中国人民大学心理学系, 北京 100872
收稿日期:2020-11-09出版日期:2022-01-15发布日期:2021-11-25通讯作者:刘聪慧, E-mail: liuconghui2001@ruc.edu.cn基金资助:* 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目成果(20XNA028)资助Moral foreign language effect and its moderating variables: A systematic review and meta-analysis
ZHU Lin, LIU Jinru, LI Jing, LIU ConghuiDepartment of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
Received:2020-11-09Online:2022-01-15Published:2021-11-25摘要/Abstract
摘要： 同一个道德决策情景使用外语(相比母语)呈现时, 个体会表现出更强的功利性倾向, 即道德外语效应。随着研究的深入, 结论并不一致。本研究运用元分析方法首次探讨了语言类型(母语vs. 外语)对道德判断中功利性倾向的影响, 并分析了相关的调节变量。通过文献检索及梳理, 共有19篇文献46个独立样本97个效应量符合元分析标准(N = 9672)。结果显示存在较小但稳定的道德外语效应(g = 0.23); 调节效应分析表明, 道德外语效应受故事类型的影响, 在个人道德两难故事中存在较小但稳定的外语效应(g = 0.32), 但在非个人道德两难故事(g = 0.11)与日常道德评价故事中(g = 0.12)不存在外语效应; 非个人道德两难故事中的外语效应受记分方式的影响, 多点记分在该故事类型下存在效应(g = 0.27), 二点记分不存在效应(g = 0.05); 性别和语系类型没有显著的调节效应。这些结果表明语言类型对个体面对道德困境时的选择倾向有一定程度的影响, 道德故事类型和记分方式在未来的研究中需要加以考虑。
参考文献
| *元分析用到的文献 [1] 蔡阿燕, 杨洁敏, 许爽, 袁加锦. (2016). 表达抑制调节负性情绪的男性优势——来自事件相关电位的证据. [2] 陈武英, 卢家楣, 刘连启, 林文毅. (2014). 共情的性别差异. [3] 高园园. (2017). 道德判断中的外语效应及其心理机制. [4] *关旭. (2017). [5] 关旭, 张锋, 周楠, 尹军. (2017). 决策行为和道德判断过程的外语效应: 现状与展望. [6] *胡宏安. (2019). [7] 胡艺馨, 何英为, 王大伟. (2018). 道德决策中的情绪作用. [8] 黄龙, 徐富明, 胡笑羽. (2020). 眼动轨迹匹配法:一种研究决策过程的新方法. [9] 李明晖, 饶俪琳. (2017). 解释水平视角下的道德判断. [10] 李笑燃, 肖前国, 吴小勇. (2014). 近十年有关道德的形成与加工机制研究述评. [11] 林蓝菲, 高华. (2020). 道德判断的外语效应与框架效应. [12] 罗跃嘉, 李万清, 彭家欣, 刘超. (2013). 道德判断的认知神经机制. [13] 倪传斌. (2020). 外语效应的表现形式、影响因素及其作用机制. [14] 邱俊杰, 张锋. (2015). 道德困境中行为判断的认知与情绪问题: 从道德双加工模型到建构水平理论. [15] 田学红, 杨群, 张德玄, 张烨. (2011). 道德直觉加工机制的理论构想. [16] *杨雯雯. (2020). [17] 尹军, 关旭, 花蕊, 张锋. (2018). 审慎加工对形成道德判断外语效应的作用. [18] 余宏波, 刘桂珍. (2006). 移情、道德推理、观点采择与亲社会行为关系的研究进展. [19] 喻丰, 彭凯平, 韩婷婷, 柴方圆, 柏阳. (2011). 道德困境之困境——情与理的辩争. [20] 曾笑雨, 马燚娜. (2020). 多项式模型在道德判断研究中的应用. [21] 张诗容, 胡平. (2017). 外语效应:证据, 机制与前瞻. [22] 张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. (2019). 自尊与社交焦虑的关系: 基于中国学生群体的元分析. [23] Aguilar P., Brussino S.,& Fernández-Dols, J.-M.(2013). Psychological distance increases uncompromising consequentialism. [24] Amit E., Algom D., & Trope Y. (2009). Distance- dependent processing of pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 400-415. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015835 [25] Assink, M., & Wibbelink, C. J. (2016). Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(3), 154-174. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p154 [26] Baron, J. (1994). Nonconsequentialist decisions. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 17(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0140525X0003301X [27] Bialek M.,Paruzel-Czachura, M., & Gawronski, B.(2019). Foreign language effects on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model. [28] Borenstein M., Hedges L. V., Higgins J. P., & Rothstein H. R. (Eds). (2011). [29] *Brouwer, S. (2019). The auditory foreign-language effect of moral decision making in highly proficient bilinguals. [30] Caldwell-Harris,C. L.(2014). Emotionality differences between a native and foreign language: Theoretical implications. [31] *Čavar, F., & Tytus, A. E.(2017). Moral judgement and foreign language effect: When the foreign language becomes the second language. [32] *Chan Y. L., Gu X., Ng J. C. K., & Tse C. S. (2016). Effects of dilemma type, language, and emotion arousal on utilitarian vs deontological choice to moral dilemmas in Chinese-English bilinguals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12123 [33] *Cipolletti, H., McFarlane, S., & Weissglass, C.(2016). The moral foreign-language effect. [34] Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112. 1.155 [35] Colomé, À., & Miozzo, M. (2010). Which words are activated during bilingual word production? [36] Conrad M., Recio G.,& Jacobs, A. M.(2011). The time course of emotion effects in first and second language processing: A cross cultural ERP study with German- Spanish bilinguals. [37] Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 216-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0031021 [38] *Corey J. D., Hayakawa S., Foucart A., Aparici M., Botella J., Costa A., & Keysar B. (2017). Our moral choices are foreign to us. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1109-1128. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000356 [39] *Costa A., Corey J. D., Hayakawa S., Aparici M., Vives M.-L., & Keysar B. (2017). The role of intentions and outcomes in the foreign language effect on moral judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817738409 [40] *Costa A., Foucart A., Hayakawa S., Aparici M., Apesteguia J., Heafner J., & Keysar B. (2014). Your morals depend on language. PloS one, 9(4), Article e94842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094842 [41] Crain, WC. (1985). [42] Cushman F., Young L., & Greene J. D. (2010). Our multi-system moral psychology: Towards a consensus view. In J. Doris, G. Harman, S. Nichols, J. Prinz, W. Sinnott-Armstrong, & S. Stich (Eds.), [43] Degner J., Doycheva C., & Wentura D. (2012). It matters how much you talk: On the automaticity of affective connotations of first and second language words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(1), 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000095 [44] Dewaele, J.-M. (2004). The emotional force of swearwords and taboo words in the speech of multilinguals. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 25(2-3), 204-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630408666529 [45] Dewaele, J.-M. (2010). Christ fucking shit merde! Language preferences for swearing among maximally proficient multilinguals. [46] *Driver, M. Y.(2020). Switching codes and shifting morals: How code-switching and emotion affect moral judgment. [47] Dylman A. S.,& Barry, C.(2018). When having two names facilitates lexical selection: Similar results in the picture-word task from translation distractors in bilinguals and synonym distractors in monolinguals. [48] *Dylman, A. S., & Champoux-Larsson, M.-F.(2020). It's (not) all Greek to me: Boundaries of the foreign language effect. [49] Egger M., Smith G. D., Schneider M., & Minder C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629-634. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 [50] Fisher, Z., & Tipton, E. (2015). Robumeta: An R-package for robust variance estimation in meta-analysis. [51] Friesdorf R., Conway P., & Gawronski B. (2015). Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: A process dissociation analysis. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(5), 696-713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215575731 [52] Fu R., Gartlehner G., Grant M., Shamliyan T., Sedrakyan A., Wilt T. J.,… Trikalinos, T. A.(2011). Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. [53] *Geipel J., Hadjichristidis C., & Surian L. (2015a). The foreign language effect on moral judgment: The role of emotions and norms. [54] *Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L.(2015b). How foreign language shapes moral judgment. [55] *Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L.(2016). Foreign language affects the contribution of intentions and outcomes to moral judgment. [56] Gong, H., & Medin, D. L. (2012). Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications.Judgment and Decision Making, 7(5), 628-638. [57] Goulden, K. J. (2006). Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach.Journal of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, 27(5), 419-420. [58] Graham J., Nosek B. A., Haidt J., Iyer R., Koleva S., & Ditto P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 101(2), 366-385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847 [59] Green, D. W. (2009). Mental control of the bilingual lexico- semantic system. Bilingualism Language & Cognition, 1(2), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133 [60] Hadjichristidis C., Geipel J., & Savadori L. (2015). The effect of foreign language in judgments of risk and benefit: The role of affect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(2), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000044 [61] Hadjichristidis C., Geipel J., & Surian L. (2017). How foreign language affects decisions: Rethinking the brain-drain model. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(5), 645-651. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0040-1 [62] Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 295X.108.4.814 [63] Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998-1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1137651 [64] Haidt, J. (2008). Morality.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 65-72. [65] Harenski C. L., Antonenko O., Shane M. S.,& Kiehl, K. A.(2010). A functional imaging investigation of moral deliberation and moral intuition. [66] Harris C. L., Ayçíçeğí A., & Gleason J. B. (2003). Taboo words and reprimands elicit greater autonomic reactivity in a first language than in a second language.Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(4), 561-579. [67] Harris C. L., Gleason J. B., & Aycicegi A. (2006). When is a first language more emotional? Psychophysiological evidence from bilingual speakers.Bilingual Education Bilingualism, 56, 257-283. [68] Hayakawa S., Costa A., Foucart A.,& Keysar, B.(2016). Using a foreign language changes our choices. [69] Hayakawa S., Tannenbaum D., Costa A., Corey J. D., & Keysar B. (2017). Thinking more or feeling less? Explaining the foreign-language effect on moral judgment. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1387-1397. https://doi. org/10.1177/0956797617720944 [70] Higgins, J. P., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539-1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186 [71] Higgins J. P., Thompson S. G., Deeks J. J., & Altman D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557-560. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 [72] Holman E. W., Brown C. H., Wichmann S., Müller A., Velupillai V., Hammarström H., … Egorov D. (2011). Automated dating of the world’s language families based on lexical similarity. Current Anthropology, 52(6), 841- 875. https://doi.org/10.1086/662127 [73] Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697 [74] Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. [75] Keysar B., Hayakawa S. L., & An S. G. (2012). The foreign-language effect: Thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases. Psychological Science, 23(6), 661-668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611432178 [76] Kuppens S., Laurent L., Heyvaert M., & Onghena P. (2013). Associations between parental psychological control and relational aggression in children and adolescents: A multilevel and sequential meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 49(9), 1697-1712. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0030740 [77] Liberman N.,& Trope, Y.(2014). Traversing psychological distance. [78] *Miozzo, M., Navarrete, E., Ongis, M., Mello, E., Girotto, V., & Peressotti, F.(2020). Foreign language effect in decision-making: How foreign is it? [79] Moll J.,& de Oliveira-Souza, R.(2007). Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. [80] Moore A. B., Lee N. L., Clark B. A., & Conway A. R. (2011). In defense of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research: Cross-cultural validation of the dual process model of moral judgment. Judgment Decision Making, 6(3), 186-195. http://journal.sjdm.org/ 11/10310/jdm10310.html [81] *Muda R., Niszczota P., Bialek M., & Conway P. (2018). Reading dilemmas in a foreign language reduces both deontological and utilitarian response tendencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(2), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000447 [82] Pavlenko, A. (2004). 'Stop doing that, Ia Komu Skazala!': Language choice and emotions in parent—child communication. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25(2-3), 179-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01434630408666528 [83] Pavlenko, A. (2012). Affective processing in bilingual speakers: Disembodied cognition? [84] Pereira, I. A. D., & Praxedes, P. H. L. (2016). Bilingualism, emotions and morality: A study based on the appraisal system.Entrepalavras, 6(2), 213-236. [85] Polonioli, A. (2018). A blind spot in research on foreign language effects in judgment and decision-making. [86] Puntoni S., de Langhe B., & van Osselaer, S. M. (2009). Bilingualism and the emotional intensity of advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 1012- 1025. https://doi.org/10.1086/595022 [87] Rothstein H. R., Sutton A. J., & Borenstein M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. [88] Schwarzer, G. (2007). Meta: An R package for meta-analysis. R news, 7(3), 40-45. [89] Segalowitz, N. (2010). [90] *Shin, H. I., & Kim, J. (2017). Foreign language effect and psychological distance. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(6), 1339-1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9498-7 [91] Simonsohn U., Simmons J. P., & Nelson L. D. (2015). Better P-curves: Making P-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious P-hacking, a Reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(6), 1146-1152. https://doi.org/10.1037/ xge0000104 [92] Sinnott-Armstrong W., Young L., & Cushman F. (2010). Moral intuitions as heuristics. [93] Smith T. C., Spiegelhalter D. J., & Thomas A. (1995). Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: A comparative study. Statistics in Medicine, 14(24), 2685- 2699. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780142408 [94] Thacker S. B.(1988). Meta-analysis: A quantitative approach to research integration. [95] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. [96] Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683 [97] Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software 36(3), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03 [98] Vøllestad J., Nielsen M. B., & Nielsen G. H. (2012). Mindfulness-and acceptance-based interventions for anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. [99] Wagenmakers E. J., Marsman M., Jamil T., Ly A., Verhagen J., Love J., .. Morey R. D. (2017). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. [100] Warn D., Thompson S., & Spiegelhalter D. (2002). Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: Methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1601-1623. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1189 [101] Wong G.,& Ng, B. C.(2018). Moral judgement in early bilinguals: Language dominance influences responses to moral dilemmas. [102] *Woumans E., Van der Cruyssen I., & Duyck W. (2020). Crime and punishment: Morality judgment in a foreign language. |
相关文章 15
| [1] | 张建平, 林澍倩, 刘善仕, 张亚, 李焕荣. 领导授权赋能与领导有效性的关系：基于元分析的检验[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(9): 1576-1598. |
| [2] | 曾宪卿, 许冰, 孙博, 叶健彤, 傅世敏. EMMN受偏差-标准刺激对类型和情绪类型影响: 来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1163-1178. |
| [3] | 张雯, 胡娜, 丁雪辰, 李俊一. 拒绝敏感性与边缘型人格特征的关联：一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1179-1194. |
| [4] | 叶静, 张戌凡. 老年人心理韧性与幸福感的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 202-217. |
| [5] | 那宇亭, 赵宇雯, 关丽丽. 自我面孔识别的神经机制：基于fMRI研究的ALE元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(10): 1783-1795. |
| [6] | 程浩, 张亚利, 姚雪, 张向葵. 自恋与行为抑制/激活系统的关系：元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(10): 1796-1807. |
| [7] | 孙腾巍, 颜宇娴, 靳宇倡, 安俊秀. 基于正念的干预与自我同情的关系：一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(10): 1808-1828. |
| [8] | 刘豆豆, 胥彦, 李超平. 中国情境下家长式领导与员工绩效关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(10): 1829-1846. |
| [9] | 陈钰, 莫李澄, 毕蓉, 张丹丹. 新生儿语音感知的神经基础:元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(8): 1273-1281. |
| [10] | 张银花, 李红, 吴寅. 计算模型在道德认知研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1042-1055. |
| [11] | 黄崇蓉, 胡瑜. 组织内信任与创造力的关系：元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1118-1132. |
| [12] | 张建平, 秦传燕, 刘善仕. 寻求反馈能改善绩效吗?——反馈寻求行为与个体绩效关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 549-565. |
| [13] | 方俊燕, 张敏强. 元回归中效应量的最小个数需求：基于统计功效和估计精度[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 673-680. |
| [14] | 张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. 孤独感和手机成瘾的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1836-1852. |
| [15] | 胥彦, 李超平. 人口统计学特征对公共服务动机有什么影响?来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1631-1649. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5711
