删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

成人在语境中的母语词汇意义学习

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

刘文娟, 董及美, 崔梦舒, 陈功香()
济南大学教育与心理科学学院, 济南 250022
收稿日期:2018-11-28出版日期:2019-09-15发布日期:2019-07-24
通讯作者:陈功香E-mail:sep_chengx@ujn.edu.cn

基金资助:国家社会科学基金(18BGL123);济南大学社科类校级项目(18YB13);济南大学博士基金(XBS1834);济南大学博士基金(XBS1333);济南大学博士基金的资助(B1818)

The contextual learning of the lexical meaning in adults’ native language learning

LIU Wenjuan, DONG Jimei;, CUI Mengshu, CHEN Gongxiang()
School of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
Received:2018-11-28Online:2019-09-15Published:2019-07-24
Contact:CHEN Gongxiang E-mail:sep_chengx@ujn.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 语境学习是成人获得词汇意义的主要方式, 大量研究者使用语境学习范式考察成人母语词汇意义学习的问题。已有研究将词汇意义学习分为两大阶段:习得词汇的对应概念阶段和将新词的意义整合到已有的语义网络中的阶段。基于词汇意义学习两大加工阶段中语境学习的相关研究, 梳理了词汇、语境、被试因素对成人词汇意义学习的影响, 指出未来研究需要进一步关注新概念学习、隐喻意义学习等问题。


1 陈双 . ( 2014). 学习方式如何影响新词语整合到语义网络的过程(博士学位论文). 中国科学院大学心理研究所, 北京.
2 李文玲, 刘谦 . ( 1992). 心理表征及其争论. 心理科学, (1), 56-58.
3 宋红华 . ( 2011). 转喻视角下汉语旧词新义的词汇语用意义演变研究(硕士学位论文). 广东商学院, 广州.
4 唐瑜婷, 陈宝国 . ( 2014). 工作记忆、语境限制强度和句子长度对二语词汇学习的影响. 心理科学, 37(3), 649-655.
5 张美超 . ( 2017). 语篇情境多样性对新词语义整合的影响(硕士学位论文). 中国科学院大学心理研究所, 北京.
6 Arias-Trejo, N., & Plunkett, K. (2013). What’s in a link: Associative and taxonomic priming effects in the infant lexicon. Cognition, 128(2), 214-227.
7 Balass M., Nelson J. R., & Perfetti C. A . ( 2010). Word learning: An ERP investigation of word experience effects on recognition and word processing. Contemporary educational psychology, 35(2), 126-140.
8 Bakker I., Takashima A., van Hell J. G., Janzen G., & Mcqueen J. M . ( 2015). Tracking lexical consolidation with ERPs: Lexical and semantic-priming effects on N400 and LPC responses to newly-learned words. Neuropsychologia, 79, 33-41.
9 Batterink, L., & Neville H. ( 2011). Implicit and explicit mechanisms of word learning in a narrative context: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3181-3196.
10 Blaye A., Bernard-Peyron V., Paour J.-L., & Bonthoux F . ( 2006). Categorical flexibility in children: Distinguishing response flexibility from conceptual flexibility; the protracted development of taxonomic representations. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3(2), 163-188.
11 Borovsky A., Elman J. L., & Kutas M . (2012). Once is enough: N400 indexes semantic integration of novel word meanings from a single exposure in context. Language Learning and Development, 8(3), 278-302.
12 Borovsky A., Kutas M., & Elman J . ( 2010). Learning to use words: Event-related potentials index single-shot contextual word learning. Cognition, 116(2), 289-296.
13 Broek,G. S. E. V. D., Takashima, A., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L . (2018). Contextual richness and word learning: Context enhances comprehension but retrieval enhances retention. Language Learning. 68(2), 546-585.
14 Chen S., Wang L., & Yang Y . (2014). Acquiring concepts and features of novel words by two types of learning: Direct mapping and inference. Neuropsychologia, 56(1), 204-218.
15 Clay F., Bowers J. S., Davis C. J., & Hanley D. A . (2007). Teaching adults new words: The role of practice and consolidation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(5), 970-976.
16 Dascal, M. (1987). Defending literal meaning. Cognitive Science, 11(3), 259-281.
17 Davis, M. H., & Gaskell, M. G . (2009). A complementary systems account of word learning: Neural and behavioural evidence. Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3773-3800.
18 Ding J., Chen S., Wang L., & Yang Y . (2017). Thematic and taxonomic relations of novel words learned from action and perceptual features. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 41, 70-84.
19 Ding J., Liu W., & Yang Y . ( 2017). The influence of concreteness of concepts on the integration of novel words into the semantic network. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(2111). 1-10.
20 Fairhall,S. L., & Caramazza, A. (2013). Category-selective neural substrates for person- and place-related concepts. Cortex, 49(10), 2748-2757.
21 Frishkoff G. A., Collins-Thompson K., Hodges L., & Crossley S . ( 2016). Accuracy feedback improves word learning from context: Evidence from a meaning-generation task. Reading & Writing, 29(4), 609-632.
22 Hare M., Jones M., Thomson C., Kelly S., & Mcrae K . ( 2009). Activating event knowledge. Cognition, 111(2), 151-167.
23 Hills T. T., Maouene M., Maouene J., Sheya A., & Smith L . ( 2009). Longitudinal analysis of early semantic networks: Preferential attachment or preferential acquisition? Psychological science, 20(6), 729-739.
24 Hu B., Tang B., Chen Q., & Kang L . ( 2016). A novel word embedding learning model using the dissociation between nouns and verbs. Neurocomputing, 171, 1108-1117.
25 Jenkins J. R., Stein M. L., & Wysocki K . ( 1984). Learning vocabulary through reading. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 767-787.
26 Johns B. T., Dye M., & Jones M. N . ( 2016). The influence of contextual diversity on word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1214-1220.
27 Kapnoula, E. C., & Mcmurray, B. (2016). Newly learned word forms are abstract and integrated immediately after acquisition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 491-499.
28 Kapnoula E. C., Packard S., Gupta P., & Mcmurray B . ( 2015). Immediate lexical integration of novel word forms. Cognition, 134, 85-99.
29 Klimesch, W. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews, 29(2-3), 169-195.
30 Klimesch W., Sauseng P., & Hanslmayr S . ( 2007). EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition-timing hypothesis. Brain Research Reviews, 53(1), 63-88.
31 Klimesch W., Schimke H., & Schwaiger J . ( 1994). Episodic and semantic memory: An analysis in the EEG theta and alpha band. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 91(6), 428-441.
32 Landrigan, J. F., & Mirman, D. ( 2017). The cost of switching between taxonomic and thematic semantics. Memory & Cognition, 46(6), 191-203.
33 Liu W., Ding J., Li L., & Yang Y . ( 2019). Metaphorical meaning learning in contexts: An event-related potential study. Journal of Neurolinguistics (#49), 57-70.
34 Maguire M. J., Brier M. R., & Ferree T. C . ( 2010). EEG theta and alpha responses reveal qualitative differences in processing taxonomic versus thematic semantic relationships. Brain & Language, 114(1), 16-25.
35 Mestres-Missé A., Münte T. F., & Rodriguez-Fornells A . ( 2009). Functional neuroanatomy of contextual acquisition of concrete and abstract words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(11), 2154-2171.
36 Mestres-Missé A., Münte T. F., & Rodriguez-Fornells A . ( 2014). Mapping concrete and abstract meanings to new words using verbal contexts. Second Language Research, 30(2), 191-223.
37 Mestres-Missé A., Rodriguez-Fornells A., & Münte T. F . ( 2007). Watching the brain during meaning acquisition. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1858-1866.
38 Mestres-Missé A., Rodriguez-Fornells A., & Münte T. F . ( 2010). Neural differences in the mapping of verb and noun concepts onto novel words. Neuroimage, 49(3), 2826-2835.
39 Mirman D., Landrigan J. F., & Britt A. E . ( 2017). Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 499-520.
40 Nagy, W. E., & Anderson,R. C . ( 1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 304-330.
41 Nagy W. E., Herman P. A., & Anderson R. C . ( 1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(2), 233-253.
42 Nazzi, T., & Polka, L. (2018). The consonant bias in word learning is not determined by position within the word: Evidence from vowel-initial words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 174, 103-111.
43 Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44 Perfetti C. A., Wlotko E. W., & Hart L. A . ( 2005). Word learning and individual differences in word learning reflected in event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1281-1292.
45 Plummer P., Perea M., & Rayner K . ( 2014). The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 275-283.
46 Qiao, X., & Forster, K. I . ( 2013). Novel word lexicalization and the prime lexicality effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1064-1074.
47 Reichle, E. D., & Perfetti, C. A . ( 2003). Morphology in word identification: A word-experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 219-237.
48 Rogers T. T. , & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
49 Sachs O., Weis S., T, Huber W., & Kircher T . ( 2008). Categorical and thematic knowledge representation in the brain: Neural correlates of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations. Neuropsychologia, 46(2), 409-418.
50 Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J . ( 1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(1), 82-102.
51 Schwartz M. F., Kimberg D. Y., Walker G. M., Brecher A., Faseyitan O. K., Dell G. S., & Coslett H. B . ( 2011). Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(20), 8520-8524.
52 Tamminen J., Davis M. H., Merkx M., & Rastle K . ( 2012). The role of memory consolidation in generalisation of new linguistic information. Cognition, 125(1), 107-112.
53 Temple P., Acher M., Jezequel J. M., & Barais O . ( 2017). Learning contextual-variability models. IEEE Software, 34(6), 64-70.
54 Tyler,L. K., & Moss,H. E . ( 2001). Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 244-252.
55 van der Ven F., Takashima A., Segers E., & Verhoeven L . ( 2015). Learning word Meanings: overnight integration and study modality effects. Plos One, 10(5), e0124926.
56 Warrington,E. K., & Mccarthy, R. (1983). Category specific access dysphasia. Brain, 106(4), 859-878.
57 Xu Y., Wang X., Wang X., Men W., Gao J. H., & Bi Y . ( 2018). Doctor, teacher, and stethoscope: Neural representation of different types of semantic relations. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(13), 3303-3317.
58 Zhang M., Chen S., Wang L., Yang X., & Yang Y . ( 2017). Episodic specificity in acquiring thematic knowledge of novel words from descriptive episodes. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(488), 1-16.
59 Zhang M., Ding J., Li X., & Yang Y . (2019). The impact of variety of episodic contexts on the integration of novel words into semantic network. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(2), 214-238.




[1]孙燕青,董奇. 多媒体语境条件下的第二语言词汇学习[J]. 心理科学进展, 2003, 11(2): 147-152.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4784
相关话题/心理 济南大学 基金 博士 论文

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 社会排斥的心理行为特征及其脑机制
    彭苏浩,陶丹,冷玥(),邓慧华东南大学儿童发展与教育研究所,南京210096收稿日期:2019-01-14出版日期:2019-09-15发布日期:2019-07-24通讯作者:冷玥E-mail:lengyue@seu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(31500881);江苏省自然科学基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 1993至2016年医学生心理健康变迁的横断历史研究
    辛素飞1(),姜文源1,辛自强21鲁东大学教育科学学院,烟台2640112中央财经大学社会与心理学院,北京100081收稿日期:2018-09-14出版日期:2019-07-15发布日期:2019-05-22通讯作者:辛素飞E-mail:xinsufei2005@163.com基金资助:*国家社会科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 素食的心理过程及影响因素
    刘潇肖1,田启瑞2(),曾雅丽11厦门大学管理学院,厦门3610052山东师范大学心理学院,济南250358收稿日期:2018-08-12出版日期:2019-07-15发布日期:2019-05-22通讯作者:田启瑞E-mail:tianqirui@sdnu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金青 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 和谐医患关系的心理机制及其促进技术
    孙连荣1,王沛2()1上海师范大学天华学院,上海2018152华东师范大学教育学部特殊教育系,上海200062收稿日期:2018-03-07出版日期:2019-06-15发布日期:2019-04-22通讯作者:王沛E-mail:wangpei1970@163.com基金资助:国家社会科学重大招标项目 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 风险决策的概率权重偏差:心理机制与优化策略
    孙庆洲,邬青渊,张静,江程铭,赵雷,胡凤培()浙江工业大学管理学院,杭州310023收稿日期:2018-08-23出版日期:2019-05-15发布日期:2019-03-20通讯作者:胡凤培E-mail:fengpei@zjut.edu.cn基金资助:*教育部人文社科青年基金项目(18YJC6301 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 不道德传染的心理机制及其影响
    王悦1,龚园超1,2,3,李莹1()1郑州大学教育学院,郑州4500012中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京1001013中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2018-06-05出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:李莹E-mail:liyin ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 揭秘经济管理中的行为异象:心理账户理论的应用启示
    刘培,冯一丹,李爱梅(),刘伟,谢健飞暨南大学管理学院广州510632收稿日期:2018-04-23出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:李爱梅E-mail:tliaim@jnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71271101);国家自然科学基金项目(7 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理表征的可视化途径:基于噪音的反向相关图像分类技术
    侯春娜1(),刘志军21东北师范大学心理学院,长春1300242长春理工大学社会学系,长春130022收稿日期:2018-07-17出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:侯春娜E-mail:houcn359@nenu.edu.cn基金资助:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 回溯式时距估计的动态性及心理机制
    杨莲莲,黄希庭(),刘培朵,岳童西南大学心理学部,重庆400715收稿日期:2018-03-30出版日期:2019-02-15发布日期:2018-12-25通讯作者:黄希庭E-mail:xthuang@swu.edu.cn基金资助:&西南大学重庆市人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“社区领 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理韧性及其神经机制:来自非人类动物模型的证据
    刘浩然1,张晨风1,杨莉1,2()1华南师范大学心理学院2华南师范大学脑科学与康复医学研究院,广州510631收稿日期:2017-11-13出版日期:2019-02-15发布日期:2018-12-25通讯作者:杨莉E-mail:yang_li@m.scnu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金( ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01