
1 中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室, 北京 100101
2 中国科学院心理研究所脑与认知科学 国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
3 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
收稿日期:
2018-04-25出版日期:
2019-10-31发布日期:
2019-09-23通讯作者:
祝卓宏E-mail:zhuzh@psych.ac.cn基金资助:
* 中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2016M601156);北京尚善基金会“抑路前行”公益项目PEAK relational training system for children with autism: A novel application based on relational frame theory
BAI Xiaoyu1,2, Tawanda S. Mutusva2,3, ZHU Zhuohong1,2(
1 Laboratory of Mental Health and Behavior Genetics, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2 State Key Laboratory of Brain & Cognitive Science, Beijing 100101, China;
3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Received:
2018-04-25Online:
2019-10-31Published:
2019-09-23Contact:
ZHU Zhuohong E-mail:zhuzh@psych.ac.cn摘要/Abstract
摘要: PEAK (Promoting the Emergence of Advanced Knowledge, 促进高阶知识涌现)关系训练系统是全球首个同时整合了斯金纳的《言语行为》和后斯金纳主义的“关系框架理论”, 促进孤独症谱系障碍(Autism spectrum disorders, ASD)患者的语言、学习、社交等核心技能发展的语言行为评估训练系统。截至2018年底, PEAK关系训练系统由以下4个模块组成:直接训练模块、泛化模块、等价关系模块、功能转化模块。每一模块依据难易程度分别设置了184个目标能力的评估方法及训练课程。已发表的多项实证研究表明, PEAK关系训练系统打破了《语言行为里程碑评估及安置程序》(Verbal Behavior Milestones and Placement Program, VB-MAPP) 对ASD患者进行里程碑评估时出现的“天花板效应”, 有望比VB-MAPP提供更全面、高阶的语言行为评估体系。此外, PEAK关系训练系统表现出的评估工具的信效度良好、多项效果研究显著、实践中易操作等特性, 使其不仅适用于专业人员教学, 未来在ASD患者家庭干预模式中也有潜在的应用价值。
图/表 1

图1PEAK关系训练系统模块框架图

参考文献 26
1 | 茅荣杰, 汪作为, 杜亚松 . ( 2017). 孤独症语言障碍干预策略研究进展. 临床精神医学杂志, 27( 3), 210-212. |
2 | 牛瑞花, 徐胜 . ( 2016). 语言行为方法在自闭症儿童干预中应用研究综述. 绥化学院学报, ( 4), 69-72. |
3 | 王分分, 祝卓宏 . ( 2017). 言语行为的关系框架理论视角:孤独症谱系障碍的新探索. 心理科学进展, 25( 8), 1321-1326. |
4 | 王淑娟, 张婍, 祝卓宏 . ( 2012). 关系框架理论:接纳与承诺治疗的理论基础(述评). 中国心理卫生杂志, 26( 11), 877-880. |
5 | 朱丽莎 . ( 2017). 学龄前儿童关系反应水平评估及训练的有效性探究. (硕士学位论文), 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京. |
6 | 桑德伯格. (2014).VB-MAPP语言行为里程碑评估及安置程序 (黄伟合,李丹译). 北京: 北京大学医学出版社. (原书出版于2008年) |
7 | Belisle J., Dixon M. R., Stanley C. R., Munoz B., & Daar J. H . ( 2016). Teaching foundational perspective-taking skills to children with autism using the PEAK-T curriculum: Single-reversal "I-You" deictic frames. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49( 4), 965-969. |
8 | Dickins D. W., Singh K. D., Roberts N., Burns P., Downes J. J., Jimmieson P., & Bentall R. P . ( 2001). An fMRI study of stimulus equivalence. Neuroreport, 12( 2), 405-411. |
9 | Dixon,M. R . ( 2016). Is PEAK hard to learn? Retrieved April 1, 2008, from https://www. peak2aba.com/faqs |
10 | Dixon M. R., Belisle J., Mckeel A., Whiting S., Speelman R., Daar J. H., & Rowsey K . ( 2017). An internal and critical review of the PEAK relational training system for children with autism and related intellectual disabilities: 2014-2017. Behavior Analyst, 40( 2), 493-521. |
11 | Dixon M. R., Belisle J., Stanley C. R., & Rowsey K . ( 2018). Student outcomes after 1 year of front line staff implementation of the PEAK curriculum. Behavioral Interventions, 33( 2), 185-195. |
12 | Dixon M. R., Belisle J., Stanley C., Rowsey K., Daar J. H., & Szekely S . ( 2015). Toward a behavior analysis of complex language for children with autism: Evaluating the relationship between PEAK and the VB-MAPP. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 27( 2), 223-233. |
13 | Dixon M. R., Carman J., Tyler P. A., Whiting S. W., Enoch M. R., & Daar J. H . ( 2014). PEAK relational training system for children with autism and developmental disabilities: Correlations with Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and assessment reliability. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 26( 5), 603-614. |
14 | Dixon M. R., Peach J., Daar J. H., & Penrod C . ( 2017). Teaching complex verbal operants to children with autism and establishing generalization using the peak curriculum. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50( 2), 317-331. |
15 | Gross,A. C., &Fox,E. J . ( 2009). Relational frame theory: An overview of the controversy. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25( 1), 87-98. |
16 | Hayes,S. C., Barnes-Holmes, &Roche . ( 2001). Relational frame theory a post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers. |
17 | McKeel A. N., Dixon M. R., Daar J. H., Rowsey K. E., & Szekely S . ( 2015). Evaluating the ef?cacy of the peak relational training system using a randomized controlled trial of children. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 230-241. |
18 | Niklas T., & Hayes. S. C ., ( 2010). Learning RFT: An introduction to relational frame theory and its application. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications. |
19 | Partington, J. . ( 2006). Assessment of basic language and learning skills-revised (The ABLLS-R). Pleasant Hill: Behavior Analysts. |
20 | Reed,D. D., &Luiselli,J. K . ( 2016). Promoting the emergence of advanced knowledge: A review of peak relational training system: Direct training module by Mark R. Dixon. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49( 1), 205-211. |
21 | Schlund M. W., Cataldo M. F., & Hoehn-Saric R . ( 2008). Neural correlates of derived relational responding on tests of stimulus equivalence. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4( 1), 6. |
22 | Simms,M. D., &Jin,X. M . ( 2015). Autism, language disorder, and social (pragmatic) communication disorder: dsm-v and differential diagnoses. Pediatrics in Review, 36( 8), 355-363. |
23 | Skinner,B. F . ( 1957). Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton Century Crofts. |
24 | Stewart I., Mcelwee J., & Ming S . ( 2013). Language generativity, response generalization, and derived relational responding. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29( 1), 137-155. |
25 | Sundberg M. L. ( 2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program (VB-MAPP). Concord: Advancements in Verbal Behavior Press. |
26 | Sundberg,M. L . ( 2008). Validity, reliability, and the use of the VB-MAPP in research. Retrieved April 7, 2008, from www.marksundberg.com/vb-mapp. htm |
相关文章 10
[1] | 王琳, 王志丹, 王泓婧. 孤独症儿童动作发展障碍的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1239-1250. |
[2] | 毕小彬, 范晓壮, 米文丽, 贺荟中. 高风险婴儿前瞻性纵向研究与孤独症谱系障碍早期识别[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 443-455. |
[3] | 荆伟, 王庭照. 双通路理论视角下孤独症谱系障碍者的视线加工障碍[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 508-521. |
[4] | 赵晓宁, 胡金生, 李松泽, 刘西, 刘琼阳, 吴娜. 基于眼动研究的孤独症谱系障碍早期预测[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(2): 301-311. |
[5] | 李涛涛, 胡金生, 王琦, 李骋诗, 李松泽, 何建青, 李辰洋, 刘淑清. 孤独症谱系障碍者的视听时间整合 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 1031-1040. |
[6] | 巨兴达, 宋伟, 徐婧. CHRM3基因与孤独症谱系障碍[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(12): 2141-2152. |
[7] | 王分分, 祝卓宏. 言语行为的关系框架理论视角: 孤独症谱系障碍的新探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(8): 1321-1326. |
[8] | 王琦;胡金生;李骋诗;李松泽. 孤独症谱系障碍者的情绪韵律识别[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(9): 1377-1390. |
[9] | 赵春晓;江光荣;林秀彬. 心理咨询中的非言语行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(8): 1257-1265. |
[10] | 李松泽; 胡金生; 李骋诗; 王琦; 刘淑清; 康晓东; 崔丽 . 孤独症谱系障碍者的视觉−空间工作记忆缺陷及脑机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(7): 1050-1064. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4861