不同分配方案下各国碳排放额及公平性评价

删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

清华大学辅仁网/2017-07-07

不同分配方案下各国碳排放额及公平性评价

王利宁, 陈文颖

清华大学核能与新能源技术研究院, 北京 100084

CO₂ emission allowances for typical allocation regimes and their equality assessments

WANG Lining, CHEN Wenying

Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

摘要:

输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要基于政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第五次评估报告第一工作组决策者摘要给出的实现控制2 ℃温升目标不同可能性下的累计碳排放总量, 该文计算比较了代表性分配方案下各主要国家和地区2010—2100年的分配额, 并基于此用人均累计排放构建的Theil指数评价了各方案的公平性。结果表明: 各国分配额随全球允许排放总量的增加均将有所增大, 但不同分配方案赋予各国分配额的增长比例不同; 且在给定的允许排放总量下, 分配方案参数的变化也会对各国排放额有一定影响。对于各方案的公平性而言, 考虑历史责任的方案能有效减少全球排放的不公平性; 考虑能力的方案有助于减少附件I和非附件I这2组间已存在的排放不公平性。

关键词 ：气候变化,政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第五次评估报告,碳排放权分配方案,公平性评价

Abstract：The cumulative emissions data provided by the Summary for Policymakers of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (Working Group I) were used to calculate the carbon allowances for the main countries and regions during 2010-2100 for typical allocation schemes. The results show that each country's permitted discharges change with the various total constraints at different rates for each scheme. In addition, the scheme parameters also impact each country's quota. The allocation regimes are evaluated from the perspective of fairness to show that the regimes based on historical responsibilities more effectively reduce the inequities among global emissions to maintain reasonable rights for developing countries and that the regimes based on ability to pay more effectively reduce the emissions inequities between Annex I and non-Annex I groups.

Key words：climate change Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report carbon permit allocation equity assessment

收稿日期: 2013-12-30 出版日期: 2015-09-08

ZTFLH:

X24

通讯作者:陈文颖, 教授, E-mail: chenwy@mail.tsinghua.edu.cnE-mail: chenwy@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn

引用本文:

王利宁, 陈文颖. 不同分配方案下各国碳排放额及公平性评价[J]. 清华大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 55(6): 672-677,683.
WANG Lining, CHEN Wenying. CO₂ emission allowances for typical allocation regimes and their equality assessments. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2015, 55(6): 672-677,683.

链接本文:

http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/或 http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2015/V55/I6/672

图表:

表1　典型碳排放权分配方案

图1　各主要国家或地区分配额较2010年水平变化率

图2　2010-2100年各主要国家或地区总分配额较基准情景变化率

图3　不同约束量下的减排权衡关系

图4　附件I和非附件I国家碳分配额在

图5　各分配方案下对应的组间和总的Theil指数

参考文献:

[1]	Baer P, Harte J, Haya B, et al. Equity and greenhouse gas responsibility [J]. Science, 2000, 289(5488): 2287.
[2]	Höhne N, den Elzen M, Weiss M. Common but differentiated convergence (CDC): A new conceptual approach to long-term climate policy [J]. Climate Policy, 2006, 6(2): 181-199.[3] 何建坤, 陈文颖, 滕飞, 等. 全球长期减排目标与碳排放权分配原则 [J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2009, 5(6): 362-368. HE Jiankun, CHEN Wenying, TENG Fei, et al. Long-term climate change mitigation target and carbon permit allocation [J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2009, 5(6): 362-368. (in Chinese)
[4]	陈文颖, 吴宗鑫, 何建坤. 全球未来碳排放权“两个趋同”的分配方法 [J]. 清华大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 45(6): 850-853. CHEN Wenying, WU Zongxin, HE Jiankun. Two-convergence approach for future global carbon permit allocation [J]. Journal of Tsinghua University: Science and Technology, 2005, 45(6): 850-853. (in Chinese)
[5]	Höhne N, den Elzen M, Escalante D. Regional GHG reduction targets based on effort sharing: A comparison of studies [J]. Climate Policy, 2014, 14(1): 122-147.
[6]	den Elzen M, Höhne N. Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in Annex I and non-Annex I countries for meeting concentration stabilization targets [J]. Climatic Change, 2008, 91(3): 249-274.
[7]	Heil M T, Wodon Q T. Future inequality in CO2 emissions and the impact of abatement proposals [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2000, 17(2): 163-181.
[8]	Padilla E, Serrano A. Inequality in CO2 emissions across countries and its relationship with income inequality: A distributive approach [J]. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(14): 1762-1772.
[9]	滕飞, 何建坤, 潘勋章, 等. 碳公平的测度: 基于人均历史累计排放的碳基尼系数 [J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2009, 5(6): 362-368. TENG Fei, HE Jiankun, PAN Xunzhang, et al. How to measure carbon equity: Carbon Gini index based on historical cumulative emission per capita [J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2010, 5(6): 362-368. (in Chinese)
[10]	World Resource Institute. Climate analysis indicators tool 9.0 database [Z/OL]. (2012-12-20), http://cait.wri.org/cait.php.
[11]	World Bank. GDP [Z/OL]. (2012-12-20), http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.
[12]	Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations. World population prospects [Z/OL]. (2012-12-20), http://esa.un.org/wpp/unpp/panel_popula- tion.htm.
[13]	CHEN Wenying, YIN Xiang, ZHANG Hongjun. Towards low carbon development in China: A comparison of national and global models [J]. Climatic Change, 2013(1): 1-14.
[14]	Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group I. Summary for policymakers of climate change 2013: The physical science basis [Z/OL]. (2013-12-05), http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report-/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf.

No related articles found!