删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

汉语普通话声调感知的老年化效应:来自ERP的证据

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

肖容, 梁丹丹(), 李善鹏
南京师范大学文学院, 南京 210097
收稿日期:2018-10-17出版日期:2020-01-25发布日期:2019-11-21
通讯作者:梁丹丹E-mail:ldd233@sina.com

基金资助:* 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(简称PAPD)资助

Effects of aging on the Mandarin lexical tone perception: Evidence from ERPs

XIAO Rong, LIANG Dandan(), LI Shanpeng
School of Chinese Language and Culture, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China
Received:2018-10-17Online:2020-01-25Published:2019-11-21
Contact:LIANG Dandan E-mail:ldd233@sina.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 研究考察汉语普通话老年人前注意阶段声调感知状况, 探究是否存在领域特殊的老年化。运用事件相关电位技术, 采用被动oddball范式诱发MMN回应, 控制领域一般性因素的影响。结果显示涉及范畴变化的声调和非语音音调诱发MMN强度衰减, 不涉及范畴变化的声调诱发MMN强度未衰退。研究结果表明在前注意阶段, 在特定汉语普通话声调范畴知识加工能力上存在领域特殊的衰退, 而不涉及母语音位知识的声调的感知存在领域特殊的一定程度的保留, 这一保留与时间维度上补偿机制的调用有关。受补偿机制调节, 语言加工呈现出衰退或保留等不同的老年化进程。



图1从/we2/到/we4/的音高曲线连续统。
图1从/we2/到/we4/的音高曲线连续统。



图2年轻组和老年组的范畴感知曲线
图2年轻组和老年组的范畴感知曲线



图3范畴间声调、范畴内声调、非语音音调三种条件下老年组和年轻组两组被试产生的MMN。(A) Fz电极点上三种条件下两组被试的MMN总平均波形。(B) MMN分析时间窗内平均振幅的电压地形图。
图3范畴间声调、范畴内声调、非语音音调三种条件下老年组和年轻组两组被试产生的MMN。(A) Fz电极点上三种条件下两组被试的MMN总平均波形。(B) MMN分析时间窗内平均振幅的电压地形图。


表1以音调类型、组别为自变量, 峰值潜伏期、平均振幅为因变量的方差分析的结果
自变量 潜伏期 平均振幅
F η2p F η2p
音调类型(1, 34) 3.238? 0.164 2.715 0.141
组别(1, 34) 14.201** 0.295 4.973* 0.128
组别×音调类型(1, 34) 3.346* 0.169 8.224** 0.333

表1以音调类型、组别为自变量, 峰值潜伏期、平均振幅为因变量的方差分析的结果
自变量 潜伏期 平均振幅
F η2p F η2p
音调类型(1, 34) 3.238? 0.164 2.715 0.141
组别(1, 34) 14.201** 0.295 4.973* 0.128
组别×音调类型(1, 34) 3.346* 0.169 8.224** 0.333



图4老年组和年轻组三种类型音调诱发MMN峰值潜伏期
图4老年组和年轻组三种类型音调诱发MMN峰值潜伏期



图5老年组和年轻组三种类型音调诱发MMN平均振幅
图5老年组和年轻组三种类型音调诱发MMN平均振幅


表2以三种音调类型的位置、偏侧性、组别为自变量, 平均振幅为因变量的方差分析的结果
变异来源 范畴间 范畴内 非语音
F η2p F η2p F η2p
位置(2, 68) 8.446** 0.199 9.394** 0.216 15.866** 0.318
组别(1, 34) 5.625* 0.142 0.037 0.001 22.073** 0.394
偏侧性(1, 34) 1.540 0.043 0.688 0.020 0.626 0.018
偏侧性×位置(2, 68) 0.120 0.004 1.051 0.030 3.864* 0.102
偏侧性×组别(1, 34) 2.836 0.077 0.516 0.015 0.095 0.003
组别×位置(2, 68) 2.547 0.007 0.792 0.023 0.84 0.024
偏侧性×位置×组别(2, 68) 2.549 0.070 0.020 0.001 1.886 0.053

表2以三种音调类型的位置、偏侧性、组别为自变量, 平均振幅为因变量的方差分析的结果
变异来源 范畴间 范畴内 非语音
F η2p F η2p F η2p
位置(2, 68) 8.446** 0.199 9.394** 0.216 15.866** 0.318
组别(1, 34) 5.625* 0.142 0.037 0.001 22.073** 0.394
偏侧性(1, 34) 1.540 0.043 0.688 0.020 0.626 0.018
偏侧性×位置(2, 68) 0.120 0.004 1.051 0.030 3.864* 0.102
偏侧性×组别(1, 34) 2.836 0.077 0.516 0.015 0.095 0.003
组别×位置(2, 68) 2.547 0.007 0.792 0.023 0.84 0.024
偏侧性×位置×组别(2, 68) 2.549 0.070 0.020 0.001 1.886 0.053







[1] Aerts A., van Mierlo P., Hartsuiker R. J., Hallez H., Santens P., & de Letter M . ( 2013). Neurophysiological investigation of phonological input: Aging effects and development of normative data. Brain and Language, 125( 3), 253-263.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.02.010URL
[2] Bellis T. J., Nicol T., & Kraus N . ( 2000). Aging affects hemispheric asymmetry in the neural representation of speech sounds. Journal of Neuroscience, 20( 2), 791-797.
URLpmid: 10632608
[3] Bidelman G. M., Villafuerte J. W., Moreno S., & Alain C . ( 2014). Age-related changes in the subcortical-cortical encoding and categorical perception of speech. Neurobiology of Aging, 35( 11), 2526-2540.
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.05.006URL
[4] Blesser B . ( 1972). Speech perception under conditions of spectral transformation: I. Phonetic characteristics. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 15( 1), 5-41.
doi: 10.1044/jshr.1501.05URLpmid: 5012812
[5] Cheng C. H., Baillet S., Hsiao F. J., & Lin Y. Y . ( 2015). Effects of aging on the neuromagnetic mismatch detection to speech sounds. Biological Psychology, 104, 48-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.003URLpmid: 25451380
[6] Christmann C. A., Berti S., Steinbrink C., & Lachmann T . ( 2014). Differences in sensory processing of German vowels and physically matched non-speech sounds as revealed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the human event-related brain potential (ERP). Brain and Language, 136, 8-18.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.004URL
[7] Dennis N. A., & Cabeza R . ( 2008). Neuroimaging of healthy cognitive aging. The handbook of aging and cognition, 3, 1-54.
doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00212-6URLpmid: 31903525
[8] Du Y., Buchsbaum B. R., Grady C. L., & Alain C . ( 2016). Increased activity in frontal motor cortex compensates impaired speech perception in older adults. Nature Communications, 7, 1-12.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms12241URLpmid: 27483187
[9] Durlach N. I., & Braida L. D . ( 1969). Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46( 2B), 372-383.
doi: 10.1121/1.391258URLpmid: 6491044
[10] Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., & McHugh P. R . ( 1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric research, 12( 3), 189-198.
doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6URLpmid: 1202204
[11] Geal-Dor M., Goldstein A., Kamenir Y., & Babkoff H . ( 2006). The effect of aging on event-related potentials and behavioral responses: comparison of tonal, phonologic and semantic targets. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117( 9), 1974-1989.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.05.024URLpmid: 16859986
[12] Getzmann S., & Falkenstein M . ( 2011). Understanding of spoken language under challenging listening conditions in younger and older listeners: a combined behavioral and electrophysiological study. Brain Research, 1415, 8-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.08.001URL
[13] Gordon-Salant S., & Fitzgibbons P. J . ( 1993). Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36( 6), 1276-1285.
doi: 10.1044/jshr.3606.1276URLpmid: 8114494
[14] Harkrider A. W., Plyler P. N., & Hedrick M. S . ( 2005). Effects of age and spectral shaping on perception and neural representation of stop consonant stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116( 9), 2153-2164.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.05.016URLpmid: 16043402
[15] Kennedy K. M., & Raz N . ( 2009). Aging white matter and cognition: differential effects of regional variations in diffusion properties on memory, executive functions, and speed. Neuropsychologia, 47( 3), 916-927.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.001URL
[16] Liberman A. M., Harris K. S., Hoffman H. S., & Griffith B. C . ( 1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54( 5), 358-368.
doi: 10.1037/h0044417URLpmid: 13481283
[17] Lin M. C., Yan J. Z., & Sun G. H . ( 1984, February). A preliminary experiment on the normal stress of two- character Chinese. Dialect, ( 1), 57-73.
[ 林茂灿, 颜景助, 孙国华 . ( 1984, 2月). 北京话两字组正常重音的初步实验. 方言, ( 1), 57-73.]
[18] Lister J. J., Maxfield N. D., Pitt G. J., & Gonzalez V. B . ( 2011). Auditory evoked response to gaps in noise: Older adults. International Journal of Audiology, 50 (4), 211-225.
doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.526967URL
[19] MacKay >D. G., & Burke D. M . ( 1990). Chapter five cognition and aging: a theory of new learning and the use of old connections. In Advances in Psychology (Vol. 71, pp. 213-263). North-Holland.
[20] Näätänen R., Lehtokoski A., Lennes M., Cheour M., Huotilainen M., Iivonen A., … Alho K . ( 1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432-434.
doi: 10.1038/385432a0URLpmid: 9009189
[21] Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Rinne T., & Alho K . ( 2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118( 12), 2544-2590.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026URLpmid: 17931964
[22] Oldfield R. C . ( 1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9( 1), 97-113.
doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4URLpmid: 5146491
[23] Persson J., Sylvester C. Y. C., Nelson J. K., Welsh K. M., Jonides J., & Reuter-Lorenz P. A . ( 2004). Selection requirements during verb generation: differential recruitment in older and younger adults. Neuroimage, 23( 4), 1382-1390.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.004URL
[24] , Qi B. E., & Liu B . ( 2015). The review of categorization features of tone perception. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 29( 15), 1396-1400.
[ 亓贝尔, 刘博 . ( 2015). 声调知觉的范畴化特征及其研究进展. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 29( 15), 1396-1400.]
[25] Ren G. Q., Tang Y. Y., Li X. Q., & Sui X . ( 2013). Pre-attentive processing of Mandarin tone and intonation: Evidence from event-related potentials. In Functional brain mapping and the endeavor to understand the working brain. IntechOpen.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.025URLpmid: 27568075
[26] Ross B., Fujioka T., Tremblay K. L., & Picton T. W . ( 2007). Aging in binaural hearing begins in mid-life: evidence from cortical auditory-evoked responses to changes in interaural phase. Journal of Neuroscience, 27( 42), 11172-11178.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1813-07.2007URLpmid: 17942712
[27] , Schneider B. A., & Pichora-Fuller M. K . ( 2000). Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. In F. I.M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition(2nd ed., pp. 155-220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[28] Scott S. K., Blank C. C., Rosen S., & Wise R. J . ( 2000). Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain, 123( 12), 2400-2406.
doi: 10.1093/brain/123.12.2400URLpmid: 11099443
[29] Shtyrov Y., & Pulvermüller F . ( 2002). Neurophysiological evidence of memory traces for words in the human brain. Neuroreport, 13( 4), 521-525.
doi: 10.1097/00001756-200203250-00033URLpmid: 11930174
[30] Shtyrov Y., Kujala T., Palva S., Ilmoniemi R. J., & Näätänen R . ( 2000). Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeech sounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Neuroimage, 12( 6), 657-663.
doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0646URLpmid: 11112397
[31] Sorokin A., Alku P., & Kujala T . ( 2010). Change and novelty detection in speech and non-speech sound streams. Brain research, 1327, 77-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.052URLpmid: 20188710
[32] Takegata R., Tervaniemi M., Alku P., Ylinen S., & Näätänen R . ( 2008). Parameter-specific modulation of the mismatch negativity to duration decrement and increment: evidence for asymmetric processes. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119( 7), 1515-1523.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.025URLpmid: 18468482
[33] Taylor J. K., & , Burke D. M . ( 2002). Asymmetric aging effects on semantic and phonological processes: naming in the picture-word interference task. Psychology and Aging, 17( 4), 662-676.
doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.17.4.662URLpmid: 12507362
[34] Wang Y., Yang X., & Liu C . ( 2017). Categorical perception of Mandarin Chinese tones 1-2 and tones 1-4: effects of aging and signal duration. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60( 12), 3667-3677.
doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0061URLpmid: 29121180
[35] Wang Y., Yang X., Zhang H., Xu L., Xu C., & Liu C . ( 2017). Aging effect on categorical perception of Mandarin tones 2 and 3 and thresholds of pitch contour discrimination. American Journal of Audiology, 26( 1), 18-26.
doi: 10.1044/2016_AJA-16-0020URLpmid: 28251239
[36] Wilson S. M., & Iacoboni M . ( 2006). Neural responses to non-native phonemes varying in producibility: Evidence for the sensorimotor nature of speech perception. Neuroimage, 33( 1), 316-325.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.032URLpmid: 16919478
[37] Xi J., Zhang L., Shu H., Zhang Y., & Li P . ( 2010). Categorical perception of lexical tones in Chinese revealed by mismatch negativity. Neuroscience, 170( 1), 223-231.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.06.077URLpmid: 20633613
[38] Yang X., Wang Y., Xu L., Zhang H., Xu C., & Liu C . ( 2015). Aging effect on Mandarin Chinese vowel and tone identification. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America, 138( 4), 411-416.
doi: 10.1121/1.4933234URLpmid: 26520353
[39] Yu K., Zhou Y., Li L., Su J. A., Wang R., & Li P . ( 2017). The interaction between phonological information and pitch type at pre-attentive stage: an ERP study of lexical tones. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32( 9), 1164-1175.
[40] Zhao L . ( 2010). Experimental course of ERPs. Nanjing, China: Southeast university press.
[ 赵仑 . ( 2010). ERPs实验教程. 南京: 东南大学出版社.]




[1]杨婉晴, 肖容, 梁丹丹. 2~4岁普通话儿童前注意阶段的声调感知机制[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6): 730-741.
[2]姚尧,陈晓湘. 音乐训练对4~5岁幼儿普通话声调范畴感知能力的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 456-468.
[3]赵荣;王小娟;杨剑峰. 声调在汉语音节感知中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 915-923.
[4]郑秋晨. 汉语元音对声调感知边界的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(9): 1223-1231.
[5]陶冶;徐琴美. 12个月中国婴儿熟悉词表征中声调的语义特性[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(10): 1111-1118.
[6]陶冶,徐琴美,im Plunkett. 不同母语环境下16个月婴儿词汇表征中声调的语义特性[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(8): 1066-1074.
[7]蒋柯,熊哲宏. 利/害条件下归纳推理的心理效应分离[J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(11): 1050-1059.
[8]覃薇薇,刘思耘,杨莉,周宗奎. 前分类声音存储器对声调和情绪韵律的加工[J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(06): 651-662.
[9]席洁,姜薇,张林军,舒华. 汉语语音范畴性知觉及其发展[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(07): 572-579.
[10]谢宁,王程,吴艳红. 抑制控制能力衰退对知觉组织老年化的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(05): 424-432.
[11]沈模卫,高涛,刘利春,李鹏. 内源性眼跳前的空间注意转移[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(06): 663-670.
[12]周晓林,曲延轩,舒华,Gareth Gaskell,William Marslen-Wilson. 汉语听觉词汇加工中声调信息对语义激活的制约作用[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(04): 379-392.
[13]张明, 陈骐. 提示和非提示位置的负启动效应[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(增刊): 39-45.
[14]邓园,冯丽萍, ,彭聃龄. 不同语境下汉语三声连续变调发生规律初探[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(06): 719-725.
[15]武宁宁, ,舒华. Gating技术与汉语听觉词汇加工[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(05): 582-590.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4600
相关话题/心理 汉语 电压 知识 技术