删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

亲组织不道德行为的多层次模型 *

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

王晓辰1, 高欣洁1, 郭攀博2()
1 浙江工商大学工商管理学院, 杭州 310018
2 浙江广厦建设职业技术学院, 杭州 310012
收稿日期:2017-05-24出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28
通讯作者:郭攀博E-mail:lguopanbo@hotmail.com

基金资助:* 浙江省自然科学基金(LY16G020006);浙江省哲学社会科学规划基金(17NDJC221YB);浙江省哲学社会科学规划基金(13ZJQN055YB);教育部人文社会科学基金(17YJC190012);浙江省一流学科(A类 浙江工商大学工商管理学科 JYTgs20171106);浙江工商大学研究生科研创新基金(16020000501)

A multi-level integrated model of unethical pro-organizational behavior

WANG Xiaochen1, GAO Xinjie1, GUO Panbo2()
1 School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
2 Guangsha College of Applied Construction Technology, Hangzhou 310012, China
Received:2017-05-24Online:2018-06-10Published:2018-04-28
Contact:GUO Panbo E-mail:lguopanbo@hotmail.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 亲组织不道德行为(unethical pro-organizational behavior, UPB)是指旨在促成组织有效运作, 而违背社会的核心价值观、法律、或道德标准的行为。这一概念从一个全新的角度解释不道德行为的心理机制, 引起各界广泛关注。研究者梳理了UPB的概念与测量, 分析了与其他相关概念之间的比较, 建立了多层次的整合模型。未来研究应进一步完善UPB的概念、维度与测量, 开展其跨层次研究, 关注UPB的本土化研究。


表1UPB与相关概念的对比
相关概念 区别 联系 相关研究
“必须的恶行” “必须的恶行”可能对社会有利, 可能属于道德行为;
UPB只属于不道德行为。
UPB旨在对组织有利, “必须的恶行”在某种层面上也对组织有利。 Molinsky &
Margolis (2005)
偏差行为 偏差行为包含道德行为与不道德行为, 但不关注行为背后的动机;
UPB不仅是一种不道德行为, 还关注行为的隐含动机。
UPB是对偏差行为的补充。 Warren (2003)
组织不当行为 组织不当行为包括道德行为与不道德行为, 但并不基于社会交换理论;
UPB只包括不道德行为, 以社会交换为理论基础, 关注不道德行为对实体的潜在影响。
组织不当行为中包含的“帮助组织的行为”的概念与UPB不谋而合。 Vardi & Weitz
(2004)

表1UPB与相关概念的对比
相关概念 区别 联系 相关研究
“必须的恶行” “必须的恶行”可能对社会有利, 可能属于道德行为;
UPB只属于不道德行为。
UPB旨在对组织有利, “必须的恶行”在某种层面上也对组织有利。 Molinsky &
Margolis (2005)
偏差行为 偏差行为包含道德行为与不道德行为, 但不关注行为背后的动机;
UPB不仅是一种不道德行为, 还关注行为的隐含动机。
UPB是对偏差行为的补充。 Warren (2003)
组织不当行为 组织不当行为包括道德行为与不道德行为, 但并不基于社会交换理论;
UPB只包括不道德行为, 以社会交换为理论基础, 关注不道德行为对实体的潜在影响。
组织不当行为中包含的“帮助组织的行为”的概念与UPB不谋而合。 Vardi & Weitz
(2004)



图1UPB的多层次整合模型
图1UPB的多层次整合模型







[1] 林英晖, 程垦 . ( 2016). 领导–部属交换与员工亲组织非伦理行为: 差序格局视角. 管理科学, 29( 5), 57-70.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2016.05.005URL
[2] 谭亚莉, 廖建桥, 李骥 . ( 2011). 管理者非伦理行为到组织腐败的衍变过程、机制与干预: 基于心理社会微观视角的分析. 管理世界, ( 12), 68-77.
[3] 吴明证, 沈斌, 孙晓玲 . ( 2016). 组织承诺和亲组织的非伦理行为关系: 道德认同的调节作用. 心理科学, 39( 2), 392-398.
[4] 张桂平 . ( 2016). 职场排斥对员工亲组织性非伦理行为的影响机制研究. 管理科学, 29( 4), 104-114.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2016.04.009URL
[5] 赵红丹, 周君 . ( 2017). 企业伪善、道德推脱与亲组织非伦理行为: 有调节的中介效应. 外国经济与管理, 39( 1), 15-28.
[6] 郑睦凡, 赵俊华 . ( 2013). 权力如何影响道德判断行为: 情境卷入的效应. 心理学报, 45( 11), 1274-1282.
[7] Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1-52.
doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2URL
[8] Astakhova, M. N., & Porter, G. (2015). Understanding the work passion-performance relationship: The mediating role of organizational identification and moderating role of fit at work. Human Relations, 68( 8), 1315-1346.
doi: 10.1177/0018726714555204URL
[9] Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3( 3), 193-209.
doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3URLpmid: 15661671
[10] Bersoff, D. M . ( 1999). Why good people sometimes do bad things: Motivated reasoning and unethical behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25( 1), 28-39.
doi: 10.1016/S1529-2096(01)03015-2URL
[11] Castille C. M., Buckner J. E., & Thoroughgood C. N . ( 2016). Prosocial citizens without a moral compass? Examining the relationship between machiavellianism and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3079-9
doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3079-9URL
[12] Chen M., Chen C. C., & Sheldon O. J . ( 2016). Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101( 8), 1082-1096.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000111URLpmid: 27100068
[13] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S . ( 2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31( 6), 874-900.
[14] DeCelles K. A., DeRue D. S., Margolis J. D., & Ceranic T. L . ( 2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 681-689.
doi: 10.1037/a0026811URLpmid: 22250668
[15] Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W . ( 1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19( 2), 252-284.
doi: 10.5465/AMR.1994.9410210749URL
[16] Effelsberg D., Solga M., & Gurt J . ( 2014). Transformational leadership and follower’s unethical behavior for the benefit of the company: A two-study investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120( 1), 81-93.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1644-zURL
[17] Emerson, R. M . ( 1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003URL
[18] Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M . ( 1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58( 2), 203-210.
doi: 10.1037/h0033627URLpmid: 13640824
[19] Graham K. A., Ziegert J. C., & Capitano J . ( 2015). The effect of leadership style, framing, and promotion regulatory focus on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 126( 3), 423-436.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1952-3URL
[20] Greenberg, J. (1997). The STEAL motive: Managing the social determinants of employee theft. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations(pp. 85-108). California: SAGE Publications.
[21] Kalshoven K., van Dijk H., & Boon C . ( 2016). Why and when does ethical leadership evoke unethical follower behavior? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31( 2), 500-515.
doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2013.13515abstractURL
[22] Kish-Gephart J., Detert J., Trevi?o L. K., Baker V., & Martin S . ( 2014). Situational moral disengagement: Can the effects of self-interest be mitigated? Journal of Business Ethics, 125( 2), 267-285.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1909-6URL
[23] Kong, D. T . ( 2016). The pathway to unethical pro-organizational behavior: Organizational identification as a joint function of work passion and trait mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 86-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.035URL
[24] Krebs, D. L . ( 2005). An evolutionary reconceptualization of Kohlberg’s model of moral development. In R. L. Burgess & K. MacDonald (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human development ( 2nd ed., pp. 243-274). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
doi: 10.4135/9781452233574.n9URL
[25] Matherne, C. F., & Litchfield, S. R . ( 2012). Investigating the relationship between affective commitment and unethical pro-organizational behaviors: The role of moral identity. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9( 5), 35-46.
[26] Miao Q., Newman A., Yu J., & Xu L . ( 2013). The relationship between ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Linear or curvilinear effects. Journal of Business Ethics, 116( 3), 641-653.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1504-2URL
[27] Molinsky, A., & Margolis, J. (2005). Necessary evils and interpersonal sensitivity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30( 2), 245-268.
doi: 10.2307/20159118URL
[28] Moore C., Detert J. R., Trevi?o L. K., Baker V. L., & Mayer D. M . ( 2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65( 1), 1-48.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01237.xURL
[29] Peterson, D. (2004). Perceived leader integrity and ethical intentions of subordinates. The Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25( 1), 7-23.
doi: 10.1108/01437730410512741URL
[30] Rest, J. R . ( 1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.
[31] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L . ( 2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55( 1), 68-78.
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68URL
[32] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C . ( 1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations( 2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
[33] Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D . ( 2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88( 3), 500-517.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500URLpmid: 12814298
[34] Thau S., Derfler-Rozin R., Pitesa M., Mitchell M. S., & Pillutla M. M . ( 2015). Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100( 1), 98-113.
doi: 10.1037/a0036708URLpmid: 24773402
[35] Tian, Q., & Peterson, D. K . ( 2016). The effects of ethical pressure and power distance orientation on unethical pro-organizational behavior: The case of earnings management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25( 2), 159-171.
doi: 10.1111/beer.12109URL
[36] Trevi?o L. K., Weaver G. R., & Reynolds S. J . ( 2006). Behavioral ethical in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32( 6), 951-990.
[37] Umphress E. E., Bingham J. B., & Mitchell M. S . ( 2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95( 4), 769-780.
doi: 10.1037/a0019214URLpmid: 20604596
[38] Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B . ( 2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22( 3), 621-640.
doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0559URL
[39] Vadera, A. K., & Pratt, M. G . ( 2013). Love, hate, ambivalence, or indifference? A conceptual examination of workplace crimes and organizational identification. Organization Science, 24( 1), 172-188.
doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0714URL
[40] Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2004). Misbehavior in organizations: Theory, research, and management. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[41] Warren, D. E . ( 2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 28( 4), 622-632.
doi: 10.2307/30040751URL




[1]严秋斯, 隋杨, 郝雪晶. 亲组织不道德行为的解释机制与理论模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 338-352.
[2]李馨, 刘培, 肖晨洁, 王笑天, 李爱梅. 组织中权力如何促进亲社会行为?责任感知的中介作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1586-1598.
[3]王桃林, 张勇, 周浩, 张军伟. 亲组织不道德行为的负面效应及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(8): 1246-1255.
[4]颜爱民, 李亚丽, 谢菊兰, 李莹. 员工对企业社会责任的差异化反应:基于归因理论的阐释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 1004-1014.
[5]刘艳, 邹希, 舒心. 组织认同对员工创新行为的促进和抑制过程[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1153-1166.
[6]程垦, 林英晖. 动机视角下的亲组织不道德行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(6): 1111-1122.
[7]魏钧;陈中原;张勉. 组织认同的基础理论、测量及相关变量[J]. 心理科学进展, 2007, 15(6): 948-955.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4348
相关话题/组织 心理 社会 科学 伦理