删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

视觉观点采择中自我中心性偏差的抑制和归因之争

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

吴梦慧, 谢久书, 邓铸
南京师范大学心理学院, 南京 210097
收稿日期:2021-02-09出版日期:2022-01-15发布日期:2021-11-25
通讯作者:谢久书, E-mail: jiusxie@outlook.com;邓铸, E-mail: zdeng_psy@163.com

基金资助:* 江苏省自然科学基金青年项目(BK20190701); 江苏省高等学校自然科学研究项目面上项目(19KJB190001); 江苏省“双创博士”项目(184080H10810)

The debate between inhibition and attribution of egocentric bias in visual perspective taking

WU Menghui, XIE Jiushu, DENG Zhu
School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China
Received:2021-02-09Online:2022-01-15Published:2021-11-25







摘要/Abstract


摘要: 自我中心性偏差是社交失败的重要原因, 但其产生机制还存在争议。以往研究存在抑制性选择模型与流利性错误归因两种理论观点:前者认为对自身观点的抑制失败会导致自我中心性偏差; 后者则认为错误地选择自身更为流畅的信息会导致自我中心性偏差。为整合上述争论, 提出抑制-归因协同作用模型, 认为抑制和归因两种加工或可共同导致自我中心性偏差。未来研究应借助精巧的研究范式和特殊被试群体, 进一步验证该模型。


[1] Abbate S. C., Giammusso I., & Boca S. (2019). The effect of perspective-taking on linguistic intergroup bias.Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(2), 183-199. doi:10.1177/0261927x19874383
[2] Amodio, D. M. (2019). Social cognition 2.0: An interactive memory systems account.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(1), 21-33. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.002
[3] Apperly I. A., Carroll D. J., Samson D., Humphreys G. W., Qureshi A., & Moffitt G. (2010). Why are there limits on theory of mind use? Evidence from adults' ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(6), 1201-1217. doi:10.1080/17470210903281582
[4] Bernstein D. M., Erdfelder E., Meltzoff A. N., Peria W., & Loftus G. R. (2011). Hindsight bias from 3 to 95 years of age.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 37(2), 378-391. doi:10.1037/a0021971
[5] Bernstein D. M., Kumar R., Masson M. E. J., & Levitin D. J. (2018). Fluency misattribution and auditory hindsight bias.Memory & Cognition, 46(8), 1331-1343. doi:10.3758/s13421-018-0840-6
[6] Birch S. A. J., Brosseau-Liard P. E., Haddock T., & Ghrear S. E. (2017). A ‘curse of knowledge' in the absence of knowledge? People misattribute fluency when judging how common knowledge is among their peers.Cognition, 166, 447-458. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.015
[7] Cakal H., Halabi S., Cazan A.-M., & Eller A. (2021). Intergroup contact and endorsement of social change motivations: The mediating role of intergroup trust, perspective-taking, and intergroup anxiety among three advantaged groups in Northern Cyprus, Romania, and Israel.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 48-67. doi:10.1177/1368430219885163
[8] Chopik W. J., O'Brien E., & Konrath S. H. (2017). Differences in empathic concern and perspective taking across 63 countries.Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 48(1), 23-38. doi:10.1177/0022022116673910
[9] Creswell C., Murray L., & Cooper P. (2014). Interpretation and expectation in childhood anxiety disorders: Age effects and social specificity.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(3), 453-465. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9795-z
[10] Debiec, J., & Olsson, A. (2017). Social fear learning: From animal models to human function.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(7), 546-555. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.010
[11] Drayton L. A., Santos L. R., & Baskin-Sommers A. (2018). Psychopaths fail to automatically take the perspective of others.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(13), 3302-3307. doi:10.1073/pnas.1721903115
[12] Elekes F., Varga M., & Kiraly I. (2016). Evidence for spontaneous level-2 perspective taking in adults.Consciousness and Cognition, 41, 93-103. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.010
[13] FeldmanHall, O., & Shenhav, A. (2019). Resolving uncertainty in a social world.Nature Human Behaviour, 3(5), 426-435. doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0590-x
[14] Flavell J. H., Everett B. A., Croft K., & Flavell E. R. (1981). Young children's knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence for the level 1-level 2 distinction.Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 99-103. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.17.1.99
[15] Francois, Q., & Rossetti, Y. (2020). What do theory-of-mind tasks actually measure? Theory and practice.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 384-396. doi:10.1177/ 1745691619896607
[16] Frick, A., & Baumeler, D. (2017). The relation between spatial perspective taking and inhibitory control in 6-year- old children.Psychological Research, 81(4), 730-739. doi:10.1007/s00426-016-0785-y
[17] Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). How we predict what other people are going to do.Brain Research, 1079, 36-46. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.126
[18] Furlanetto T., Becchio C., Samson D., & Apperly I. (2016). Altercentric interference in level 1 visual perspective taking reflects the ascription of mental states, not submentalizing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(2), 158-163. doi:10.1037/xhp0000138
[19] Ganesh S., van Schie H. T., Cross E. S., de Lange F. P., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2015). Disentangling neural processes of egocentric and allocentric mental spatial transformations using whole-body photos of self and other.Neuroimage, 116, 30-39. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.003
[20] Gardner M. R., Stent C., Mohr C., & Golding J. F. (2017). Embodied perspective-taking indicated by selective disruption from aberrant self motion.Psychological Research, 81(2), 480-489. doi:10.1007/s00426-016-0755-4
[21] Gunia A., Moraresku S., & Vlcek K. (2021). Brain mechanisms of visuospatial perspective-taking in relation to object mental rotation and the theory of mind.Behavioural Brain Research, 407, 113247. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113247
[22] Jansen P., Render A., Scheer C., & Siebertz M. (2020). Mental rotation with abstract and embodied objects as stimuli: Evidence from event-related potential (ERP).Experimental Brain Research, 238(3), 525-535. doi:10.1007/s00221-020-05734-w
[23] Kessler, K., & Thomson, L. A. (2010). The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference.Cognition, 114(1), 72-88. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.015
[24] Klimecki, O. M. (2019). The role of empathy and compassion in conflict resolution.Emotion Review, 11(4), 310-325. doi:10.1177/1754073919838609
[25] Legg E. W., Olivier L., Samuel S., Lurz R., & Clayton N. S. (2017). Error rate on the director's task is influenced by the need to take another's perspective but not the type of perspective.Royal Society Open Science, 4(8), 170284. doi:10.1098/rsos.170284
[26] Leslie A. M., German T. P., & Polizzi P. (2005). Belief-desire reasoning as a process of selection.Cognitive Psychology, 50(1), 45-85. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.06.002
[27] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. doi:10.1037/0033- 295x.98.2.224
[28] Martin A. K., Perceval G., Davies I., Su P., Huang J., & Meinzer M. (2019). Visual perspective taking in young and older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(11), 2006-2026. doi:10.1037/xge0000584
[29] Michelon, P., & Zacks, J. M. (2006). Two kinds of visual perspective taking.Perception & Psychophysics, 68(2), 327-337. doi:10.3758/bf03193680
[30] Millett A. C., D'Souza A. D. C., & Cole G. G. (2020). Attribution of vision and knowledge in ‘spontaneous perspective taking'.Psychological Research, 84(6), 1758-1765. doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01179-1
[31] Muto H., Matsushita S., & Morikawa K. (2018). Spatial perspective taking mediated by whole-body motor simulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(3), 337-355. doi:10.1037/xhp0000464
[32] Nobusako S., Nishi Y., Nishi Y., Shuto T., Asano D., Osumi M., & Morioka S. (2017). Transcranial direct current stimulation of the temporoparietal junction and inferior frontal cortex improves imitation-inhibition and perspective-taking with no effect on the autism-spectrum quotient score.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 84. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00084
[33] Pile V., Haller S. P. W., Hiu C. F., & Lau, J. Y. F. (2017). Young people with higher social anxiety are less likely to adopt the perspective of another: Data from the director task.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 55, 41-48. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.11.002
[34] Qureshi A. W., Bretherton L., Marsh B., & Monk R. L. (2020). Stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex impacts conflict resolution in level-1 visual perspective taking.Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20(3), 565-574. doi:10.3758/s13415-020-00786-5
[35] Samson D., Apperly I. A., Braithwaite J. J., Andrews B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1255-1266. doi:10.1037/a0018729
[36] Samuel S., Roehr-Brackin K., Jelbert S., & Clayton N. S. (2019). Flexible egocentricity: Asymmetric switch costs on a perspective-taking task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 45(2), 213-218. doi:10.1037/xlm0000582
[37] Santiesteban I., Kaur S., Bird G., & Catmur, C. J. N. (2017). Attentional processes, not implicit mentalizing, mediate performance in a perspective-taking task: Evidence from stimulation of the temporoparietal junction.Neuroimage, 155, 305-311. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.055
[38] Schwarzkopf S., Schilbach L., Vogeley K., & Timmermans B. (2014). “Making it explicit” makes a difference: Evidence for a dissociation of spontaneous and intentional level 1 perspective taking in high-functioning autism.Cognition, 131(3), 345-354. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.02.003
[39] Simpson, A. J., & Todd, A. R. (2017). Intergroup visual perspective-taking: Shared group membership impairs self-perspective inhibition but may facilitate perspective calculation.Cognition, 166, 371-381. doi:10.1016/j.cognition. 2017.06.003
[40] Surian, L., & Franchin, L. (2020). On the domain specificity of the mechanisms underpinning spontaneous anticipatory looks in false-belief tasks.Developmental Science, 23(6), e12955. doi:10.1111/desc.12955
[41] Surtees, A. D. R., & Apperly, I. A. (2012). Egocentrism and automatic perspective taking in children and adults.Child Development, 83(2), 452-460. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624. 2011.01730.x
[42] Surtees A. D. R., Apperly I. A., & Samson D. (2013). Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes.Cognition, 129(2), 426-438. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.008
[43] Surtees A. D. R., Samson D., & Apperly I. A. (2016). Unintentional perspective-taking calculates whether something is seen, but not how it is seen.Cognition, 148, 97-105. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.010
[44] Todd A. R., Simpson A. J., & Cameron C. D. (2019). Time pressure disrupts level-2, but not level-1, visual perspective calculation: A process-dissociation analysis.Cognition, 189, 41-54. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.002
[45] Todd A. R., Simpson A. J., & Tamir D. I. (2016). Active perspective taking induces flexible use of self-knowledge during social inference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(12), 1583-1588. doi:10.1037/xge0000237
[46] van Elk M., Duizer M., Sligte I., & van Schie H. (2017). Transcranial direct current stimulation of the right temporoparietal junction impairs third-person perspective taking.Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(1), 9-23. doi:10.3758/s13415-016-0462-z
[47] van Mier, H. I. (2019). Changing the influence of the egocentric reference frame impacts deviations in haptic parallelity matching. Experimental Brain Research, 237(9), 2387-2395. doi:10.1007/s00221-019-05596-x
[48] Voyer D., Jansen P., & Kaltner S. (2017). Mental rotation with egocentric and object-based transformations.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(11), 2319-2330. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1233571
[49] Wang J. J., Tseng P., Juan C. H., Frisson S., & Apperly I. A. (2019). Perspective-taking across cultures: Shared biases in Taiwanese and British adults.Royal Society Open Science, 6(11), 190540. doi:10.1098/rsos.190540
[50] Wilson C. J., Soranzo A., & Bertamini M. (2017). Attentional interference is modulated by salience not sentience.Acta Psychologica, 178, 56-65. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.010
[51] Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2005). Multiple systems for spatial imagery: Transformations of objects and bodies.Spatial Cognition Computation, 5(4), 271-306. doi:10.1207/ s15427633scc0504_1
[52] Zhai J., Xie J. S., Chen J. H., Huang Y. J., Ma Y. C., & Huang Y. L. (2021). The presence of other-race people disrupts spontaneous level-2 visual perspective taking. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/sjop.12751
[53] Zhao L., Wang J. J., & Apperly I. A. (2018). The cognitive demands of remembering a speaker's perspective and managing common ground size modulate 8-and 10-year-olds' perspective-taking abilities.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 174, 130-149. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.05.013




[1]隋雪, 史汉文, 李雨桐. 语言加工过程中的观点采择及其认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 990-999.
[2]程羽慧, 袁祥勇, 蒋毅. 社会互动加工的认知特性及脑机制——第三人称的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 472-480.
[3]李艺, 肖风. 自动观点采择:内隐心智化与潜心智化的争议[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(10): 1887-1900.
[4]郭容, 傅鑫媛. 社会阶层信号及其对人际水平社会互动的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1268-1274.
[5]王逸璐, 谢晓非. 帮助情境中的预测偏差:成因与应对[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 117-127.
[6]赵书松, 张一杰, 赵君. 第三方组织公平:研究视角、内容与设计[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(12): 2216-2229.
[7]金剑;李晔;陈冬明;郭凯娇. 权力和地位对自利行为的影响及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(5): 878-886.
[8]刘超. 人类的笑:进化论与社会互动论的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(11): 2020-2028.
[9]潘彦谷;刘衍玲;冉光明;雷浩;马建苓;滕召军. 动物和人类的利他本性:共情的进化[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(7): 1229-1238.
[10]赵钰丹;李新旺;田琳;杨钒. 社会互动对青春期啮齿类动物药物成瘾易感性的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(12): 2164-2173.
[11]文鹏;史硕. 团队内非伦理行为的社会互动机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(6): 805-814.
[12]宋新燕;孟祥芝. 婴儿语音感知发展及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(6): 843-852.
[13]赵显;刘力;张笑笑;向振东;付洪岭. 观点采择:概念、操纵及其对群际关系的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(12): 2079-2088.
[14]李纾. 发展中的行为决策研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(4): 490-496.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5722
相关话题/科学 心理 社会 人类 博士