) 1 辽宁师范大学脑与认知神经科学研究中心, 大连 116029
2 上海师范大学教育学院, 上海 200234
收稿日期:2017-09-06出版日期:2019-01-15发布日期:2018-11-23基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金青年项目(81601166);国家自然科学基金面上项目(31371033);辽宁****课题项目(面孔表情加工情境效应的神经机制研究)支持The inversion effect of body recognition
ZHANG Keye1, ZHANG Mingming1, LIU Tiantian2, LUO Wenbo1, HE Weiqi1() 1 Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
2 College of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
Received:2017-09-06Online:2019-01-15Published:2018-11-23摘要/Abstract
摘要： 肢体识别加工的研究常常以倒置肢体作为对象.肢体倒置效应是指, 与正立肢体相比, 人们识别倒置肢体的时间更长,正确率更低.该现象为探究肢体识别提供了新的思路.近些年, 研究者们使用多种技术考察了这一效应及肢体构形加工的特异机制与神经基础.其中, 头部信息在肢体倒置效应中的作用引起了一些研究者的争论.此外, 构形加工理论和构形加工连续量理论都肯定了构形加工在该效应产生中的作用, 但对于构形加工所包含的子成分还存在一些分歧.未来需要进一步拓展该领域的特殊群体研究, 揭示头部信息的具体作用, 完善相关理论解释以及探索更具有生态效度的肢体倒置效应.
参考文献 56
| 1 | 陈丽, 李伟霞, 张烨, 张庆林 . (2015). 躯体知觉的认知神经机制. 心理科学,38(1), 85-92. |
| 2 | 范聪, 陈顺森, 张灵聪, 罗文波 . (2014). 身体表情加工的神经机制. 心理学进展, 4(3), 506-514. |
| 3 | 陶维东, 孙弘进, 张旭东, 郑剑虹 . (2011). 非面孔物体倒置效应形成过程的认知神经机制. 心理科学进展,19(8), 1104-1114. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.01104URL |
| 4 | 汪海玲, 傅世敏 . (2011). 面孔倒置效应的研究与理论述评. 心理科学进展,19(11), 1588-1594. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.01588URL |
| 5 | 汪亚珉, 黄雅梅 . (2011). 面孔识别中的构形加工与特征加工. 心理科学进展,19(8), 1126-1137. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.01126URL |
| 6 | Arizpe J. M., Mckean D. L., Tsao J. W ., & Chan , A. W. Y. (2017). Where you look matters for body perception: Preferred gaze location contributes to the body inversion effect. PLoS ONE, 12(1), e0169148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169148URLpmid: 5234795 |
| 7 | Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., & Mccarthy G . (2009). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 551-65. |
| 8 | Brandman T., & Yovel G. (2010). The body inversion effect is mediated by face-selective, not body-selective, mechanisms. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(31), 10534-10540. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0911-10.2010URLpmid: 20685996 |
| 9 | Brandman T., & Yovel G. (2016). Bodies are represented as wholes rather than their sum of parts in the occipital- emporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 26(2), 530-543. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu205URLpmid: 25217470 |
| 10 | Cabeza R., & Kato T. (2000). Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. Psychological Science, 11(5), 429-433. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00283URLpmid: 11228917 |
| 11 | Cave C.B., &Kosslyn S.M . (1993). The role of parts and spatial relations in object identification. Perception, 22(2), 229-248. |
| 12 | Chang D. H.F., &Troje N.F . (2009). Acceleration carries the local inversion effect in biological motion perception. Journal of Vision, 9(1), 1-17. doi: 10.1167/9.1.19URLpmid: 19271889 |
| 13 | Cleary L., Looney K., Brady N., & Fitzgerald M . (2014). Inversion effects in the perception of the moving human form: A comparison of adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing adolescents. Autism, 18(8), 943-952. doi: 10.1177/1362361313499455URLpmid: 24126867 |
| 14 | de Gelder B. (2016). Why bodies? In B. de Gelder (Eds.), Emotions and the body (pp. 1-22) . New York, US: Oxford University Press. |
| 15 | de Gelder B., Van den Stock J., Meeren H. K. M., Sinke C. B. A., Kret M. E., & Tamietto M . (2010). Standing up for the body. Recent progress in uncovering the networks involved in the perception of bodies and bodily expressions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(4), 513-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.008URLpmid: 19857515 |
| 16 | Gauthier I., &Tarr M.J . (1997). Becoming a "Greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37(12), 1673-1682. |
| 17 | Gauthier I., Williams P., Tarr M. J., & Tanaka J . (1998). Training 'greeble' experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research, 38(15-16), 2401-2428. |
| 18 | Le Grand R. L., Mondloch C. J., Maurer D., & Brent H. P . (2001). Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing. Nature, 410(6831), 890. |
| 19 | Groves K., Kennett S., & Gillmeister H . (2017). Evidence for ERP biomarkers of eating disorder symptoms in women. Biological Psychology, 123, 205-219. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.12.016URLpmid: 28057515 |
| 20 | Haig N.D . (2013). The effect of feature displacement on face recognition. Perception, 42(11), 1158-1165. doi: 10.1068/p130505URLpmid: 6535975 |
| 21 | Harris A., Vyas D. B., & Reed C. L . (2016). Holistic processing for bodies and body parts: New evidence from stereoscopic depth manipulations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(5), 1513-1519. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1027-4URLpmid: 27001251 |
| 22 | Itier R.J., &Taylor M.J . (2004 a). Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs. NeuroImage, 21(4), 1518-1532. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.016URLpmid: 15050576 |
| 23 | Itier R.J., &Taylor M.J . (2004 b). Face recognition memory and configural processing: A developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(3), 487-502. |
| 24 | Itier R.J., &Taylor M.J . (2004 c). N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebral Cortex, 14(2), 132-142. doi: 10.1021/ed085p221URLpmid: 14704210 |
| 25 | Kanwisher N. . (2010). Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(25), 11163-11170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005062107URLpmid: 20484679 |
| 26 | Lefaucheur J. P., André-Obadia N., Antal A., Ayache S. S., Baeken C., Benninger D. H., ... Garcia-Larrea L . (2014). Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clinical Neurophysiology, 125(11), 2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021URLpmid: 25034472 |
| 27 | Luck S.J . (2014). Overview of common ERP components. In S. J. Luck (Eds.), An introduction to the event-related potential technique(2 ed., pp. 71-117). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press. |
| 28 | Maurer D., Le Grand R., & Mondloch C. J . (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 255-260. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4URLpmid: 12039607 |
| 29 | Minnebusch D. A., Suchan B., & Daum I . (2009). Losing your head: Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of body inversion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(5), 865-874. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21074URLpmid: 1870258142 |
| 30 | Mohamed T. N., Neumann M. F., & Schweinberger S. R . (2011). Combined effects of attention and inversion on event-related potentials to human bodies and faces. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(3-4), 138-146. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2011.597848URLpmid: 24168528 |
| 31 | Papeo L., Stein T., & Soto-Faraco S . (2017). The two-body inversion effect. Psychological Science, 28(3), 369-379. doi: 10.1177/0956797616685769URLpmid: 28140764 |
| 32 | Peelen M.V., &Downing P.E . (2007). The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(8), 636-648. doi: 10.1038/nrn2195URLpmid: 17643089 |
| 33 | Reed C. L., Beall P. M., Stone V. E., Kopelioff L., Pulham D. J., & Hepburn S. L . (2007). Brief report: Perception of body posture-What individuals with autism spectrum disorder might be missing. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(8), 1576-1584. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0220-0URLpmid: 17029019 |
| 34 | Reed C. L., Stone V. E., Bozova S., & Tanaka J . (2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14(4), 302-308. |
| 35 | Reed C. L., Stone V. E., Grubb J. D., & Mcgoldrick J. E . (2006). Turning configural processing upside down: Part and whole body postures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 73-87. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.73URLpmid: 16478327 |
| 36 | Rezlescu C., Susilo T., Wilmer J. B., & Caramazza A . (2017). The inversion, part-whole, and composite effects reflect distinct perceptual mechanisms with varied relationships to face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,43(12), 1961-1973. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000400URLpmid: 28406690 |
| 37 | Righart R., & de Gelder B. (2007). Impaired face and body perception in developmental prosopagnosia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(43), 17234-17238. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707753104URLpmid: 17942679 |
| 38 | Rivolta D., Lawson R. P., & Palermo R . (2016). More than just a problem with faces: Altered body perception in a group of congenital prosopagnosics. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(2), 276-286. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1174277URLpmid: 27049475 |
| 39 | Robbins R.A., & Coltheart M. (2012). The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1098-1104. doi: 10.1037/a0028584URLpmid: 22642217 |
| 40 | Rossion B., & Jacques C. (2008). Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170. NeuroImage, 39(4), 1959-1979. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.011URLpmid: 18055223 |
| 41 | Shao H. Y., Weng X. C., & He S . (2017). Functional organization of the face-sensitive areas in human occipital-temporal cortex. NeuroImage, 157, 129-143. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.061URLpmid: 28572061 |
| 42 | Soria Bauser, D., & Suchan B. (2013). Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of intact and scrambled body perception. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124(4), 686-696. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.09.030URLpmid: 23375380 |
| 43 | Soria B.D., & Suchan B. (2015). Is the whole the sum of its parts? Configural processing of headless bodies in the right fusiform gyrus. Behavioural Brain Research, 281, 102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.015URLpmid: 25510195 |
| 44 | Stein T., Sterzer P., & Peelen M. V . (2012). Privileged detection of conspecifics: Evidence from inversion effects during continuous flash suppression. Cognition, 125(1), 64-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.005URLpmid: 22776239 |
| 45 | Stekelenburg J.J., & de Gelder B. (2004). The neural correlates of perceiving human bodies: An ERP study on the body-inversion effect. Neuroreport, 15(5), 777-780. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200404090-00007URLpmid: 15073513 |
| 46 | Susilo T., Yovel G., Barton J. J. S., & Duchaine B . (2013). Face perception is category-specific: Evidence from normal body perception in acquired prosopagnosia. Cognition, 129(1), 88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.004URLpmid: 23856076 |
| 47 | Tanaka J.W., &Farah M.J . (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 46(2), 225-245. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401045URLpmid: 8316637 |
| 48 | Tao W.D., &Sun H.J . (2013). Configural processing in body posture recognition: An eye-tracking study. Neuroreport, 24(16), 903-910. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000017URLpmid: 24071707 |
| 49 | Tao W. D., Zeng W. X., & Sun H. J . (2014). Behavioral and electrophysiological measures of the body inversion effect: The contribution of the limb configurations. Neuroreport, 25(14), 1099-1108. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000234URLpmid: 25076068 |
| 50 | Taylor J. C., Wiggett A. J., & Downing P. E . (2007). Functional MRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(3), 1626-1633. doi: 10.1152/jn.00012.2007URLpmid: 17596425 |
| 51 | Urgesi C., Calvo-Merino B., Haggard P., & Aglioti S. M . (2007). Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals two cortical pathways for visual body processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(30), 8023-8030. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0789-07.2007URLpmid: 17652592 |
| 52 | Urgesi C., Fornasari L., Canalaz F., Perini L., Cremaschi S., Faleschini L., .. Fabbro F . (2014). Impaired configural body processing in anorexia nervosa: Evidence from the body inversion effect. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 486-508. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12057URLpmid: 24206365 |
| 53 | Willems S., Vrancken L., Germeys F., & Verfaillie K . (2014). Holistic processing of human body postures: Evidence from the composite effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(7), 618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00618URLpmid: 24999337 |
| 54 | Yin R.K . (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 141-145. doi: 10.1037/h0027474URL |
| 55 | Yovel G., & Kanwisher N. (2005). The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Current Biology, 15(24), 2256-2262. |
| 56 | Yovel G., Pelc T., & Lubetzky I . (2010). It's all in your head: Why is the body inversion effect abolished for headless bodies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(3), 759-767. doi: 10.1037/a0017451URLpmid: 20515202 |
相关文章 15
| [1] | 王春地, 王大辉. 振动触觉频率信息的工作记忆容量及存储机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1141-1148. |
| [2] | 曾宪卿, 许冰, 孙博, 叶健彤, 傅世敏. EMMN受偏差-标准刺激对类型和情绪类型影响: 来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1163-1178. |
| [3] | 侯文霞, 田欣然, 刘立志, 易冰, 欧玉晓, 陈文锋, 尚俊辰. 面孔吸引力同化的连续性效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1210-1215. |
| [4] | 荆伟, 张婕, 付锦霞, 田琳, 赵微. 婴幼儿面孔注意偏向：先天倾向与发展轨迹——来自正常和孤独症婴幼儿的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1216-1230. |
| [5] | 王润洲, 毕鸿燕. 发展性阅读障碍的听觉时间加工缺陷[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1231-1238. |
| [6] | 王正雨, 胡金生. 睡眠对创造性问题解决的影响: 基于记忆重组的解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1251-1263. |
| [7] | 殷融, 赵嘉. 语法的进化连续性及进化起源解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1264-1278. |
| [8] | 李雅宁, 田杨阳, 吴琦, 冷海州, 蒋重清, 杨伊生. 面孔社会知觉中的表情效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1022-1029. |
| [9] | 黄元娜, 李云箫, 李纾. 为什么被选的和被拒的会是同一个备择选项?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1010-1021. |
| [10] | 隋雪, 史汉文, 李雨桐. 语言加工过程中的观点采择及其认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 990-999. |
| [11] | 何蔚祺, 李帅霞, 赵东方. 群体面孔情绪感知的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 761-772. |
| [12] | 于文勃, 王璐, 程幸悦, 王天琳, 张晶晶, 梁丹丹. 语言经验对概率词切分的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 787-795. |
| [13] | 肖承丽, 隋雨檠, 肖苏衡, 周仁来. 空间交互研究新视角：多重社会因素的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 796-805. |
| [14] | 汪钰涵, 马国杰, 庄想灵. 手机分心对行人过街中信息加工及行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 806-814. |
| [15] | 尹俊婷, 王冠, 罗俊龙. 威胁对创造力的影响：认知与情绪双加工路径[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 815-826. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4564
