删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

宗教启动会使人更加道德吗?

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

饶婷婷1, 喻丰1(), 周爱钦2, 许丽颖1, 杨沈龙1()
1 西安交通大学人文社会科学学院社会心理学研究所, 西安 710049
2 清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084
收稿日期:2018-08-20出版日期:2019-05-15发布日期:2019-03-20
通讯作者:喻丰,杨沈龙E-mail:yufengx@xjtu.edu.cn;yangsl@xjtu.edu.cn



Does religious priming make people better?

RAO Tingting1, YU Feng1(), ZHOU Aiqin2, XU Liying1, YANG Shenlong1()
1 Institute of Social Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, China;
2 School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Received:2018-08-20Online:2019-05-15Published:2019-03-20
Contact:YU Feng,YANG Shenlong E-mail:yufengx@xjtu.edu.cn;yangsl@xjtu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 通过启动被试的宗教信仰状态, 进而探讨宗教对个体道德的影响作用, 这是近年来宗教心理学研究的热点问题, 但是围绕此问题的研究结论并不统一。有研究发现, 宗教启动可以增强个体的道德。但也有研究表明宗教启动会使个体更不道德。宗教启动对道德的影响是通过宗教信念的中介作用而实现的, 被试的信仰类型、性别、实验启动的方式及内容、以及被试的人格倾向则会因为影响中介信念的激活而调节宗教启动与道德的关系。未来研究需要进一步创新启动实验研究方法, 探索影响宗教与道德的关系的调节变量, 结合跨文化、跨学科的研究视角, 更深入地挖掘这一问题。


[1] 董梦晨, 吴嵩, 朱一杰, 郭亚飞, 金盛华 . ( 2015). 宗教信仰对亲社会行为的影响. 心理科学进展, 23( 6), 1095-1108.
[2] 卢川, 郭斯萍 . ( 2014). 国外精神性研究述评. 心理科学, 37( 2), 506-511.
[3] 喻丰, 彭凯平, 窦东徽, 董蕊, 韩婷婷 . ( 2014). 美德是幸福的前提吗? 心理科学, 37( 6), 1518-1523.
[4] Ahmed A. M., & Salas O. , ( 2011). Implicit influences of Christian religious representations on dictator and prisoner's dilemma game decisions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40( 3), 242-246.
doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2010.12.013URL
[5] Aveyard M. E . ( 2014). A call to honesty: Extending religious priming of moral behavior to Middle Eastern Muslims. Plos One, 9( 7), e99447.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099447URL
[6] Batara J. B. L . ( 2016). Religious song as a facilitator of prosocial behavior. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 5( 1), 3-12.
[7] Batara J. B., Franco P. S., Quiachon M. A., & Sembrero D. R . ( 2016). Effects of religious priming concepts on prosocial behavior towards ingroup and outgroup. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12( 4), 635-644.
doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1170URL
[8] Bobkowski P. S., & Kalyanaraman S. , ( 2010). Effects of online Christian self-disclosure on impression formation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49( 3), 456-476.
doi: 10.1111/jssr.2010.49.issue-3URL
[9] Cappellen P., Van, Corneille O., Cols S., & Saroglou V . ( 2011) Beyond mere compliance to authoritative figures: Religious priming increases conformity to informational influence among submissive people. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21( 2), 97-105.
doi: 10.1080/10508619.2011.556995URL
[10] Carpenter T. P., & Marshall M. A . ( 2009). An examination of religious priming and intrinsic religious motivation in the moral hypocrisy paradigm. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48( 2), 386-393.
doi: 10.1111/jssr.2009.48.issue-2URL
[11] Chan K. Q., Tong E. M. W., & Tan Y. L . ( 2014). Taking a leap of faith: Reminders of god lead to greater risk taking. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5( 8), 901-909.
doi: 10.1177/1948550614537309URL
[12] Clobert M., Saroglou V., & Hwang K. K . ( 2015). Buddhist concepts as implicitly reducing prejudice and increasing prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41( 4), 513-525.
doi: 10.1177/0146167215571094URL
[13] Clobert M., Saroglou V., & Hwang K. K . ( 2017). East Asian religious tolerance versus Western monotheist prejudice: The role of (in) tolerance of contradiction. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20( 2), 216-232.
[14] Debono A., Shariff A. F., Poole S., & Muraven M . ( 2017). Forgive us our trespasses: Priming a forgiving (but not a punishing) god increases unethical behavior. Psychology of Religion & Spirituality, 9( suppl 1), S1-S10.
[15] Eugenia C. W., & Keisham M. C .( 2017). In god's hands: How reminders of god dampen the effectiveness of fear appeals. Journal of Marketing Research, 55( 1), 119-131.
[16] Farid P., Margarida P., & Joana A . ( 2017). Effect of religious day on prosocial behavior: A field study. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 27( 2), 116-123.
doi: 10.1080/10508619.2017.1301742URL
[17] Galen L. W . ( 2012). Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138( 5), 876-906.
doi: 10.1037/a0028251URL
[18] Ginges J., Hansen I., & Norenzayan A . ( 2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20( 2), 224-230.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02270.xURL
[19] Gomes C. M., & Mccullough M. E . ( 2015). The effects of implicit religious primes on dictator game allocations: A preregistered replication experiment. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 144( 6), e94-e104.
doi: 10.1037/xge0000027URL
[20] Good M., Inzlicht M., & Larson M. J . ( 2015). God will forgive: Reflecting on god’s love decreases neurophysiological responses to errors. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10( 3), 357-363.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu096URL
[21] Goodwin G. P., & Darley J. M . ( 2008). The psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism. Cognition, 106( 3), 1339-1366.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.007URL
[22] Hall D. L., Matz D. C., & Wood W . ( 2010). Why don't we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14( 1), 126-139.
doi: 10.1177/1088868309352179URL
[23] Holbrook C., Fessler D. M. T., & Pollack J . ( 2016). With god on our side: Religious primes reduce the envisioned physical formidability of a menacing adversary. Cognition, 146, 387-392.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.011URL
[24] Jackson J. C., & Gray , K. ( 2018). When a good god makes bad people: Testing a theory of religion and immorality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
[25] Jackson J. C., Jong J., Bluemke M., Poulter P., Morgenroth L., & Halberstadt J . ( 2018). Testing the causal relationship between religious belief and death anxiety. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 8( 1), 57-68.
[26] Johnson M. K., Rowatt W. C., & Labouff J . ( 2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1( 2), 119-126.
doi: 10.1177/1948550609357246URL
[27] Johnson M. K., Rowatt W. C., & Labouff J. P . ( 2012). Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both?. Psychology of Religion & Spirituality, 4( 2), 154-168.
[28] Kupor D. M., Laurin K., & Levav J . ( 2015). Anticipating divine protection? Reminders of god can increase nonmoral risk taking. Psychological Science, 26( 4), 374-384.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614563108URL
[29] Lin P. K. F., Tong E. M. W., Lee L. N., Low A. H. M., & Gomes D . ( 2016). The prosocial impact of god concept priming on god believers. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory Research & Practice, 3( 1), 93-103.
[30] McCullough M. E., Carter E. C., DeWall C. N., & Corrales C. M . ( 2012). Religious cognition down-regulates sexually selected, characteristically male behaviors in men, but not in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 562-568
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.02.004URL
[31] Mckay R., Efferson C., Whitehouse H., & Fehr E . ( 2011). Wrath of god: Religious primes and punishment. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 278( 1713), 1858-1863.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2125URL
[32] Mckay R., & Whitehouse H. , ( 2015). Religion and morality. International Journal of Ethics, 141( 2), 447-473.
[33] Neuberg S. L., Warner C. M., Mistler S. A., Berlin A., Hill E. D., Johnson J. D., .. Schober J . ( 2014). Religion and intergroup conflict: Findings from the global group relations project. Psychological Science, 25( 1), 198-206.
[34] Pachterbeke M. V., Freyer C., & Saroglou V . ( 2011). When authoritarianism meets religion: Sacrificing others in the name of abstract deontology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41( 7), 898-903.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.834URL
[35] Piazza J., & Landy J. F . ( 2013). “Lean not on your own understanding”: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral judgments. Judgment & Decision Making, 8( 6), 639-661.
[36] Preston J. L., & Ritter R. S . ( 2013). Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39( 11), 1471-1483.
[37] Purzycki B. G., Apicella C., Atkinson Q. D., Cohen E., Mcnamara R. A., Willard A. K., … Henrich J . ( 2016). Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature, 530( 7590), 327-330.
doi: 10.1038/nature16980URL
[38] Purzycki B. G., Henrich J., Apicella C., Atkinson Q. D., Baimel A., Cohen E., .. Norenzayan A . ( 2017). The evolution of religion and morality: A synthesis of ethnographic and experimental evidence from eight societies. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 8( 2), 101-132.
[39] Rand D. G., Dreber A., Haque O. S., Kane R. J., Nowak M. A., & Coakley S . ( 2014). Religious motivations for cooperation: An experimental investigation using explicit primes. Religion Brain & Behavior, 4( 1), 31-48.
[40] Randolph-Seng B., & Nielsen M. E . ( 2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17( 4), 303-315.
[41] Randolph-Seng B., & Nielsen M. E . ( 2008). Is god really watching you? A response to Shariff and Norenzayan (2007). International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 18( 2), 119-122.
doi: 10.1080/10508610701879373URL
[42] Ritter R. S., & Preston J. L . ( 2011). Gross gods and icky atheism: Disgust responses to rejected religious beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47( 6), 1225-1230.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.006URL
[43] Ritter R. S., & Preston J. L . ( 2013). Representations of religious words: Insights for religious priming research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52( 3), 494-507.
[44] Rodriguez L. M., Neighbors C., & Foster D. W . ( 2014). Priming effects of self-reported drinking and religiosity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28( 1), 1-9.
doi: 10.1037/a0031828URL
[45] Sagioglou C., & Forstmann M. , ( 2013). Activating Christian religious concepts increases intolerance of ambiguity and judgment certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 5), 933-939.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.003URL
[46] Saroglou V., ,( 2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42( 8), 1320-1340.
doi: 10.1177/0022022111412267URL
[47] Saroglou V., Corneille O., & Van Cappellen P . ( 2009). “Speak, Lord, your servant is listening”: Religious priming activates submissive thoughts and behaviors. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19( 3), 143-154.
doi: 10.1080/10508610902880063URL
[48] Schumann K., Mcgregor I., Nash K. A., & Ross M . ( 2014). Religious magnanimity: Reminding people of their religious belief system reduces hostility after threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107( 3), 432-453.
doi: 10.1037/a0036739URL
[49] Shariff A. F., & Norenzayan A. , ( 2007). God is watching you: Priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18( 9), 803-809.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.xURL
[50] Shariff A. F., & Norenzayan A. , ( 2011). Mean gods make good people: Different views of god predict cheating behavior. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21( 2), 85-96.
doi: 10.1080/10508619.2011.556990URL
[51] Shariff A. F., Piazza J., & Kramer S. R . ( 2014). Morality and the religious mind: Why theists and nontheists differ. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18( 9), 439-441.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.003URL
[52] Shariff A. F., Willard A. K., Andersen T., & Norenzayan A . ( 2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20( 1), 27-48.
doi: 10.1177/1088868314568811URL
[53] Tong E M. W., & Teo Q. H . ( 2018). The influence of religious concepts on the effects of blame appraisals on negative emotions. Cognition, 177, 150-164.
[54] Tongeren D. R. V., Newbound H., & Johnson E . ( 2016). The interactive effects of religiosity and priming religion following recall of a values violation. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 23( 2-3), 211-224.
[55] Van L. N . ( 2017). Two paradigms for religious representation: The physicist and the playground (a reply to levy). Cognition, 164, 206-211.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.021URL
[56] Willard A. K., Shariff A. F., & Norenzayan A . ( 2016). Religious priming as a research tool for studying religion: Evidentiary value, current issues, and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12( 12), 71-75.
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.003URL
[57] Xygalatas D., . ( 2012). Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: A case study from Mauritius. Religion Brain and Behavior, 3( 2), 91-102.
[58] Yilmaz O., & Bahcekapili H. G . ( 2015). Without God, everything is permitted? The reciprocal influence of religious and meta-ethical beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 95-100.




[1]刘传军, 廖江群. 道德困境研究的范式沿革及其理论价值[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1508-1520.
[2]詹思群, 严瑜. 工作场所不文明行为与职场排斥间的螺旋效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 560-570.
[3]王博韬, 魏萍. 道德情绪:探寻道德与创造力关系的新视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 268-275.
[4]严秋斯, 隋杨, 郝雪晶. 亲组织不道德行为的解释机制与理论模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 338-352.
[5]沈蕾, 江黛苔, 陈宁, 刘伟. 自豪感的神经基础:比较的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 131-139.
[6]贾成龙, 孙莉, 冯伯乐, 秦金亮. 依恋启动及其效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1539-1550.
[7]王桃林, 张勇, 周浩, 张军伟. 亲组织不道德行为的负面效应及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(8): 1246-1255.
[8]张银花, 李红, 吴寅. 计算模型在道德认知研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1042-1055.
[9]贾成龙, 刘廷廷, 孙莉, 秦金亮. 个体依恋特征的二重性:特质性依恋与状态性依恋[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 626-637.
[10]欧红蕾, 孙炳海, 张文海, 李伟健. 勿以恶小而为之:滑坡效应的心理机制及预防策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 650-660.
[11]徐科朋, 杨凌倩, 吴家虹, 薛宏, 张姝玥. CNI模型在道德决策研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2102-2113.
[12]谢家全, 谢昌颐, 杨文登. 饥饿对认知与社会行为的影响及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(1): 141-149.
[13]丁凤琴, 王冬霞. 道德概念具身隐喻及其影响因素:来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1540-1555.
[14]王财玉, 郑晓旭, 余秋婷, 雷雳. 绿色消费的困境:身份建构抑或环境关心?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1507-1520.
[15]李莹, 张灿, 王悦. 道德情绪在道德隐喻映射中的作用及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1224-1231.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4687
相关话题/心理 科学 宗教 社会 组织

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 追踪研究在组织行为学中的应用
    胥彦,李超平()中国人民大学公共管理学院组织与人力资源研究所,北京100872收稿日期:2018-05-07出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:李超平E-mail:lichaoping@ruc.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金资助(71772171);国家自 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 从动作模仿到社会认知:自我-他人控制的作用
    王协顺,苏彦捷()北京大学心理与认知科学学院,行为与心理健康北京市重点实验室,北京100871收稿日期:2018-10-17出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:苏彦捷E-mail:yjsu@pku.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31571134);国 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 不道德传染的心理机制及其影响
    王悦1,龚园超1,2,3,李莹1()1郑州大学教育学院,郑州4500012中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京1001013中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2018-06-05出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:李莹E-mail:liyin ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 揭秘经济管理中的行为异象:心理账户理论的应用启示
    刘培,冯一丹,李爱梅(),刘伟,谢健飞暨南大学管理学院广州510632收稿日期:2018-04-23出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:李爱梅E-mail:tliaim@jnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71271101);国家自然科学基金项目(7 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 行为社会政策:“助推”公共福利的实践与探索
    张书维,梁歆佚,岳经纶()中山大学中国公共管理研究中心、政治与公共事务管理学院,广州510275收稿日期:2018-04-03出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:岳经纶E-mail:E-mail:klngok@126.com基金资助:国家社会科学基金青年项目资助(1 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理表征的可视化途径:基于噪音的反向相关图像分类技术
    侯春娜1(),刘志军21东北师范大学心理学院,长春1300242长春理工大学社会学系,长春130022收稿日期:2018-07-17出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:侯春娜E-mail:houcn359@nenu.edu.cn基金资助:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 暴力视频游戏对个体亲社会性的影响:一项元分析
    邵嵘,滕召军,刘衍玲()西南大学心理健康教育研究中心,重庆400715收稿日期:2017-11-24出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:刘衍玲E-mail:ssq@swu.edu.cn基金资助:国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“亲社会视频游戏对青少年亲社会行为的影响” ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 回溯式时距估计的动态性及心理机制
    杨莲莲,黄希庭(),刘培朵,岳童西南大学心理学部,重庆400715收稿日期:2018-03-30出版日期:2019-02-15发布日期:2018-12-25通讯作者:黄希庭E-mail:xthuang@swu.edu.cn基金资助:&西南大学重庆市人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“社区领 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 为何越减越肥?——限制性饮食者过度进食的心理机制及影响因素
    王劭睿1,陈红1,2()1西南大学心理学部2认知与人格教育部重点实验室,重庆400715收稿日期:2018-03-21出版日期:2019-02-15发布日期:2018-12-25通讯作者:陈红E-mail:chenhg@swu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31771237);中央高 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理韧性及其神经机制:来自非人类动物模型的证据
    刘浩然1,张晨风1,杨莉1,2()1华南师范大学心理学院2华南师范大学脑科学与康复医学研究院,广州510631收稿日期:2017-11-13出版日期:2019-02-15发布日期:2018-12-25通讯作者:杨莉E-mail:yang_li@m.scnu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金( ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01