葛海虹,
赵静,
蒋京呈,
韦洪莲,,
菅小东,
林军
生态环境部固体废物与化学品管理技术中心, 北京 100029
作者简介: 王燕飞(1982-),女,博士,高级工程师,研究方向为化学品风险评估与管理,E-mail:wangyanfei@meescc.cn.
通讯作者: 韦洪莲,weihonglian@meescc.cn ;
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划课题（2018YFC1801605）；江苏省环保科研课题（2018006）中图分类号: X171.5
Data Quality Evaluation for Environmental Exposure Based on a Semi-quantitative Method
Wang Yanfei,Ge Haihong,
Zhao Jing,
Jiang Jingcheng,
Wei Honglian,,
Jian Xiaodong,
Lin Jun
Solid Waste and Chemicals Management Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100029, China
Corresponding author: Wei Honglian,weihonglian@meescc.cn ;
CLC number: X171.5
-->
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要:环境暴露数据是化学物质环境暴露评估的重要基础，暴露数据的质量将影响风险评估结果的准确度，因此，有必要构建科学的数据可靠性评估方法，以估算可靠的化学物质环境浓度，为其环境暴露评估提供科学的依据。不同国家/地区的化学物质风险评估的框架基本相同，对于环境暴露数据质量的评估要点也基本一致，但是在具体方法上根据各自的管理特点与要求略有差异。本文对几种定量（半定量）、定性的环境暴露数据评估方法进行了系统评述，并结合中国的化学物质环境风险评估要求及环境管理特点，提出了适用于中国环境风险评估的环境暴露数据质量评估方法，并以双酚A和八甲基环四硅氧烷的环境暴露数据质量评估为例，研究了评估方法应用于不同物质的数据质量评估中的共性与区别。
关键词: 双酚A/
八甲基环四硅氧烷/
环境暴露/
数据质量评估
Abstract:Environmental exposure data is an important part for environmental exposure assessment of chemical substances, and the quality of exposure data will affect the accuracy of the risk assessment results. It is necessary to develop a scientific method for data quality evaluation to estimate the reliable environmental concentration of chemical substances and provide scientific basis for the environmental exposure assessment. The similar frameworks of chemical risk assessment are used by different countries/regions, and the key points for exposure data quality evaluation are essentially the same. However, the detailed methods are slightly different according to various management characteristics and requirements. Quantitative (semi-quantitative) and qualitative evaluation methods were systematically reviewed, and the method that is appropriate for environmental risk assessment in China was proposed. Also the commonalities and differences of data quality evaluation for different substances were analyzed using the case studies of bisphenol A (BPA) and octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4).
Key words:bisphenol A/
octamethyl cyclotetrasiloxane/
environmental exposure/
data quality evaluation.
| Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Report of the OECD Workshop on improving the use of monitoring data in the exposure assessment of industrial chemicals[R]. Paris:OECD, 2002 |
| European Chemicals Bureau. Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment. Part Ⅱ[R]. Brussel:European Communities, 2003 |
| European Chemicals Agency. Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment-Chapter R.16:Environmental Exposure Assessment. Version 3.0[R]. Helsinki:European Chemicals Agency, 2016 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency. Application of systematic review in TSCA risk evaluations[R]. Washington DC:Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 2018 |
| Klecka G M, Zabik J, Woodburn K B, et al. Exposure analysis of C8- and C9-alkylphenols, alkylphenol ethoxylates, and their metabolites in surface water systems within the United States[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2007, 13(4):792-822 |
| 生态环境部固体废物与化学品管理技术中心. 中国双酚A环境风险的初步评估[R]. 北京:生态环境部固体废物与化学品管理技术中心, 2019 Solid Waste and Chemicals Management Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China. Preliminary environmental risk assessment report of bisphenol A in China[R]. Beijing:Solid Waste and Chemicals Management Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China, 2019(in Chinese) |
| 杨巧云, 邱兴华, 李克秋, 等. 电子垃圾拆解地区人体双酚A内暴露及与氧化应激效应的关联研究[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2016, 11(2):238-246Yang Q Y, Qiu X H, Li K Q, et al. Exposure to bisphenol A and the oxidative damage for local residents at an e-waste dismantling area[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2016, 11(2):238-246(in Chinese) |
| International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 20596-1:2018 Water quality-Determination of cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes in water-Part 1:Method using purge and trap with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GS-MS)[S]. First Edition. Geneva:ISO, 2018 |
