1 湖南师范大学心理学系
2 认知与人类行为湖南省重点实验室, 长沙410081) ;(3广州大学心理与脑科学研究中心, 广州 510006
收稿日期:2017-12-13出版日期:2019-01-25发布日期:2018-11-26通讯作者:丁道群基金资助:* 湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(17YBA278);广东省基础研究与应用研究重大项目(2016WZDXM022);湖南省研究生科研创新项目(CX2017B163)The influence of embodied implicit power on fair decision making
LI Xiao-dan1, DING Dao-qun1,2,*, YE Hao-sheng31 Department of Psychology, Hunan Normal University
2 Key Laboratory for Cognition and Human Behavior of Human Province, Changsha 410081, China) (3 The Center for Mind and Brain Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Received:2017-12-13Online:2019-01-25Published:2018-11-26Contact:DING Dao-qun 摘要/Abstract
摘要： 已有研究表明, 扩张身体姿势可启动个体的权力感。基于具身认知的视角, 实验1考察身体姿势对免惩罚游戏的提议者进行金钱分配时的影响, 实验2和实验3分别考察最后通牒游戏、免惩罚游戏的回应者在蜷缩和扩张姿势下对各种分配类型方案的拒绝率。结果表明, 与蜷缩姿势相比, 扩张姿势使个体更倾向于在免惩罚游戏提议者角色时做出更多的利己不公平分配, 同时使个体更倾向于拒绝最后通牒游戏和免惩罚游戏中的不公平分配。本研究证明了扩张姿势启动的权力感可影响个体的公平决策。
图/表 3
图1实验程序图
图1实验程序图表1实验2(最后通牒游戏)的两种姿势条件下不同分配方案的拒绝率(M ± SD) (n = 45)
| 身体姿势 | 极不公平 分配方案 | 相对不公平 分配方案 | 公平分 配方案 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 扩张姿势 | 0.86 ± 0.05 | 0.44 ± 0.06 | 0.01 ± 0.1 |
| 蜷缩姿势 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | 0 ± 0 |
表1实验2(最后通牒游戏)的两种姿势条件下不同分配方案的拒绝率(M ± SD) (n = 45)
| 身体姿势 | 极不公平 分配方案 | 相对不公平 分配方案 | 公平分 配方案 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 扩张姿势 | 0.86 ± 0.05 | 0.44 ± 0.06 | 0.01 ± 0.1 |
| 蜷缩姿势 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | 0 ± 0 |
表2实验3(免惩罚游戏)的两种姿势条件下不同分配方案的拒绝率(M ± SD) (n = 40)
| 身体姿势 | 极不公平 分配方案 | 相对不公 平分配方案 | 公平分 配方案 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 扩张姿势 | 0.47 ± 0.06 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.03 ± 0.03 |
| 蜷缩姿势 | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.03 |
表2实验3(免惩罚游戏)的两种姿势条件下不同分配方案的拒绝率(M ± SD) (n = 40)
| 身体姿势 | 极不公平 分配方案 | 相对不公 平分配方案 | 公平分 配方案 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 扩张姿势 | 0.47 ± 0.06 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.03 ± 0.03 |
| 蜷缩姿势 | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.03 |
参考文献 37
| [1] | Albrecht K., Essen E. V., Fliessbach K., & Falk A. . (2013). The influence of status on satisfaction with relative rewards. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00804URLpmid: 3812870 |
| [2] | Anderson C., & Galinsky A.D . ( 2010). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36( 4), 511-536. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.324URL |
| [3] | Billeke P., Zamorano F., López T., Rodriguez C., Cosmelli D.& Aboitiz F.. ,( 2014). Someone has to give in: Theta oscillations correlate with adaptive behavior in social bargaining. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(12), 2041-2048. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu012URLpmid: 4249481 |
| [4] | Boksem M. A. S., Kostermans E., Milivojevic B., & De Cremer D. . ( 2012). Social status determines how we monitor and evaluate our performance. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7( 3), 304-313. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr010URLpmid: 21421733 |
| [5] | Camerer C.F . ( 2004). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Cuadernos De Economía, 23( 41), 229-236. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-0427.2004.372_1.xURL |
| [6] | Carney D. R., Cuddy A. J. C., &Yap A. J. . ( 2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21( 10), 1363-1368. doi: 10.1177/0956797610383437URL |
| [7] | Carney D. R., Cuddy A. J. C., &Yap A. J. . ( 2015). Review and summary of research on the embodied effects of expansive (vs. contractive) nonverbal displays. Psychological Science, 26( 5), 657-663. doi: 10.1177/0956797614566855URLpmid: 25841000 |
| [8] | Fabre E. F., Causse M., Pesciarelli F., &Cacciari C. . ( 2016). The responders' gender stereotypes modulate the strategic decision-making of proposers playing the ultimatum game. Frontiers in Psychology, 7( 126), 281-293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00012URLpmid: 4724784 |
| [9] | Feng C., Luo Y. J., &Krueger F. . ( 2015). Neural signatures of fairness-related normative decision making in the ultimatum game: A coordinate-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 36( 2), 591-602. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22649URLpmid: 25327760 |
| [10] | Fischer J., Fischer P., Englich B., Aydin N., &Frey D. . ( 2011). Empower my decisions: The effects of power gestures on confirmatory information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47( 6), 1146-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.008URL |
| [11] | Fiske S.T . ( 1993). Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48( 6), 621-628. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.48.6.621URLpmid: 8328729 |
| [12] | Gabay A. S., Radua J., Kempton M. J., &Mehta M. A. . ( 2014). The Ultimatum Game and the brain: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 549-558. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.014URLpmid: 25454357 |
| [13] | Galinsky A. D., Michael S., &Magee J. C. . ( 2017). The four horsemen of power at the bargaining table. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32( 4), 606-611. doi: 10.1108/JBIM-10-2016-0251URL |
| [14] | Guo X. Y., Zheng L., Cheng X. M., Liu Y. J., &Li L. . ( 2017). The cognitive and neural mechanisms of perception of unfairness and related decision-making process. Advances in Psychological Science, 25( 6), 903-911. |
| [ 郭秀艳, 郑丽, 程雪梅, 刘映杰, 李林 . ( 2017). 不公平感及相关决策的认知神经机制. 心理科学进展, 25( 6), 903-911.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00903URL | |
| [15] | Haruno M., Kimura M., &Frith C. D. . ( 2014). Activity in the nucleus accumbens and amygdala underlies individual differences in prosocial and individualistic economic choices. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26( 8), 1861-1870. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00589URL |
| [16] | Hewig J., Kretschmer N., Trippe R. H., Hecht H., Coles M. G. H., Holroyd C. B& Miltner W. H. R. .,( 2011). Why humans deviate from rational choice. Psychophysiology, 48( 4), 507-514. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01081.xURLpmid: 20667034 |
| [17] | Hu J., Blue P. R., Yu H. B., Gong X. L., Xiang Y., Jiang C. J., &Zhou X. L. . ( 2016). Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11( 1), 1-10. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv086URLpmid: 26141925 |
| [18] | Hu J., Cao Y., Blue P. R., &Zhou X. . ( 2014). Low social status decreases the neural salience of unfairness. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 402. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00402URLpmid: 4238404 |
| [19] | Jin J., Li Y., Chen D. M., &Guo K. J. . ( 2017). Effects and mechanisms of power and status on self-interested behavior. Advances in Psychological Science, 25( 5), 878-886. |
| [ 金剑, 李晔, 陈冬明, 郭凯娇 . ( 2017). 权力和地位对自利行为的影响及其机制. 心理科学进展, 25( 5), 878-886.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00878URL | |
| [20] | Keltner D., Van Kleef G. A., Chen S., &Kraus M. W. . ( 2008). A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40( 40), 151-192. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00003-2URL |
| [21] | Kim P. H., Pinkley R. L., &Fragale A. R. . ( 2005). Power dynamics in negotiation. Academy of Management Review, 30( 4), 799-822. |
| [22] | Kopsida E., Berrebi J., Petrovic P., &Ingvar M. . ( 2016). Testosterone administration related differences in brain activation during the ultimatum game. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 66. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00066URLpmid: 26973448 |
| [23] | Li H., Galinsky A. D., Gruenfeld D. H., &Guillory L. E. . ( 2011). Powerful postures versus powerful roles. Psychological Science, 22( 1), 95-102. doi: 10.1177/0956797610391912URL |
| [24] | Li X. D., Du J. Z., &Ye H. S. . ( 2016). Bidirectionality metaphorical effect of Chinese ritual culture: Contractive postures make people humble. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48( 6), 746-756. |
| [ 黎晓丹, 杜建政, 叶浩生 . ( 2016). 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应: 蜷缩的身体使人更卑微. 心理学报, 48( 6), 746-756.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00746URL | |
| [25] | Massi B., & Luhmann C.C . ( 2015). Fairness influences early signatures of reward-related neural processing. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15( 4), 768-775. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0362-7URLpmid: 25962511 |
| [26] | Nowak M. A., Page K. M., &Sigmund K. . ( 2000). Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science, 289( 5485), 1773-1775. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5485.1773URLpmid: 10976075 |
| [27] | Park L. E., Streamer L., Huang L., &Galinsky A. D. . ( 2013). Stand tall, but don't put your feet up: Universal and culturally-specific effects of expansive postures on power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 6), 965-971. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.001URL |
| [28] | Rand D. G., Tarnita C. E., Ohtsuki H., &Nowak M. A. . ( 2013). Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110( 7), 2581-2586. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1214167110URLpmid: 23341593 |
| [29] | Salancik G.R., & Pfeffer J. , ( 1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19( 4), 453-473. doi: 10.2307/2391803URL |
| [30] | Smith P.K., & Galinsky A.D . ( 2010). The nonconscious nature of power: Cues and consequences. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4( 10), 918-938. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00300.xURL |
| [31] | Takagishi H., Takahashi T., Toyomura A., Takashino N., Koizumi M., &Yamagishi T. . ( 2009). Neural correlates of the rejection of unfair offers in the impunity game. Neuro Endocrinology Letters, 30(4), 496-500. doi: 10.1159/000197899URLpmid: 20010492 |
| [32] | Wang G. R., Li J. B., Li Z., Wei M. X., &Li S. D. . ( 2016). Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1639, 38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.040URLpmid: 26930614 |
| [33] | Wallace B., Cesarini D., Lichtenstein P., &Johannesson M. . ( 2007). Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104( 40), 15631-15634. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706642104URL |
| [34] | Wang Y. W., Zhang Z., Bai L. Y., Lin C. D., Osinsky R., &Hewig J. . ( 2017). Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: Neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations. Scientific Reports, 7, 39827. doi: 10.1038/srep39827URLpmid: 5209655 |
| [35] | Yamagishi T., Horita Y., Mifune N., Hashimoto H., Li Y., Shinada M., … Simunovic D . ( 2012). Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109( 50), 20364-20368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212126109URLpmid: 23188801 |
| [36] | Yang W. Q., Li Qi., Guo M. Y., Fan Q., &He Y. L. ., ( 2017). The effects of power on human behavior: The perspective of regulatory focus. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(3), 404- 415. |
| [ 杨文琪, 李强, 郭名扬, 范谦, 何伊丽 . ( 2017). 权力感对个体的影响: 调节定向的视角. 心理学报, 49( 3), 404-415.] | |
| [37] | Zak P. J., Kurzban R., Ahmadi S., Swerdloff R. S., Park J., Efremidze L., … Matzner W . ( 2009). Testosterone administration decreases generosity in the ultimatum game. Plos One, 4( 12), e8330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008330URLpmid: 20016825 |
相关文章 15
| [1] | 苏佳佳, 叶浩生. 中国神话中的具身心理学思想探索[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 386-398. |
| [2] | 王汉林, 蒋泽亮, 冯晓慧, 鲁忠义. 道德概念的空间形象性：语言因素和具身因素的共同作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(2): 128-138. |
| [3] | 叶浩生,曾红,杨文登. 生成认知：理论基础与实践走向[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(11): 1270-1280. |
| [4] | 宋晓蕾, 李洋洋, 杨倩, 游旭群. 反应手的不同状态对联合任务中观察学习的影响 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 975-984. |
| [5] | 易仲怡, 杨文登, 叶浩生. 具身认知视角下软硬触觉经验对性别角色认知的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(7): 793-802. |
| [6] | 叶浩生, 麻彦坤, 杨文登. 身体与认知表征：见解与分歧[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 462-472. |
| [7] | 黎晓丹; 杜建政; 叶浩生. 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应：蜷缩的身体使人更卑微[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 746-756. |
| [8] | 刘文娟;沈曼琼;李莹;王瑞明. 情绪概念加工与情绪面孔知觉的相互影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 163-173. |
| [9] | 苏得权;曾红;陈骐; 叶浩生. 用药动作线索诱发海洛因戒断者的镜像神经活动：一项fMRI研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1499-1506. |
| [10] | 刘思耘;周宗奎;李娜. 网络使用经验对动作动词加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(8): 992-1003. |
| [11] | 杨惠兰;何先友;赵雪汝;张维. 权力的概念隐喻表征：来自大小与颜色隐喻的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(7): 939-949. |
| [12] | 黎晓丹;叶浩生. 中国古代儒道思想中的具身认知观[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(5): 702-710. |
| [13] | 唐佩佩;叶浩生;杜建政. 权力概念与空间大小：具身隐喻的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4): 514-521. |
| [14] | 叶浩生. “具身”涵义的理论辨析[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(7): 1032-1042. |
| [15] | 李惠娟;张积家;张瑞芯. 上下意象图式对羌族亲属词认知的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 481-491. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4364
