1 中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室, 北京 100101
2 中国科学院心理研究所脑与认知科学 国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
3 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
收稿日期:
2018-04-25出版日期:
2019-10-31发布日期:
2019-09-23通讯作者:
祝卓宏E-mail:zhuzh@psych.ac.cn基金资助:
* 中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2016M601156);北京尚善基金会“抑路前行”公益项目PEAK relational training system for children with autism: A novel application based on relational frame theory
BAI Xiaoyu1,2, Tawanda S. Mutusva2,3, ZHU Zhuohong1,2()1 Laboratory of Mental Health and Behavior Genetics, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2 State Key Laboratory of Brain & Cognitive Science, Beijing 100101, China;
3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Received:
2018-04-25Online:
2019-10-31Published:
2019-09-23Contact:
ZHU Zhuohong E-mail:zhuzh@psych.ac.cn摘要/Abstract
摘要: PEAK (Promoting the Emergence of Advanced Knowledge, 促进高阶知识涌现)关系训练系统是全球首个同时整合了斯金纳的《言语行为》和后斯金纳主义的“关系框架理论”, 促进孤独症谱系障碍(Autism spectrum disorders, ASD)患者的语言、学习、社交等核心技能发展的语言行为评估训练系统。截至2018年底, PEAK关系训练系统由以下4个模块组成:直接训练模块、泛化模块、等价关系模块、功能转化模块。每一模块依据难易程度分别设置了184个目标能力的评估方法及训练课程。已发表的多项实证研究表明, PEAK关系训练系统打破了《语言行为里程碑评估及安置程序》(Verbal Behavior Milestones and Placement Program, VB-MAPP) 对ASD患者进行里程碑评估时出现的“天花板效应”, 有望比VB-MAPP提供更全面、高阶的语言行为评估体系。此外, PEAK关系训练系统表现出的评估工具的信效度良好、多项效果研究显著、实践中易操作等特性, 使其不仅适用于专业人员教学, 未来在ASD患者家庭干预模式中也有潜在的应用价值。
图/表 1
图1PEAK关系训练系统模块框架图
图1PEAK关系训练系统模块框架图
参考文献 26
1 | 茅荣杰, 汪作为, 杜亚松 . ( 2017). 孤独症语言障碍干预策略研究进展. 临床精神医学杂志, 27( 3), 210-212. |
2 | 牛瑞花, 徐胜 . ( 2016). 语言行为方法在自闭症儿童干预中应用研究综述. 绥化学院学报, ( 4), 69-72. |
3 | 王分分, 祝卓宏 . ( 2017). 言语行为的关系框架理论视角:孤独症谱系障碍的新探索. 心理科学进展, 25( 8), 1321-1326. |
4 | 王淑娟, 张婍, 祝卓宏 . ( 2012). 关系框架理论:接纳与承诺治疗的理论基础(述评). 中国心理卫生杂志, 26( 11), 877-880. |
5 | 朱丽莎 . ( 2017). 学龄前儿童关系反应水平评估及训练的有效性探究. (硕士学位论文), 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京. |
6 | 桑德伯格. (2014).VB-MAPP语言行为里程碑评估及安置程序 (黄伟合,李丹译). 北京: 北京大学医学出版社. (原书出版于2008年) |
7 | Belisle J., Dixon M. R., Stanley C. R., Munoz B., & Daar J. H . ( 2016). Teaching foundational perspective-taking skills to children with autism using the PEAK-T curriculum: Single-reversal "I-You" deictic frames. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49( 4), 965-969. |
8 | Dickins D. W., Singh K. D., Roberts N., Burns P., Downes J. J., Jimmieson P., & Bentall R. P . ( 2001). An fMRI study of stimulus equivalence. Neuroreport, 12( 2), 405-411. |
9 | Dixon,M. R . ( 2016). Is PEAK hard to learn? Retrieved April 1, 2008, from https://www. peak2aba.com/faqs |
10 | Dixon M. R., Belisle J., Mckeel A., Whiting S., Speelman R., Daar J. H., & Rowsey K . ( 2017). An internal and critical review of the PEAK relational training system for children with autism and related intellectual disabilities: 2014-2017. Behavior Analyst, 40( 2), 493-521. |
11 | Dixon M. R., Belisle J., Stanley C. R., & Rowsey K . ( 2018). Student outcomes after 1 year of front line staff implementation of the PEAK curriculum. Behavioral Interventions, 33( 2), 185-195. |
12 | Dixon M. R., Belisle J., Stanley C., Rowsey K., Daar J. H., & Szekely S . ( 2015). Toward a behavior analysis of complex language for children with autism: Evaluating the relationship between PEAK and the VB-MAPP. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 27( 2), 223-233. |
13 | Dixon M. R., Carman J., Tyler P. A., Whiting S. W., Enoch M. R., & Daar J. H . ( 2014). PEAK relational training system for children with autism and developmental disabilities: Correlations with Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and assessment reliability. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 26( 5), 603-614. |
14 | Dixon M. R., Peach J., Daar J. H., & Penrod C . ( 2017). Teaching complex verbal operants to children with autism and establishing generalization using the peak curriculum. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50( 2), 317-331. |
15 | Gross,A. C., &Fox,E. J . ( 2009). Relational frame theory: An overview of the controversy. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25( 1), 87-98. |
16 | Hayes,S. C., Barnes-Holmes, &Roche . ( 2001). Relational frame theory a post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers. |
17 | McKeel A. N., Dixon M. R., Daar J. H., Rowsey K. E., & Szekely S . ( 2015). Evaluating the ef?cacy of the peak relational training system using a randomized controlled trial of children. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 230-241. |
18 | Niklas T., & Hayes. S. C ., ( 2010). Learning RFT: An introduction to relational frame theory and its application. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications. |
19 | Partington, J. . ( 2006). Assessment of basic language and learning skills-revised (The ABLLS-R). Pleasant Hill: Behavior Analysts. |
20 | Reed,D. D., &Luiselli,J. K . ( 2016). Promoting the emergence of advanced knowledge: A review of peak relational training system: Direct training module by Mark R. Dixon. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49( 1), 205-211. |
21 | Schlund M. W., Cataldo M. F., & Hoehn-Saric R . ( 2008). Neural correlates of derived relational responding on tests of stimulus equivalence. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4( 1), 6. |
22 | Simms,M. D., &Jin,X. M . ( 2015). Autism, language disorder, and social (pragmatic) communication disorder: dsm-v and differential diagnoses. Pediatrics in Review, 36( 8), 355-363. |
23 | Skinner,B. F . ( 1957). Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton Century Crofts. |
24 | Stewart I., Mcelwee J., & Ming S . ( 2013). Language generativity, response generalization, and derived relational responding. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29( 1), 137-155. |
25 | Sundberg M. L. ( 2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program (VB-MAPP). Concord: Advancements in Verbal Behavior Press. |
26 | Sundberg,M. L . ( 2008). Validity, reliability, and the use of the VB-MAPP in research. Retrieved April 7, 2008, from www.marksundberg.com/vb-mapp. htm |
相关文章 10
[1] | 王琳, 王志丹, 王泓婧. 孤独症儿童动作发展障碍的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1239-1250. |
[2] | 毕小彬, 范晓壮, 米文丽, 贺荟中. 高风险婴儿前瞻性纵向研究与孤独症谱系障碍早期识别[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 443-455. |
[3] | 荆伟, 王庭照. 双通路理论视角下孤独症谱系障碍者的视线加工障碍[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 508-521. |
[4] | 赵晓宁, 胡金生, 李松泽, 刘西, 刘琼阳, 吴娜. 基于眼动研究的孤独症谱系障碍早期预测[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(2): 301-311. |
[5] | 李涛涛, 胡金生, 王琦, 李骋诗, 李松泽, 何建青, 李辰洋, 刘淑清. 孤独症谱系障碍者的视听时间整合 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 1031-1040. |
[6] | 巨兴达, 宋伟, 徐婧. CHRM3基因与孤独症谱系障碍[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(12): 2141-2152. |
[7] | 王分分, 祝卓宏. 言语行为的关系框架理论视角: 孤独症谱系障碍的新探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(8): 1321-1326. |
[8] | 王琦;胡金生;李骋诗;李松泽. 孤独症谱系障碍者的情绪韵律识别[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(9): 1377-1390. |
[9] | 赵春晓;江光荣;林秀彬. 心理咨询中的非言语行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(8): 1257-1265. |
[10] | 李松泽; 胡金生; 李骋诗; 王琦; 刘淑清; 康晓东; 崔丽 . 孤独症谱系障碍者的视觉−空间工作记忆缺陷及脑机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(7): 1050-1064. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4861