王国庆1,2,,,
李勖之1,2,
戚旭东3,
张亚1,2,
闫佳莉1,2,
林玉锁1,2
1. 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所, 南京 210042;
2. 国家环境保护土壤环境管理与污染控制重点实验室, 南京 210042;
3. 江苏省地质矿产局第一地质大队, 南京 210041
作者简介: 郑丽萍(1985-),女,助理研究员,研究方向为土壤环境标准与基准制订和环境风险评估,E-mail:zlp@nies.org.
通讯作者: 王国庆,nies.sepa@163.com ;
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划“场地土壤环境风险评估方法和基准”资助项目（2018YFC1801100）；国家重点研发计划“土壤阳离子型重金属安全阈值研究”资助项目（2016YFD0800406）中图分类号: X171.5
Research on Key Techniques for the Formulation of Soil Environmental Benchmarks Based on Ecologically Protection—The Case of the United States and Australia
Zheng Liping1,2,Wang Guoqing1,2,,,
Li Xuzhi1,2,
Qi Xudong3,
Zhang Ya1,2,
Yan Jiali1,2,
Lin Yusuo1,2
1. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China, Nanjing 210042, China;
2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Soil Environmental Management and Pollution Control, Nanjing 210042, China;
3. The 1st Geological Brigade of Jiangsu Geology & Mineral Exploration Bureau, Nanjing 210041, China
Corresponding author: Wang Guoqing,nies.sepa@163.com ;
CLC number: X171.5
-->
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要:土壤环境基准是土壤环境质量标准制修订、土壤环境质量评价和监管的重要科学依据。笔者选取美国和澳大利亚基于保护生态的土壤基准制订中的关键技术进行深入讨论，从两国的制订策略和关键推导方法等方面进行详细阐述，比对了两国的基准值制订技术要点。结果表明，两国的土壤基准名称、保护对象和毒理数据处理措施等存在差异，这与各国的具体制定策略有密切关联。建议我国在基准制订中加强不同区域土壤基准的针对性研究，建立本国土壤毒性数据共享平台，为土壤环境质量标准的制修订提供数据支撑。
关键词: 生态受体/
土壤环境基准/
制订方法
Abstract:Soil environmental benchmarks are an important scientific basis for the formulation and revision of soil environmental quality standards, and the evaluation and supervision of soil environmental quality. The key technologies in the formulation of soil benchmarks for ecological protection in the United States and Australia were selected for in-depth discussion. The formulation strategies and derivation methods were elaborated, and the technical points of the benchmark formulation were compared. The results show that there are differences in the soil benchmark names, protection objects, and toxicological data processing methods between the two countries, which are closely related to the specific strategies of each country. China should strengthen the targeted research of soil benchmarks in different regions, establish a national soil toxicity data-sharing platform, and provide data support for the formulation and revision of soil environmental quality standards.
Key words:soil environmental benchmarks/
formulation method/
ecological receptor.
| 中华人民共和国生态环境部法规与标准司. 《中华人民共和国土壤污染防治法》解读与适用手册[M]. 北京:法律出版社, 2018:38-42 |
| 骆永明, 夏家淇. 中国土壤环境质量基准与标准制定的理论和方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2015:10-12 |
| 张红振, 骆永明, 夏家淇, 等. 基于风险的土壤环境质量标准国际比较与启示[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(3):795-802Zhang H Z, Luo Y M, Xia J Q, et al. Some thoughts of the comparison of risk based soil environmental standards between different countries[J]. Environmental Science, 2011, 32(3):795-802(in Chinese) |
| 颜增光, 谷庆宝, 周娟, 等. 构建土壤生态筛选基准的技术关键及方法学概述[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2008, 3(5):417-427Yan Z G, Gu Q B, Zhou J, et al. A synoptic review of the technical tips and methodologies for the development of ecological soil screening benchmarks[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2008, 3(5):417-427(in Chinese) |
| 中华人民共和国生态环境部, 中华人民共和国国家市场监督管理总局. 土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准:GB 15618-2018[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2018 |
| 郑丽萍, 冯艳红, 张亚, 等. 基于生态风险的土壤环境基准研究概况[C]//中国环境科学学会. 中国环境科学学会2016年学术年会论文集. 海口:中国环境科学学会, 2016:3713-3716 |
| 郑丽萍, 龙涛, 冯艳红, 等. 基于生态风险的铅(Pb)土壤环境基准研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(6):1030-1035Zheng L P, Long T, Feng Y H, et al. Environmental quality criteria for lead in soil based on ecological risk[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2016, 32(6):1030-1035(in Chinese) |
| 王晓南, 刘征涛, 王婉华, 等. 重金属铬(Ⅵ)的生态毒性及其土壤环境基准[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(8):3155-3161Wang X N, Liu Z T, Wang W H, et al. Ecotoxicological effect and soil environmental criteria of the heavy metal chromium(Ⅵ)[J]. Environmental Science, 2014, 35(8):3155-3161(in Chinese) |
| 冯承莲, 赵晓丽, 侯红, 等. 中国环境基准理论与方法学研究进展及主要科学问题[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2015, 10(1):2-17Feng C L, Zhao X L, Hou H, et al. Research progress and main scientific problems of theory and methodology of China's environmental quality criteria[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2015, 10(1):2-17(in Chinese) |
| 周启星, 安婧, 何康信. 我国土壤环境基准研究与展望[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30(1):1-6Zhou Q X, An J, He K X. Research and prospect on soil-environmental criteria in China[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2011, 30(1):1-6(in Chinese) |
| 夏家淇. 土壤砷的环境基准研究[J]. 农村生态环境, 1993, 9(4):1-4,62 Xia J Q. Studies on the soil-environmental criteria for arsenic[J]. Rural Eco-Environment, 1993, 9(4):1-4,62(in Chinese) |
| 宋静, 骆永明, 夏家淇. 我国农用地土壤环境基准与标准制定研究[J]. 环境保护科学, 2016, 42(4):29-35Song J, Luo Y M, Xia J Q. Study of the development of environmental criteria and standards for agricultural lands in China[J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2016, 42(4):29-35(in Chinese) |
| 王国庆, 林玉锁. 土壤环境标准值及制订研究:服务于管理需求的土壤环境标准值框架体系[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2014, 30(5):552-562Wang G Q, Lin Y S. Soil environmental standard values (SESV) and their development:A proposed SESV framework serving the needs of soil environmental management[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2014, 30(5):552-562(in Chinese) |
| 邱荟圆, 李博, 祖艳群. 土壤环境基准的研究和展望[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(18):67-72Qiu H Y, Li B, Zu Y Q. Soil environmental criteria:Research and prospect[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(18):67-72(in Chinese) |
| 王喜宽, 黄增芳, 苏美霞, 等. 河套地区土壤基准值及背景值特征[J]. 岩矿测试, 2007, 26(4):287-292Wang X K, Huang Z F, Su M X, et al. Characteristics of reference and background values of soils in Hetao area[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2007, 26(4):287-292(in Chinese) |
| 赵晓丽, 赵天慧, 李会仙, 等. 中国环境基准研究重点方向探讨[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2015, 10(1):18-30Zhao X L, Zhao T H, Li H X, et al. Investigation on important directions of China environmental quality criteria[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2015, 10(1):18-30(in Chinese) |
| 滕涌, 周启星. 土壤环境质量基准与水/大气环境质量基准的转换研究[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2018, 48(11):1466-1477Teng Y, Zhou Q X. Conversion relationships between environmental quality criteria of water/air and soil[J]. Scientia Sinica:Terrae, 2018, 48(11):1466-1477(in Chinese) |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels[R]. Washington D C:US EPA, 2003 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Role of background in the CERCLA Cleanup Program[R]. Washington D C:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 2002 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels:Attachment 1-2:Discussion concerning soil microbial processes[R]. Washington D C:US EPA, 2003 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels:Attachment 1-3:Review of dermal and inhalation exposure pathway for wildlife[R]. Washington D C:US EPA, 2003 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidance for Developing Ecological Soil Screening Levels:Attachment 3-1:Review of Dermal and Inhalation Exposure Pathway for Wildlife[R]. Washington D C:US EPA, 2003 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels:Attachment 3-2 Eco-SSL Standard Operating Procedure #2[R]. Washington D C:US EPA, 2003 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels:Attachment 4-1:Exposure factors and bioaccumulation models for derivation of wildlife Eco-SSLs[R]. Washington D C:US EPA, 2003 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels:Attachment 4-2:Eco-SSL standard operating procedure # 3[R]. Washington D C:US EPA, 2003 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels:Attachment 4-3:Eco-SSL standard operating procedure #4[R]. Washington D C:US EPA, 2003 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels:Attachment 4-4:Eco-SSL standard operating procedure #5[R]. Washington D C:US EPA, 2003 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Ecological risk assessment and risk management principles for superfund sites[R]. Washington D C:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 1999 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F.[R]. Washington D C:US EPA, 1998 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Ecological risk assessment guidance for superfund:Process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments. Interim final[R]. Washington D C:US EPA, 1997 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Soil screening guidance:Technical background document. EPA/540/R-95/128.[R]. Washington D C:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US EPA, 1996 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Internal report on summary of measured, calculated, and recommended logKow values[R]. Washington D C:Office of Water, US EPA, 1995 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Wildlife exposure factors handbook, volumes Ⅰ and Ⅱ. EPA/600/R-93/187.[R]. Washington D C:US EPA, 1993 |
| National Environment Protection Council (NEPC). Schedule B(5), guideline on ecological risk assessment, national environment protection (assessment of site contamination) measure 1999[R]. Adelaide:NEPC, 2013 |
| National Environment Protection Council (NEPC). Schedule B(1), guideline on the investigation levels for soil and groundwater, national environment protection (assessment of site contamination) measure 2013[R]. Adelaide:NEPC, 2013 |
| National Environment Protection Council (NEPC). Schedule B5b, guideline on methodology to derive ecological investigation levels in contaminated soils[R]. Adelaide:NEPC, 2013 |
| National Environment Protection Council (NEPC). Schedule B5a, guideline on ecological risk assessment[R]. Adelaide:NEPC, 2013 |
| National Environment Protection Council (NEPC). Schedule B5c, guideline on ecological investigation levels for arsenic, chromium (Ⅲ), copper, DDT, lead, naphthalene, nickel & zinc[R]. Adelaide:NEPC, 2013 |
| National Environment Protection Council (NEPC). Review of the national environment protection (assessment of site contamination) measure:Issues paper[R]. Adelaide:NEPC, 2005 |
| National Environment Protection Council (NEPC). National environment protection (assessment of site contamination) measure:NEPM review discussion paper[R]. Adelaide:NEPC, 2006 |
| National Environment Protection Council (NEPC). National environment protection (assessment of site contamination) measure review:Review report[R]. Adelaide:NEPC, 2006 |
| Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). Scientific criteria document for the development of the Canadian soil and groundwater quality guidelines for perfluorooctane sulfonate:Protection of environmental and human health[R]. Winnipeg:CCME, 2017 |
| Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). Canadian soil quality guidelines for barium:Protection of environmental and human health[R]. Winnipeg:CCME, 2013 |
| Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). Interim Canadian environmental quality criteria for contaminated sites[R]. Winnipeg:CCME, 1991 |
| Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). A protocol for the derivation of environmental and human health soil quality guidelines[R]. Winnipeg:CCME, 1996 |
| Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). Canadian soil quality guidelines for carcinogenic and other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (environmental and human health effects)[R]. Winnipeg:CCME, 2010 |
| 郑丽萍, 王国庆, 龙涛, 等. 不同国家基于生态风险的土壤筛选值研究及启示[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2018, 13(6):39-49Zheng L P, Wang G Q, Long T, et al. A study of risk-based ecological soil screening levels among different countries and its implication for China[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2018, 13(6):39-49(in Chinese) |
| 孙在金, 赵淑婷, 林祥龙, 等. 基于物种敏感度分布法建立中国土壤中锑的环境基准[J]. 环境科学研究, 2018, 31(4):774-781Sun Z J, Zhao S T, Lin X L, et al. Deriving soils environmental criteria of antimony in China by species sensitivity distributions[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(4):774-781(in Chinese) |
| 罗思亮. 广东省阳江-茂名地区土壤地球化学背景值与基准值分析[J]. 云南化工, 2018, 45(6):89-92Luo S L. Analysis of soil geochemical background values and reference values in Yangjiang Maoming area of Guangdong Province[J]. Yunnan Chemical Technology, 2018, 45(6):89-92(in Chinese) |
| 王莹, 侯青叶, 杨忠芳, 等. 成都平原农田区土壤重金属元素环境基准值初步研究[J]. 现代地质, 2012, 26(5):953-962Wang Y, Hou Q Y, Yang Z F, et al. Study on environmental criteria for heavy metal of farmland soil in Chengdu plain[J]. Geoscience, 2012, 26(5):953-962(in Chinese) |
| 葛峰, 徐坷坷, 刘爱萍, 等. 国外土壤环境基准研究进展及对中国的启示[J].土壤学报, 2021, 58(2):331-343Ge F, Xu K K, Liu A P, et al. Progress of the research on soil environmental criteria in other countries and its enlightenment to China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(2):331-343(in Chinese) |
| 刘娜, 金小伟, 王业耀, 等. 生态毒理数据筛查与评价准则研究[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2016, 11(3):1-10Liu N, Jin X W, Wang Y Y, et al. Review of criteria for screening and evaluating ecotoxicity data[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2016, 11(3):1-10(in Chinese) |
| 吴爱明, 赵晓丽, 冯宇, 等. 美国生态毒理数据库(ECOTOX)对中国数据库构建的启示[J]. 环境科学研究, 2017, 30(4):636-644Wu A M, Zhao X L, Feng Y, et al. The enlightenment of the ecotoxicology knowledgebase (ECOTOX) for its establishment in China[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2017, 30(4):636-644(in Chinese) |
