删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

民族主义与国际主义国际私法思想的对立与融合

中国政法大学 辅仁网/2017-06-25
民族主义与国际主义国际私法思想的对立与融合
耿勇; 1:河南大学法学院 摘要(Abstract)：

20世纪中期以前,民族主义与普遍主义国际私法思想呈现出对峙的局面。随着比较法学派的兴起,这种对峙不断缓和并趋于统一和融合。这种统一和融合的趋势主要表现在两个方面:一是商人法在国际私法中的地位和作用受到重视,二是北美自由贸易联盟和欧盟的不同的国际私法一体化路径所达到的异曲同工的效果。

关键词(KeyWords)： 民族主义;;国际主义;;国际私法;;一体化

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 耿勇;

Email:


参考文献(References)： [1]Pavel Kalensky.Trends of Private International Law.Prague:Academia Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences,1971,p.81.[2]Pavel Kalensky.Trends of Private International Law.Prague:Academia Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences,1971,p.96-151.[1]Pavel Kalensky.Trends of Private International Law.Prague:Academia Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences,1971,p.139.[1]Friedrich K.Juenger.Lessons Comparisons Might Teach.The American Journal of Comparative Law,1975,(4).p.742-750.[2]Benedicte Fauvarque Cosson.Comparative Law and Conflict of Laws:Allies or Enemies.The American Journal of Comparative Law,2001,(3).p.637-646.[3]Benedicte Fauvarque Cosson.Comparative Law and Conflict of Laws:Allies or Enemies.The American Journal of Comparative Law,2001,(3).p.407-427.[1]Mark D.Rosen.The Empirical and Theoretical Underpinnings of the Law Merchant:Do Codification and Private International Leave Room for a New Law Merchant.Chicago Journal of International Law.2004,(5).[2]Hugh Collins.Regulating Contract.London:Oxford University Press,1999.p.59.[3]Gunther Tubner.Global Law Without A State.Aldershot:Dartmouth Pub Co.,1996.p.3.[4]Frederic William Maitland.Select Pleas in Manorial and other Seigniorial Courts.London:Professional Books,1974.p.133.[5]Thomas E.Carbonneau.Lex Mercatoria Arbitration.Hague:Kluwer Law International,1998.p.99.[1]RenDavid.The International Unification of Private Law.International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law.Hamburg:Max Planck Insti-tute,1971.p.56-61.[2]Fredrich K.Juenger.Conflict of Laws,Comparative Law and Civil:The Lex Mercatoria and Private International Law,La.L.Rev.,2000,(60).[3]Armistead M.Dobie.Seven Implications of Swift v.Tyson.Virginia Law Review,1930,(6).[4]Gene R.Shreve.From Swift to Erie:An Historical Perspective.Michigan Law Review.1984,(4).[1]Otto Kahn Freund.The Growth of Internationalism in English Private International Law:Lectures.Jerusalem:Magnes Press,HebrewU-niversity,1960.p.136.[2]Friedrich K.Juenger.The Inter-American Convention on the LawApplicable to International Contract:Some Highlights and Compari-sons.The American Journal of Comparative Law.1994,(2).p.381-393.[3]Boris Kozolchyk.The UNIDROITPrinciples as a Model for the Unification of the Best Contractual Practices in the Americas.The Ameri-can Journal of Comparative Law,1998,(46).[1]H.Patrick Glenn.Conflict of Laws in a Common Market?The NAFTA EXPERIMENT.Chicago-Kent Law Review,2000,(76).p.1789-1819.[2]H.Patrick Glenn.Conflict of Laws in a Common Market?The NAFTA EXPERIMENT.Chicago-Kent Law Review,2000,(76).[1]Hilton v.Guyot,159U.S.113(1895)[EB/OL].http://supreme.justia.com/us/159/133/.2006-09-19.[2]Hilton v.Guyot,159U.S.113(1895)[EB/OL].http://supreme.justia.com/us/159/133/.2006-09-19.[3]H.Patrick Glenn.Conflict of Laws in a Common Market?The NAFTA EXPERIMENT.Chicago-Kent Law Review,2000,(76).[4]H.Patrick Glenn.Conflict of Laws in a Common Market?The NAFTA EXPERIMENT.Chicago-Kent Law Review,2000,(76).[1]耿勇:《国家主权与国际私法后现代转型》,中国政法大学出版社2007年版。[2][美]里.布里梅耶:《冲突法:案例与资料》,中信出版社2003年版。[3]李浩培:《李浩培文选》,法律出版社2000年版。[4]杜涛:《德国国际私法:理论、方法和立法变迁》,法律出版社2006年版。[5]黄进、胡永庆:“现代商人法论——历史和趋势”,载《比较法研究》1997年第2期。[6]黄进:《国际私法》,法律出版社1999年版。[7]肖永平:《欧盟统一国际私法研究》,武汉大学出版社2002年版。[8]高丽蓉、朱景文:“比较法作用的新领域”,载《比较法研究》2003年第6期。[9]耿勇:“意大利新国际私法管辖权规则初探”,载《政法论坛》2003年第3期。

相关话题/中国政法大学 历史 河南大学 政法 法学院

Free考研考试FreeKaoYan.Com
欢迎来到Free考研考试，"为实现人生的Free而奋斗"

© 2020 FreeKaoYan! . All rights reserved.