删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

具身认知视角的饮食消费行为——基于心理模拟“具身”方式

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

熊素红1(), 孙洪杰2, 陆佶3, 姚琦4, 张全成5
1 重庆工商大学商务策划学院, 重庆 400067
2 海南大学管理学院, 海口 570228
3 Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada B2N 5E3
4 重庆交通大学经济与管理学院, 重庆 400074
5 四川师范大学商学院, 成都 610101
收稿日期:2019-04-19出版日期:2020-03-15发布日期:2020-01-18
通讯作者:熊素红E-mail:xiong@ctbu.edu.cn

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目(71472018);国家自然科学基金项目(71772021);国家自然科学基金项目(71672120);教育部规划基金项目(17YJAZH096);重庆市基础研究与前沿探索项目(cstc2018jcyjAX0044);重庆市社会科学规划重点项目(2018ZDGL06)

Eating behavior from the perspective of embodied cognition: Based on the mental simulation approach

XIONG Suhong1(), SUN Hongjie2, LU Ji3, YAO Qi4, ZHANG Quancheng5
1 School of Business Planning, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China
2 Management School, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
3 Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada
4 School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 4000074, China
5 Business School, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China
Received:2019-04-19Online:2020-03-15Published:2020-01-18
Contact:XIONG Suhong E-mail:xiong@ctbu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 随着具身认知理论的发展, 基于心理模拟“具身”方式的饮食消费行为研究得到了一些新颖、有趣的研究结果, 为过食与肥胖、食品营销等问题的解决提供了新视角。心理模拟既能促进进食也能抑制进食; 心理模拟容易性因素与动机性因素是影响心理模拟程度的两大类主要前因变量; 未来需要进一步探索心理模拟的容易性因素与动机性因素、心理模拟提高消费欲望与产生腻厌反应的边界条件, 以及利用心理模拟探讨肥胖高危人群——高奖赏敏感性个体过食的深层次内在机制等。


[1] 董军, 付淑英, 卢山, 杨绍峰, 齐春辉 . (2018). 自我控制失败的理论模型与神经基础. 心理科学进展, 26(1), 134-143.
[2] 耿晓伟, 张峰, 王艳净, 范琳琳, 姚艳 . (2018). 健康目标启动降低高热量食物消费. 心理学报, 50(8), 840-847.
[3] 韩德昌, 王艳芝 . (2012). 心理模拟: 一种有效预防冲动购买行为的方法. 南开管理评论, 15(1), 142-150.
[4] 刘豫, 陈红, 李书慧, 罗念 . (2017). 在线抑制控制训练对失败的限制性饮食者不健康食物选择的改善. 心理学报, 49(2), 219-227.
[5] 汪宇, 路晖, 杜捷, 陈红 . (2016). 神经影像视角下的肥胖脑机制研究. 心理科学, 39(5), 1086-1092.
[6] 魏华, 段海岑, 周宗奎 . (2018). 具身认知视角下的消费者行为. 心理科学进展, 2 6(7), 1294-1306.
[7] 熊素红, 孙洪杰 . (2017). 奖赏敏感性在冲动性饮食行为中的作用. 心理科学, 40(2), 429-435.
[8] 叶浩生 . (2010). 具身认知: 认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18(5), 705-710.
[9] 叶浩生 . (2016). 镜像神经元的意义. 心理学报, 48(4), 444-456.
[10] 钟毅平, 李琎, 王潇 . (2017). 时间洞察力特质对食品选择偏好的影响: 解释水平对内隐偏好的作用. 心理科学, 40(5), 1161-1167.
[11] Barsalou L. W . (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617-645.
[12] Beaver J. D., Lawrence A. D., van Ditzhuijzen J., Davis M. H., Woods A., & Calder A. J . (2006). Individual differences in reward drive predict neural responses to images of food. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(19), 5160-5166.
[13] Bittman M . (2014). Will China defeat obesity? Retrieved August 25, 2015, from http://nyti.ms/1uvsGTV.
[14] Blechert J., Klackl J., Miedl S. F., & Wilhelm F. H . (2016). To eat or not to eat: Effects of food availability on reward system activity during food picture viewing. Appetite, 99, 254-261.
[15] Cavazzana A., Larsson M., Hoffmann E., Hummel T., & Haehner A . (2017). The vessel’s shape influences the smell and taste of Cola. Food Quality & Preference, 59, 8-13.
[16] Christian B. M., Miles L. K., Kenyeri S. T., Mattschey J., & Macrae C. N . (2016). Taming temptation: Visual perspective impacts consumption and willingness to pay for unhealthy foods. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 22(1), 85-94.
[17] Cornil Y . (2017). Mind over stomach: A review of the cognitive drivers of food satiation. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(4), 419-429.
[18] Cornil Y., & Chandon P . (2016). Pleasure as a substitute for size: How multisensory imagery can make people happier with smaller food portions. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 847-864.
[19] Crum A. J., Corbin W. R., Brownell K. D., & Salovey P . (2011). Mind over milkshakes: Mindsets, not just nutrients, determine ghrelin response. Health Psychology, 30(4), 424-429.
[20] Davis C., Patte K., Levitan R., Reid C., Tweed S., & Curtis C . (2007). From motivation to behaviour: A model of reward sensitivity, overeating, and food preferences in the risk profile for obesity. Appetite, 48(1), 12-19.
[21] Elder R. S., & Krishna A . (2010). The effects of advertising copy on sensory thoughts and perceived taste. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 748-756.
[22] Elder R. S., & Krishna A . (2012). The “visual depiction effect” in advertising: Facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988-1003.
[23] Harrar V., & Spence C . (2013). The taste of cutlery: How the taste of food is affected by the weight, size, shape, and colour of the cutlery used to eat it. Flavour, 2(1), 21.
[24] Haynes A., Kemps E., & Moffitt R . (2016a). Is cake more appealing in the afternoon? Time of day is associated with control over automatic positive responses to unhealthy food. Food Quality and Preference, 54, 67-74.
[25] Haynes A., Kemps E., & Moffitt R . (2016b). Does trait self-control predict weaker desire for unhealthy stimuli? A lab-based study of unhealthy snack intake. Personality & Individual Differences, 89, 69-74.
[26] Jeannerod M . (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14(1), S103-S109.
[27] Keesman M., Aarts H., Vermeent S., HäFner M., & Papies E. K . (2016). Consumption simulations induce salivation to food cues. PLoS One, 11(11), e0165449.
[28] Kidd C., & Loxton N. J . (2018). Junk food advertising moderates the indirect effect of reward sensitivity and food consumption via the urge to eat. Physiology & Behavior, 188, 276-282.
[29] Krishna A., Cian L., & Sokolova T . (2016). The power of sensory marketing in advertising. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 142-147.
[30] Krishna A., Morrin M., & Sayin E . (2014). Smellizing cookies and salivating: A focus on olfactory imagery. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 18-34.
[31] Larson J. S., Redden J. P., & Elder R. S . (2014). Satiation from sensory simulation: Evaluating foods decreases enjoyment of similar foods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 188-194.
[32] Li X., Tao Q., Fang Y., Cheng C., Hao Y., Qi J., ... Zhang X . (2015). Reward sensitivity predicts ice cream-related attentional bias assessed by inattentional blindness. Appetite, 89, 258-264.
[33] Liem D. G., Miremadi F., Zandstra E. H., & Keast R. S . (2012). Health labelling can influence taste perception and use of table salt for reduced-sodium products. Public Health Nutrition, 15(12), 2340-2347.
[34] Lu J., Xiong S., Arora N., & Dubé L . (2015). Using food as reinforcer to shape children's non-food behavior: The adverse nutritional effect doubly moderated by reward sensitivity and gender. Eating Behaviors, 19, 94-97.
[35] Malik S., McGlone F., Bedrossian D., & Dagher A . (2008). Ghrelin modulates brain activity in areas that control appetitive behavior. Cell Metabolism, 7(5), 400-409.
[36] Maxwell A. L., Loxton N. J., & Hennegan J. M . (2017). Exposure to food cues moderates the indirect effect of reward sensitivity and external eating via implicit eating expectancies. Appetite, 111, 135-141.
[37] Moore D. J., & Konrath S . (2015). “I can almost taste it:” Why people with strong positive emotions experience higher levels of food craving, salivation and eating intentions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 42-59.
[38] Morewedge C. K., Huh Y. E., & Vosgerau J . (2010). Thought for food: Imagined consumption reduces actual consumption. Science, 330(6010), 1530-1533.
[39] Papies E. K . (2013). Tempting food words activate eating simulations. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(1), 838-849.
[40] Papies E. K., Best M., Gelibter E., & Barsalou L. W . (2017). The role of simulations in consumer experiences and behavior: Insights from the grounded cognition theory of desire. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(4), 402-418.
[41] Papies E. K., Pronk T. M., Keesman M., & Barsalou L. W . (2015). The benefits of simply observing: Mindful attention modulates the link between motivation and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 148-170.
[42] Pecher D., & van Dantzig S . (2016). The role of action simulation on intentions to purchase products. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(4), 971-974.
[43] Redden J. P., Haws K. L., & Chen J . (2017). The ability to choose can increase satiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(2), 186-200.
[44] Rennie L., Uskul A. K., Adams C., & Appleton K . (2014). Visualisation for increasing health intentions: Enhanced effects following a health message and when using a first-person perspective. Psychology & Health, 29(2), 237-252.
[45] Roefs A., Quaedackers L., Werrij M. Q., Wolters G., Havermans R., Nederkoorn C., ... Jansen A . (2006). The environment influences whether high-fat foods are associated with palatable or with unhealthy. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 44(5), 715-736.
[46] Shen H., & Sengupta J . (2012). If you can't grab it, it won't grab you: The effect of restricting the dominant hand on target evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 525-529.
[47] Shen H., Zhang M., & Krishna A . (2016). Computer interfaces and the "direct-touch" effect: Can iPads increase the choice of hedonic food? Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 745-758.
[48] Simmons W. K., Martin A., & Barsalou L. W . (2005). Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward. C erebral Cortex, 15(10), 1602-1608.
[49] Steinmetz J., Tausen B. M., & Risen J. L . (2018). Mental simulation of visceral states affects preferences and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(3), 406-417.
[50] Strack F., Martin L. L., & Stepper S . (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 768-777.
[51] Van Dillen L. F., Papies E. K., & Hofmann W . (2013). Turning a blind eye to temptation: How cognitive load can facilitate self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 427-443.
[52] Wadhera D., & Capaldi-Phillips E. D . (2014). A review of visual cues associated with food on food acceptance and consumption. Eating Behaviors, 15(1), 132-143.
[53] Wang Y. C., Mcpherson K., Marsh T., Gortmaker S. L., & Brown M . (2011). Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet, 378(9793), 815-825.
[54] World Health Organisation . (2016). Obesity and overweight: Fact sheet. Retrieved December 16, 2016, from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.
[55] Yeomans M. R., Chambers L., Blumenthal H., & Blake A . (2008). The role of expectancy in sensory and hedonic evaluation: The case of smoked salmon ice-cream. Food Quality and Preference, 19(6), 565-573.
[56] Zhou Y., Gao X., Chen H., & Kong F . (2017). High-disinhibition restrained eaters are disinhibited by self-regulatory depletion in the food-related inhibitory control. Eating Behaviors, 26, 70-75.
[57] Zhou Y., Liu Y., Du J., & Chen H . (2018). Effects of food exposure on food-related inhibitory control in restrained eaters: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 672, 130-135.




[1]于文华, 鲁忠义. 手势认知功能研究的新视角:“空间化”手势假设[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 426-433.
[2]李莹, 张灿, 王悦. 道德情绪在道德隐喻映射中的作用及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1224-1231.
[3]陈琳, 田晓明, 段锦云. 建议采纳的认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 149-159.
[4]魏华, 段海岑, 周宗奎. 具身认知视角下的消费者行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1294-1306.
[5]李恒. “前”、“后”轴上的内隐时空映射及其影响因素 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 975-983.
[6]路红, 张心园, 韦文琦, 刘毅. 空间物理秩序对心理和行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 560-570.
[7]刘传军, 廖江群. 具身效应何处寻:解决可重复性危机的分析性途径[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(12): 2260-2271.
[8]徐富明;李欧;邓颖;李燕;史燕伟. 判断与决策中的投射偏差[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(3): 422-430.
[9]孙炳丽;田雨;孙海洋;王文忠. 从心理咨询与治疗的角度看自我[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(1): 83-90.
[10]叶红燕;张凤华. 从具身视角看道德判断[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488.
[11]郑玮琦;刘烨;傅小兰. 影响时空隐喻理解中时间运动视角选择的因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(10): 1711-1722.
[12]李慧敏;王若萌;王权红;邱江. 计算机时代的书写心理学[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(10): 1843-1851.
[13]韩冬;叶浩生. 重中之“重”——具身视角下重的体验与表征[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(6): 918-925.
[14]陈昭蓉;李晔. 关系模式框架下的具身社会关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(4): 702-710.
[15]陈亚萍;李晓东. 婴儿动作理解的研究回顾与展望[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(4): 671-678.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4989
相关话题/心理 科学 神经 饮食 规划