商业判断规则的多维分析
陶一鸣; 1:广州市广播电视大学 摘要(Abstract)：

商业判断规则是一项关于经营者免于就合理的经营失误承担责任的法律规则。由商业判断规则的构成要件可知,董事之商业判断行为,只要是善意作出并尽合理注意,即使后来证明该判断是错误的,做出该判断的董事并不对因此给公司所造成的损失负责。商业判断规则在经济学上符合成本收益的考量,在内容上包含了董事注意义务的内容。

关键词(KeyWords)： 商业判断规则;;注意义务;;利益

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 陶一鸣;

Email:


参考文献(References)： [1]Cinerama,Inc.v.Technicolor,Inc.,No.8358,1991Del.Ch.LEXIS105,at*28.[2]AC Acquisitions Corp.v.Anderson,Clayton&Co.,519A.2d103,111(Del.Ch.1986).[3]Jedwab v.MGMGrand Hotels,Inc509A.2d584(Del.Ch.1986).[1]Cinerama.Inc.v.Technicolor.Inc No.8358,1991Del.Ch.LEXIS105(Del.Ch.June21,1991).[2]Miller V.Am.Tel.Co&Tel.Co.,507F.2d759(3d Cir.1974).[3]Potter V.Pholad,560N.E.2d388,395(Minn,Ct.App.1997)[4]Harhen v.Brown,710N.E.2d224,234-36(Mass.Ct.App.)[5]In re RJR Nabisco,Inc.Shareholders Litigation,Fed.Sec.L.Rep.(CCH)P94,194,at91,700(Del.Ch.Jan.31,1989)[6]Committee on Corporate Law,A.B.A.,Changes In the Model Business Corporation Act-----Amendments Pertaining to Electronic Filings,Business Lawyer,Vol.53,November1997,pp.180-181.转引自,丁丁:《商业判断规则研究》,吉林人民出版社2005年1月版,第34页。[1]Re the Walt Disney Company Derivative Litigation(Brehm v.Eisner),2006Del.Lexis307.[1]Harry G.Henn,Law of Corporations,West Publishing Company,1977,p482.[2]William L.Cary,Melvin Aron Eisenbery,Cases and Materials on Corporations(fifth edition),the Foundation Press,INC,1980,p553.[1]Manning,The Business Judgment Rule and The Directors’Duty of Attention,39Bus,Law(1984)[2]Adolf A.Berle&Gardiner C.Means,The Modern Corporation and Private Property,p.336[1]See DOES DELAWARE'S SECTION102(b)(7)PROTECTRECKLESS DIRECTORS FROMPERSONAL LIABILITY?ONLY IF DEL-AWARE COURTS ACTIN GOOD FAITH,Matthew R.Berry,Washington Law Review,November,2004.[2]Sinclair Oil Corp.V Levien(280A.2d717,1971,p.720.)[3]Aronson v.Lewis案中,法官也认为“在商业判断规则下董事责任是基于“重大过失”理念而建立的”。持相同理念的还有AL-LEN法官,他也认为:“原告要挑战商业判断规则必须证明董事违反注意义务且对原告造成了损失。”see W.T.Allen,J.B.Jacobs and L.E.Strine,Jr.,"Function Over Form:A Reassessment of Standards of Review in Delaware Corporation Law"(2001),26Del.J.Corp.L.859,at p.892。[4]Cinerama,Inc.v.Technicolor,Inc.,No.8358,1991Del.Ch.LEXIS105,at36(Del.Ch.June21,1991)(Revised June24,1991),reprinted in17DEL.J.CORP.L.551,572(1992).[1]丁丁:《商业判断规则研究》,吉林人民出版社2005年版。[2]曹顺明:《股份有限公司董事损害赔偿责任研究》,中国法制出版社2005年版。[3]亚当.斯密:《国富论》,唐日松等译,华夏出版社2005年版。