组织内信任与创造力的关系：元分析的证据

删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

黄崇蓉, 胡瑜(

)

温州大学心理与行为研究所, 浙江温州 325000

收稿日期:2019-11-01出版日期:2020-07-15发布日期:2020-05-21
通讯作者:胡瑜E-mail:psyhuyu@126.com

基金资助:* 国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA165)

The relationship between trust and creativity in organizations: Evidence from meta-analysis

HUANG Chongrong, HU Yu(

)

Institute of Psychology and Behavior, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325000, China

Received:2019-11-01Online:2020-07-15Published:2020-05-21
Contact:HU Yu E-mail:psyhuyu@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用元分析技术探讨了组织内部水平信任、垂直信任和系统信任对创造力的影响。通过文献搜索纳入元分析的研究有85项, 共99个独立效应量。其中, 水平信任与创造力关系的元分析有41个独立样本, 垂直信任与创造力关系的元分析有34个独立样本, 系统信任与创造力关系的元分析有24个独立样本。元分析结果表明, 水平信任(r = 0.50)、垂直信任(r = 0.38)和系统信任(r = 0.48)与创造力之间存在显著正相关。水平信任、垂直信任、系统信任三者与创造力的关系受到信任测量工具的调节作用, 但是不受文化背景和知识水平的调节影响。

图/表 4

图1文献筛选的流程图

图1文献筛选的流程图

表1纳入元分析的基本资料

论文信息	样本量	文化	测量工具	知识水平	信任类型	效应量(r)
耿甜甜, 2015	184	e	其它	3	LT	-0.15
吴志新, 2016	330	e	McAllister (1995)	1	LT	0.53
丁琳, 2016	168	e	Schoorman et al. (1996)	2	VT	0.48
何洁, 2013	239	e	其它	NA	ST	0.37
彭雪鸽, 2017	190	e	McAllister (1995)	1	VT	0.002
范恒, 2017	233	e	McAllister (1995)	1	VT	0.11
李宏利^a, 2018	449	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.2
李宏利^b, 2018	318	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.45
杜恒波, 2018	327	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	LT	0.29
尉佳芸, 2014	342	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	LT	0.21
彭山草, 2018	286	e	结合3份及以上	NA	ST	0.59
张峰, 2017	174	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.25
刘爽, 2017	340	e	其它	3	LT&ST&VT	0.61&0.77&0.61
吴媚, 2017	385	e	其它	NA	ST	0.52
倪清, 2017	268	e	McAllister (1995)	2	LT	0.54
张明会, 2016	276	e	结合2份	2	ST	0.75
朱蕾, 2017	174	e	结合2份	NA	VT	0.10
汪小钗, 2016	203	e	其它	NA	ST	0.28
于妍, 2015	307	e	McAllister (1995)	1	LT	0.39
张慧琴, 2016	296	e	初浩楠(2008)	3	LT	0.46
艾睿楠, 2015	161	e	其它	1	LT&ST&VT	0.12&0.27&0.37
刘慧, 2013	236	e	McAllister (1995)	2	LT	0.72
张浠铃, 2013	253	e	其它	2	ST&VT&LT	0.89&0.87&0.79
乐恩凤, 2013	304	e	其它	1	LT	0.60
何斌, 2013	236	e	McAllister (1995)	1	LT	0.209
刘少红, 2013	177	e	结合2份	1	ST	0.31
王雁飞, 2012	311	e	结合2份	NA	ST	0.23
沈勇, 2012	128	e	初浩楠(2008)	NA	LT	0.24
郐璐晶, 2011	305	e	结合3份及以上& Robinson (1996)	1	VT&ST	0.56&0.59
刘玲, 2011	149	e	Robinson (1996)	1	ST	0.86
徐文昕, 2011	158	e	McAllister (1995)	1	LT	0.31
白云涛, 2008	288	e	结合2份	NA	VT	0.17
王晓丽, 2010	130	e	Schoorman et al. (1996)	1	VT&LT	0.74&0.75
赖海联, 2011	126	e	其它	NA	LT	0.42
赵航, 2016	409	e	结合2份&结合3份及以上	3	ST &LT	0.75&0.76
高鹏, 2008	178	e	其它	3	LT	0.48
柏林, 2009	110	E	结合3份及以上	NA	ST	0.74
徐磊, 2019	510	e	其它	1	LT	0.48
王振, 2017	477	e	其它	NA	LT	0.50
宋建, 2015	209	e	McAlliste (1995)	NA	LT	0.58
张秀娥, 2012	112	e	其它	NA	LT	0.89
邝光明, 2012	339	e	其它	1	LT	0.63
黄海艳, 2011	496	e	结合2份	1	LT	0.63
张伟明, 2011	103	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.48
程德俊, 2010	158	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	LT	0.34
王国顺, 2011	469	e	结合3份及以上	NA	LT	0.74
瞿焱, 2014	247	e	其它	NA	LT	0.09
Wang, 2017	315	e	结合2份	NA	ST	0.49
Khan, 2015	153	w	McAllister (1995)	1	LT	0.43
Nielsen, 2009	120	e	结合2份	NA	ST	-0.05
Xu, 2010	65	e	其它	NA	LT	0.55
Charterina, 2018	202	w	结合3份及以上	NA	LT	0.69
TSAI, 2012	68	e	McAllister (1995)	1	LT	0.18
Golipour, 2011	210	w	其它	NA	LT&VT&ST	0.61&0.75&0.76
Wang, 2018	173	e	结合3份及以上	NA	ST	0.46
Wu, 2011	183	e	其它	NA	LT	0.19
Wu, 2016	409	e	结合3份及以上	3	ST&LT	0.75&0.76
Xie, 2018	294	e	其它	2	VT	0.76
Zhang, 2018	276	e	结合2份	NA	LT	0.36
Liao, 2006	254	e	其它	1	VT	0.39
Brattstro?m, 2012	99	w	结合3份及以上	NA	LT	0.48
Akhtar, 2019	273	e	结合3份及以上	3	LT	0.50
Lei, 2019	389	e	其它	NA	LT	0.71
Marane, 2012	245	w	Schoorman et al. (1996)	NA	VT	0.76
Wei, 2018	263	w	其它	NA	ST	0.13
Olander, 2015	80	w	结合3份及以上	NA	ST	0.14
Jo, 2012	365	e	其它	NA	ST	0.27
LEE, 2015	316	w	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.13
JAVED, 2017	205	w	其它	NA	VT	0.34
Masood, 2017	587	w	其它	NA	VT	0.36
Afsar, 2018	539	w	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.41
Hughes, 2018	99	w	结合3份及以上	NA	VT&LT	0.24&0.01
Jo, 2015	350	e	其它	NA	VT&ST	0.27&0.47
Carmeli, 2009	172	w	Robinson (1996)	1	VT	0.27
Rodrigues, 2013	244	w	Schoorman et al. (1996)	NA	VT	0.37
Ruppel, 2000	111	w	其它	NA	VT	0.25
Shih, 2017	142	w	其它	3	LT	0.03
Yu, 2018	935	e	其它	NA	ST	0.23
Wang, 2007	219	e	其它	2	VT	0.28
Xu, 2016	199	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	LT	0.18
Zhang, 2014	322	e	McAllister (1995)	1	VT	0.56
Zhang, 2015	222	e	其它	3	VT	0.07
Ozturk, 2019	159	w	Robinson (1996)	NA	VT	0.41
Madjar, 2009	176	w	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.27
George, 2007	161	w	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.16

表1纳入元分析的基本资料

论文信息	样本量	文化	测量工具	知识水平	信任类型	效应量(r)
耿甜甜, 2015	184	e	其它	3	LT	-0.15
吴志新, 2016	330	e	McAllister (1995)	1	LT	0.53
丁琳, 2016	168	e	Schoorman et al. (1996)	2	VT	0.48
何洁, 2013	239	e	其它	NA	ST	0.37
彭雪鸽, 2017	190	e	McAllister (1995)	1	VT	0.002
范恒, 2017	233	e	McAllister (1995)	1	VT	0.11
李宏利^a, 2018	449	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.2
李宏利^b, 2018	318	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.45
杜恒波, 2018	327	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	LT	0.29
尉佳芸, 2014	342	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	LT	0.21
彭山草, 2018	286	e	结合3份及以上	NA	ST	0.59
张峰, 2017	174	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.25
刘爽, 2017	340	e	其它	3	LT&ST&VT	0.61&0.77&0.61
吴媚, 2017	385	e	其它	NA	ST	0.52
倪清, 2017	268	e	McAllister (1995)	2	LT	0.54
张明会, 2016	276	e	结合2份	2	ST	0.75
朱蕾, 2017	174	e	结合2份	NA	VT	0.10
汪小钗, 2016	203	e	其它	NA	ST	0.28
于妍, 2015	307	e	McAllister (1995)	1	LT	0.39
张慧琴, 2016	296	e	初浩楠(2008)	3	LT	0.46
艾睿楠, 2015	161	e	其它	1	LT&ST&VT	0.12&0.27&0.37
刘慧, 2013	236	e	McAllister (1995)	2	LT	0.72
张浠铃, 2013	253	e	其它	2	ST&VT&LT	0.89&0.87&0.79
乐恩凤, 2013	304	e	其它	1	LT	0.60
何斌, 2013	236	e	McAllister (1995)	1	LT	0.209
刘少红, 2013	177	e	结合2份	1	ST	0.31
王雁飞, 2012	311	e	结合2份	NA	ST	0.23
沈勇, 2012	128	e	初浩楠(2008)	NA	LT	0.24
郐璐晶, 2011	305	e	结合3份及以上& Robinson (1996)	1	VT&ST	0.56&0.59
刘玲, 2011	149	e	Robinson (1996)	1	ST	0.86
徐文昕, 2011	158	e	McAllister (1995)	1	LT	0.31
白云涛, 2008	288	e	结合2份	NA	VT	0.17
王晓丽, 2010	130	e	Schoorman et al. (1996)	1	VT&LT	0.74&0.75
赖海联, 2011	126	e	其它	NA	LT	0.42
赵航, 2016	409	e	结合2份&结合3份及以上	3	ST &LT	0.75&0.76
高鹏, 2008	178	e	其它	3	LT	0.48
柏林, 2009	110	E	结合3份及以上	NA	ST	0.74
徐磊, 2019	510	e	其它	1	LT	0.48
王振, 2017	477	e	其它	NA	LT	0.50
宋建, 2015	209	e	McAlliste (1995)	NA	LT	0.58
张秀娥, 2012	112	e	其它	NA	LT	0.89
邝光明, 2012	339	e	其它	1	LT	0.63
黄海艳, 2011	496	e	结合2份	1	LT	0.63
张伟明, 2011	103	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.48
程德俊, 2010	158	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	LT	0.34
王国顺, 2011	469	e	结合3份及以上	NA	LT	0.74
瞿焱, 2014	247	e	其它	NA	LT	0.09
Wang, 2017	315	e	结合2份	NA	ST	0.49
Khan, 2015	153	w	McAllister (1995)	1	LT	0.43
Nielsen, 2009	120	e	结合2份	NA	ST	-0.05
Xu, 2010	65	e	其它	NA	LT	0.55
Charterina, 2018	202	w	结合3份及以上	NA	LT	0.69
TSAI, 2012	68	e	McAllister (1995)	1	LT	0.18
Golipour, 2011	210	w	其它	NA	LT&VT&ST	0.61&0.75&0.76
Wang, 2018	173	e	结合3份及以上	NA	ST	0.46
Wu, 2011	183	e	其它	NA	LT	0.19
Wu, 2016	409	e	结合3份及以上	3	ST&LT	0.75&0.76
Xie, 2018	294	e	其它	2	VT	0.76
Zhang, 2018	276	e	结合2份	NA	LT	0.36
Liao, 2006	254	e	其它	1	VT	0.39
Brattstro?m, 2012	99	w	结合3份及以上	NA	LT	0.48
Akhtar, 2019	273	e	结合3份及以上	3	LT	0.50
Lei, 2019	389	e	其它	NA	LT	0.71
Marane, 2012	245	w	Schoorman et al. (1996)	NA	VT	0.76
Wei, 2018	263	w	其它	NA	ST	0.13
Olander, 2015	80	w	结合3份及以上	NA	ST	0.14
Jo, 2012	365	e	其它	NA	ST	0.27
LEE, 2015	316	w	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.13
JAVED, 2017	205	w	其它	NA	VT	0.34
Masood, 2017	587	w	其它	NA	VT	0.36
Afsar, 2018	539	w	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.41
Hughes, 2018	99	w	结合3份及以上	NA	VT&LT	0.24&0.01
Jo, 2015	350	e	其它	NA	VT&ST	0.27&0.47
Carmeli, 2009	172	w	Robinson (1996)	1	VT	0.27
Rodrigues, 2013	244	w	Schoorman et al. (1996)	NA	VT	0.37
Ruppel, 2000	111	w	其它	NA	VT	0.25
Shih, 2017	142	w	其它	3	LT	0.03
Yu, 2018	935	e	其它	NA	ST	0.23
Wang, 2007	219	e	其它	2	VT	0.28
Xu, 2016	199	e	McAllister (1995)	NA	LT	0.18
Zhang, 2014	322	e	McAllister (1995)	1	VT	0.56
Zhang, 2015	222	e	其它	3	VT	0.07
Ozturk, 2019	159	w	Robinson (1996)	NA	VT	0.41
Madjar, 2009	176	w	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.27
George, 2007	161	w	McAllister (1995)	NA	VT	0.16

表2效应量的异质性检验结果

信任类型	k	Q值	df (Q)	I²值	Tau²值	H值	CI_95%	%Var
水平信任	41	916.01^***	40	95.63	0.09	22.90	[0.50, 0.65]	4.99%
垂直信任	34	846.36^***	33	96.10	0.10	25.65	[0.34, 0.51]	5.74%
系统信任	24	83.93^***	23	97.23	0.13	3.50	[0.43, 0.64]	4.06%

表2效应量的异质性检验结果

信任类型	k	Q值	df (Q)	I²值	Tau²值	H值	CI_95%	%Var
水平信任	41	916.01^***	40	95.63	0.09	22.90	[0.50, 0.65]	4.99%
垂直信任	34	846.36^***	33	96.10	0.10	25.65	[0.34, 0.51]	5.74%
系统信任	24	83.93^***	23	97.23	0.13	3.50	[0.43, 0.64]	4.06%

表3主效应和调节效应元分析结果

自变量		N	k	r	SD_r	CI_95%	%Var	p
水平信任	主效应	10155	41	0.50	0.22	[0.50, 0.65]	4.99%
	调节变量
	东方	8730	33	0.51	0.21	[0.52, 0.68]	4.95%	> 0.05
	西方	1425	8	0.38	0.25	[0.24, 0.63]	7.01%
	测量手段
	McAllister	2413	11	0.43	0.16	[0.34, 0.62]	11.87%	< 0.05
	初浩楠	660	3	0.32	0.11	[0.25, 0.50]	39.07%
	其他	3666	15	0.45	0.24	[0.40, 0.67]	5.12%
	结合2份	1067	4	0.51	0.21	[0.33, 0.85]	3.96%
	结合3份及以上	2349	8	0.67	0.17	[0.59, 0.88]	2.97%
	知识水平
	高	2089	7	0.55	0.25	[0.36, 0.73]	2.61%	> 0.05
	中	899	4	0.58	0.26	[0.32, 0.82]	3.07%
	低	3031	11	0.49	0.14	[0.40, 0.56]	11.33%
垂直信任	主效应	8513	34	0.38	0.22	[0.34, 0.51]	5.74%
	调节效应
	东方	5289	21	0.39	0.25	[0.31, 0.55]	4.68%	> 0.05
	西方	3224	13	0.38	0.18	[0.31, 0.53]	8.96%
	测量手段
	McAllister	3323	12	0.28	0.16	[0.22, 0.43]	11.71%	< 0.05
	Robinson	331	2	0.34	0.07	[0.26, 0.49]	89.07%
	Schoorman, Mayer&Davis	787	4	0.58	0.17	[0.39, 0.82]	5.61%
	其他	2253	9	0.52	0.27	[0.36, 0.79]	2.62%
	结合2份	1415	5	0.29	0.10	[0.22, .042]	28.87%
	结合3份及以上	404	2	0.48	0.14	[0.36, 0.68]	25.34%
	知识水平
	高	562	2	0.49	0.34	[0.02, 0.96]	1.79%	> 0.05
	中	934	4	0.63	0.23	[0.40, 0.85]	2.96%
	低	1767	8	0.38	0.22	[0.23, 0.53]	7.10%
系统信任	主效应	6824	24	0.48	0.23	[0.43, 0.64]	4.06%
	调节效应
	东方	6414	21	0.48	0.22	[0.43, 0.64]	4.01%	> 0.05
	西方	410	3	0.40	0.37	[0.08, 1.04]	4.75%
	测量手段
	Robinson	454	2	0.68	0.13	[0.60, 0.92]	11.54%	< 0.05
	其他	3238	9	0.43	0.21	[0.32, 0.64]	3.92%
	结合2份	2097	8	0.49	0.24	[0.38, 0.71]	4.93%
	结合3份及以上	1035	5	0.50	0.28	[0.31, 0.87]	3.75%
	知识水平
	高	749	2	0.69	0.07	[0.59, 0.79]	14.09%	> 0.05
	中	529	2	0.82	0.07	[0.72, 0.91]	9.28%
	低	326	2	0.56	0.27	[0.19, 0.93]	3.94%

表3主效应和调节效应元分析结果

自变量		N	k	r	SD_r	CI_95%	%Var	p
水平信任	主效应	10155	41	0.50	0.22	[0.50, 0.65]	4.99%
	调节变量
	东方	8730	33	0.51	0.21	[0.52, 0.68]	4.95%	> 0.05
	西方	1425	8	0.38	0.25	[0.24, 0.63]	7.01%
	测量手段
	McAllister	2413	11	0.43	0.16	[0.34, 0.62]	11.87%	< 0.05
	初浩楠	660	3	0.32	0.11	[0.25, 0.50]	39.07%
	其他	3666	15	0.45	0.24	[0.40, 0.67]	5.12%
	结合2份	1067	4	0.51	0.21	[0.33, 0.85]	3.96%
	结合3份及以上	2349	8	0.67	0.17	[0.59, 0.88]	2.97%
	知识水平
	高	2089	7	0.55	0.25	[0.36, 0.73]	2.61%	> 0.05
	中	899	4	0.58	0.26	[0.32, 0.82]	3.07%
	低	3031	11	0.49	0.14	[0.40, 0.56]	11.33%
垂直信任	主效应	8513	34	0.38	0.22	[0.34, 0.51]	5.74%
	调节效应
	东方	5289	21	0.39	0.25	[0.31, 0.55]	4.68%	> 0.05
	西方	3224	13	0.38	0.18	[0.31, 0.53]	8.96%
	测量手段
	McAllister	3323	12	0.28	0.16	[0.22, 0.43]	11.71%	< 0.05
	Robinson	331	2	0.34	0.07	[0.26, 0.49]	89.07%
	Schoorman, Mayer&Davis	787	4	0.58	0.17	[0.39, 0.82]	5.61%
	其他	2253	9	0.52	0.27	[0.36, 0.79]	2.62%
	结合2份	1415	5	0.29	0.10	[0.22, .042]	28.87%
	结合3份及以上	404	2	0.48	0.14	[0.36, 0.68]	25.34%
	知识水平
	高	562	2	0.49	0.34	[0.02, 0.96]	1.79%	> 0.05
	中	934	4	0.63	0.23	[0.40, 0.85]	2.96%
	低	1767	8	0.38	0.22	[0.23, 0.53]	7.10%
系统信任	主效应	6824	24	0.48	0.23	[0.43, 0.64]	4.06%
	调节效应
	东方	6414	21	0.48	0.22	[0.43, 0.64]	4.01%	> 0.05
	西方	410	3	0.40	0.37	[0.08, 1.04]	4.75%
	测量手段
	Robinson	454	2	0.68	0.13	[0.60, 0.92]	11.54%	< 0.05
	其他	3238	9	0.43	0.21	[0.32, 0.64]	3.92%
	结合2份	2097	8	0.49	0.24	[0.38, 0.71]	4.93%
	结合3份及以上	1035	5	0.50	0.28	[0.31, 0.87]	3.75%
	知识水平
	高	749	2	0.69	0.07	[0.59, 0.79]	14.09%	> 0.05
	中	529	2	0.82	0.07	[0.72, 0.91]	9.28%
	低	326	2	0.56	0.27	[0.19, 0.93]	3.94%

参考文献 150

	标*的文献为纳入元分析的文章
[1]	^艾睿楠. (2015). 组织信任与员工绩效的相关性研究*(硕士学位论文). 首都经济贸易大学, 北京.
[2]	^白云涛, 王亚刚, 席酉民. (2008). 多层级领导对员工信任、工作绩效及创新行为的影响模式研究. 管理工程学报*, (3), 24-29.
[3]	^柏林. (2009). 高新技术企业科研团队效能与创造力研究*(硕士学位论文). 天津理工大学.
[4]	陈景刚. (2006). 国企员工组织信任知觉、公平感与组织公民行为关系研究(硕士学位论文). 西南交通大学, 成都.
[5]	陈鹏凯, 陈伟强. (2018). 中西文化差异对青少年设计创造力培养的影响. 文化创新比较研究, 2(26), 196-198.
[6]	^程德俊, 宋哲, 王蓓蓓. (2010). 认知信任还是情感信任:高参与工作系统对组织创新绩效的影响. 经济管理*, 32(11), 81-90.
[7]	初浩楠. (2008). 中国文化环境下企业人际信任及其对知识共享的影响研究(博士学位论文). 华中科技大学, 武汉.
[8]	丁凤琴, 赵虎英. (2018). 感恩的个体主观幸福感更强?——一项元分析. 心理科学进展, 26(10), 1749-1764.
[9]	丁琳, 耿紫珍. (2016). 领导对下属的信任与员工创造力——心理授权的中介效应. 西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版)*, 35(4), 31-77.
[10]	^杜恒波, 朱千林. (2018). 职场负面八卦对科技人员创造力的影响机制研究. 心理科学*, 41(1), 125-131.
[11]	^范恒, 张怡凡. (2017). 主动的员工更具创造力吗?知识探索的中介作用与信任领导的调节作用. 中国人力资源开发*, (10), 64-75.
[12]	^高鹏, 张凌, 汤超颖, 李媛. (2008). 信任与建设性争辩对科研团队创造力影响的实证研究. 中国管理科学*, 16(S1), 561-565.
[13]	^耿甜甜. (2015). 从个体创造力到团队创造力:关系嵌入的调节作用研究*(硕士学位论文). 东北财经大学, 辽宁.
[14]	^何斌. (2013). 人际信任、隐性知识共享与员工创新关系研究*(硕士学位论文). 南京师范大学.
[15]	^何洁. (2013). 高绩效人力资源实践如何激发员工创造力:自我决定视角. 当代经济管理*, 35(4), 52-56.
[16]	^黄海艳, 李乾文. (2011). 研发团队的人际信任对创新绩效的影响——以交互记忆系统为中介变量. 科学学与科学技术管理*, 32(10), 173-179.
[17]	^郐璐晶. (2011). 组织支持感与员工创新行为关系的实证研究*(硕士学位论文). 西南交通大学, 成都.
[18]	^邝光明. (2012). 知识型团队成员信任、领导风格与技术创新绩效的关系研究*(硕士学位论文). 浙江工商大学, 杭州.
[19]	^赖海联. (2011). 网络密度与中心性对团队创新绩效影响研究*(硕士学位论文). 华中科技大学, 武汉.
[20]	^乐恩凤. (2013). 组织内部信任对员工创新行为的影响研究*(硕士学位论文). 暨南大学, 广州.
[21]	乐国安, 韩振华. (2009). 信任的心理学研究与展望. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 35(2), 1-5.
[22]	李国春, 吴勉华, 余小金. (2013). Meta分析导论 (p.206). 北京: 科学出版社.
[23]	^李宏利, 王星, 董丽娟, 杨岚. (2018). 员工创新行为源于领导情感信任吗?风险倾向与组织行为授权的调节作用. 心理与行为研究*, 16(5), 701-712.
[24]	^李宏利, 郁巧玲. (2018). 自我独立与员工创造力的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理研究*, 11(1), 43-51.
[25]	^刘慧. (2013). 高校科研团队人际信任对创新绩效的影响——以知识共享与整合为中介变量. 技术经济与管理研究*, (11), 24-28.
[26]	^刘玲. (2011). 变革型领导与知识型员工创新行为的关系研究*(硕士学位论文). 安徽大学, 合肥.
[27]	^刘少红. (2013). 知识型员工的组织内信任与工作绩效的关系研究*(硕士学位论文). 南京师范大学.
[28]	^刘爽. (2017). 组织信任对“90后”知识型员工创新行为影响机制研究*(硕士学位论文). 大连理工大学.
[29]	刘智强, 葛靓, 王凤娟. (2015). 组织任期与员工创新:基于地位属性和文化差异的元分析. 南开管理评论, 18(6), 4-15.
[30]	^倪清, 吴成颂, 徐慧, 叶江峰. (2017). 谦卑型文化与知识型员工创新绩效关系:风险承担意愿与情感信任的链式中介模型. 科技进步与对策*, 34(11), 132-139.
[31]	^彭山草. (2018). 知识型员工组织内信任与创新绩效的关系研究*(硕士学位论文). 北京交通大学.
[32]	^彭雪鸽. (2017). 任务重塑对个体创造力的影响*(硕士学位论文). 南京大学.
[33]	^瞿焱, 姚云雷. (2014). 关系质量、知识共享与创新绩效的关系——基于节能服务公司的实证研究. 浙商研究*, (0), 97-107.
[34]	^沈勇, 何斌. (2012). 人际信任与组织创新氛围交互效应下的员工创新. 江海学刊*, (6), 68-72.
[35]	石中英. (2008). 中国传统文化阻碍创造性人才培养吗? 中国教育学刊, (8), 1-6.
[36]	^宋建. (2015). 科研团队人际信任对创新绩效的影响机理研究*(硕士学位论文). 南京大学.
[37]	苏涛, 陈春花, 崔小雨, 陈鸿志. (2017). 信任之下, 其效何如——来自Meta分析的证据. 南开管理评论, 20(4), 179-192.
[38]	王飞雪, 山岸俊男. (1999). 信任的中、日、美比较研究. 社会学研究, (2), 67-82.
[39]	^王国顺, 杨昆. (2011). 社会资本、吸收能力对创新绩效影响的实证研究. 管理科学*, 24(5), 23-36.
[40]	^汪小钗. (2016). 组织信任、知识分享与创新行为关系实证研究*(硕士学位论文). 重庆大学.
[41]	^王晓丽. (2010). 员工目标取向与创新绩效:组织信任的调节作用研究*(硕士学位论文). 吉林大学.
[42]	^王雁飞, 朱瑜. (2012). 组织社会化、信任、知识分享与创新行为: 机制与路径研究. 研究与发展管理*, 24(2), 34-46.
[43]	^王振, 刘戒骄. (2017). 组织创新绩效问题研究——以中国式领导为基础. 现代管理科学*, (12), 18-20.
[44]	^尉佳芸. (2014). 领导创造力对员工创造力的上行下效作用机制研究*(硕士学位论文). 上海交通大学.
[45]	吴立焕. (2015). 创业团队内部信任关系的差异性研究(硕士学位论文). 安徽财经大学, 蚌埠.
[46]	^吴媚. (2017). 公仆型领导对员工创新行为的影响研究*(硕士学位论文). 兰州财经大学.
[47]	^吴志新. (2016). 组织内人际信任对员工创造力的影响研究*(硕士学位论文). 华侨大学, 泉州.
[48]	徐碧祥. (2007). 员工信任对其知识整合与共享意愿的作用机制研究(博士学位论文). 浙江大学, 杭州.
[49]	^徐磊. (2019). 跨界行为、团队信任与创新绩效:资源损耗的调节作用. 科技进步与对策*, 36(6), 11-18.
[50]	^徐文昕. (2011). 人际信任对员工创新行为的影响机理研究*(硕士学位论文). 安徽大学, 合肥.
[51]	薛天山. (2008). 中国人的信任逻辑. 伦理学研究, (4), 70-77.
[52]	杨志蓉, 谢章澍, 宝贡敏. (2010). 团队快速信任、互动行为对团队创造力的作用机理研究. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 24(06):31-34.
[53]	^于妍, 陈同扬, 陈晓敏. (2015). 人际信任对成员创新行为的影响——以团队成员交换为中介变量. 中国劳动*, (22), 74-79.
[54]	^张峰, 杨建君. (2017). 企业内部信任、经理人创新动力与能力关系研究. 科研管理*, 38(8), 44-50.
[55]	^张慧琴, 宋丽芳, 吴静. (2016). 团队创新氛围对新生代知识型员工创新行为的作用机理研究. 中国人力资源开发*, (23), 15-22.
[56]	^张明会. (2016). 家长式领导对员工创新行为的影响*(硕士学位论文). 新疆财经大学.
[57]	^张伟明, 夏洪胜. (2011). 魅力型领导、下属的信任与团队创新绩效关系的研究. 科技管理研究*, 31(8), 109-112.
[58]	^张浠铃. (2013). 授权领导与员工创新行为的关系:组织信任与知识分享作用研究*(硕士学位论文). 华南理工大学, 广州.
[59]	^张秀娥, 周荣鑫, 王于佳. (2012). 创业团队成员信任对社会网络与企业创新能力关系的影响. 经济与管理研究*, (3), 105-111.
[60]	^赵航. (2016). 团队信任对团队创造力的作用机制研究*(硕士学位论文). 大连理工大学.
[61]	赵娜, 周明洁, 陈爽, 李永鑫, 张建新. (2014). 信任的跨文化差异研究:视角与方法. 心理科学, 37(4), 1002-1007.
[62]	^朱蕾, 张峰, 杨建君. (2017). 企业内部信任、组织决策导向和创新选择关系研究. 武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)*, 30(1), 46-54.
[63]	^Afsar, B., & Masood, M. (2018). Transformational leadership, creative self-efficacy, trust in supervisor, uncertainty avoidance, and innovative work behavior of nurses. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science*, 54(1), 36-61.
[64]	Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., Bosco, F. A., Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Debunking myths and urban legends about meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 306-331.
[65]	^Akhtar, S., Khan, K. U., Hassan, S., Irfan, M., & Atlas, F. (2019). Antecedents of task performance: An examination of transformation leadership, team communication, team creativity, and team trust. Journal of Public Affairs*, 19(2), e1927.
[66]	Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.
[67]	Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
[68]	Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147-173.
[69]	Bidault, F., & Castello, A. (2009). Trust and creativity: Understanding the role of trust in creativity-oriented joint developments. R&D Management, 39(3), 259-270.
[70]	Bidault, F., & Castello, A. (2010). Why too much trust is death to innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(4), 33-38.
[71]	^Brattstr?m, A., L?fsten, H., & Richtnér, A. (2012). Creativity, trust and systematic processes in product development. Research Policy*, 41(4), 743-755.
[72]	Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189-1207. URLpmid: 17100478
[73]	Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260.
[74]	^Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior*, 43(3), 169-191.
[75]	Ceserani, J. (2014). Innovation and trust - The path to mastery. Industrial and Commercial Training, 46(6), 302-306.
[76]	Chang, S., Jia, L., Takeuchi, R., & Cai, Y. (2014). Do high- commitment work systems affect creativity? A multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 665-680. doi: 10.1037/a0035679 URLpmid: 24490963
[77]	^Charterina, J., Landeta, J., & Basterretxea, I. (2018). Mediation effects of trust and contracts on knowledge-sharing and product innovation: Evidence from the European machine tool industry. European Journal of Innovation Management*, 21(2), 274-293.
[78]	Chen, K. H., Yien, J. M., & Huang, C. J. (2011). The perceived leader support behavior for subordinate's creativity: The moderating effect of trust. Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 257-264.
[79]	Chen, M. H., Chang, Y.-C., & Hung, S.-C. (2008). Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R&D Management, 38(1), 21-34.
[80]	Chiaburu, D. S., Lorinkova, N. M., & van Dyne, L. (2013). Employees’ social context and change-oriented citizenship: A meta-analysis of leader, coworker, and organizational influences. Group & Organization Management, 38(3), 291-333.
[81]	Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non- fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), 39-52. doi: 10.1111/joop.1980.53.issue-1 URL
[82]	Cummings, L., & Bromiley, L. J. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE Publications.
[83]	Duden, A. (2012). Trust in learning organizations. International Journal of Management Cases, 14(4), 167-175.
[84]	Eisenberg, N, & Miller, P. (1987) . Empathy, sympathy, and altruism: Empirical and conceptual links. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[85]	Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K., & Puumalainen, K. (2008). The role of trust in organisational innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(2), 160-181.
[86]	Fielding, R. (1997). A socio/cognitive perspective on cross cultural attitudes and practices in creativity development. Australian Art Education, 20(1-2), 27-33.
[87]	Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.
[88]	George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don't: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687-697. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.687 URLpmid: 12184573
[89]	^George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal*, 50(3), 605-622.
[90]	^Golipour, R., Jandaghi, G., Mirzaei, M. A., & Arbatan, T. R. (2011). The impact of organizational trust on innovativeness at the Tehran oil refinery company. African Journal of Business Management*, 5(7), 2660-2667.
[91]	Gould-Williams, J. (2003). The importance of HR practices and workplace trust in achieving superior performance: A study of public-sector organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 28-54.
[92]	Gu, Q., Tang, T. L.-P., & Jiang, W. (2015). Does moral leadership enhance employee creativity? Employee identification with leader and leader-member exchange (LMX) in the Chinese context. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 513-529.
[93]	Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557-560. URLpmid: 12958120
[94]	Hon, A. H. Y., Bloom, M., & Crant, J. M. (2014). Overcoming resistance to change and enhancing creative performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 919-941.
[95]	^Hughes, M., Rigtering, J. P. C., Covin, J. G., Bouncken, R. B., & Kraus, S. (2018). Innovative behaviour, trust and perceived workplace performance. British Journal of Management*, 29(4), 750-768.
[96]	Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta- analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[97]	Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta- analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings( 2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[98]	Igarashi, T., Kashima, Y., Kashima, E. S., Farsides, T., Kim, U., Strack, F., … Yuki, M. (2008). Culture, trust, and social networks. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(1), 88-101.
[99]	^Javed, B., Naqvi, S. M. M. R., Khan, A. K., Arjoon, S., & Tayyeb, H. H. (2017). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety. Journal of Management & Organization*, 25(1), 117-136.
[100]	^* Jo, N. Y., & Lee, K. C. (2012). The effect of organizational trust, task complexity and intrinsic motivation on employee creativity: Emphasis on moderating effect of stress. Paper presented at the Human Centric Technology and Service in Smart Space, Dordrecht.
[101]	^Jo, N. Y., Lee, K. C., Lee, D. S., & Hahn, M. (2015). Empirical analysis of roles of perceived leadership styles and trust on team members’ creativity: Evidence from Korean ICT companies. Computers in Human Behavior*, 42, 149-156.
[102]	^Khan, M. S., Breitenecker, R. J., Gustafsson, V., & Schwarz, E. J. (2015). Innovative entrepreneurial teams: The give and take of trust and conflict. Creativity and Innovation Management*, 24(4), 558-573.
[103]	Kim, J., & Michael, W. B. (1995). The relationship of creativity measures to school achievement and to preferred learning and thinking style in a sample of Korean high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(1), 60-74.
[104]	Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 385-399.
[105]	^Lee, D. (2015). The impact of leader's humor on employees' creativity: The moderating role of trust in leader. Seoul Journal of Business*, 21(1), 59-86.
[106]	^Lei, H., Nguyen, T. T., & Le, P. B. (2019). How knowledge sharing connects interpersonal trust and innovation capability: The moderating effect of leadership support. Chinese Management Studies*, 13(2), 276-298.
[107]	^Liao, L. F. (2006). A learning organization perspective on knowledge-sharing behavior and firm innovation. Human Systems Management*, 25(4), 227-236.
[108]	López-López, J. A., Van den Noortgate, W., Tanner-Smith, E. E., Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2017). Assessing meta- regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(4), 435-450. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1245 URLpmid: 28556477
[109]	^Madjar, N., & Ortiz-Walters, R. (2009). Trust in Supervisors and Trust in Customers: Their Independent, relative, and joint effects on employee performance and creativity. Human Performance*, 22(2), 128-142.
[110]	^*Marane, B. (2012). The mediating role of trust in organization on the influence of psychological empowerment on innovation behavior. European Journal of Social Sciences*, 33(1), 39-51.
[111]	Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64-74.
[112]	^Masood, M., & Afsar, B. (2017). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior among nursing staff. Nursing Inquiry*, 24(4), e12188.
[113]	Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123-136.
[114]	McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and Cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
[115]	McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011). Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 23-63.
[116]	McLean, L. D. (2005). Organizational culture’s influence on creativity and innovation: A review of the literature and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 226-246.
[117]	^Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2009). Learning and innovation in international strategic alliances: An empirical test of the role of trust and tacitness. Journal of Management Studies*, 46(6), 1031-1056.
[118]	Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe, H. A. (1997). Development and psychometric properties of the organizational trust inventory. Evaluation Review, 21(5), 614-635.
[119]	^Olander, H., Vanhala, M., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Blomqvist, K. (2015). HR-related knowledge protection and innovation performance: The moderating effect of trust. Knowledge and Process Management*, 22(3), 220-233.
[120]	Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
[121]	^Ozturk, A., & Karatepe, O. M. (2019). Frontline hotel employees’ psychological capital, trust in organization, and their effects on nonattendance intentions, absenteeism, and creative performance. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management*, 28(2), 217-239.
[122]	Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574-599.
[123]	^Rodrigues, A. F. C., & Veloso, A. L. d. O. M. (2013). Confian?a Organizacional, Risco e Criatividade. Revista Brasileira de Gest?o de Negócios*, 15, 545-561.
[124]	Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[125]	Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
[126]	^* Ruppel, C. P., & Harrington, S. J. (2000). The relationship of communication, ethical work climate, and trust to commitment and innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(4), 313-328.
[127]	Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1996). Empowerment in veterinary clinics: The role of trust in delegation. Paper presented at the 11th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
[128]	Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
[129]	Shih, H.-A., & Susanto, E. (2017). Perceived identifiability, shared responsibility and innovative work behavior. The International Journal of Human Resource Management*, 28(22), 3109-3127.
[130]	Sinaceur, M. (2010). Suspending judgment to create value: Suspicion and trust in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3), 543-550.
[131]	Skilton, P. F., & Dooley, K. J. (2010). The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 118-134.
[132]	Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591-620.
[133]	^Tsai, W.-C., Chi, N.-W., Grandey, A. A., & Fung, S.-C. (2012). Positive group affective tone and team creativity: Negative group affective tone and team trust as boundary conditions. Journal of Organizational Behavior*, 33(5), 638-656.
[134]	^Wang, C.-H., & Chen, K.-L. (2018). Do relationships have a dark side for innovation performance in the high-tech industry? International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management*, 15(2), 1850018.
[135]	^Wang, K. Y., & Casimir, G. (2007). How attitudes of leaders may enhance organizational creativity: Evidence from a Chinese study. Creativity and Innovation Management*, 16(3), 229-238.
[136]	^Wang, L., Zhang, M., & Li, X. (2017). Trust and knowledge creation: the moderating effects of legal inadequacy. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117*(10), 2194-2209.
[137]	^Wei, L. H., Thurasamy, R., & Popa, S. (2018). Managing virtual teams for open innovation in global business services industry. Management Decision*, 56(6), 1285-1305.
[138]	Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
[139]	^Wu, J., Zhao, H., & Pan, D. (2016). Effects of different trust on team creativity: Taking knowledge sharing as a mediator*. Paper presented at the Knowledge and Systems Sciences, Singapore.
[140]	^Wu, M. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge acquisition in network munificence and innovation*. Paper presented at the Education and Management, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[141]	^Xie, Y., Xue, W., Li, L., Wang, A., Chen, Y., Zheng, Q., … Li, X. (2018). Leadership style and innovation atmosphere in enterprises: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135*, 257-265.
[142]	^Xu, Q. (2010,Nov). A research on trusting employees and tourism firm's service innovation -- Based on the empirical analysis of guangzhou tourism*. Paper presented at the 2010 3rd International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering.
[143]	^Xu, S., Jiang, X., & Walsh, I. J. (2016). The influence of openness to experience on perceived employee creativity: The moderating roles of individual trust. The Journal of Creative Behavior*, 52(2), 142-155.
[144]	^Yu, M.-C., Mai, Q., Tsai, S.-B., & Dai, Y. (2018). An empirical study on the organizational trust, employee- organization relationship and innovative behavior from the integrated perspective of social exchange and organizational sustainability. Sustainability*, 10(3), 1-4.
[145]	Zaugg, H., & Davies, R. S. (2013). Communication skills to develop trusting relationships on global virtual engineering capstone teams. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(2), 228-233.
[146]	^Zhang, M., Zhao, X., & Lyles, M. (2018). Effects of absorptive capacity, trust and information systems on product innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management*, 38(2), 493-512.
[147]	^Zhang, X., & Zhou, J. (2014). Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124*(2), 150-164.
[148]	^Zhang, Y., Long, L., Wu, T.-y., & Huang, X. (2015). When is pay for performance related to employee creativity in the Chinese context? The role of guanxi HRM practice, trust in management, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior*, 36(5), 698-719.
[149]	Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.
[150]	Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity:A critical review and directions for future research. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management(pp. 165-217).