1北京第二外国语学院旅游科学学院, 北京 100024
2清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084
3北京师范大学政府管理学院, 北京100875
收稿日期:
2019-10-09出版日期:
2020-07-15发布日期:
2020-05-21通讯作者:
董雅楠E-mail:dongyn.15@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn基金资助:
* 国家自然科学基金项目(71802008)资助More valuable voice: The antecedent mechanisms of employee voice quality
JIANG Jing1, DONG Yanan2(), LI Yan3, YANG Baiyin21School of Tourism Sciences, Beijing International Studies University, Beijing 100024, China
2School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
3School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Received:
2019-10-09Online:
2020-07-15Published:
2020-05-21Contact:
DONG Yanan E-mail:dongyn.15@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn摘要/Abstract
摘要: 员工高质量的建议是企业提质增效的重要途径。然而, 以往研究主要聚焦在员工的“建言参与”和“建言数量”上, 忽略了一个最本质的问题——员工的建言质量如何?为解决这一关键问题, 分别从员工建言质量的内涵、测量、前因机制的角度构建一个关于员工建言质量的系统研究。研究一基于扎根理论, 探讨员工建言质量的内涵与结构, 开发员工建言质量的测量工具; 研究二是基于内隐建言理论, 从个体和团队两个层面探讨员工与领导的批判性思维对员工建言质量的影响机制。理论贡献在于推动员工建言质量的理论构建, 拓展批判性思维理论、内隐建言理论的应用。
图/表 6
表1建言行为测量工具表
**** | 测量内容 | 关注重点 |
---|---|---|
van Dyne & | 员工建言行为 | 员工建言的参与 |
默许性建言、防御性建言及亲社会性建言 | 员工建言的动机 | |
向领导建言行为、向同事建言行为 | 员工建言的对象 | |
顾全大局型建言、自我冒进型建言 | 员工建言的动机 | |
员工促进性建言、抑制性建言 | 员工建言内容对企业有利性的具体体现 | |
支持性建言、建设性建言、防御性建言、破坏性建言 | 员工建言内容对企业有利性的具体体现 |
表1建言行为测量工具表
**** | 测量内容 | 关注重点 |
---|---|---|
van Dyne & | 员工建言行为 | 员工建言的参与 |
默许性建言、防御性建言及亲社会性建言 | 员工建言的动机 | |
向领导建言行为、向同事建言行为 | 员工建言的对象 | |
顾全大局型建言、自我冒进型建言 | 员工建言的动机 | |
员工促进性建言、抑制性建言 | 员工建言内容对企业有利性的具体体现 | |
支持性建言、建设性建言、防御性建言、破坏性建言 | 员工建言内容对企业有利性的具体体现 |
表2建言内容维度划分表
出处 | 重要性 | 可行性 |
---|---|---|
内容涉及解决措施 | ||
建议内容所涉及问题的重要性 | 达到建议预期实施效果所需的资源、达到建议预期实施效果所需的相互依赖关系 | |
建议内容所涉及问题的重要性 |
表2建言内容维度划分表
出处 | 重要性 | 可行性 |
---|---|---|
内容涉及解决措施 | ||
建议内容所涉及问题的重要性 | 达到建议预期实施效果所需的资源、达到建议预期实施效果所需的相互依赖关系 | |
建议内容所涉及问题的重要性 |
图1建言质量四象限图
图1建言质量四象限图
图2建言质量形成机制理论模型
图2建言质量形成机制理论模型
图3员工批判性思维对员工建言质量的影响机制图
图3员工批判性思维对员工建言质量的影响机制图
图4领导批判性思维对员工建言质量的跨层影响机制图
图4领导批判性思维对员工建言质量的跨层影响机制图
参考文献 62
[1] | 彼得·费希万, 诺琳·费希万, 爱格尼丝·蒂瓦里, 费利克斯·尤恩. (2009). 作为普遍人类现象的批判性思维——中国和美国的视角. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 46(1), 55-62. |
[2] | 陈春花. (2010). 企业文化. 北京: 机械工业出版社. |
[3] | 董毓. (2011). 批判性思维原理和方法: 走向新的认知和实践. 北京: 高等教育出版社. |
[4] | 段锦云, 凌斌. (2011). 中国背景下员工建言行为结构及中庸思维对其的影响. 心理学报, 43(10), 1185-1197. |
[5] | 段锦云, 施嘉逸, 凌斌. (2017). 高承诺组织与员工建言:双过程模型检验. 心理学报, 49(4), 539-553. |
[6] | 段锦云, 肖君宜, 夏晓彤. (2017). 变革型领导、团队建言氛围和团队绩效: 创新氛围的调节作用. 科研管理, 38(4), 76-83. |
[7] | 段锦云, 曾恺, 阎寒. (2017). 服务型领导影响员工建言的双重机制研究. 应用心理学, 23(3), 210-219. |
[8] | 侯烜方, 李燕萍, 涂乙冬. (2014). 新生代工作价值观结构、测量及对绩效影响. 心理学报, 46(6), 823-840. |
[9] | 李方君, 祁婷婷. (2017). 员工建言能提高工作绩效吗? 建言采纳与自我效能感的作用. 中国人力资源开发, (8), 71-82. |
[10] | 李茵, 黄蕴智. (2005). 内隐理论的历史视野与当代探索: 概念澄清及方法考虑. 北京大学教育评论, 3(4), 101-112. |
[11] | 廖晓明, 陈珊. (2017). “90后”新生代员工的特点与管理策略. 领导科学, (19), 10-11. |
[12] | 刘义. (2010). 大学生批判性思维研究:概念、历史与实践(博士学位论文), 华中科技大学, 武汉. |
[13] | 江静, 杨百寅. (2014). 善于质疑辨析就会有高创造力吗: 中国情境下的领导-成员交换的弱化作用. 南开管理评论, 17(2), 117-128. |
[14] | 江静, 杨百寅. (2016). 换位思考、任务反思与团队创造力: 领导批判性思维的调节作用. 南开管理评论, 19(6), 27-35. |
[15] | 屠兴勇. (2015). 批判性思维、创新氛围对员工创新行为的影响机制. 社会科学, (8), 40-51. |
[16] | 屠兴勇. (2016). 批判性反思视角下前摄型人格对员工创新的影响. 社会科学, (10), 66-77. |
[17] | 屠兴勇, 郭娟梅. (2016). 批判性反思对员工创新行为的影响: 知识分享的中介作用和自我效能感的调节效应. 预测, 35(2), 9-16. |
[18] | 屠兴勇, 何欣, 郭娟梅.(2015). 批判性思维对员工创新行为的影响——一个有调节的中介模型效应. 科学学与科学技术管理, 36(10), 169-180. |
[19] | 屠兴勇, 王泽英, 张琪. (2016). 批判性反思效应下领导教练行为对员工创新的影响机制研究. 南开管理评论, 19(6), 4-16. |
[20] | 叶玉珠. (1999). 代理课老师批判思考教学专业知识、个人教学效能与教学行为之现况及关系研究. 国立政治大学学报, 8, 55-84. |
[21] | 赵玉田, 崔玉娇. (2017). 新生代员工工作价值观与员工建言行为的关系研究. 天津商业大学学报, 37(3), 63-68. |
[22] | Burris, E., Rockmann, K., & Kim, Y. (2017). The value of voice to managers: Employee identification and the content of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2099-2125. |
[23] | Chen, S. Y., & Hou, Y. H. (2016). The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination. Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 1-13. |
[24] | Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self- determination research. Rochester, Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press. |
[25] | Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884. |
[26] | Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461-488. |
[27] | Dierendonck, D. V., & Nuijten, I. (2011). The servant leadership survey: Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Business & Psychology, 26(3), 249-267. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1URLpmid: 21949466 |
[28] | Duan, J., Kwan, H. K., & Ling, B. (2014). The role of voice efficacy in the formation of voice behaviour: A cross-level examination. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(4), 526-543. |
[29] | Facione, P. A.(1990). The Delphi report.Critical thinking:A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press. |
[30] | Facione, P. A.(2011).Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press. |
[31] | Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. (1997). Professional judgement and the disposition toward critical thinking. Millbrae,CA: The California Academic Press. |
[32] | Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual- level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715-729. |
[33] | Flynn, L. R., & Pearcy, D. (2001). Four subtle sins in scale development: Some suggestions for strengthening the current paradigm. International Journal of Market Research, 43(4), 1-14. |
[34] | Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. |
[35] | Frazier, M. L., & Bowler, W. M. (2015). Voice climate, supervisor undermining, and work outcomes: A group- level examination. Journal of Management, 41(3), 841-863. |
[36] | Frazier, M. L., & Fainshmidt, S. (2012). Voice climate, work outcomes, and the mediating role of psychological empowerment: A multilevel examination. Group & Organization Management: An International Journal, 37(6), 691-715. |
[37] | Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967-988. |
[38] | Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104-121. |
[39] | Hirschman, A. O.(1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. |
[40] | Hsiung, H. H. (2012). Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior: A multi-level psychological process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 349-361. |
[41] | Jiang, J., Gao, A., & Yang, B. (2018). Employees’ critical thinking, leaders’ inspirational motivation and voice behavior: The mediating role of voice efficacy. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17(1), 33-41. |
[42] | Jiang, J., & Yang, B. (2015). Roles of creative process engagement and leader-member exchange in critical thinking and employee creativity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(7), 1217-1232. |
[43] | Joreskog, K. G., Sorbom, D., & Jhoreskog, K. G. (1989). LISREL 7 user’s reference guide. Scientific Software Mooresville, IN. |
[44] | Kish-Gephart, J. J., Detert, J. R., Trevi?o, L. K., & Edmondson, A. C. (2009). Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 163-193. |
[45] | Lam, C. F., & Mayer, D. M. (2014). When do employees speak up for their customers? A model of voice in a customer service context. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 637-666. |
[46] | Lepine, J. A., & van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology,86 (2), 326-336. URLpmid: 11393444 |
[47] | Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92. |
[48] | Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189-202. |
[49] | Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 87-112. URLpmid: 24041119 |
[50] | Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Procedia, 1(1), 173-197. |
[51] | Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extra role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403-419. |
[52] | Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183-191. doi: 10.1037/a0020744URLpmid: 20718517 |
[53] | Raub, S., & Robert, C. (2013). Empowerment, organizational commitment, and voice behavior in the hospitality industry: Evidence from a multinational sample. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(2), 136-148. |
[54] | Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. |
[55] | Tangirala, S., Kamdar, D., Venkataramani, V., & Parke, M. R. (2013). Doing right versus getting ahead: The effects of duty and achievement orientations on employees’ voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1040-1050. URLpmid: 23915430 |
[56] | van Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392. |
[57] | van, Dyne, L., V., & Lepine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119. |
[58] | Whiting, S. W., Maynes, T. D., Podsakoff, N. P., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 159-182. doi: 10.1037/a0024871URLpmid: 21842973 |
[59] | Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Pierce, J. R. (2008). Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 125-139. URLpmid: 18211140 |
[60] | Xu, E., Huang, X., Ouyang, K., Liu, W., & Hu, S. (2019). Tactics of speaking up: The roles of issue importance, perceived managerial openness, and managers' positive mood. Human Resource Management, 1-15. |
[61] | Yanchar, S. C., Slife, B. D., & Warne, R. (2008). Critical thinking as disciplinary practice. Review of General Psychology, 12(3), 265-281. |
[62] | Zhang, Y., Huai, M. Y., & Xie, Y. H. (2015). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: A dual process model. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 25-36. |
相关文章 13
[1] | 胥彦, 李超平. 人口统计学特征对公共服务动机有什么影响?来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1631-1649. |
[2] | 李方君, 王舒曼, 李爱梅, 李斌. 群体信息加工视角下团队建言有效性及作用机制:建言数量与质量的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(6): 965-974. |
[3] | 许 晟. 调节焦点视角员工追随选择分化: 前因与后果的影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 400-410. |
[4] | 侯玉波. 批判性思维对中国人创新观念与行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(5): 723-730. |
[5] | 吴如燕, 夏宝妹, 王薇, 徐桂华, 陈 刚. 围产期抑郁引发代际性抑郁障碍及机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(12): 2082-2088. |
[6] | 刘啸莳, 曹中平, 李丹. 自传体记忆的开端:最早记忆的诱发与评估[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(10): 1713-1725. |
[7] | 李斌;马红宇;李爱梅;凌文辁. 怀旧的触发、研究范式及测量[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(7): 1289-1298. |
[8] | 付美云;马华维;乐国安. 职场欺负的旁观者:角色、行为与影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(6): 987-994. |
[9] | 袁鸣;邓铸;季培. 儿童社会认识论:儿童对信息提供者的选择性信任[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(3): 480-486. |
[10] | 商冲晨;莫书亮. 家庭微系统对幼儿心理理论的影响:因素、过程和机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(6): 914-923. |
[11] | 仲理峰;周霓裳;董翔;宋广文. 领导-部属交换对领导和部属工作结果的双向影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(5): 1041-1050. |
[12] | 林澜;莫长炜. 心理契约对组织公民行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2008, 16(5): 779-788. |
[13] | 陈永胜;牟丽霞. 西方社区感研究的现状与趋势[J]. 心理科学进展, 2007, 15(1): 169-173. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5104