李辉林2,
胡清2,,,
高菁阳2,
王宏2
1. 南方科技大学环境科学与工程学院, 深圳 518055;
2. 南方科技大学工程技术创新中心(北京), 北京 100083
作者简介: 王超(1982-),女,副研究员,研究方向为土壤环境风险评估及新型污染物在环境中的检测、归趋、去除及人体和生态风险评估,E-mail:wangchaoshirley@sustech.edu.cn.
通讯作者: 胡清,huq@sustech.edu.cn ;
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划“粤港澳大湾区污染场地安全利用保障技术与集成工程示范”（2019YFC1803900）中图分类号: X171.5
Analysis and Prospects on Soil Environmental Risk Assessment Technology in China
Wang Chao1,2,Li Huilin2,
Hu Qing2,,,
Gao Jingyang2,
Wang Hong2
1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China;
2. Sustech Engineering Innovation Center(Beijing), Southern University of Science and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
Corresponding author: Hu Qing,huq@sustech.edu.cn ;
CLC number: X171.5
-->
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要:随着我国工业化、城镇化及农业高度集约化的快速发展，耕地和场地土壤复合污染问题日益突出，土壤污染的风险日趋显现。本文在总结国内外土壤污染健康风险评估技术发展历程的基础上，探讨我国国内建设用地健康风险评估技术导则的异同点，分析目前国内外有关土壤环境风险评估技术研究的热点与不足，重点介绍了蒸气入侵模型的发展、土壤中有机污染物和重金属健康风险评估方面的研究工作。最后，本文提出根据场地利用场景并结合考虑生物可给性的模型校正开展精细化的土壤环境人体健康风险评估，同时也要加强土壤环境的生态风险评估以及地质高背景区的风险管控。本文为未来场地土壤环境的分级分类管理提供了前瞻性建议。
关键词: 土壤环境/
健康风险评估技术/
暴露模型/
蒸气入侵模型/
生物可给性
Abstract:With the rapid development of China's industrialization, urbanization and high agricultural intensification, the combined pollution of cultivated land and site soil has become increasingly prominent, and soil pollution risks have become increasingly urgent. This paper summarizes the development history on health risk assessment technology of soil contamination at home and abroad, discusses similarities and differences of domestic health risk assessment technology guidelines for construction land, analyzes the current hotspots and shortcomings of research on soil environmental risk assessment technology at home and abroad with focuses on the development of vapor intrusion models and the research work on health risk assessment of organic pollutants and heavy metals in soil. Finally, this paper proposes to carry out a refined health risk assessment of soil contamination based on site utilization scenarios and bioaccessibility model calibration. At the same time, it is necessary to strengthen the ecological risk assessment of soil contamination, and the risk management and control of high geological background areas. This paper provides forward-looking recommendations for the future hierarchical and classified management of site soil environment.
Key words:soil environment/
health risk assessment technology/
exposure models/
vapor intrusion models/
bioaccessibility.
| 罗泽娇, 贾娜, 刘仕翔, 等. 我国污染场地土壤风险评估的局限性[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2015, 22(5):40-46,58 Luo Z J, Jia N, Liu S X, et al. Limitations of risk assessment on contaminated site soil in China[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2015, 22(5):40-46,58(in Chinese) |
| 中华人民共和国环境保护部. 污染场地风险评估技术导则(发布稿):HJ 25.3-2014[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国环境保护部, 2014 |
| 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行):GB 36600-2018[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2018 |
| 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行):GB 15618-2018[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2018 |
| 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 污染地块风险管控与土壤修复效果评估技术导则(试行):HJ 25.5-2018[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2018 |
| 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 建设用地土壤污染风险评估技术导则:HJ 25.3-2019[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2019 |
| 王立婷, 刘仁志. 土壤污染风险评价研究进展[J]. 中国环境管理, 2020, 12(2):62-68Wang L T, Liu R Z. Research progress on soil pollution risk assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 12(2):62-68(in Chinese) |
| 王蕊, 陈明, 陈楠, 等. 基于总量及形态的土壤重金属生态风险评价对比:以龙岩市适中镇为例[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(10):4348-4359Wang R, Chen M, Chen N, et al. Comparision of ecological risk assessment based on the total amount and speciation distribution of heavy metals in soil:A case study for Longyan City, Fujian Province[J]. Environmental Science, 2017, 38(10):4348-4359(in Chinese) |
| 王美娥, 丁寿康, 郭观林, 等. 污染场地土壤生态风险评估研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11):3946-3958Wang M E, Ding S K, Guo G L, et al. Advances in ecological risk assessment of soil in contaminated sites[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(11):3946-3958(in Chinese) |
| National Research Council. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government:Managing the Process[M]. Washington DC:National Academies Press, 1983:1-205 |
| Epa U U. Guidelines for exposure assessment[J]. Risk Assessment Forum, 1992, 57(104):22888-22938 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). A Framework for Assessing Health Risks of Environmental Exposures to Children[R]. Washington DC:US EPA, 2006 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Exposure Factors Handbook[R]. Washington DC:US EPA, 1997 |
| 李志博, 骆永明, 宋静, 等. 土壤环境质量指导值与标准研究Ⅱ·污染土壤的健康风险评估[J]. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(1):142-151Li Z B, Luo Y M, Song J, et al. Study on soil environmental quality guidelines and standardsⅡ. Health risk assessment of polluted soils[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2006, 43(1):142-151(in Chinese) |
| 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 《环境健康风险评估技术指南总纲(征求意见稿)》编制说明[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2018 |
| International Association for Testing Materials (ASTM International). Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action[S]. West Conshohocken:ASTM International, 2000 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS):Part A:Human health evaluation manual[R]. Washington DC:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US EPA, 1989 |
| United States Hazardous Site Control Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Soil Screening Guidance:User's Guide[M]. Washington DC:Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US EPA, 1996:1-92 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Draft guidance for evaluating the vapor intrusion to indoor air pathway from groundwater and soils (subsurface vapor intrusion guidance)[J]. Federal Register, 2002, 67(230):71169-71172 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS):Part B:Development of risk-based preliminary remediation goals[R]. Washington DC:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US EPA, 1991 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS):Part C:Risk-evaluation of remedial alternatives[R]. Washington DC:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US EPA, 1991 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS):Part D:Standardized planning, reporting, and review of superfund risk assessments[R]. Washington DC:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US EPA, 2001 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS):Part E:Supplemental guidance for dermal risk assessment[R]. Washington DC:Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, US EPA, 2004 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS):Part F:Supplemental guidance for inhalation risk assessment[R]. Washington DC:Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, US EPA, 2009 |
| Martin I, Cowie C. Compilation of data for priority organic pollutants for derivation of soil guideline values[R]. London:Environment Agency, 2008 |
| Hosford M. Human Health Toxicological Assessment of Contaminants in Soil[M]. London:Environment Agency, 2009:1-79 |
| Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and Environment Agency (EA). The Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment (CLEA) Model:Technical Basis and Algorithms[M]. R&D Publication CLR, 2002:1-200 |
| Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Subcommittee on Environmental Quality Criteria for Contaminated Sites. A protocol for the derivation of environmental and human health soil quality guidelines[R]. Ottawa:Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 1996 |
| 陈梦舫, 韩璐, 罗飞. 污染场地土壤与地下水风险评估方法学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2017:5-10 |
| Piet O, Lijzen J, Swartjes F, et al. Evaluation and revision of the CSOIL parameter set. Proposed parameter set for human exposure modelling and deriving Intervention Values for the first series of compounds[R]. Bilthoven:National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 2001 |
| D'Aprile L, Tatàno F, Musmeci L. Development of quality objectives for contaminated sites:State of the art and new perspectives[J]. International Journal of Environment and Health, 2007, 1(1):120-141 |
| 骆永明, 夏家淇, 章海波, 等. 中国土壤环境质量基准与标准制定的理论和方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2015:13-20 |
| American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites[S]. Washington DC:American Society for Testing and Materials, 1995 |
| American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Guide for Developing Conceptual Site Models for Contaminated Sites[M]. Washington DC:American Society for Testing and Materials, 1995:1-200 |
| 北京市生态环境局. 建设用地土壤污染状况调查与风险评估技术导则:DB11/T 656-2019[S]. 北京:北京市市场监督管理局, 2019 |
| 北京市生态环境局. 场地土壤环境风险评价筛选值:DB11/T 811-2011[S]. 北京:北京市质量技术监督局, 2011 |
| 上海市环境保护局. 上海市污染场地风险评估技术规范[S]. 上海:上海市环境保护局, 2014 |
| 上海市环境保护局. 上海市场地土壤环境健康风险评估筛选值(试行)[S]. 上海:上海市环境保护局, 2015 |
| 重庆市环境保护局. 重庆场地环境调查与风险评估技术导则:DB50/T 725-2016[S]. 重庆:重庆市质量技术监督局, 2016 |
| 浙江省生态环境厅. 污染场地风险评估技术导则(征求意见稿):DB33/T[S]. 杭州:浙江省市场监督管理局, 2019 |
| 林晓峰, 蔡兆亮, 胡恭任. 土壤重金属污染生态风险评价方法研究进展[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2010, 27(8):749-751Lin X F, Cai Z L, Hu G R. Research progress on ecological risk assessment methods for heavy metal contamination in soil[J]. Journal of Environment and Health, 2010, 27(8):749-751(in Chinese) |
| 李春平, 张峰, 马烈. 污染场地风险评估技术方法比较分析[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2015, 33(7):47-52Li C P, Zhang F, Ma L. Comparative analysis of risk assessment technical methods for contaminated sites in China[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2015, 33(7):47-52(in Chinese) |
| 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)(征求意见稿)编制说明[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2018 |
| 刘德成, 李玉倩, 郑纯静, 等. 土壤重金属污染风险评价方法对比研究[J]. 河北农业科学, 2020, 24(4):89-95Liu D C, Li Y Q, Zheng C J, et al. Comparative study on risk assessment methods of heavy metal pollution in soil[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 24(4):89-95(in Chinese) |
| 中华人民共和国国土资源部, 中华人民共和国水利部. 地下水质量标准:GB/T14848[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中华人民共和国国家标准化管理委员会, 2017 |
| 广东省环境保护厅. 土壤重金属风险评价筛选值珠江三角洲[S]. 广州:广东省质量技术监督局, 2014 |
| 重庆市环境保护局. 场地土壤环境风险评估筛选值[S]. 重庆:重庆市质量技术监督局, 2016 |
| 香港环境保护署. 按风险厘定的土壤污染整治标准的使用指引[S]. 香港:香港环境保护署, 2007 |
| 辽宁省生态环境厅. 辽宁省污染场地风险评估筛选值[S]. 沈阳:辽宁省市场监督管理局, 辽宁省生态环境厅, 2019 |
| 深圳市生态环境局. 深圳市建设用地土壤污染风险筛选值和管制值(试行)[S]. 深圳:深圳市市场监督管理局, 2020 |
| 澳门环境保护局. 土地污染评估指引[S]. 澳门:澳门环境保护局, 2019 |
| 肖庆文. 蒸气入侵国内外研究现状与展望[J]. 环境科技, 2018, 31(2):74-78Xiao Q W. Research advances in vapor intrusion of contaminated sites[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2018, 31(2):74-78(in Chinese) |
| 马杰. 污染场地VOCs蒸气入侵风险评估与管控[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2020:210-250 |
| Johnson P C, Ettinger R A. Heuristic model for predicting the intrusion rate of contaminant vapors into buildings[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1991, 25(8):1445-1452 |
| DeVaull G E. Indoor vapor intrusion with oxygen-limited biodegradation for a subsurface gasoline source[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(9):3241-3248 |
| Jury W A, Russo D, Streile G, et al. Evaluation of volatilization by organic chemicals residing below the soil surface[J]. Water Resources Research, 1990, 26(1):13-20 |
| Little J C, Daisey J M, Nazaroff W W. Transport of subsurface contaminants into buildings[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1992, 26(11):2058-2066 |
| Van den Berg R. Human exposure to soil contamination:A qualitative and quantitative analysis towards proposals for human toxicological intervention values (partly revised edition)[R]. Bilthoven:National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 1994 |
| Waitz M F W, Freijer J I, Kreule P, et al. The VOLASOIL risk assessment model based on CSOIL for soils contaminated with volatile compounds[R]. Bilthoven:National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 1996 |
| Provoost J, Bosman A, Reijnders L, et al. Vapour intrusion from the vadose zone-Seven algorithms compared[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2010, 10(3):473-483 |
| Ferguson C C, Krylov V V, McGrath P T. Contamination of indoor air by toxic soil vapours:A screening risk assessment model[J]. Building and Environment, 1995, 30(3):375-383 |
| De Abreu L D V. A transient three dimensional numerical model to simulate vapor intrusion into buildings[D]. Phoenix:Arizona State University, 2005:1-517 |
| Pennell K G, Bozkurt O, Suuberg E M. Development and application of a three-dimensional finite element vapor intrusion model[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2009, 59(4):447-460 |
| Yao Y J, Verginelli I, Suuberg E M. A two-dimensional analytical model of petroleum vapor intrusion[J]. Water Resources Research, 2016, 52(2):1528-1539 |
| Yao Y J, Verginelli I, Suuberg E M. A two-dimensional analytical model of vapor intrusion involving vertical heterogeneity[J]. Water Resources Research, 2017, 53(5):4499-4513 |
| Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). Canada-wide standard for petroleum hydrocarbons (PHC) in soil[S]. Ottawa:CCME, 2008 |
| Feniak N A, Sigal E A, Miller P A, et al. Development of a health-based total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) method[R]. Washington DC:Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1995 |
| Park I S, Park J W. A novel total petroleum hydrocarbon fractionation strategy for human health risk assessment for petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated site management[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 179(1-3):1128-1135 |
| Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group (TPHCWG). Human health risk based evaluation of petroleum release sites:Implementing the working group approach[R]. Amherst:Amherst Scientific Publishers, 1999 |
| Ascary K, Pollard S. The UK approach for evaluating human health risks from petroleum hydrocardons in soils, Science Report P5-080/TR3[R]. London:Environment Agency, 2005 |
| 杜红花. 基于居住用地规划室内蒸汽入侵模型修正的污染场地健康风险评估研究[D]. 湘潭:湘潭大学, 2019:57-59 Du H H. Health risk assessment of contaminated sites based on modification of indoor vapor invasion model in residential land planning[D]. Xiangtan:Xiangtan University, 2019:57-59(in Chinese) |
| 毛芳. 基于数值模型研究污染源类型、土壌质地和毛细管作用对石油烃蒸气入侵风险评估的影响[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2019:53-55 Mao F. Investigating the influence of source type, soil texture and capillary fringe in petroleum vapor intrusion risk assessment based on numerical model[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2019:53-55(in Chinese) |
| 王北洪, 马智宏, 付伟利. 密封高压消解罐消解-原子吸收光谱法测定土壤重金属[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(S2):255-259Wang B H, Ma Z H, Fu W L. Determination of heavy metal in soil by high pressure sealed vessels assisted digestion-atomic absorption spectrometry[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, 24(S2):255-259(in Chinese) |
| 张玉, 熊杰, 唐翠梅, 等. 某污染场地土壤重金属生物可给性及其对修复目标的影响研究[J]. 中国氯碱, 2019(6):41-47 Zhang Y, Xiong J, Tang C M, et al. Bioaccessibility of heavy metals in soil of a contaminated site and its impact on determination of clean-up levels[J]. China Chlor-Alkali, 2019(6):41-47(in Chinese) |
| 陈奕. 基于生物可给性分析工业场地土壤重金属污染的人体健康风险[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2020, 15(5):319-326Chen Y. Bioaccessibility and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in industrial sites[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2020, 15(5):319-326(in Chinese) |
| 王波, 邵迪初, 项张华, 等. 基于IEUBK模型研究环境铅对婴儿血铅的影响[J]. 卫生研究, 2011, 40(4):478-480Wang B, Shao D C, Xiang Z H, et al. Contribution of environmental lead exposure to blood lead level among infants based on IEUBK model[J]. Journal of Hygiene Research, 2011, 40(4):478-480(in Chinese) |
| 徐松. IEUBK模型结合流行病学调查的儿童环境铅暴露健康风险评估研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2010:1-5 |
| 李灿, 曾云, 刘淑运, 等. 基于儿童和成人血铅模型的土壤环境铅基准值研究[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2017, 34(9):789-793Li C, Zeng Y, Liu S Y, et al. Lead benchmarks for soils based on blood lead model for children and adult in China[J]. Journal of Environment and Health, 2017, 34(9):789-793(in Chinese) |
| 杨珂玲, 张宏志, 张志刚, 等. 铅暴露的环境健康风险评估模型的本土化研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(2):163-169Yang K L, Zhang H Z, Zhang Z G, et al. Localization study of environmental health risk assessment model for lead exposure[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(2):163-169(in Chinese) |
| 刘爽. 地质高背景区重金属污染农田质量评价及分区管控研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2020:39-45 Liu S. Research on quality evaluation and zoning management of heavy metal contaminated farmland in high geological background area[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2020:39-45(in Chinese) |
