中文阅读中副中央凹预加工的范围与程度

删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

张慢慢(

), 臧传丽(

), 白学军

教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津师范大学心理学部, 国民心理健康评估与促进协同创新中心, 天津 300387

收稿日期:2019-04-24出版日期:2020-06-15发布日期:2020-04-22
通讯作者:张慢慢,臧传丽E-mail:zhangmanman289@126.com;zangchuanli@163.com

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目(31800920)

The spatial extent and depth of parafoveal pre-processing during Chinese reading

ZHANG Manman(

), ZANG Chuanli(

), BAI Xuejun

Center of Collaborative Innovation for Assessment and Promotion of Mental Health, Tianjin 300387, China

Received:2019-04-24Online:2020-06-15Published:2020-04-22
Contact:ZHANG Manman,ZANG Chuanli E-mail:zhangmanman289@126.com;zangchuanli@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在阅读中, 读者既能加工当前注视的中央凹视觉区的信息, 也能从副中央凹视觉区提取信息并利用该信息预先加工下文词汇, 称为预加工或预视。它是熟练阅读的一个关键环节。对副中央凹信息的预加工涉及预视的空间范围和预视程度(即预视量和预视类型)。在拼音文字阅读的研究中, 关于预视范围与预视程度如何受中央凹加工负荷和副中央凹预加工负荷的调节存在争议, 一个主要的原因是拼音文字词长变异大, 在考察预视程度时难以克服预视范围的干扰。而中文词长变化小, 能有效分离预视范围与预视程度。利用中文优势, 采用眼动技术来考察:(1)副中央凹预加工负荷如何影响预视范围, (2)中央凹加工负荷如何影响预视范围与预视程度, (3)阅读能力与阅读效率如何调节预视范围与预视程度, 结果将有助于解决副中央凹预视研究中的理论争论, 为预测阅读能力与衡量阅读效率提供更多有效的眼动行为指标。

图/表 3

图1不同视觉区在阅读文本中的分布示意图注:假设一个汉字所占视角为1°, 在“使用”上的圆点表示眼睛的注视位置, 文字颜色深浅表示视敏度下降造成的文本视觉成像模糊; 阅读知觉广度反映了注意系统的分布, 不等同于视觉区分布; 下划线内容表示中文阅读知觉广度的范围, 本研究关注注视点右侧副中央凹视觉区的预视情况。

图2E-Z读者模型的词汇加工进程简略图注:L1是熟悉性验证, L2是词汇通达, 二者共同代表了当前词n的词汇识别过程; P表示进行下一次眼跳计划, 启动了对词n+1的眼动程序M1, M1是可变的, 之后进入不可变眼动程序M2; S是执行眼跳; A代表注意, 在L2完成后立即转移到词n+1上, 对词n+1进行预加工。

图3SWIFT模型假设的动态注意空间分布示意图注:图中显示了一般情况下与中央凹负荷最大情况下注意的两种分布, σL表示注视点左侧的词汇加工效率, σR表示注视点右侧词汇加工效率。资料来源:Engbert & Kliegl, 2011

参考文献 91

[1]	白学军, 刘娟, 臧传丽, 张慢慢, 郭晓峰, 闫国利 . (2011). 中文阅读过程中的副中央凹预视效应. 心理科学进展, 19(12), 1721-1729.
[2]	白学军, 刘丽萍, 闫国利 . (2008). 阅读句子过程中词跳读的眼动研究. 心理科学, 31(5), 1045-1048.
[3]	白学军, 孟红霞, 王敬欣, 田静, 臧传丽, 闫国利 . (2011). 阅读障碍儿童与其年龄和能力匹配儿童阅读空格文本的注视位置效应. 心理学报, 43(8), 851-862.
[4]	李玉刚, 黄忍, 滑慧敏, 李兴珊 . (2017). 阅读中的眼跳目标选择问题. 心理科学进展, 25(3), 404-412.
[5]	梁菲菲, 王永胜, 杨文, 白学军 . (2017). 阅读水平调节儿童阅读眼动注视模式的发展: 基于 9~11岁儿童的证据. 心理学报, 49(4), 450-459.
[6]	刘敏, 李赛男, 刘妮娜, 王正光, 闫国利 . (2019). 2~5年级小学生汉字识别中预视效应的发展研究. 心理发展与教育, 35(4), 447-457.
[7]	沈德立, 白学军, 臧传丽, 闫国利, 冯本才, 范晓红 . (2010). 词切分对初***句子阅读影响的眼动研究. 心理学报*, 42(2), 159-172.
[8]	王永胜, 白学军, 臧传丽, 高晓雷, 郭志英, 闫国利 . (2016). 副中央凹中字N+2的预视对汉语阅读眼跳目标选择影响的眼动研究. 心理学报, 48(1), 1-11. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00001 URL
[9]	王永胜, 陈茗静, 赵冰洁, 李馨, 白宇鸽 . (2017). 副中央凹中字N+1与字N+2在眼跳目标选择中的作用. 心理与行为研究, 15(6), 756-765.
[10]	王永胜, 赵冰洁, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军 . (2018). 中央凹加工负荷与副中央凹信息在汉语阅读眼跳目标选择中的作用. 心理学报, 50(12), 1336-1345.
[11]	熊建萍, 闫国利, 白学军 . (2009). 不同年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理科学, 32(3), 584-587.
[12]	闫国利, 伏干, 白学军 . (2008). 不同难度阅读材料对阅读知觉广度影响的眼动研究. 心理科学, 31(6), 1287-1290.
[13]	闫国利, 李赛男, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 王丽红 . (2018). 小学二年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理科学, 41(4), 849-855.
[14]	闫国利, 王丽红, 巫金根, 白学军 . (2011). 不同年级学生阅读知觉广度及预视效益的眼动研究. 心理学报, 43(3), 249-263.
[15]	臧传丽, 鹿子佳, 白玉, 张慢慢 . (2018). 阅读过程中的词跳读及其产生的认知机制. 心理与行为研究, 16(4), 477-483.
[16]	臧传丽, 鹿子佳, 张志超 . (2019). 语义和句法信息在副中央凹加工中的作用. 心理科学进展, 27(1), 11-19.
[17]	臧传丽, 张慢慢, 郭晓峰, 刘娟, 闫国利, 白学军 . (2012). 中文词汇加工的若干效应: 基于眼动研究的证据. 心理科学进展, 20(9), 1382-1392.
[18]	Angele, B., Laishley, A. E., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P . (2014). The effect of high- and low-frequency previews and sentential fit on word skipping during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 1181-1203.
[19]	Ashby, J., Yang, J., Evans, K. H. C., & Rayner, K . (2012). Eye movements and the perceptual span in silent and oral reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(4), 634-640.
[20]	Blythe, H. I., & Joseph, H. S. S. L . (2011) . Children's eye movements during reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 643-662). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
[21]	Brysbaert, M., Drieghe, D., & Vitu, F . (2005) . Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading In G Underwood (Ed), Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp 53-77). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
[22]	Chace, K. H., Rayner, K., & Well, A. D . (2005). Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: Effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(3), 209-217.
[23]	Chen, H. C., & Tang, C. K . (1998). The effective visual field in reading Chinese. Reading and Writing, 10, 245-254.
[24]	Clifton, C., Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Inhoff, A. W., Liversedge, S. P., Reichle, E. D., & Schotter, E. R . (2016). Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner’s 40 year legacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 1-19.
[25]	Drieghe, D . (2008). Foveal processing and word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 856-860.
[26]	Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A . (2005). Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 954-969.
[27]	Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R . (2011) . Parallel graded attention models of reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp.787-800). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
[28]	Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R . (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777-813.
[29]	Häikiö, T., Bertram, R., Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P . (2009). Development of the letter identity span in reading: Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(2), 167-181.
[30]	Hawelka, S., Schuster, S., Gagl, B., & Hutzler, F . (2015). On forward inferences of fast and slow readers. An eye movement study. Scientific Reports, 5, 8432.
[31]	Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F . (1990). Effects of foveal processing difﬁculty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16 (3), 417-429.
[32]	Huestegge, L., Radach, R., Corbic, D., & Huestegge, S. M . (2009). Oculomotor and linguistic determinants of reading development: A longitudinal study. Vision Research, 49(24), 2948-2959.
[33]	Hyönä, J . (1995). Do irregular letter combinations attract readers' attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 68-81.
[34]	Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Eiter, B. M., & Juhasz, B . (2003). Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 56(5), 803-827.
[35]	Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K . (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(6), 431-439.
[36]	Juhasz, B. J., White, S. J., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K . (2008). Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1560-1579.
[37]	Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C . (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 68-81. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.68 URL
[38]	Kliegl, R., Hohenstein, S., Yan, M., & McDonald, S. A . (2013). How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 581-600. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.658073 URL
[39]	Li, X. S., Bicknell, K., Liu, P. P., Wei, W., & Rayner, K . (2014). Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems: A systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 895-913.
[40]	Li, X. S., Zang, C. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Pollatsek, A . (2015) . The role of words in Chinese reading. In Pollatsek, A., & Treiman, R. (Eds), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 232-244). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
[41]	Liu, W. M., Inhoff, A. W., Ye, Y., & Wu, C. L . (2002). Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1213-1227.
[42]	Liu, Y. P., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. S . (2015). Parafoveal processing affects outgoing saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1229-1236.
[43]	Liu, Y. P., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. S . (2016). The effect of word frequency and parafoveal preview on saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(7), 1008-1025.
[44]	Liu, Y. P., Yu, L., & Reichle, E. D . (2019). The dynamic adjustment of saccades during Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements and simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(3), 535-543.
[45]	Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. L., Zhang, M. M., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Drieghe, D . (2014). The effect of visual complexity and word frequency on eye movements during Chinese reading. Visual Cognition, 22(3-4), 441-457.
[46]	Marx, C., Hawelka, S., Schuster, S., & Hutzler, F . (2017). Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers. Scientific Reports, 7, 41602.
[47]	McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K . (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17(6), 578-586.
[48]	McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K . (1976). Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8(5), 365-368.
[49]	McDonald, S. A . (2005). Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is not cumulative across multiple saccades. Vision Research, 45(14), 1829-1834.
[50]	McGowan, V. A., & Reichle, E. D . (2018). The “risky” reading strategy revisited: New simulations using E-Z Reader. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 179-189.
[51]	Miellet, S., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C . (2009). Parafoveal magnification: Visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science, 20(6), 721-728.
[52]	Pollatsek, A., Tan, L. H., & Rayner, K . (2000). The role of phonological codes in integrating information across saccadic eye movements in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 607-633.
[53]	Rayner, K . (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65-81.
[54]	Rayner, K . (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41(2), 211-236.
[55]	Rayner, K . (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
[56]	Rayner, K . (2009). The Thirty-fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457-1506.
[57]	Rayner, K., & Bertera, J. H . (1979). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206(4417), 468-469. doi: 10.1126/science.504987 URL
[58]	Rayner, K., Castelhano, M. S., & Yang, J. M . (2009). Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 24(3), 755-760.
[59]	Rayner, K., Inhoff, A. W., Morrison, R. E., Slowiaczek, M. L., & Bertera, J. H . (1981). Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(1), 167-179.
[60]	Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., Masson, M. E. J., Potter, M. C., & Treiman, R . (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help?. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4-34.
[61]	Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., & Bélanger, N. N . (2010). Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 834-839.
[62]	Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P . (2011). Eye movements and word skipping during reading: effects of word length and predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(2), 514-528.
[63]	Reichle, E. D. (2011). Serial-attention models of reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp.767-786). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
[64]	Reichle, E. D., & Drieghe, D . (2013). Using E-Z reader to examine word skipping during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39(4), 1311-1320.
[65]	Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Drieghe, D., Blythe, H. I., Joseph, H. S. S. L., White, S. J., & Rayner, K . (2013). Using E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill. Developmental Review, 33(2), 110-149.
[66]	Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K . (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125-157.
[67]	Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H . (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65(2), 177-206.
[68]	Risse, S . (2014). Effects of visual span on reading speed and parafoveal processing in eye movements during sentence reading. Journal of Vision, 14(8), 1-13.
[69]	Risse, S., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R . (2008). Eye-movement control in reading: Experimental and corpus-analysis challenges for a computational model. In K. Rayner, D. Shen, X. Bai, & G. Yan (Eds.), Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements (p. 68). Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House.
[70]	Schad, D. J., & Engbert, R . (2012). The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model. Visual Cognition, 20(4-5), 391-421. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2012.670143 URL
[71]	Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K . (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5-35.
[72]	Schotter, E. R., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K . (2014). Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial-attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and N+2 preview effects. Visual Cognition, 22 (3-4), 309-333.
[73]	Schroyens, W., Vitu, F., Brysbaert, M., & d'Ydewalle, G . (1999). Eye movement control during reading: Foveal load and parafoveal processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 52(4), 1021-1046.
[74]	Sereno, S. C., Hand, C. J., Shahid, A., Yao, B., & O’Donnell, P. J . (2018). Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 302-313.
[75]	Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Yen, N.-S . (2004). Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences. Brain and Language, 91(2), 235-244.
[76]	Vasilev, M. R., & Angele, B . (2017). Parafoveal preview effects from word N+1 and word N+2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(3), 666-689.
[77]	Veldre, A., & Andrews, S . (2014). Lexical quality and eye movements: Individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(4), 703-727.
[78]	Veldre, A., & Andrews, S . (2015). Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers’ lexical representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 219-232.
[79]	Veldre, A., & Andrews, S . (2018). How does foveal processing difficulty affect parafoveal processing during reading? Journal of Memory and Language, 103, 74-90.
[80]	White, S. J . (2007). Foveal load and parafoveal processing: The case of word skipping. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain( pp. 409-424). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
[81]	White, S. J., & Liversedge, S. P . (2006). Foveal processing difficulty does not modulate non-foveal orthographic influences on fixation positions. Vision Research, 46(3), 426-437.
[82]	White, S. J., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P . (2005). Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 891-896.
[83]	Yan, M . (2015). Visually complex foveal words increase the amount of parafoveal information acquired. Vision Research, 111, 91-96.
[84]	Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J., & Zhou, X. L . (2010). Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1669-1676.
[85]	Yang, J., Rayner, K., Li, N., & Wang, S . (2012). Is preview benefit from word n+2 a common effect in reading Chinese? Evidence from eye movements. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1079-1091.
[86]	Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Rayner, K . (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n+2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(4), 1192-1204.
[87]	Yen, M.-H., Tsai, J.-L., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hung, D. L . (2008). Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese. Memory and Cognition, 36(5), 1033-1045.
[88]	Zang, C., Du, H., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2019). Word skipping in Chinese reading: The role of high-frequency preview and syntactic felicity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000738.
[89]	Zang, C., Fu, Y., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P . (2018). Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(12), 1831-1841.
[90]	Zang, C., Liversedge, S. P., Bai, X., & Yan, G . (2011) . Eye movements during Chinese reading. In S.P. Liversedge, I.D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling. (Eds). The Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 961-978). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
[91]	Zhang, M., Liversedge, S. P., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Zang, C . (2019). The influence of foveal lexical processing load on parafoveal preview and saccadic targeting during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(6), 812-825. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000644 URL