data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
1北京师范大学发展心理研究院, 北京 100875
2第二军医大学心理系, 上海200433
收稿日期:
2017-09-27出版日期:
2018-10-15发布日期:
2018-08-23基金资助:
* 国家自然科学基金项目(31000466)Will the deficit in inhibition increase the rates of tip-of-the-tongue among the elderly?
PENG Huamao1, MAO Xiaofei2,1(data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
1 Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2 Department of Psychology, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
Received:
2017-09-27Online:
2018-10-15Published:
2018-08-23摘要/Abstract
摘要: 抑制不足理论认为老年人抑制能力不足, 易受干扰信息的影响, 阻碍对目标词的检索, 故比年轻人有更多舌尖现象。实验1操纵抑制通达子功能探讨其在老年人舌尖现象中的作用, 采用2(干扰条件:有、无)×2(年龄组:老年、年轻)的混合设计, 相比于无干扰条件, 干扰条件下舌尖现象年龄差异变得更大, 表明老年人舌尖现象和通达功能有关。实验2操纵抑制删除子功能, 采用2(是否激活干扰:是、否)×2(年龄组:老年、年轻)的混合设计, 不激活干扰条件下舌尖现象年龄差异不显著, 而激活干扰条件下舌尖现象年龄差异显著, 舌尖现象随龄增多与删除功能不足有关。通达和删除功能不足是老年人舌尖现象增多的重要原因。
图/表 3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4766/f4766632ec035c52d8d709e82a3d8d41bb1afe99" alt=""
图1有干扰(左)和无干扰(右)条件下的舌尖现象诱发问题
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4766/f4766632ec035c52d8d709e82a3d8d41bb1afe99" alt=""
表1不同条件下各年龄组的舌尖现象比例
年龄组 | 有干扰 | 无干扰 | 激活干扰 | 不激活干扰 |
---|---|---|---|---|
年轻组 | 0.092 ± 0.059 | 0.079 ± 0.067 | 0.118 ± 0.055 | 0.120 ± 0.053 |
老年组 | 0.183 ± 0.087 | 0.133 ± 0.075 | 0.174 ± 0.010 | 0.140 ± 0.079 |
表1不同条件下各年龄组的舌尖现象比例
年龄组 | 有干扰 | 无干扰 | 激活干扰 | 不激活干扰 |
---|---|---|---|---|
年轻组 | 0.092 ± 0.059 | 0.079 ± 0.067 | 0.118 ± 0.055 | 0.120 ± 0.053 |
老年组 | 0.183 ± 0.087 | 0.133 ± 0.075 | 0.174 ± 0.010 | 0.140 ± 0.079 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8ad4/b8ad453b1ab8a64073f83f4c6f6a78ca11a58def" alt=""
图2不同条件下各年龄组的舌尖现象比例
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8ad4/b8ad453b1ab8a64073f83f4c6f6a78ca11a58def" alt=""
参考文献 45
[1] | Abrams L., Trunk D. L., & Merrill L. A . ( 2007). Why a superman cannot help a tsunami: Activation of grammatical class influences resolution of young and older adults' tip- of-the-tongue states. Psychology and Aging, 22( 4), 835-845. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.835URL |
[2] | Anderson M. C., & Bjork R. A .( 1994) . Mechanisms of inhibition in long-term memory: A new taxonomy. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language (pp.265-325) . San Diego, CA: Academic Press. |
[3] | Arbuckle T.Y., &Gold D.P .( 1993). Aging, inhibition and verbosity. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48( 5), 225-232. |
[4] | Aron A. R., Robbins T. W., & Poldrack R. A . ( 2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8( 4), 170-177. |
[5] | Ayasse N., & Wingfield A . ( 2017). The impact of context and competition on speech comprehension in younger and older adults revealed using eye-tracking and pupillometry. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141( 5), 3747-3747. |
[6] | Borella E., Ghisletta P., & De Ribaupierre A . ( 2011). Age differences in text processing: The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed. Journals of Gerontology Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66( 3), 311-320. |
[7] | Brown A.S .( 1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109( 2), 204-223. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.109.2.204URLpmid: 2034750 |
[8] | Brown R., & McNeill D . ( 1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5( 4), 325-337. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80040-3URL |
[9] | Burke D. M., MacKay D. G., Worthley J. S., & Wade E . ( 1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language, 30( 5), 542-579. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90026-GURL |
[10] | Chen X. Q., Zhang J. J., & Zhu Y X . ( 2015). The Research of inhibition deficit hypothesis in the aging of speech production: Evidence from different speech level. Acta Psychologica Sinica,47 ( 3), 329-343. |
[ 陈栩茜, 张积家, 朱云霞 . ( 2015). 言语产生老化中的抑制损伤: 来自不同任务的证据. 心理学报, 47 ( 3), 329-343.] | |
[11] | Choi H., & Smith S.M . ( 2005). Incubation and the resolution of tip-of-the-tongue states. The Journal of General Psychology, 132( 4), 365-376. doi: 10.3200/GENP.132.4.365-376URL |
[12] | Cohen G., & Faulkner D .( 1986). Memory for proper names: Age differences in retrieval. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4( 2), 187-197. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1986.tb01010.xURL |
[13] | Cohen J., & Gordon-Salant S . ( 2017). The effect of visual distraction on auditory-visual speech perception by younger and older listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141( 5), 470-476. |
[14] | Cross E.S., &Burke D.M . ( 2004). Do alternative names block young and older adults’ retrieval of proper names? Brain and Language, 89( 1), 174-181. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00363-8URLpmid: 15010248 |
[15] | Dahlgren D.J . ( 1998). Impact of knowledge and age on tip-of-the-tongue rates. Experimental Aging Research, 24( 2), 139-153. doi: 10.1080/036107398244283URLpmid: 9555567 |
[16] | Dempster F.N . ( 1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12( 1), 45-75. doi: 10.1016/0273-2297(92)90003-KURL |
[17] | Fang Y.H., &Zhang J.J . ( 2013). Roles of semantic similarity and category size on semantic effect in picture-word interference paradigm. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45( 5), 523-537. |
[ 方燕红, 张积家 . ( 2013). 语义相似性与类别大小对图-词干扰范式下语义效应的影响. 心理学报, 45( 5), 523-537.] | |
[18] | Gao Y .( 2013). The role of visual perceptual Stress in inhibition aging. ( Unpublished master thesis). Beijing Normal University. |
[ 高悦 . ( 2013). 视知觉压力在抑制老化中的作用 (硕士学位论文). 北京师范大学.] | |
[19] | Gollan T.H., &Brown A.S .( 2006). From tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) data to theoretical implications in two steps: When more TOTs means better retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135( 3), 462-483. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.462URL |
[20] | Gong Y. X .( 1992). Manual of wechsler adult intelligence scale - Chinese version. Hunan: Hunan Map Press. |
[ 龚耀先 . ( 1992). 韦氏成人智力量表手册. 湖南: 湖南地图出版社.] | |
[21] | Hartley A.A . ( 1993). Evidence for the selective preservation of spatial selective attention in old age. Psychology and Aging, 8( 3), 371-379. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.8.3.371URLpmid: 8216957 |
[22] | Hasher L., &Zacks R. T .( 1988) . Working memory, comprehension,and aging: A review and a new view. In Bower, G. H. (Eds). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 22 (pp.193-225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041-9URL |
[23] | Huang. Y. F., Wang D. H., Xiao H. X., & Jiang W . ( 2014). Effects of aging on false memory within DRM paradigm: A study based on fuzzy-trace theory. Psychological Development and Education. 30( 1), 24-30. |
[ 黄一帆, 王大华, 肖红蕊, 姜薇 . ( 2014). DRM范式中错误记忆的年龄差异及其机制. 心理发展与教育, 30( 1), 24-30.] | |
[24] | James L.E., & Burke D.M . ( 2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26( 6), 1378-1391. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1378URL |
[25] | Jones G.V . ( 1989). Back to Woodworth: Role of interlopers in the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. Memory and Cognition, 17( 1), 69-76. doi: 10.3758/BF03199558URL |
[26] | Jones G.V., &Langford S .( 1987). Phonological blocking in the tip of the tongue state. Cognition, 26( 2), 115-122. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90027-8URLpmid: 3652647 |
[27] | Lustig C., Hasher L., & Zacks R . ( 2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a “new view”. Inhibition in Cognition, 17, 145-162. doi: 10.1037/11587-008URL |
[28] | Meyer A.S., &Bock K . ( 1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? Memory and Cognition, 20( 6), 715-726. doi: 10.3758/BF03202721URLpmid: 1435274 |
[29] | Nelson T.O., &Narens L ( 1980). Norms of 300 general- information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19( 3), 338-368. |
[30] | Pushkar D., Basevitz P., Arbuckle T., Nohara-LeClair M., Lapidus S., & Peled M . ( 2000). Social behavior and off-target verbosity in elderly people. Psychology and Aging, 15( 2), 361-374. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.361URLpmid: 10879589 |
[31] | Rastle K.G., &Burke D.M . ( 1996). Priming the tip of the tongue: Effects of prior processing on word retrieval in young and older adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 35( 4), 586-605. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0031URL |
[32] | Reason J.T., &Lucas D . ( 1984). Using cognitive diaries to investigate naturally occurring memory blocks. Everyday Memory, Actions, and Absent Mindedness, 53-70. |
[33] | Roediger H.L . ( 1974). Inhibiting effects of recall. Memory and Cognition, 2( 2), 261-269. doi: 10.3758/BF03208993URL |
[34] | Ryan E. B., Meneer W. B., & Trovato D . ( 1994). Age-based perceptions of conversational skills among younger and older adults. Sage Focus Editions, 173, 15-15. |
[35] | Samanez-Larkin G. R., Robertson E. R., Mikels J. A., Carstensen L. L., & Gotlib I. H . ( 2009). Selective attention to emotion in the aging brain. Psychology and aging, 24( 3), 519-529. doi: 10.1037/a0016952URLpmid: 19739908 |
[36] | Schacter D.L .( 1999). The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54( 3), 182-203 doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.54.3.182URLpmid: 10199218 |
[37] | Schwartz B.L .( 2010). The effects of emotion on tip-of- the-tongue states. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17( 1), 82-87. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.82URLpmid: 20081165 |
[38] | Shafto M.A., &Tyler L.K .( 2014). Language in the aging brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation. Science, 346( 6209), 583-587. doi: 10.1126/science.1254404URLpmid: 25359966 |
[39] | Shafto M. A., Stamatakis E. A., Tam P. P., & Tyler L. K . ( 2010). Word retrieval failures in old age: the relationship between structure and function. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22( 7), 1530-1540. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21321URLpmid: 19642890 |
[40] | Sunderland A., Watts K., Baddeley A. D., & Harris J. E . ( 1986). Subjective memory assessment and test performance in the elderly. Journal of Gerontology,41( 3), 376-384. doi: 10.1093/geronj/41.3.376URLpmid: 3700988 |
[41] | Woodworth R.S .( 1938). Experimental psychology . New York: Holt. |
[42] | Yin S.F, &Peng H.M . ( 2016). The role of inhibition in age-related off-topic verbosity: Not access but deletion and restraint functions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7( 65), 1-11. |
[43] | Zacks R. T., &Hasher L . (1994). Directed ignoring: Inhibitory regulation of working memory. In: D. Dagenbach,., & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 241-264). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. |
[44] | Zacks R., &Hasher L . ( 1997). Cognitive gerontology and attentional inhibition: A reply to Burke and McDowd. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,52( 6), 274-283. doi: 10.1093/geronb/52B.6.P274URLpmid: 9403516 |
[45] | Zhang H.Y . ( 2013). The condition of questions that used in TOT research and the effect of emotion on TOT. ( Unpublished master thesis). Henan University, China. |
[ 张红亚 . ( 2013). 舌尖现象研究的选题条件和情绪对舌尖现象的影响(硕士学位论文). 河南大学.] |
相关文章 15
[1] | 张明, 桑汉斌, 鲁柯, 王爱君. 试次历史对跨通道非空间返回抑制的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(7): 681-693. |
[2] | 车晓玮, 徐慧云, 王凯旋, 张倩, 李寿欣. 工作记忆表征精度加工需求对注意引导的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(7): 694-713. |
[3] | 杨群, 张积家, 范丛慧. 维吾尔族与汉族的大学生在汉语歧义词消解中的语境促进效应及反应抑制效应[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(7): 746-757. |
[4] | 张帆, 王爱君, 张明. 基于干扰物特征的统计规则对注意抑制效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(6): 555-564. |
[5] | 王慧媛, 陈艾睿, 张明. 意义关联的注意定向效应:基于空间位置的抑制和捕获[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(2): 113-127. |
[6] | 黄月胜, 张豹, 范兴华, 黄杰. 无关工作记忆表征的负性情绪信息能否捕获视觉注意?一项眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 26-37. |
[7] | 杨亦松, 林静, 何晓燕, 尹军. 动作理解因境而异: 动作加工中情境信息的自动整合[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6): 682-693. |
[8] | 张环, 侯双, 王海曼, 廉宇煊, 杨海波. 他人在场条件下的社会分享型提取诱发遗忘[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6): 716-729. |
[9] | 唐晓雨,孙佳影,彭姓. 双通道分配性注意对视听觉返回抑制的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 257-268. |
[10] | 陈洁佳, 周翊, 陈杰. 音乐训练与抑制控制的关系:来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(12): 1365-1376. |
[11] | 王堂生, 杨春亮, 钟年. 记忆的前向测试效应对老年人学习新事物的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(11): 1266-1277. |
[12] | 王元, 李柯, 盖笑松, 曹逸飞. 基于即时反馈的反应抑制训练对青少年和成人执行功能的训练效应和迁移效应[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(10): 1212-1223. |
[13] | 孙岩,薄思雨,吕娇娇. 认知重评和表达抑制情绪调节策略的脑网络分析:来自EEG和ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(1): 12-25. |
[14] | 彭姓,常若松,李奇,王爱君,唐晓雨. 不同SOA下视觉返回抑制对视听觉整合的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(7): 759-771. |
[15] | 赵怀阳, 江俊, 周临舒, 蒋存梅. 人类镜像系统参与音乐情绪的自动加工:来自EEG的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(7): 795-804. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4281