反馈间隔影响反馈加工：整合行为和电生理研究的视角

删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

万楠, 朱树青, 贾世伟(

)

山东师范大学心理学院, 济南 250358

收稿日期:2018-12-03出版日期:2020-02-15发布日期:2019-12-25
通讯作者:贾世伟E-mail:jiashiwei82@126.com

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金青年项目(NSFC31200784)

The effect of feedback interval on feedback processing: A perspective of integrating behavioral and electrophysiological researches

WAN Nan, ZHU Shuqing, JIA Shiwei(

)

School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China

Received:2018-12-03Online:2020-02-15Published:2019-12-25
Contact:JIA Shiwei E-mail:jiashiwei82@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 反馈在现实生活中扮演着重要角色, 通过反馈信息进行学习是人类获取知识和技能的有效手段。反馈间隔是指个体行为发生到反馈刺激呈现之间的时间间隔。在反馈加工过程中, 反馈间隔是一个重要影响因素, 但反馈间隔影响反馈加工的研究结果不一。对反馈间隔影响反馈加工的行为和电生理研究分别做了介绍, 对结果出现差异的原因进行了分析。未来的研究应考虑结合行为研究与电生理研究, 并统一反馈间隔的操作定义。

参考文献 51

[1]	冯霞, 冯文锋, 冯成志 . ( 2018). 反馈类型和反馈时间对动作技能获得的影响. 心理科学, 41( 3), 533-539.
[2]	金亚虹, 章建成, 孙耀华, 任杰 . ( 2001). 延迟结果反馈对追踪任务技能学习的影响. 心理科学, 24( 6), 739-740.
[3]	刘志雅, 莫雷, 张娟 . ( 2007). 基于规则的类别学习和信息整合的类别学习. 心理科学, 30( 6), 1429-1432.
[4]	孙海龙, 邢强 . ( 2014). 反馈对知觉类别学习的影响及其认知神经生理机制. 心理科学进展, 22( 1), 67-74.
[5]	邢强, 王家慰, 黄秀青 . ( 2018). 反馈时间、反馈类型和掩蔽类型对概率类别学习的影响. 心理学探新, 38( 5), 26-32.
[6]	张奇, 刘万伦 . ( 2007). 类别学习多重系统理论的研究与展望. 心理科学进展, 15( 1), 78-87.
[7]	Arbel, Y., Hong, L., Baker, T. E., & Holroyd, C. B . ( 2017). It's all about timing: An electrophysiological examination of feedback-based learning with immediate and delayed feedback. Neuropsychologia, 99, 179-186.
[8]	Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M . ( 1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105( 3), 442-481.
[9]	Ashby, F. G., Queller, S., & Berretty, P. M . ( 1999). On the dominance of unidimensional rules in unsupervised categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61( 6), 1178-99.
[10]	Bourne, L. E . ( 1957). Effects of delay of information feedback and task complexity on the identification of concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54( 3), 201-207.
[11]	Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L . ( 2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13( 4), 273-281.
[12]	Carpenter, S. K., & Vul, E . ( 2011). Delaying feedback by three seconds benefits retention of face-name pairs: The role of active anticipatory processing. Memory & Cognition, 39( 7), 1211-1221.
[13]	Davachi, L . ( 2006). Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16( 6), 693-700.
[14]	Dickerson, K. C., & Delgado, M. R . ( 2015). Contributions of the hippocampus to feedback learning. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15( 4), 861-877.
[15]	Ferdinand, N. K., Mecklinger, A., Kray, J., & Gehring, W. J . ( 2012). The processing of unexpected positive response outcomes in the mediofrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 32( 35), 12087-12092.
[16]	Foerde, K., Race, E., Verfaellie, M., & Shohamy, D . ( 2013). A role for the medial temporal lobe in feedback-driven learning: Evidence from amnesia. Journal of Neuroscience, 33( 13), 5698-5704.
[17]	Foerde, K., & Shohamy, D . ( 2011). Feedback timing modulates brain systems for learning in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 31( 37), 13157-13167.
[18]	Gabrieli, J. D . ( 1998). Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49( 49), 87-115.
[19]	Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R . ( 2002). The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295( 5563), 2279-2282.
[20]	Guthrie, J. T . ( 1971). Feedback and sentence learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10( 1), 23-28.
[21]	Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Holroyd, C. B., & Simons, R. F . ( 2006). The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biological Psychology, 71( 2), 148-154.
[22]	Holroyd, C. B., Krigolson, O. E., Baker, R., Lee, S., & Gibson, J . ( 2009). When is an error not a prediction error? An electrophysiological investigation. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9( 1), 59-70.
[23]	Kim, S., & Arbel, Y . ( 2019). Immediate and delayed auditory feedback in declarative learning: An examination of the feedback related event related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 129, 255-262.
[24]	Kulhavy, R. W . ( 1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47( 2), 211-232.
[25]	Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A . ( 1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1( 4), 279-308.
[26]	Lee, T. D., Swinnen, S. P., & Serrien, D. J . ( 1994). Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest, 46( 3), 328-344.
[27]	Luft, C. D . ( 2014). Learning from feedback: The neural mechanisms of feedback processing facilitating better performance . Behavioural Brain Research, 261( 6), 356-368.
[28]	Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G . ( 2004). Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning. Behavioral Processes, 66( 3), 309-332.
[29]	Maddox, W. T., Ashby, F. G., & Bohil, C. J . ( 2003). Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29( 4), 650-662.
[30]	Miltner, W. H., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G . ( 1997). Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a ‘‘generic’’ neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 788-798.
[31]	Mory, E. H . ( 2004). Feedback research revisited. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
[32]	Mullaney, K. M., Carpenter, S. K., Grotenhuis, C., & Burianek, S . ( 2014). Waiting for feedback helps if you want to know the answer: The role of curiosity in the delay-of-feedback benefit. Memory & Cognition, 42( 8), 1273-1284.
[33]	Oliveira, F. T., Mcdonald, J. J., & Goodman, D . ( 2007). Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate is not all error related: Expectancy deviation and the representation of action-outcome associations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1994-2004.
[34]	Opitz, B., Ferdinand, N. K., & Mecklinger, A . ( 2011). Timing matters: The impact of immediate and delayed feedback on artificial language learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 8.
[35]	Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D . ( 2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31( 1), 3-8.
[36]	Peterburs, J., Kobza, S., & Bellebaum, C . ( 2016). Feedback delay gradually affects amplitude and valence specificity of the feedback-related negativity (FRN). Psychophysiology, 53( 2), 209-215.
[37]	Proudfit, G. H . ( 2015). The reward positivity: From basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression. Psychophysiology, 52( 4), 449-459.
[38]	Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B . ( 1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95( 3), 355-386.
[39]	Saltzman, I. J . ( 1951). Delay of reward and human verbal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41( 6), 437-439.
[40]	Sambrook, T. D., & Goslin, J . ( 2015). A neural reward prediction error revealed by a meta-analysis of ERPs using great grand averages. Psychological Bulletin, 141( 1), 213-235.
[41]	Sinha, N., & Glass, A. L . ( 2015). Delayed, but not immediate, feedback after multiple-choice questions increases performance on a subsequent short-answer, but not multiple-choice, exam: Evidence for the dual-process theory of memory. The Journal of General Psychology, 142( 2), 118-134.
[42]	Smith, T. A . ( 2007). Spacing and the delay-retention effect: An alternative explanation of the effects of feedback timing on semantic learning (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Texas at Arlington.
[43]	Smith, T. A., & Kimball, D. R . ( 2010). Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36( 1), 80-95.
[44]	Staresina, B. P., & Davachi, L . ( 2009). Mind the gap: Binding experiences across space and time in the human hippocampus. Neuron, 63( 2), 267-276.
[45]	Walsh, M. M., & Anderson, J. R . ( 2012). Learning from experience: Event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36( 8), 1870-1884.
[46]	Wang, J., Chen, J., Lei, Y., & Li, P . ( 2014). P300, not feedback error-related negativity, manifests the waiting cost of receiving reward information. Neuroreport, 25( 13), 1044-1048.
[47]	Weinberg, A., Luhmann, C. C., Bress, J. N., & Hajcak, G . ( 2012). Better late than never? The effect of feedback delay on ERP indices of reward processing. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12( 4), 671-677.
[48]	Weismuller, B., & Bellebaum, C . ( 2016). Expectancy affects the feedback-related negativity (FRN) for delayed feedback in probabilistic learning. Psychophysiology, 53( 11), 1739-1750.
[49]	Worthy, D. A., Markman, A. B., & Maddox, W. T . ( 2013). Feedback and stimulus-offset timing effects in perceptual category learning. Brain and Cognition, 81( 2), 283-293.
[50]	Zhang, X., Lei, Y., Yin, H., Li, P., & Li, H . ( 2018). Slow is also fast: Feedback delay affects anxiety and outcome evaluation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 20.
[51]	Yin, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., & Li, P . ( 2018). Feedback delay impaired reinforcement learning: Principal components analysis of reward positivity. Neuroscience Letters, 685, 179-184.