential candidate gene for a novel maturity locus,E10, in soybean
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2017,130(2):377-390.

[本文引用: 2]

RAY J D, HINSON K, MANKONO J, MALO M F . Genetic control of a long-juvenile trait in soybean
Crop Science, 1995,35(4):1001-1006.

[本文引用: 1]

WANG F F, NAN H Y, CHEN L Y, FANG C, ZHANG H Y, SU T, LI S C, CHENG Q, DONG L D, LIU B H, KONG F J, LU S J . A new dominant locus,E11, controls early flowering time and maturity in soybean
Molecular Breeding, 2019,39(5):70.

[本文引用: 1]

WATANABE S, XIA Z, HIDESHIMA R, TSUBOKURA Y, SATO S, YAMANAKA N, TAKAHASHI R, ANAI T, TABATA S, KITAMURA K, HARADA K . A map-based cloning strategy employing a residual heterozygous line reveals that the GIGANTEA gene is involved in soybean maturity and flowering
Genetics, 2011,188(2):395-407.

[本文引用: 1]

WATANABE S, HIDESHIMA R, XIA Z, TSUBOKURA Y, SATO S, NAKAMOTO Y, YAMANAKA N, TAKAHASHI R, ISHIMOTO M, ANAI T, TABATA S, HARADA K . Map-based cloning of the gene associated with the soybean maturity locus E3
Genetics, 2009,182(4):1251-1262.

[本文引用: 1]

LIU B, KANAZAWA A, MATSUMURA H, TAKAHASHI R, HARADA K, ABE J . Genetic redundancy in soybean photoresponses associated with duplication of the phytochrome A gene
Genetics, 2008,180(2):995-1007.

[本文引用: 1]

ZHAO C, TAKESHIMA R, ZHU J, XU M, SATO M, WATANABE S, KANAZAWA A, LIU B H, KONG F J, YAMADA T, ABE J . A recessive allele for delayed flowering at the soybean maturity locus E9 is a leaky allele of FT2a, a FLOWERING LOCUS T ortholog
BMC Plant Biology, 2016,16:20.

[本文引用: 1]

LU S J, ZHAO X H, HU Y L, LIU S L, NAN H Y, LI X M, FANG C, CAO D, SHI X Y, KONG L P, SU T, ZHANG F G, LI S C, WANG Z, YUAN X H, COBER E R, WELLER J L, LIU B H, HOU X L, TIAN Z X, KONG F J . Natural variation at the soybean J locus improves adaptation to the tropics and enhances yield
Nature Genetics, 2017,49(5):773-779.

[本文引用: 1]

DISSANAYAKA A, RODRIGUEZ T O, DI S, YAN F, GITHIRI S M, RODAS F R, ABE J, TAKAHASHI R . Quantitative trait locus mapping of soybean maturity gene E5
Breeding Science, 2016,66(3):407-415.

[本文引用: 1]

向仕华, 王吴彬, 何庆元, 杨红燕, 刘成, 邢光南, 赵团结, 盖钧镒 . 多环境下野生大豆染色体片段代换系群体农艺性状相关QTL/片段的鉴定
中国农业科学, 2015,48(1):10-22.

URL [本文引用: 1]

XIANG S H, WANG W B, HE Q Y, YANG H Y, LIU C, XING G N, ZHAO T J, GAI J Y . Identification of QTL/segments related to agronomic traits using CSSL population under multiple environments
Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015,48(1):10-22. (in Chinese)

URL [本文引用: 1]

宋晓宇, 毛婷婷, 王立伟, 刘丽凤, 李晓那, 孙石, 韩天富 . 不同播期条件下大豆开花期性状的全基因组关联分析
中国油料作物学报, 2018,40(4):459.

[本文引用: 1]

SONG X Y, MAO T T, WANG L W, LIU L F, LI X N, SUN S, HAN T F . Genome–wide association analysis of soybean flowering time under different sowing dates.
Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2018, 40(4):459.(in Chinese)

[本文引用: 1]

张雅娟, 曹永策, 李曙光, 常芳国, 孔杰杰, 盖钧镒, 赵团结 . 夏大豆重组自交系群体 NJRIMN开花期和株高QTL定位
大豆科学, 2018,37(6):860-865.

[本文引用: 1]

ZHANG Y J, CAO Y C, LI S G, CHANG F G, KONG J J, GAI J Y, ZHAO T J . Mapping QTL for flowering time and plant height in a summer-sowing soybean RIL population NJRIMN
Soybean Science, 2018, 37(6):860-865. (in Chinese)

[本文引用: 1]

ORF J H, CHASE K, JARVIK T, MANSURC L M, CREGAN P B, ADLER F R, LARK K G . Genetics of soybean agronomic traits: I. Comparison of three related recombinant inbred populations
Crop Science, 1999,39(6):1642-1651.

[本文引用: 1]

YAMANAKA N, NINOMIYA S, HOSHI M, TSUBOKURA Y, YANO M, NAGAMURA Y, SASAKI T, HARADA K . An informative linkage map of soybean reveals QTLs for flowering time, leaflet morphology and regions of segregation distortion
DNA Research, 2001,8(2):61-72.

[本文引用: 1]

LEE S, JUN T H, MICHEL A P, MIAN M A R . SNP markers linked to QTL conditioning plant height, lodging, and maturity in soybean
Euphytica, 2015,203(3):521-532.

[本文引用: 2]

MAO T T, LI J Y, WEN Z X, WU T T, WU C X, SUN S, JIANG B J, HOU W S, LI W B, SONG Q J, WANG D C, HAN T F . Association mapping of loci controlling genetic and environmental interaction of soybean flowering time under various photo-thermal conditions
BMC Genomics, 2017,18(1):415.

[本文引用: 1]

WATANABE S, TSUKAMOTO C, OSHITA T, YAMADA T, ANAI T, KAGA A . Identification of quantitative trait loci for flowering time by a combination of restriction site-associated DNA sequencing and bulked segregant analysis in soybean
Breeding Science, 2017,67(3), 277-285.

[本文引用: 1]

KONG L P, LU S J, WANG Y P, FANG C, WANG F F, NAN H Y, SU T, LI S C, ZHANG F G, LI X M, ZHAO X H, YUAN X H, LIU B H, KONG F J . Quantitative trait locus mapping of flowering time and maturity in soybean using next-generation sequencing-based analysis
Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018,9:995.

[本文引用: 1]

KIM M Y, SHIN J H, KANG Y J, SHIM S R, LEE S H . Divergence of flowering genes in soybean
Journal of Biosciences, 2012,37(5):857-870.

[本文引用: 1]

ZHAI H, Lü S X, WANG Y Q, CHEN X, REN H X, YANG J Y, CHENG W, ZONG C M, GU H P, QIU H M, WU H Y, ZHANG X Z, CUI T T, XIA Z J . Allelic variations at four major maturity E genes and transcriptional abundance of the E1 gene are associated with flowering time and maturity of soybean cultivars
PLoS ONE, 2014,9(5):e97636.

[本文引用: 1]

邱丽娟, 常汝镇 . 大豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准
北京:中国农业出版社, 2006.

[本文引用: 1]

QIU L J, CHANG R Z. Descriptors and data standard for soybean (Glycine spp)
Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2006. (in Chinese)

[本文引用: 1]

NYQUIST W E, BAKER R J . Estimation of heritability and prediction of selection response in plant-populations
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 1991,10.3:235-322.

[本文引用: 1]

HAN K, JEONG H J, YANG H B, KANG S M, KWON J Y, KIM S, CHOI D, KANG B C . An ultra-high-density bin map facilitates high-throughput QTL mapping of horticultural traits in pepper (Capsicum annuum)
DNA Research, 2016,23(2):81-91.

[本文引用: 1]

HUANG X H, FENG Q, QIAN Q, ZHAO Q, WANG L, WANG A, GUAN J P, FAN D L, WENG Q J, HUANG T, DONG G J, SANG T, HAN B . High-throughput genotyping by whole-genome resequencing
Genome Research, 2009,19(6):1068-1076.

[本文引用: 1]

VAN OOIJEN J W . JoinMap? 4, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations
Wageningen,Kyazma BV, 2006.

[本文引用: 1]

YANG J, HU C C, HU H, YU R D, XIA Z, YE X Z, ZHU J . QTLNetwork: Mapping and visualizing genetic architecture of complex traits in experimental populations
Bioinformatics, 2008,24(5):721-723.

[本文引用: 1]

WANG S, BASTEN C, ZENG Z . Windows QTL cartographer 2.5
Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh,NC, 2007.

[本文引用: 1]

GUTIERREZ-GONZALEZ J J, VUONG T D, ZHONG R, YU O, LEE J D, SHANNON G, ELLERSIECK M, NGUYEN H T, SLEPER D A . Major locus and other novel additive and epistatic loci involved in modulation of isoflavone concentration in soybean seeds
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2011,123(8):1375-1385.

[本文引用: 1]

ZOU G H, ZHAI G W, FENG Q, YAN S, WANG A, ZHAO Q, SHAO J F, ZHANG Z P, ZOU J Q, HAN B, TAO Y Z . Identification of QTLs for eight agronomically important traits using an ultra-high- density map based on SNPs generated from high-throughput sequencing in sorghum under contrasting photoperiods
Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012,63(15):5451-5462.

[本文引用: 1]

ZHANG D, LI H, WANG J, ZHANG H, HU Z, CHU S, LV H, YU D . High-density genetic mapping identifies new major loci for tolerance to low-phosphorus stress in soybean
Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016,7:372.

[本文引用: 1]

JIANG N, SHI S, SHI H, KHANZADA H, WASSAN G M, ZHU C, PENG X, YU Q, CHEN X, HE X, FU J, HU L, XU J, OUYANG L, SUN X, ZHOU D, HE H, BIAN J . Mapping QTL for seed germinability under low temperature using a new high-density genetic map of rice
Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017,8:1223.

[本文引用: 1]

ARDISSON M, RANWEZ V, BESNARD A, BESNARD A, LEROY P, POUX G, ROUMET P, VIADER V, SANTONI S, DAVID J . Genotyping by sequencing using specific allelic capture to build a high-density genetic map of durum wheat
PLoS ONE, 2016,11(5):e0154609.

[本文引用: 1]

张传量, 简俊涛, 冯洁, 崔紫霞, 许小宛, 孙道杰 . 基于90K芯片标记的小麦芒长QTL定位
中国农业科学, 2018,51(1):17-25.

URL [本文引用: 1]

ZHANG C L, JIAN J T, FENG J, CUI Z X, XU X W, SUN D J . QTL Identification for awn length based on 90K array mapping in wheat
Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(1):17-25. (in Chinese)

URL [本文引用: 1]

WANG W B, LIU M F, WANG Y F, LI X L, CHENG S X, SHU L P, YU Z P, KONG J J, ZHAO T J, GAI J Y . Characterizing two inter-specific bin maps for the exploration of the QTLs/genes that confer three soybean evolutionary traits
Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016,7:1248.

[本文引用: 1]

CHENG Y B, MA Q B, REN H L, XIA Q J, SONG E L, TAN Z Y, LI S X, ZHANG G Y, NIAN H . Fine mapping of a Phytophthora- resistance gene RpsWY in soybean(Glycine max L.) by high- throughput genome-wide sequencing
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2017,130(5):1041-1051.

[本文引用: 1]

WANG L, CHENG Y, MA Q, MU Y, HUANG Z, XIA Q, ZHANG G, NIAN H . QTL fine-mapping of soybean (Glycine max L.) leaf type associated traits in two RILs populations
BMC Genomics, 2019,20(1):260.

[本文引用: 1]

XU Y, CROUCH J H . Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: From publications to practice
Crop Science, 2008,48(2):391-407.

[本文引用: 1]

WANG D L, ZHU J, LI Z K L, PATERSON A H . Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTL× environment interactions by mixed linear model approaches
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1999,99(7/8):1255-1264.

[本文引用: 1]

YANG J, ZHU J . Methods for predicting superior genotypes under multiple environments based on QTL effects
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2005,110(7):1268-1274.

[本文引用: 1]

CHEN X . A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development
Science, 2004,303(5666):2022-2025.

[本文引用: 1]

ABE M, KAYA H, WATANABE-TANEDA A, SHIBUTA M, YAMAGUCHI A, SAKAMOTO T, KURATA T, AUSIN I, ARAKI T, ALONSO‐BLANCO C . FE, a phloem specific Myb related protein, promotes flowering through transcriptional activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T and FLOWERING LOCUS T INTERACTING PROTEIN 1
The Plant Journal, 2015,83(6):1059-1068.

[本文引用: 1]

HU R B, QI G, KONG Y Z, KONG D J, GAO Q, ZHOU G K . Comprehensive analysis of NAC domain transcription factor gene family in Populus trichocarpa
BMC Plant Biology, 2010,10(1):145.

[本文引用: 1]

KIM S G, KIM S Y, PARK C M . A membrane-associated NAC transcription factor regulates salt-responsive flowering via FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis
Planta, 2007,226(3):647-654.

[本文引用: 1]

KONG F J, LIU B H, XIA Z J, SATO S, KIM B M, WATANABE S, YAMADA T, TABATA S, KANAZAWA A, HARADA K, ABE J . Two coordinately regulated homologs of FLOWERING LOCUS T are involved in the control of photoperiodic flowering in soybean
Plant Physiology, 2010,154(3):1220-1231.

[本文引用: 1]

相关话题/环境 遗传 基因 控制 材料