| [1] | 陈丽君, 江洁, 任志洪, 袁宏 . ( 2017). “阳刚”还是“清秀”更具吸引力?——对男性面孔二态性不同偏好的元分析. 心理科学进展, 25( 4), 553-569. | | [2] | 陈瑞, 郑毓煌 . ( 2015). 进化的女性生理周期: 波动的繁衍动机和行为表现. 心理科学进展, 23( 5), 836-848. | | [3] | 蒋柯, 熊哲宏 . ( 2010). 进化心理学的理论建构策略——兼评D•M•巴斯的《进化心理学: 心理的新科学》. 心理科学, 33( 3), 758-760. | | [4] | 寇慧, 苏艳华, 张妍, 孔繁昌, 胡媛艳, 王洋, 陈红 . ( 2013). 面孔吸引力的影响因素: 观察者假设. 心理科学进展, 21( 12), 2144-2153. | | [5] | 温芳芳 . ( 2016). 男性化与女性化: 面孔吸引力研究. 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社. | | [6] | 徐华伟 . ( 2016). 自欺欺人的美丽:美颜处理对面孔吸引力判断的影响(硕士学位论文). 山东: 曲阜师范大学. | | [7] | 徐华伟, 牛盾, 李倩 . ( 2016). 面孔吸引力和配偶价值: 进化心理学视角. 心理科学进展, 24( 7), 1130-1138. | | [8] | 杨红玲, 何佳, 刘耀中 . ( 2016). 心理学视野下的面孔宽长比研究. 心理科学, 39( 3), 707-713. | | [9] | 张秋丽, 孙青青, 郑涌 . ( 2015). 婚恋关系中的相似性匹配及争议. 心理科学, 38( 3), 748-756. | | [10] | 张妍, 孔繁昌, 陈红, 向燕辉, 高笑, 陈敏燕 . ( 2010). 男性对女性面孔吸引力的认知偏好: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 42( 11), 1060-1072. | | [11] | 郑治国, 俞宗火, 廖华, 刘建平 . ( 2017). 能以貌取人吗? 面孔宽高比研究述评. 心理科学, 40( 5), 1235-1241. | | [12] | Agthe M., Spörrle M., & Maner J. K . ( 2010). Don't hate me because I'm beautiful: Anti-attractiveness bias in organizational evaluation and decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46( 6), 1151-1154. | | [13] | Agthe M., Spörrle M., & Maner J. K . ( 2011). Does being attractive always help? Positive and negative effects of attractiveness on social decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37( 8), 1042-1054. | | [14] | Agthe M., Strobel M., Spörrle M., Pfundmair M., & Maner J. K . ( 2016). On the borders of harmful and helpful beauty biases: The biasing effects of physical attractiveness depend on sex and ethnicity. Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 1474704916653968. | | [15] | Baker, R. ( 2016). Human sperm competition. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York: Springer. | | [16] | Barbaro N., Pham M. N., & Shackelford T. K . ( 2015). Solving the problem of partner infidelity: Individual mate retention, coalitional mate retention, and in-pair copulation frequency. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 67-71. | | [17] | Bird B. M., Carré J. M., Knack J. M., & Arnocky S . ( 2016). Threatening men's mate value influences aggression toward an intrasexual rival: The moderating role of narcissism. American Journal of Psychology, 129( 2), 169-183. | | [18] | Burleson M. H., Hall D. L., & Gutierres S. E . ( 2016). Age moderates contrast effects in women’s judgments of facial attractiveness. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 10( 3), 179-187. | | [19] | Burns G. L., & Farina A. ( 1987). Physical attractiveness and self-perception of mental disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96( 2), 161-163. | | [20] | Buss D. M. ( 2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: Free Press. | | [21] | Buss D. M . ( 2017). Sexual conflict in human mating. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4( 26), 307-313. | | [22] | Buss D. M., & Abrams M. ( 2016). Jealousy, infidelity, and the difficulty of diagnosing pathology: A CBT approach to coping with sexual betrayal and the green-eyed monster. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 35( 2), 150-172. | | [23] | Buss D. M., & Duntley, J. D. ( 2011). The evolution of intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16( 5), 411-419. | | [24] | Buss D. M., Goetz C., Duntley J. D., Asao K., & Conroy-Beam D . ( 2017). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143-149. | | [25] | Buss D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. ( 1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100( 2), 204-232. | | [26] | Buss D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. ( 2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6( 1), 134-146. | | [27] | Buss D. M., Shackelford T. K., & McKibbin W. F . ( 2008). The mate retention inventory-short form (MRI-SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 44( 1), 322-334. | | [28] | Butler E. E., Saville C. W. N., Ward R., & Ramsey R . ( 2017). Physical attraction to reliable, low variability nervous systems: Reaction time variability predicts attractiveness. Cognition, 158, 81-89. | | [29] | Buunk B. P . ( 1997). Personality, birth order and attachment styles as related to various types of jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 23( 6), 997-1006. | | [30] | Chu S., Hardaker R., & Lycett J. E . ( 2007). Too good to be ‘true’? The handicap of high socio-economic status in attractive males. Personality and Individual Differences, 42( 7), 1291-1300. | | [31] | Conroy-Beam D., & Buss, D. M. ( 2016). How are mate preferences linked with actual mate selection? Tests of mate preference integration algorithms using computer simulations and actual mating couples. PLoS ONE, 11( 6), e156078. | | [32] | Cousins A. J., & Gangestad, S. W. ( 2007). Perceived threats of female infidelity, male proprietariness, and violence in college dating couples. Violence Victims, 22( 6), 651-668. | | [33] | DeBruine L. M., Jones B. C., Smith F. G., & Little A. C . ( 2010). Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36( 3), 751-758. | | [34] | Dermer M., & Thiel, D. L. ( 1975). When beauty may fail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31( 6), 1168-1176. | | [35] | Desrumaux P., de Bosscher S., & Léoni V . ( 2009). Effects of facial attractiveness, gender, and competence of applicants on job recruitment. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 68( 1), 33-42. | | [36] | Dhole S., & Servedio, M. R. ( 2015). Sperm competition and the evolution of seminal fluid composition. Evolution, 68( 10), 3008-3019. | | [37] | Dion K., Berscheid E., & Walster E . ( 1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24( 3), 285-305. | | [38] | Ditzen B., Palm-fischbacher S., Gossweiler L., Stucky L., & Ehlert U . ( 2017). Effects of stress on women’s preference for male facial masculinity and their endocrine correlates. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 82, 67-74. | | [39] | Dixson B. J., Grimshaw G. M., Linklater W. L., & Dixson A. F . ( 2010). Watching the hourglass. Human Nature, 21( 4), 355-370. | | [40] | Edlund J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. ( 2010). Mate value and mate preferences: An investigation into decisions made with and without constraints. Personality and Individual Differences, 49( 8), 835-839. | | [41] | Edlund J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. ( 2014). The mate value scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 72-77. | | [42] | Fisher C. I., Hahn A. C., Debruine L. M., & Jones B. C . ( 2016). Is women’s sociosexual orientation related to their physical attractiveness? Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 396-399. | | [43] | Foo Y. Z., Simmons L. W., & Rhodes G . ( 2017). Predictors of facial attractiveness and health in humans. Scientific Reports, 7, 39731. | | [44] | Försterling F., Preikschas S., & Agthe M . ( 2007). Ability, luck, and looks: An evolutionary look at achievement ascriptions and the sexual attribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92( 5), 775-788. | | [45] | Fugère M. A., Chabot C., Doucette K., & Cousins A. J . ( 2017). The importance of physical attractiveness to the mate choices of women and their mothers. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3( 3), 243-252. | | [46] | Fugère M. A., Cousins A. J., & Maclaren S. A . ( 2015). ( Mis)matching in physical attractiveness and women's resistance to mate guarding. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 190-195. | | [47] | Furnham A., Richards S. C., & Paulhus D. L . ( 2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7( 3), 199-216. | | [48] | Gangestad S. W., & Haselton, M. G. ( 2015). Human estrus: Implications for relationship science. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 45-51. | | [49] | Gangestad S. W., & Simpson, J. A. ( 2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23( 4), 573-587. | | [50] | Garza R., Heredia R. R., & Cieslicka A. B . ( 2016). Male and female perception of physical attractiveness: An eye movement studys. Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 147470491663161. | | [51] | Gheorghiu A. I., Callan M. J., & Skylark W. J . ( 2017). Facial appearance affects science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114( 23), 5970-5975. | | [52] | Gildersleeve K., Haselton M. G., & Fales M. R . ( 2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140( 5), 1205-1259. | | [53] | Goetz A. T., & Shackelford, T. K. ( 2006). Sexual coercion and forced in-pair copulation as sperm competition tactics in humans. Human Nature, 17( 3), 265-282. | | [54] | Goetz A. T., & Shackelford, T. K. ( 2009). Sexual coercion in intimate relationships: A comparative analysis of the effects of women’s infidelity and men's dominance and control. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38( 2), 226-234. | | [55] | Graham-Kevan N., & Archer J. ( 2009). Control tactics and partner violence in heterosexual relationships. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30( 6), 445-452. | | [56] | Griffey J. A. F., & Little, A. C. ( 2014). Infant's visual preferences for facial traits associated with adult attractiveness judgements: Data from eye-tracking. Infant Behavior and Development, 37( 3), 268-275. | | [57] | Griffin A. M., & Langlois, J. H. ( 2006). Stereotype directionality and attractiveness stereotyping: Is beauty good or is ugly bad. Social Cognition, 24( 2), 187-206. | | [58] | Haselton M. G., & Gangestad, S. W. ( 2006). Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones & Behavior, 49( 4), 509-518. | | [59] | He S., & Tsang S. ( 2017). Perceived female infidelity and male sexual coercion concerning first sex in Chinese college students' dating relationships: The mediating role of male partners' attachment insecurity. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 146-152. | | [60] | Howie J. M., & Pomiankowski A. ( 2018). Mate value. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York: Springer. | | [61] | Jasieńska G., Ziomkiewicz A., Ellison P. T., Lipson S. F., & Thune I . ( 2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 271( 1545), 1213-1217. | | [62] | Johnson S. K., Podratz K. E., Dipboye R. L., & Gibbons E . ( 2010). Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: Tracking down the "beauty is beastly" effect. Journal of Social Psychology, 150( 3), 301-318. | | [63] | Jokela, M. ( 2009). Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the late 20th century United States. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30( 5), 342-350. | | [64] | Jonason P. K., Li N. P., & Buss D. M . ( 2010). The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48( 4), 373-378. | | [65] | Jones B. C., Hahn A. C., Fisher C. I., Wang H., Kandrik M., Han C., … DeBruine L. M . ( 2018). No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women’s hormonal status. Psychological Science, 29( 6), 996-1005. | | [66] | Jones B. C., Little A. C., Boothroyd L., Debruine L. M., Feinberg D. R., Smith M. J., … Perrett D. I . ( 2005). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones & Behavior, 48( 3), 283-290. | | [67] | Jones D. N., & Weiser, D. A. ( 2014). Differential infidelity patterns among the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 20-24. | | [68] | Kaighobadi F., & Shackelford, T. K. ( 2008). Female attractiveness mediates the relationship between in-pair copulation frequency and men’s mate retention behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 45( 4), 293-295. | | [69] | Komori M., Kawamura S., & Ishihara S . ( 2009). Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness. Vision Research, 49( 8), 862-869. | | [70] | Kościński, K. ( 2014). Assessment of waist-to-hip ratio attractiveness in women: An anthropometric analysis of digital silhouettes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43( 5), 989-997. | | [71] | Langlois J. H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A. J., Larson A., Hallam M., & Smoot M . ( 2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126( 3), 390-423. | | [72] | Law Smith M. J., Perrett D. I., Jones B. C., Cornwell R. E., Moore F. R., Feinberg D. R., … Hillier S. G . ( 2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273( 1583), 135-140. | | [73] | Lee A. J., & Zietsch, B. P. ( 2011). Experimental evidence that women's mate preferences are directly influenced by cues of pathogen prevalence and resource scarcity. Biology Letters, 7( 6), 892-895. | | [74] | Lee L., Loewenstein G., Ariely D., Hong J., & Young J . ( 2008). If I’m not hot, are you hot or not? Physical attractiveness evaluations and dating preferences as a function of one's own attractiveness. Psychological Science, 19( 7), 669-677. | | [75] | Li N. P., Bailey. J. M., Kenrick D. T., & Linsenmeier J. A . ( 2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82( 6), 947-955. | | [76] | Li N. P., Valentine K. A., & Patel L . ( 2010). Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50( 2), 291-294. | | [77] | Little A. C., Burt D. M., & Perrett D. I . ( 2006). Assortative mating for perceived facial personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40( 5), 973-984. | | [78] | Little A. C., Burt D. M., Penton-Voak I. S., & Perrett D. I . ( 2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 268( 1462), 39-44. | | [79] | Little A. C., Jones B. C., & DeBruine L. M . ( 2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Social London, 366( 1571), 1638-1659. | | [80] | Lorenzo G. L., Biesanz J. C., & Human L. J . ( 2010). What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood: Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first impressions of personality. Psychological Science, 21( 12), 1777-1782. | | [81] | Lu H. J., Zhu X. Q., & Chang L . ( 2015). Good genes, good providers, and good fathers: Economic development involved in how women select a mate. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9( 4), 215-228. | | [82] | Luxen M. F., & van de Vijver, F. J. R . ( 2006). Facial attractiveness, sexual selection, and personnel selection: When evolved preferences matter. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27( 2), 241-255. | | [83] | Ma Q., Hu Y., Jiang S., & Meng L . ( 2015). The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: An ERP study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 77. | | [84] | Ma Q., Qian D., Hu L., & Wang L . ( 2017). Hello handsome! Male’s facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios—An ERP study. PLoS ONE, 12( 7), e180459. | | [85] | Ma Y., Zhao G., Tu S., & Zheng Y . ( 2015). Attentional biases toward attractive alternatives and rivals: Mechanisms involved in relationship maintenance among Chinese women. PLoS ONE, 10( 8), e0136662. | | [86] | Maestripieri D., Henry A., & Nickels N . ( 2017). Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psy- chology, and evolutionary psychology. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 40, e19. | | [87] | Ma-Kellams C., Wang M. C., & Cardiel H . ( 2017). Attractiveness and relationship longevity: Beauty is not what it is cracked up to be. Personal Relationships, 24( 1), 146-161. | | [88] | Maner J. K., & Ackerman, J. M. ( 2015). Sexually selective cognition. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 52-56. | | [89] | Maner J. K., Miller S. L., Rouby D. A., & Gailliot M. T . ( 2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The implicit cognition of romantic rivalry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97( 1), 74-87. | | [90] | Mathes E. W., & Kozak G. ( 2008). The exchange of physical attractiveness for resource potential and commitment.[J] ournal of Evolutionary Psychology, 6( 1), 43-56. | | [91] | Mckibbin W. F., Goetz A. T., Shackelford T. K., Schipper L. D., Starratt V. G., & Stewart-Williams S . ( 2007). Why do men insult their intimate partners? Personality and Individual Differences, 43( 2), 231-241. | | [92] | Meltzer A. L., Mcnulty J. K., Jackson G. L., & Karney B. R . ( 2014). Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106( 3), 418-428. | | [93] | Michał, K. ( 2018). Do gender and physical attractiveness affect college grades? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43( 5), 1-11. | | [94] | Miner E. J., Starratt V. G., & Shackelford T. K . ( 2009). It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differences, 47( 3), 214-218. | | [95] | Muñoz-Reyes J. A., Pita M., Arjona M., Sanchez-Pages S., & Turiegano E . ( 2014). Who is the fairest of them all? The independent effect of attractive features and self- perceived attractiveness on cooperation among women. Evolution & Human Behavior, 35( 2), 118-125. | | [96] | Olivola C. Y., Funk F., & Todorov A . ( 2014). Social attributions from faces bias human choices. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18( 11), 566-570. | | [97] | Oltmanns J. R., Markey P. M., & French J. E . ( 2016). Dissimilarity in physical attractiveness within romantic dyads and mate retention behaviors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34( 4), 565-577. | | [98] | Pailing A., Boon J., & Egan V . ( 2014). Personality, the dark triad and violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 81-86. | | [99] | Penton-voak I. S., Little A. C., Jones B. C., Burt D. M., Tiddeman B. P., & Perrett D. I . ( 2003). Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117( 3), 264-271. | | [100] | Perilloux C., Cloud J. M., & Buss D. M . ( 2013). Women’s physical attractiveness and short-term mating strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 54( 4), 490-495. | | [101] | Pham M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. ( 2014). Human sperm competition: A comparative evolutionary analysis. Animal Behavior & Cognition, 3( 1), 410-422. | | [102] | Pham M., Shackelford T. K., Holden C. J., Zeigler-Hill V., Hummel A., & Memering S. L . ( 2014). Partner attractiveness moderates the relationship between number of sexual rivals and in-pair copulation frequency in humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128( 3), 328-331. | | [103] | Pillsworth E. G., & Haselton, M. G. ( 2006). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27( 4), 247-258. | | [104] | Poutvaara, P. ( 2014). Facial appearance and leadership: An overview and challenges for new research. The Leadership Quarterly, 25( 5), 801-804. | | [105] | Rhodes, G. ( 2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57( 1), 199-226. | | [106] | Rhodes G., Simmons L. W., & Peters M . ( 2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26( 2), 186-201. | | [107] | Roney J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. ( 2008). Women's estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men's testosterone. Hormones & Behavior, 53( 1), 14-19. | | [108] | Ruffle B. J., & Shtudiner Z. ( 2015). Are good-looking people more employable? Management Science, 61( 8), 1760-1776. | | [109] | Salkicevic S., Stanic A. L., & Grabovac M. T . ( 2014). Good mates retain us right: Investigating the relationship between mate retention strategies, mate value, and relationship satisfaction. Evolutionary Psychology, 12( 5), 1038-1052. | | [110] | Segal-Caspi L., Roccas S., & Sagiv L . ( 2012). Don't judge a book by its cover, revisited: Perceived and reported traits and values of attractive women. Psychological Science, 23( 10), 1112-1116. | | [111] | Sela Y., Mogilski J. K., Shackelford T. K., Zeigler-Hill V., & Fink B . ( 2017). Mate value discrepancy and mate retention behaviors of self and partner. Journal of Personality, 85( 5), 730-740. | | [112] | Shackelford T. K., Goetz A. T., Buss D. M., Euler H. A., & Hoier S . ( 2005). When we hurt the ones we love: Predicting violence against women from men's mate retention. Personal Relationships, 12( 4), 447-463. | | [113] | Shinada M., & Yamagishi T. ( 2014). Physical attractiveness and cooperation in a Prisoner's Dilemma Game. Evolution & Human Behavior, 35( 6), 451-455. | | [114] | Soler C., Kekäläinen J., Núñez M., Sancho M., Álvarez J. G., Núñez J., … Gutiérrez R . ( 2015). Male facial attractiveness and masculinity may provide sex- and culture-independent cues to semen quality. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27( 9), 1930-1938. | | [115] | Soler C., Núñez M., Gutiérrez R., Núñez J., Medina P., Sancho M., … Núñez A . ( 2003). Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality. Evolution & Human Behavior, 24( 3), 199-207. | | [116] | Starratt V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. ( 2012). He said, she said: Men’s reports of mate value and mate retention behaviors in intimate relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 53( 4), 459-462. | | [117] | Stockemer D., & Praino R. ( 2015). Blinded by beauty? Physical attractiveness and candidate selection in the U.S. house of representatives. Social Science Quarterly, 96( 2), 430-443. | | [118] | Stockemer D., & Praino R. ( 2017). Physical attractiveness, voter heuristics and electoral systems: The role of candidate attractiveness under different institutional designs. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19( 2), 336-352. | | [119] | Swami V., Inamdar S., Stieger S., Nader I. W., Pietschnig J., Tran U. S., & Voracek M . ( 2012). A dark side of positive illusions? Associations between the love-is-blind bias and the experience of jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53( 6), 796-800. | | [120] | Taylor L. S., Fiore A. T., Mendelsohn G. A., & Cheshire C . ( 2011). “Out of my league”: A real-world test of the matching hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37( 7), 942-954. | | [121] | Todd P. M., Penke L., Fasolo B., & Lenton A. P . ( 2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of National Academy Science of the USA, 104( 38), 15011-15016. | | [122] | Trujillo L. T., Jankowitsch J. M., & Langlois J. H . ( 2014). Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: A neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14( 3), 1061-1076. | | [123] | Tsai W-C., Huang T-C., & Yu H-H . ( 2012). Investigating the unique predictability and boundary conditions of applicant physical attractiveness and non-verbal behaviours on interviewer evaluations in job interviews. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85( 1), 60-79. | | [124] | van der Horst, G, & Maree L . ( 2014). Sperm form and function in the absence of sperm competition. Molecular Reproduction & Development, 81( 3), 204-216. | | [125] | van Dongen, S . ( 2014). Associations among facial masculinity, physical strength, fluctuating asymmetry and attractiveness in young men and women. Annals of Human Biology, 41( 3), 205-213. | | [126] | Welling L. L. M., & Puts, D. A. ( 2014) Female adaptations to ovulation. In V. Weekes-Shackelford & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior. Evolutionary Psychology( pp. 243-260). New York: Springer. | | [127] | Wood W., Kressel L., Joshi P. D., & Louie B . ( 2014). Meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects on women’s mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6( 3), 229-249. | | [128] | Yang T., Chen H., Hu Y., Zheng Y., & Wang W . ( 2015). Preferences for sexual dimorphism on attractiveness levels: An Eye-tracking study. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 179-185. | | [129] | Zhang Q., Maner J. K., Xu Y., & Zheng Y . ( 2016). Relational motives reduce attentional adhesion to attractive alternatives in heterosexual university students in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46( 2), 503-511. |
|
) 