删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

反馈负波及其近10年理论解释

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

李丹阳, 李鹏*(), 李红
深圳大学心理与社会学院, 深圳 518060
收稿日期:2017-07-21出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30
通讯作者:李鹏E-mail:peng@szu.edu.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(31671158和31671150);广东省普通高校创新团队建设项目(2015KCXTD009);广东省普通高校创新团队建设项目(2015WTSCX094);深圳市基础学科布局项目(JCYJ20150729104249783);深圳大学青年教师科研启动项目(2017074);深圳大学人文社科青年扶持项目(16QNFC51)

The updated theories of feedback-related negativity in the last decade

LI Danyang, LI Peng*(), LI Hong
College of psychology and sociology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
Received:2017-07-21Online:2018-09-15Published:2018-07-30
Contact:Peng LI E-mail:peng@szu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 个体决策后的反馈对随后的结果监控和行为调整起着至关重要的作用。事件相关脑电位研究发现, 反馈负波(feedback-related negativity, FRN)是与决策后反馈加工过程紧密相关的脑电成分。近10年来关于FRN的理论解释, 在最初经典的强化学习理论和情绪动机假说的基础上又提出了反应-结果的预测模型、奖赏正波理论以及积极情绪启动模型。未来的研究应该立足于大样本, 采用互补的研究手段和多样的分析技术来探讨FRN的心理意义; 同时考虑将FRN作为奖赏加工的脑电指标, 研究社会互动情境下的人类行为。


1 李鹏, 李红 . ( 2008). 反馈负波及其理论解释. 心理科学进展, 16( 5), 705-711.
2 Alexander, W. H., & Brown, J. W. ( 2011). Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor. Nature Neuroscience, 14( 10), 1338-1344.
3 Angus D. J., Kemkes K., Schutter D. J. L. G., & Harmon- Jones E. ( 2015). Anger is associated with reward-related electrocortical activity: Evidence from the reward positivity. Psychophysiology, 52(10), 1271-1280.
4 Baker, T. E., & Holroyd, C. B. ( 2011). Dissociated roles of the anterior cingulate cortex in reward and conflict processing as revealed by the feedback error-related negativity and N200. Biological Psychology, 87( 1), 25-34.
5 Balconi M., Finocchiaro R., & Canavesio Y. ( 2015). Reward sensitivity (behavioral activation system), cognitive, and metacognitive control in gambling behavior: Evidences from behavioral, feedback-related negativity, and p300 effect. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 27( 3), 219-227.
6 Becker M. P. I., Nitsch A. M., Miltner W. H., & Straube T. ( 2014). A single-trial estimation of the feedback-related negativity and its relation to bold responses in a time- estimation task. Journal of Neuroscience, 34( 8), 3005-3012.
7 Bellebaum, C., & Daum, I. ( 2008). Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27( 7), 1823-1835.
8 Bernat E. M., Nelson L. D., & Baskin-Sommers A. R. ( 2015). Time-frequency theta and delta measures index separable components of feedback processing in a gambling task. Psychophysiology, 52( 5), 626-637.
9 Beyer F., Sidarus N., Bonicalzi S., & Haggard P. ( 2017). Beyond self-serving bias: Diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 12( 1), 138-145.
10 Bismark A. W., Hajcak G., Whitworth N. M., & Allen J. J. B.( 2013). The role of outcome expectations in the generation of the feedback-related negativity. Psychophysiology, 50( 2), 125-133.
11 Bress, J. N., & Hajcak, G. ( 2013). Self-report and behavioral measures of reward sensitivity predict the feedback negativity. Psychophysiology, 50( 7), 610-616.
12 Carlson J. M., Foti D., Mujica-Parodi L. R., Harmon-Jones E., & Hajcak G. ( 2011). Ventral striatal and medial prefrontal BOLD activation is correlated with reward- related electrocortical activity: A combined ERP and FMRI study. NeuroImage, 57( 4), 1608-1616.
13 Chen J., Wu Y., Tong G. Y., Guan X. M., & Zhou X. L. ( 2012). ERP correlates of social conformity in a line judgment task. BMC Neuroscience, 13( 1), 43.
14 Cohen M. X., Wilmes K. A., & van de Vijver, I. ( 2011). Cortical electrophysiological network dynamics of feedback learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15( 12), 558-566.
15 Doñamayor N., Dinani J., Römisch M., Ye Z., & Münte T. F. ( 2014). Performance monitoring during associative learning and its relation to obsessive-compulsive characteristics. Biological Psychology, 102, 73-87.
16 Ernst, B., & Steinhauser, M. ( 2015). Effects of invalid feedback on learning and feedback-related brain activity in decision-making. Brain & Cognition, 99, 78-86.
17 Ferdinand N. K., Mecklinger A., Kray J., & Gehring W. J. ( 2012). The processing of unexpected positive response outcomes in the mediofrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 32( 35), 12087-12092.
18 Foti D., Weinberg A., Dien J., & Hajcak G. ( 2011). Event-related potential activity in the basal ganglia differentiates rewards from nonrewards: Temporospatial principal components analysis and source localization of the feedback negativity. Human Brain Mapping, 32( 12), 2207-2216.
19 Gehring W. J., Goss B., Coles M. G. H., Meyer D. E., & Donchin E. ( 1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4( 6), 385-390.
20 Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. ( 2002). The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295( 5563), 2279-2282.
21 Gu R. L., Feng X., Broster L. S., Yuan L., Xu P. F., & Luo Y. J. ( 2017). Valence and magnitude ambiguity in feedback processing. Brain & Behavior, 7( 5), e00672.
22 Gu R. L., Huang Y. X., & Luo Y. J. ( 2010). Anxiety and feedback negativity. Psychophysiology, 47( 5), 961-967.
23 Gu R. L., Ge Y., Jiang Y., & Luo Y. J. ( 2010). Anxiety and outcome evaluation: The good, the bad and the ambiguous. Biological Psychology, 85( 2), 200-206.
24 Hewig J., Kretschmer N., Trippe R. H., Hecht H., Coles M. G. H., Holroyd C. B., & Miltner, W. H. R. ( 2010). Hypersensitivity to reward in problem gamblers. Biological Psychiatry, 67( 8), 781-783.
25 Heydari, S., & Holroyd, C. B. ( 2016). Reward positivity: Reward prediction error or salience prediction error?. Psychophysiology, 53( 8), 1185-1192.
26 Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. ( 2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109( 4), 679-709.
27 Holroyd, C. B., & Krigolson, O. E. ( 2007). Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task. Psychophysiology, 44( 6), 913-917.
28 Holroyd C. B., Krigolson O. E., & Lee S. ( 2011). Reward positivity elicited by predictive cues. Neuroreport, 22( 5), 249-252.
29 Holroyd C. B., Pakzad-Vaezi K. L., & Krigolson O. E. ( 2008). The feedback correct-related positivity: Sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback. Psychophysiology, 45( 5), 688-697.
30 Holroyd, C. B., & Umemoto, A. ( 2016). The research domain criteria framework: The case for anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 418-443.
31 Holroyd, C. B., & Yeung, A. N. ( 2012). Motivation of extended behaviors by anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16( 2), 122-128.
32 Hu X. M., Xu Z. H., & Mai X. Q. ( 2017). Social value orientation modulates the processing of outcome evaluation involving others. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12( 11), 1730-1739.
33 Kimura, K., & Katayama, J. ( 2016). Cooperative context is a determinant of the social influence on outcome evaluation: An electrophysiological study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 100, 28-35.
34 Kobza S., Thoma P., Daum I., & Bellebaum C. ( 2011). The feedback-related negativity is modulated by feedback probability in observational learning. Behavioural Brain Research, 225( 2), 396-404.
35 Leng, Y., & Zhou, X. L. ( 2010). Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by interpersonal relationship: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 48( 2), 448-455.
36 Li P., Han C. H., Lei Y., Holroyd C. B., & Li H. ( 2011). Responsibility modulates neural mechanisms of outcome processing: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 48(8), 1129-1133.
37 Li P., Jia S. W., Feng T. Y., Liu Q., Suo T., & Li H. ( 2010). The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations: Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study. NeuroImage, 52( 4), 1727-1733.
38 Luft, C. D. B. ( 2014). Learning from feedback: The neural mechanisms of feedback processing facilitating better performance. Behavioural Brain Research, 261( 6), 356-368.
39 Ma Q. G., Shen Q., Xu Q., Li D. D., Shu L. C., & Weber B. ( 2011). Empathic responses to others' gains and losses: An electrophysiological investigation. NeuroImage, 54( 3), 2472-2480.
40 Maia, T. V., & Frank, M. J. ( 2011). From reinforcement learning models to psychiatric and neurological disorders. Nature Neuroscience, 14( 2), 154-162.
41 Marco-Pallares J., Cucurell D., Münte T. F., Strien N., & Rodriguez-Fornells A. ( 2011). On the number of trials needed for a stable feedback-related negativity. Psychophysiology, 48( 6), 852-860.
42 Mensen A., Poryazova R., Huegli G., Baumann C. R., Schwartz S., & Khatami R. ( 2015). The roles of dopamine and hypocretin in reward: A electroencephalographic study. PLoS One, 10( 11), e0142432.
43 Miltner W. H. R., Braun C. H., & Coles, M. G. H. ( 1997). Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9( 6), 788-798.
44 Mushtaq F., Stoet G., Bland A. R., & Schaefer A. ( 2013). Relative changes from prior reward contingencies can constrain brain correlates of outcome monitoring. PLoS One, 8( 6), e66350.
45 Mushtaq F., Wilkie R. M., Mon-Williams M. A., & Schaefer A. ( 2016). Randomised prior feedback modulates neural signals of outcome monitoring. NeuroImage, 125, 868-879.
46 Nieuwenhuis S., Aston-Jones G., & Cohen J. D. ( 2005). Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus- norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 510-532.
47 Nieuwenhuis S., Holroyd C. B., Mol N., & Coles, M. G. H. ( 2004). Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: Origins and functional significance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28( 4), 441-448.
48 Oliveira F. T. P., McDonald J. J., & Goodman D. ( 2007). Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate is not all error related: Expectancy deviation and the representation of action-outcome associations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19( 12), 1994-2004.
49 Padrón I., Fernández-Rey J., Acuña C., & Pardo-Vazquez J. L. ( 2016). Representing the consequences of our actions trial by trial: Complex and flexible encoding of feedback valence and magnitude. Neuroscience, 333, 264-276.
50 Sambrook, T. D., & Goslin, J. ( 2015). A neural reward prediction error revealed by a meta-analysis of ERPs using great grand averages. Psychological Bulletin, 141( 1), 213-235.
51 Sambrook, T. D., & Goslin, J. ( 2016). Principal components analysis of reward prediction errors in a reinforcement learning task. NeuroImage, 124, 276-286.
52 San Martín R., Manes F., Hurtado E., Isla P., & Ibañez A. ( 2010). Size and probability of rewards modulate the feedback error-related negativity associated with wins but not losses in a monetarily rewarded gambling task. NeuroImage, 51( 3), 1194-1204.
53 Schaefer A., Buratto L. G., Goto N., & Brotherhood E. V. ( 2016). The feedback-related negativity and the p300 brain potential are sensitive to price expectation violations in a virtual shopping task. PLoS One, 11( 9), e0163150.
54 Schönberg T., Daw N. D., Joel D., & O'Doherty J. P. ( 2007). Reinforcement learning signals in the human striatum distinguish learners from nonlearners during reward-based decision making. Journal of Neuroscience, 27( 47), 12860-12867.
55 Schulreich, S. ( 2016). Altered performance monitoring in psychopathy: A review of studies on action selection, error, and feedback processing. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 3( 1), 19-27.
56 Shahnazian, D., & Holroyd, C. B. ( 2017). Distributed representations of action sequences in anterior cingulate cortex: A recurrent neural network approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1280-1
57 Shestakova A., Rieskamp J., Tugin S., Ossadtchi A., Krutitskaya J., & Klucharev V. ( 2013). Electrophysiological precursors of social conformity. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 8( 7), 756-763.
58 Takács á., Kóbor A., Janacsek K., Honbolygó F., Csépe V., & Németh D. ( 2015). High trait anxiety is associated with attenuated feedback-related negativity in risky decision making. Neuroscience Letters, 600, 188-192.
59 Talmi D., Atkinson R., & El-Deredy W. ( 2013). The feedback-related negativity signals salience prediction errors, not reward prediction errors. Journal of Neuroscience, 33( 19), 8264-8269.
60 Thoma P., Norra C., Juckel G., Suchan B., & Bellebaum C. ( 2015). Performance monitoring and empathy during active and observational learning in patients with major depression. Biological Psychology, 109, 222-231.
61 Umemoto A., Hajihosseini A., Yates M. E., & Holroyd C. B. ( 2017). Reward-based contextual learning supported by anterior cingulate cortex. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17( 3), 642-651.
62 Von Borries, A. K. L., Verkes, R. J., Bulten B. H., Cools R., & de Bruijn, E. R. A. ( 2013). Feedback-related negativity codes outcome valence, but not outcome expectancy, during reversal learning. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13( 4), 737-746.
63 Walsh, M. M., & Anderson, J. R. ( 2012). Learning from experience: Event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36( 8), 1870-1884.
64 Wu Y., Zhang D. X., Elieson B., & Zhou X. L. ( 2012). Brain potentials in outcome evaluation: When social comparison takes effect. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 85( 2), 145-152.
65 Yeung, N. ( 2004). Relating cognitive and affective theories of the error-related negativity. In Errors, conflicts, and the brain. Current opinions on performance monitoring( pp. 63-70). Leipzig.
66 Zheng Y., Li Q., Wang K., Wu H. Y., & Liu X. ( 2015). Contextual valence modulates the neural dynamics of risk processing. Psychophysiology, 52( 7), 895-904.
67 Zheng Y., Li Q., Zhang Y. Y., Li Q., Shen H. J., Gao Q. H., & Zhou S. Y. ( 2017). Reward processing in gain versus loss context: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 54( 7), 1040-1053.




[1]褚昕宇, 王泽军, 肖焕禹. 身体活动的双系统理论:一种强化学习的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(8): 1337-1350.
[2]陈乐乐, 黄蓉, 贾世伟. 反馈相关负波与成瘾[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 959-968.
[3]杜玮玮, 宋婷, 李富洪. 双价效应及其认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 1969-1975.
[4]杨紫嫣;罗宇;古若雷;刘云芝;蔡华俭. 自尊的认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(5): 788-798.
[5]赵春黎. 社会从众的生物学基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(11): 1956-1965.
[6]聂其阳;罗劲. “啊哈!”和“哈哈!”:顿悟与幽默的脑认知成分比较[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(2): 219-227.
[7]李旭;胡金生. 脑神经回路预警系统:研究社会公正的新视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(07): 1175-1181.
[8]刘春雷;张庆林. 错误加工的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(02): 341-348.
[9]李鹏;李红. 反馈负波及其理论解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2008, 16(05): 705-711.
[10]蔡厚德. 强迫症的脑功能障碍[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(03): 401-407.
[11]朱湘如;刘昌. 前扣带回功能的冲突监测理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2005, 13(06): 767-773.
[12]蔡厚德,刘昌. 大脑前扣带回皮层与执行功能[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(05): 643-650.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4457
相关话题/心理 科学 深圳大学 社会 基础

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 舌尖上的“自虐”——食辣中的心理学问题
    傅于玲1,2,邓富民1,*(),杨帅3,徐玖平11四川大学商学院,成都6100412成都理工大学心理健康教育中心,成都6100593重庆邮电大学教育发展研究院,重庆400065收稿日期:2017-10-16出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:邓富民E-mail:de ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制
    吴莹皓,蒋晶*()中国人民大学商学院,北京100872收稿日期:2017-08-02出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:蒋晶E-mail:jiangjing@rmbs.ruc.edu.cnThenumerosityeffectsinconsumerbehaviorW ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 催产素对社会决策行为的影响
    张旭凯1,尹航1,李鹏2,李红1,2()1辽宁师范大学脑与认知神经科学研究中心,大连1160292深圳大学脑功能与心理科学研究中心,深圳518060收稿日期:2017-07-06出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-02通讯作者:李红E-mail:lihongszu@szu.edu ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 适应负荷:社会经济地位影响健康的生理机制
    杨洋1,孙铃1,张红川1(),黄四林2,朱晓11中央财经大学社会与心理学院,北京1000812北京师范大学发展心理研究院,北京100875收稿日期:2017-05-10出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-02通讯作者:张红川E-mail:hongchuan.zhang@cufe. ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 企业社会责任与员工绩效的关系:一项元分析
    刘俊,秦传燕()广东财经大学工商管理学院,广州510320收稿日期:2017-09-21出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:秦传燕E-mail:352850320@qq.com基金资助:教育部人文社科项目“新生代员工工作价值取向的结构内容、形成机制与影响效应研究:一 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 视觉表象个体差异及其神经基础
    叶晓燕1,张得龙1,常松2,刘鸣1()1南师范大学心理学院,广州5106312东大学教育科学学院,山东烟台264025收稿日期:2017-06-20出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:刘鸣E-mail:liuming@scnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 信任的遗传基础:来自基因的证据
    董妍(),于晓琪,李哲能中国人民大学心理学系,北京100872收稿日期:2017-08-22出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:董妍E-mail:dong8958@126.com基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年项目(31500905)Thegeneticbasicof ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 移动健康的理论基础与效果评估
    段文杰(),张洁文,何雷武汉大学社会学系,武汉430072收稿日期:2018-04-20出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:段文杰E-mail:duan.w@whu.edu.cn基金资助:国家社科基金青年项目(17CSH073);国家社科基金重大项目(16ZDA08 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 社会规范的动态过程
    陈维扬,谢天()武汉大学哲学学院心理学系,武汉430072收稿日期:2017-07-29出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:谢天E-mail:thanksky520@126.com基金资助:国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题的资助(课题名称:物质主义的成因分析及其教育对 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言认知神经科学研究中的脑沟形态分析 *
    崔新1,苏萌萌2,舒华1()1北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008752首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京100048收稿日期:2017-02-22出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:舒华E-mail:shuhua@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:* ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01