Abstract:In order to develop novel functional materials, CuMn2O4 was modified by graphite C3N4 (g-C3N4) and graphene (rGO). The modified and unmodified CuMn2O4 was characterized by XRD, specific surface area measurement, XPS and impedance test. The degradation efficiency of BP-4 and the elimination efficiency of $ {\rm{BrO}}_3^ - $ were compared. And the relationship between the structure and performance of CuMn2O4 before and after modification was explored. The results showed that BET specific surface area, total pore volume and average pore radius of the two composite catalysts increased. Compared with CuMn2O4, the specific surface area of CuMn2O4/rGO and CuMn2O4/g-C3N4 increased by 17.68 and 5.09 times, respectively. The modification of rGO and g-C3N4 not only increased the oxygen vacancy, but also increased the resistance of the catalyst. Compared with CuMn2O4, the relative content of OV in CuMn2O4/rGO and CuMn2O4/g-C3N4 increased by 2.51 times and 2.74 times, respectively. The resistance of CuMn2O4/rGO and CuMn2O4/g-C3N4 increased by 18.70% and 46.93%, respectively. Compared with CuMn2O4, the degradation rate of BP-4 by CuMn2O4/rGO increased by 5.98 times and the bromate formation yield decreased by 100%. The degradation rate of BP-4 by CuMn2O4/g-C3N4 increased by 5.37 times, and the bromate formation yield couldn’t be reduced further. Thus CuMn2O4/rGO was more suitable for the catalytic ozonation. The above research could provide a guidance for the selection of novel and efficient catalysts in the process of heterogeneous catalytic ozonation. Key words:catalytic ozonation/ CuMn2O4 modification/ graphene/ graphite carbon dioxide/ benzophenone-4/ bromate.
图1臭氧氧化反应装置示意图 Figure1.Schematic diagram of ozone oxidation reactor
图6单独臭氧、CuMn2O4、rGO、g-C3N4、CuMn2O4/rGO和CuMn2O4/g-C3N4催化臭氧氧化对BP-4的降解效果及对BP-4降解的拟一级动力学分析 Figure6.Degradation efficiency of BP-4 and the pseudo first order reaction kinetics of BP-4 degradation by the sole ozonation and CuMn2O4, rGO, g-C3N4, CuMn2O4/rGO and CuMn2O4/g-C3N4 catalytic ozonation
图7单独臭氧氧化及CuMn2O4,g-C3N4,rGO,CuMn2O4/rGO与CuMn2O4/g-C3N4催化臭氧氧化对溴酸盐生成量的影响 Figure7.$ {\rm{BrO}}_3^ - $ yield during the sole ozonation and CuMn2O4, g-C3N4, rGO, CuMn2O4/rGO and CuMn2O4/g-C3N4 catalytic ozonation
DUAN X G, AO Z M, SUN H Q, et al. Nitrogen-doped graphene for generation and evolution of reactive radicals by metal-free catalysis[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(7): 4169-4178.
[2]
WANG Y X, SUN H Q, ANG H M, et al. Facile synthesis of hierarchically structured magnetic MnO2/ZnFe2O4 hybrid materials and their performance in heterogeneous activation of peroxymonosulfate[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6(22): 19914-19923.
[3]
CAO H B, XING L L, WU G G, et al. Promoting effect of nitration modification on activated carbon in the catalytic ozonation of oxalic acid[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014, 146(1): 169-176.
[4]
KASPRZYK-HORDERN B, ZIó?EK M, NAWROCKI J. Catalytic ozonation and methods of enhancing molecular ozone reactions in water treatment[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2003, 46(4): 639-669. doi: 10.1016/S0926-3373(03)00326-6
[5]
NAWROCKI J, KASPRZYK-HORDERN B. The efficiency and mechanisms of catalytic ozonation[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2010, 99(1/2): 27-42.
[6]
LEGUBE B, KARPEL VEL LEITNER N. Catalytic ozonation: A promising advanced oxidation technology for water treatment[J]. Catalysis Today, 1999, 53(1): 61-72. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00103-0
[7]
GUO Y, SONG Z L, XU B B, et al. A novel catalytic ceramic membrane fabricated with CuMn2O4 particles for emerging UV absorbers degradation from aqueous and membrane fouling elimination[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 344(15): 1229-1239.
[8]
SONG Z L, ZHANG Y T, LIU C, et al. Insight into ·OH and $ {\rm{O}}_2^{ \cdot - }$ formation in heterogeneous catalytic ozonation by delocalized electrons and surface oxygen-containing functional groups in layered-structure nanocarbons[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 357: 655-666. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.182
[9]
ZHI C Y, BANDO Y S, TANG C C, et al. Large-scale fabrication of boron nitride nanosheets and their utilization in polymeric composites with improved thermal and mechanical properties[J]. Advanced Materials, 2009, 21(28): 2889-2893. doi: 10.1002/adma.200900323
[10]
BUTLER S Z, HOLLEN S M, CAO L Y, et al. Progress, challenges, and opportunities in two-dimensional materials beyond graphene[J]. ACS Nano, 2013, 7(4): 2898-2926. doi: 10.1021/nn400280c
[11]
GEIM A K, NOVOSELOV K S. The rise of graphene[J]. Nature Materials, 2007, 6(3): 183-191. doi: 10.1038/nmat1849
[12]
MAIYALAGAN T, WANG X, WANG H B. Review on recent progress in nitrogen-doped graphene: Synthesis, characterization, and its potential applications[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2012, 2(5): 781-794. doi: 10.1021/cs200652y
[13]
MAMBA G, MISHRA A K. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) nanocomposites: A new and exciting generation of visible light driven photocatalysts for environmental pollution remediation[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 198: 347-377. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.052
[14]
WANG Q, CHEN A S, WANG X F, et al. Fe-species-loaded graphitic carbon nitride with enhanced photocatalytic performance under visible-light irradiation[J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2016, 420: 159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2016.04.020
[15]
LIU B C, QIAO M, WANG Y B, et al. Persulfate enhanced photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A by g-C3N4 nanosheets under visible light irradiation[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 189: 115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.169
[16]
ZHENG Y, LIU J, LIANG J, et al. Graphitic carbon nitride materials: Controllable synthesis and applications in fuel cells and photocatalysis[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(5): 6717-6731.
[17]
WEN J Q, XIE J, CHEN X B, et al. A review on g-C3N4-based photocatalysts[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2016, 391: 72-123.
[18]
MOLINS-DELGADO D, DIAZ-CRUZ M S, BARCELO D. Ecological risk assessment associated to the removal of endocrine-disrupting parabens and benzophenone-4 in wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 310(5): 143-151.
[19]
RODIL R, QUINTANA J B, LOPEZ-MAHIA P, et al. Multiclass determination of sunscreen chemicals in water samples by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2008, 80(4): 1307-1315. doi: 10.1021/ac702240u
[20]
KASPRZYK-HORDERN B, DINSDALE R M, GUWY A J. The removal of pharmaceuticals personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs during wastewater treatment and its impact on the quality of receiving waters[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(2): 363-380. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.047
[21]
JHUMMERS W S, OFFEMAN R E. Preparation of graphitic oxide[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1958, 80(6): 1339. doi: 10.1021/ja01539a017
[22]
ZHU H Y, JIANG R, HUANG S H, et al. Novel magnetic NiFe2O4/multi-walled carbon nanotubes hybrids: Facile synthesis, characterization, and application to the treatment of dyeing wastewater[J]. Ceramics International, 2015, 41(9): 11625-11631. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.05.122
[23]
DEVI L G, and SRINIVAS M. Hydrothermal synthesis of reduced graphene oxide-CoFe2O4 heteroarchitecture for high visible light photocatalytic activity: Exploration of efficiency, stability and mechanistic pathways[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2017, 5(4): 3243-3255. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.06.023
[24]
WANG J G, CHEN Z M, ZHAI G J, et al. Boosting photocatalytic activity of WO3 nanorods with tailored surface oxygen vacancies for selective alcohol oxidations[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 462: 760-771. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.181
[25]
WANG Y X, CHEN L L, CAO H B, et al. Role of oxygen vacancies and Mn sites in hierarchical Mn2O3/LaMnO3-δ perovskite composites for aqueous organic pollutants decontamination[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 245: 546-554. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.025
[26]
LI L, JIANG G X, MA J M. CuMn2O4/graphene nanosheets as excellent anode for lithium-ion battery[J]. Materials Research Bulletin, 2018, 104(8): 53-59.
[27]
CHEN Y H, TIAN Y L, QIU Y Z, et al. Synthesis and superior cathode performance of sandwiched LiMn2O4@rGO nanocomposites for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Materials Today Advances, 2019, 1: 100001. doi: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2018.12.001
[28]
AKHUNDI A, HABIBI-YANGJEH A. Graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets decorated with CuCr2O4 nanoparticles: Novel photocatalysts with high performances in visible light degradation of water pollutants[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 504: 697-710. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.06.025
[29]
NIE Y L, HU C, YANG L, et al. Inhibition mechanism of $ {\rm{BrO}}_3^ - $ formation over MnOx/Al2O3 during the catalytic ozonation of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in water[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2013, 117: 41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.03.045
[30]
NIE Y L, LI N N, HU C. Enhanced inhibition of bromate formation in catalytic ozonation of organic pollutants over Fe-Al LDH/Al2O3[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2015, 151: 256-261. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.07.057
[31]
LI W W, LU X W, XU K, et al. Cerium incorporated MCM-48 (Ce-MCM-48) as a catalyst to inhibit bromate formation during ozonation of bromide-containing water: Efficacy and mechanism[J]. Water Research, 2015, 86: 2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.052
[32]
ZHANG Y T, XIA Y J, LI Q W, et al. Synchronously degradation benzotriazole and elimination bromate by perovskite oxides catalytic ozonation: Performance and reaction mechanism[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 197: 261-270. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.019
[33]
ZHANG Y T, LI Q W, LONG Y J, et al. Catalytic ozonation benefit from the enhancement of electron transfer by the coupling of g-C3N4 and LaCoO3: Discussion on catalyst fabrication and electron transfer pathway[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 254: 569-579. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.05.019
1.Beijing Key Lab for Source Control Technology of Water Pollution, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China 2.College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China Received Date: 2020-05-08 Accepted Date: 2020-06-17 Available Online: 2021-02-22 Keywords:catalytic ozonation/ CuMn2O4 modification/ graphene/ graphite carbon dioxide/ benzophenone-4/ bromate Abstract:In order to develop novel functional materials, CuMn2O4 was modified by graphite C3N4 (g-C3N4) and graphene (rGO). The modified and unmodified CuMn2O4 was characterized by XRD, specific surface area measurement, XPS and impedance test. The degradation efficiency of BP-4 and the elimination efficiency of $ {\rm{BrO}}_3^ - $ were compared. And the relationship between the structure and performance of CuMn2O4 before and after modification was explored. The results showed that BET specific surface area, total pore volume and average pore radius of the two composite catalysts increased. Compared with CuMn2O4, the specific surface area of CuMn2O4/rGO and CuMn2O4/g-C3N4 increased by 17.68 and 5.09 times, respectively. The modification of rGO and g-C3N4 not only increased the oxygen vacancy, but also increased the resistance of the catalyst. Compared with CuMn2O4, the relative content of OV in CuMn2O4/rGO and CuMn2O4/g-C3N4 increased by 2.51 times and 2.74 times, respectively. The resistance of CuMn2O4/rGO and CuMn2O4/g-C3N4 increased by 18.70% and 46.93%, respectively. Compared with CuMn2O4, the degradation rate of BP-4 by CuMn2O4/rGO increased by 5.98 times and the bromate formation yield decreased by 100%. The degradation rate of BP-4 by CuMn2O4/g-C3N4 increased by 5.37 times, and the bromate formation yield couldn’t be reduced further. Thus CuMn2O4/rGO was more suitable for the catalytic ozonation. The above research could provide a guidance for the selection of novel and efficient catalysts in the process of heterogeneous catalytic ozonation.