), 肖晨洁1, 王笑天2, 李爱梅1() 1暨南大学管理学院, 广州 510632
2广东财经大学工商管理学院, 广州 510320
收稿日期:2020-01-20出版日期:2020-09-15发布日期:2020-07-24通讯作者:刘培,李爱梅E-mail:xpy2305@gmail.com;tliaim@jnu.edu.cn基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目(71571087, 71971099);广东省自然科学基金重大项目(2017A030308013)How does power in organizations promote prosocial behavior? The mediating role of sense of responsibility
LI Xin1, LIU Pei1(), XIAO Chenjie1, WANG Xiaotian2, LI Aimei1() 1Management School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
2School of Business Administration, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China
Received:2020-01-20Online:2020-09-15Published:2020-07-24Contact:LIU Pei,LI Aimei E-mail:xpy2305@gmail.com;tliaim@jnu.edu.cn摘要/Abstract
摘要： 如何善用权力惠及于民既是一个重要的科学问题, 也是一个关键的管理实践问题。以往****主要关注组织情境中权力对亲社会行为的消极作用, 对积极作用的发生机制尚不清楚。梳理组织中权力正向影响亲社会行为的相关文献, 发现责任感知在权力促进亲社会行为中起中介作用; 掌权者在行使权力时会考虑自身需求、与他人的关系, 以及与组织的关系, 从而增强责任感知, 且不同路径会受个体层面、人际层面和组织层面的潜在因素影响。权力通过责任感知促进亲社会行为的综合模型, 对组织以及掌权者如何善用权力具有重要的启示意义。
图/表 1
图1权力通过责任感知促进亲社会行为的概念框架
图1权力通过责任感知促进亲社会行为的概念框架参考文献 88
| [1] | 蔡頠, 吴嵩, 寇彧. (2016). 权力对亲社会行为的影响: 机制及相关因素. 心理科学进展, 24(1), 120-131. |
| [2] | 李爱梅, 彭元, 李斌, 凌文辁. (2014). 金钱概念启动对亲社会行为的影响及其决策机制. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 845-856. |
| [3] | 李非, 杨春生, 廖晨, 雷杰. (2016). 微观权力, 法家思想与管理控制研究. 管理学报, 13(6), 789-797. |
| [4] | 廖建桥, 赵君, 张永军. (2010). 权力距离对中国领导行为的影响研究. 管理学报, 7(7), 988-992. |
| [5] | 凌文辁, 李锐, 聂婧, 李爱梅. (2019). 中国组织情境下上司—下属社会交换的互惠机制研究——基于对价理论的视角. 管理世界, 35(5), 134-148. |
| [6] | 彭小平, 田喜洲, 郭小东. (2019). 组织中的亲社会行为研究述评与展望. 外国经济与管理, 41(5), 114-126. |
| [7] | 肖丽, 梁晓雅, 陆雄文. (2012). 组织情景下的权力研究述评. 外国经济与管理, 34(3), 72-80. |
| [8] | 谢晓非, 王逸璐, 顾思义, 李蔚. (2017). 利他仅仅利他吗?——进化视角的双路径模型. 心理科学进展, 25(9), 1441-1455. |
| [9] | 韦庆旺. (2015). 问责条件下的权力效应研究. 天津: 天津科学技术出版社. |
| [10] | 韦庆旺, 俞国良. (2009). 权力的社会认知研究述评. 心理科学进展, 17(6), 1336-1343. |
| [11] | Acton, J. E. E. D. A., & Himmelfarb, G. (1948). Essays on freedom and power . Boston, MA: Beacon Press. |
| [12] | Anderson, C., & Brion, S. (2014). Perspectives on power in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 67-97. |
| [13] | Anicich, E. M., & Hirsh, J. B. (2017). The psychology of middle power: Vertical code-switching, role conflict, and behavioral inhibition. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 659-682. |
| [14] | B?l?u, N., & Utz, S. (2016). Exposing information sharing as strategic behavior: Power as responsibility and “Trust” buttons. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(10), 593-606. |
| [15] | Campbell, W. K., Hoffman, B. J., Campbell, S. M., & Marchisio, G. (2011). Narcissism in organizational contexts. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 268-284. |
| [16] | Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). It's all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351-386. |
| [17] | Chatterjee, A., & Pollock, T. G. (2017). Master of puppets: How narcissistic CEOs construct their professional worlds. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 703-725. |
| [18] | Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 173-187. URLpmid: 11220439 |
| [19] | C?té, S., Kraus, M. W., Cheng, B. H., Oveis, C., van der L?we, I., Lian, H., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 217-232. doi: 10.1037/a0023171URLpmid: 21463075 |
| [20] | de Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2008). Leader-follower effects in resource dilemmas: The roles of leadership selection and social responsibility. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(3), 355-369. |
| [21] | de Wit, F. R., Scheepers, D., Ellemers, N., Sassenberg, K., & Scholl, A. (2017). Whether power holders construe their power as responsibility or opportunity influences their tendency to take advice from others. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7), 923-949. |
| [22] | Ellemers, N., Kingma, L., van de Burgt, J., & Barreto, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as a source of organizational morality, employee commitment and satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Moral Psychology, 1(2), 97-124. |
| [23] | Ellemers, N., Pagliaro, S., & Barreto, M. (2013). Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 160-193. |
| [24] | Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31-41. |
| [25] | Foulk, T. A., Lanaj, K., Tu, M. H., Erez, A., & Archambeau, L. (2018). Heavy is the head that wears the crown: An actor-centric approach to daily psychological power, abusive leader behavior, and perceived incivility. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 661-684. |
| [26] | Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1450-1466. doi: 10.1037/a0012633URLpmid: 19025295 |
| [27] | Giessner, S. R., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W., & Sleebos, E. (2013). Team-oriented leadership: The interactive effects of leader group prototypicality, accountability, and team identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 658-667. URLpmid: 23565892 |
| [28] | Goldstein, N. J., & Hays, N. A. (2011). Illusory power transference: The vicarious experience of power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 593-621. |
| [29] | Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 111-127. URLpmid: 18605855 |
| [30] | Guinote, A. (2007). Behaviour variability and the situated focus theory of power. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 256-295. |
| [31] | Handgraaf, M. J., van Dijk, E., Vermunt, R. C., Wilke, H. A., & de Dreu, C. K. (2008). Less power or powerless? Egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1136-1149. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1136URL |
| [32] | Henttonen, K., Kianto, A., & Ritala, P. (2016). Knowledge sharing and individual work performance: An empirical study of a public sector organisation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(4), 749-768. |
| [33] | Hermans, J., Slabbinck, H., vanderstraeten, J., Brassey, J., Dejardin, M., Ramdani, D., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2017). The power paradox: Implicit and explicit power motives, and the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in SMEs. Sustainability, 9(11), 2001-2026. |
| [34] | Hershcovis, M. S., Neville, L., Reich, T. C., Christie, A. M., Cortina, L. M., & Shan, J. V. (2017). Witnessing wrongdoing: The effects of observer power on incivility intervention in the workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 142, 45-57. |
| [35] | Hogg, M. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Rast III, D. E. (2012). The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. European Review of Social Psychology, 23(1), 258-304. |
| [36] | Howard, E. S., Gardner, W. L., & Thompson, L. (2007). The role of the self-concept and the social context in determining the behavior of power holders: Self-construal in intergroup versus dyadic dispute resolution negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 614-631. URLpmid: 17892335 |
| [37] | Karremans, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2010). Having the power to forgive: When the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(8), 1010-1023. URLpmid: 20693385 |
| [38] | Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H, & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265-284. URLpmid: 12747524 |
| [39] | Keltner, D., van Kleef, G. A., Chen, S., & Kraus, M. W. (2008). A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 151-192. |
| [40] | Kunstman, J. W., & Maner, J. K. (2011). Sexual overperception: Power, mating motives, and biases in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 282-294. URLpmid: 21142379 |
| [41] | Lammers, J., & Galinsky, A. D.(2008). How the conceptualization and nature of interdependency moderates the effects of power. In D. Tjosvold & B. van Knippenberg (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 67-82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. |
| [42] | Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2008). Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psychological Science, 19(6), 558-564. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02123.xURLpmid: 18578845 |
| [43] | Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21(5), 737-744. |
| [44] | Liu, P., Xiao, C., He, J., Wang, X., & Li, A. (2020). Experienced workplace incivility, anger, guilt, and family satisfaction: The double-edged effect of narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 154, 109642. |
| [45] | Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351-398. |
| [46] | Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 158-186. doi: 10.1177/1088868312472732URLpmid: 23348983 |
| [47] | Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Butz, D. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 451-462. doi: 10.1177/0146167206297405URL |
| [48] | Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Menzel, A. J., & Kunstman, J. W. (2012). Dispositional anxiety blocks the psychological effects of power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(11), 1383-1395. URLpmid: 22854791 |
| [49] | Maner, J. K., & Mead, N. L. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 482-497. doi: 10.1037/a0018559URLpmid: 20649369 |
| [50] | Martin, K. D., & Cullen, J. B. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 175-194. |
| [51] | McClelland, S. I., & Holland, K. J. (2015). You, me, or her: Leaders’ perceptions of responsibility for increasing gender diversity in STEM departments. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(2), 210-225. |
| [52] | Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 549-565. URLpmid: 11642345 |
| [53] | Pagliaro, S., Lo Presti, A., Barattucci, M., Giannella, V. A., & Barreto, M. (2018). On the effects of ethical climate (s) on employees’ behavior: a social identity approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 960. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00960URL |
| [54] | Pitesa, M., & Thau, S. (2013). Compliant sinners, obstinate saints: How power and self-focus determine the effectiveness of social influences in ethical decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 636-658. |
| [55] | Pless, N. M. (2007). Understanding responsible leadership: Role identity and motivational drivers. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 437-456. |
| [56] | Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. (2006). Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. London: Sage. |
| [57] | Puusa, A., & Tolvanen, U. (2006). Organizational identity and trust. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 11(2), 29-33. |
| [58] | Righetti, F., Luchies, L. B., van Gils, S., Slotter, E. B., Witcher, B., & Kumashiro, M. (2015). The prosocial versus proself power holder: How power influences sacrifice in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(6), 779-790. URLpmid: 25810413 |
| [59] | San Martin, A., Swaab, R. I., Sinaceur, M., & Vasiljevic, D. (2015). The double-edged impact of future expectations in groups: Minority influence depends on minorities’ and majorities’ expectations to interact again. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 128, 49-60. |
| [60] | Sapolsky, R. M. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308(5722), 648-652. URLpmid: 15860617 |
| [61] | Sassenberg, K., Ellemers, N., & Scheepers, D. (2012). The attraction of social power: The influence of construing power as opportunity versus responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 550-555. |
| [62] | Schaerer, M., Lee, A. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Thau, S. (2018). Contextualizing social power research within organizational behavior. In D. L. Ferris, R. E. Johnson & C. Sedikides (Eds.), The self at work: Fundamental theory and research. Organizational frontiers series of the society for industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 194-221). New York: Routledge. |
| [63] | Scheepers, D., Ellemers, N., & Sassenberg, K. (2013). Power in group contexts: The influence of group status on promotion and prevention decision making. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 238-254. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02063.xURLpmid: 21950319 |
| [64] | Schmid Mast, M., Jonas, K., & Hall, J. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 835-850. URLpmid: 19857005 |
| [65] | Scholl, A., & Sassenberg, K. (2015). Better know when (not) to think twice: How social power impacts prefactual thought. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 159-170. doi: 10.1177/0146167214559720URLpmid: 25413718 |
| [66] | Scholl, A., Sassenberg, K., Ellemers, N., Scheepers, D., & de Wit, F. (2018). Highly identified power-holders feel responsible: The interplay between social identification and social power within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1), 112-129. URLpmid: 28983928 |
| [67] | Scholl, A., Sassenberg, K., Scheepers, D., Ellemers, N., & de Wit, F. (2017). A matter of focus: Power-holders feel more responsible after adopting a cognitive other-focus, rather than a self-focus. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(1), 89-102. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12177URLpmid: 27900793 |
| [68] | Schroeder, D. A., & Graziano, W. G.(2015) The field of prosocial behavior: An introduction and overview. In D.A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Eds), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 3-34). Britain: Oxford University Press. |
| [69] | Smith, P. K., & Hofmann, W. (2016). Power in everyday life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(36), 10043-10048. |
| [70] | Sturm, R. E., & Antonakis, J. (2015). Interpersonal power: A review, critique, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 136-163. |
| [71] | Suessenbach, F., Loughnan, S., Sch?nbrodt, F. D., & Moore, A. B. (2019). The dominance, prestige, and leadership account of social power motives. European Journal of Personality, 33(1), 7-33. |
| [72] | Tajfel, H. (1972). Social categorization. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la psychologie sociale (Vol.1, pp. 272-302). Paris: Larouse. |
| [73] | Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup con?ict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole. |
| [74] | Ta?tan, S. B., & Davoudi, S. M. M. (2019). The relationship between socially responsible leadership and organisational ethical climate: In search for the role of leader's relational transparency. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 13(3), 275-299. |
| [75] | Thau, S., Pitesa, M., & Pillutla, M.(2014). Experiments in organizational behavior. In M. Webster & J. Sell (Eds.), Laboratory experiments for the social sciences (pp. 433-447). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. |
| [76] | Thomas, E. F., Amiot, C. E., Louis, W. R., & Goddard, A. (2017). Collective self-determination: How the agent of help promotes pride, well-being, and support for intergroup helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(5), 662-677. doi: 10.1177/0146167217695553URLpmid: 28903633 |
| [77] | Torelli, C. J., & Shavitt, S. (2010). Culture and concepts of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 703-723. doi: 10.1037/a0019973URLpmid: 20649366 |
| [78] | Tost, L. P. (2015). When, why, and how do power holders “feel the power”? Examining the links between structural and psychological power and reviving the connection between power and responsibility. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 29-56. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2015.10.004URL |
| [79] | Tost, L. P., & Johnson, H. H. (2019). The prosocial side of power: How structural power over subordinates can promote social responsibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 152, 25-46. |
| [80] | van Dijke, M., de Cremer, D., Langendijk, G., & Anderson, C. (2018). Ranking low, feeling high: How hierarchical position and experienced power promote prosocial behavior in response to procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(2), 164-181. URLpmid: 28933910 |
| [81] | van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 357-371. |
| [82] | Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1915) |
| [83] | Williams, M. J. (2014). Serving the self from the seat of power: Goals and threats predict leaders’ self-interested behavior. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1365-1395. |
| [84] | Willis, G. B., & Guinote, A. (2011). The effects of social power on goal content and goal striving: A situated perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(10), 706-719. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00382.xURL |
| [85] | Wilson, K. S., Sin, H. P., & Conlon, D. E. (2010). What about the leader in leader-member exchange? The impact of resource exchanges and substitutability on the leader. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 358-372. |
| [86] | Witt, M. A., & Stahl, G. K. (2016). Foundations of responsible leadership: Asian versus Western executive responsibility orientations toward key stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 623-638. |
| [87] | Zeigler‐Hill, V., Vrabel, J. K., McCabe, G. A., Cosby, C. A., Traeder, C. K., Hobbs, K. A., & Southard, A. C. (2019). Narcissism and the pursuit of status. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 310-327. URLpmid: 29637567 |
| [88] | Zhong, C. B., Magee, J. C., Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, culture, and action: Considerations in the expression and enactment of power in East Asian and Western societies. In Y. Chen (Ed.), National culture and groups (Vol.9, pp. 53-73). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. |
相关文章 15
| [1] | 魏真瑜, 邓湘树, 赵治瀛. 亲社会行为中的从众效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 531-539. |
| [2] | 颜爱民, 李亚丽, 谢菊兰, 李莹. 员工对企业社会责任的差异化反应:基于归因理论的阐释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 1004-1014. |
| [3] | 石荣, 刘昌. 基于直觉的亲社会性：来自社会启发式假设的思考[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1468-1477. |
| [4] | 刘艳, 邹希, 舒心. 组织认同对员工创新行为的促进和抑制过程[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1153-1166. |
| [5] | 汤明, 李伟强, 刘福会, 袁博. 内疚与亲社会行为的关系：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(5): 773-788. |
| [6] | 李晓明, 蒋松源. 权力对延迟选择的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 447-452. |
| [7] | 王海侠, 贾汇源, 孙海龙, 李爱梅. 互联网连接性降低自主性的机制与后效[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(11): 1802-1811. |
| [8] | 陈庆伟, 汝涛涛, 周菊燕, 李静华, 熊晓, 李笑然, 周国富. 光照对社会心理和行为的影响 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 1083-1095. |
| [9] | 王晓辰, 高欣洁, 郭攀博. 亲组织不道德行为的多层次模型 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 1111-1120. |
| [10] | 邹小燕, 尹可丽, 陆 林. 集体仪式促进凝聚力：基于动作、情绪与记忆[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(5): 939-950. |
| [11] | 程南华, 李占星, 朱莉琪. 儿童的社会权力认知及其与社会行为的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(2): 283-293. |
| [12] | 江红艳, 刘邦舜, 孙配贞. 权力感对消费行为的影响及其理论解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(1): 156-168. |
| [13] | 金剑;李晔;陈冬明;郭凯娇. 权力和地位对自利行为的影响及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(5): 878-886. |
| [14] | 王浩;俞国良. 亲密关系中的权力认知[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(4): 639-651. |
| [15] | 张雪姣;刘聪慧. 亲社会行为中的“眼睛效应”[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(3): 475-485. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5155
