删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

Quick purification of recombinant adeno-associated viruses with the receptor-binding capture

本站小编 Free考研考试/2021-12-26

Quick purification of recombinant adeno-associated viruses with the receptor-binding capture
Peipei Chen1, Xiaoming Liu1, Huipeng Lu1, Xiaohui Zhou1, Xinyu Zhang1, Xiaoli Xia1, Huaichang Sun1,2
1. Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu Province, China;
2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory for High-Tech Research and Development of Veterinary Biopharmaceuticals, Jiangsu Agri-animal Husbandry Vocational College, Taizhou 225300, Jiangsu Province, China
Received: 27 April 2020; Revised: 20 May 2020; Published online: 27 May 2020
Foundation item: Supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2018YFC0840404-3) and by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
Corresponding author: Huaichang Sun, Tel: +86-514-87979335; Fax: +86-514-87972218; E-mail: sunh@yzu.edu.cn.

Abstract: [Objective] To establish a receptor-binding capture method for recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) purification.[Methods] We expressed polycystic kidney disease (PKD) domains 1 and 2 of AAV receptor in E. coli as an elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) fusion protein. We purified the fusion protein by inverse transition cycling (ITC). We generated two versions of rAAV-GFP and incubated them with ELP-PKD protein. We recovered the protein-bound rAAV-GFP by ITC and extracted the viral DNA for PCR analysis. We optimized the conditions for rAAV-GFP purification and identified the purified rAAV by electron microscopy and Western blotting.[Results] ELP-PKD fusion protein was correctly expressed as a soluble protein which was purified to more than 90% purity. We demonstrated the specific affinity of ELP-PKD fusion protein for rAAV-GFP binding. We purified rAAV-GFP with 58% recovery from insect cells or 56% recovery from AAV-293 cells. After elution, we obtained final rAAV-GFP recovery rates of 46% and 44% from the two cell types, respectively. We demonstrated that the purified rAAV-GFP had the typical morphology and structural proteins of AAV.[Conclusion] We established ELP-PKD-binding capture method for quick purification of rAAV from different cell types.
Keywords: adeno-associated virus receptorELP fusion expressionreceptor-binding capturerecombinant AAV purification
快速纯化重组腺联病毒的受体结合捕捉方法
陈裴裴1, 刘晓明1, 卢会鹏1, 周晓慧1, 张鑫宇1, 夏晓莉1, 孙怀昌1,2
1. 扬州大学兽医学院, 江苏省重要动物疫病和人兽共患病防控协同创新中心, 江苏 扬州 225009;
2. 江苏农牧科技职业技术学院, 江苏省兽用生物制品高技术研发重点实验室, 江苏 泰州 225300
收稿日期:2020-04-27;修改日期:2020-05-20;网络出版日期:2020-05-27
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0840404-3);江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目(PAPD)
通信作者:孙怀昌, Tel: +86-514-87979335;Fax: +86-514-87972218;E-mail: sunh@yzu.edu.cn.

摘要[目的] 建立用于重组腺联病毒(AAV)纯化的受体结合捕捉方法。[方法] 将AAV受体的多囊肾病(PKD)结构域1和2与类弹性蛋白多肽(ELP)在重组大肠杆菌中进行融合表达,利用相变循环(ITC)纯化ELP-PKD融合蛋白;分别用昆虫和AAV-293细胞制备rAAV-GFP,与ELP-PKD融合蛋白共孵育后进行ITC,从沉淀复合物提取病毒DNA进行PCR检测;在优化条件下利用ELP-PKD蛋白结合捕捉rAAV-GFP,利用电子显微镜观察、免疫转印和细胞感染试验进行rAAV鉴定。[结果] ELP-PKD融合蛋白获得正确、可溶性表达,ITC纯化的蛋白纯度大于90%;ELP-PKD蛋白能特异结合rAAV-GFP,结合具有pH、温度和时间依赖性,受体结合捕捉方法可在1 h内完成,从两种细胞纯化rAAV-GFP的回收率分别为58%和56%;rAAV-GFP洗脱具有pH和温度依赖性,洗脱rAAV-GFP的回收率分别为46%和44%;纯化rAAV-GFP具有AAV的典型形态和结构蛋白。[结论] 建立的ELP-PKD结合捕捉法可用于不同细胞源rAAV的快速纯化。
关键词:腺联病毒受体ELP融合表达受体结合捕捉重组AAV纯化
Recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAVs) have broad applications in gene therapy, vaccine development and biomedical research[1-2]. However, the application of rAAV technology is hindered by the scale production and downstream processing[3]. The traditional method for rAAV purification is cesium chloride gradient centrifugation[4]. Although both yield and purity are generally high, this technique has the drawbacks of limited cell lysate loading capacity and prolonged exposure to harmful cesium chloride[3]. Iodixanol is an alternative gradient medium for rAAV purification with the advantage of low toxicity[5]. However, iodixanol gradient centrifugation has the same drawback of limited cell lysate loading capacity as cesium chloride gradient centrifugation. Ion-exchange and affinity chromatography have been developed for scale rAAV purification with enhanced yield and purity[6]. However, chromatographic techniques can not separate the vector-related impurities from fully functional vector particles[3]. Therefore, there is the necessity to develop cost-effective methods for scale purification of rAAV vectors.
Receptor-binding capture and magnetic sequestration has been developed to concentrate noroviruses from large volume samples[7-9]. Although this technique is simple and highly sensitive, it is not suitable for virus purification at scales. Elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs) are synthetic polymers of pentapeptide repeats (e.g., Val-Pro-Gly-Xaa-Gly), where Xaa can be any amino acid except proline. ELPs have an unequal property, reversible phase transition, allowing the change from soluble monomers to insoluble aggregates at specific transition temperatures[10]. Therefore, ELP fusion proteins can be purified simply by inverse transition cycling (ITC) with broad applications such as recombinant protein purification, drug delivery and vaccine development[11-12]. More recently, a simple method for quick purification of adenoviruses has been developed by combining the receptor-binding capture with ELP-mediated precipitation[13].
AAV receptor (AAVR) or KIAA0319L is a type-Ⅰ membrane protein with five Ig-like polycystic kidney disease (PKD) domains[14]. Although AAVR is an N-linked glycoprotein, the glycosylation is not a strict requirement for AAV binding. AAV2 or AAV5 interacts predominantly with the PKD2 or PKD1 domain of AAVR. Other AAV serotypes require a combination of PKD1 and PKD2 domains for optimal binding[15]. In this study, a novel receptor-binding capture method was established for quick purification of rAAV from different cell types.
1 Materials and methods 1.1 Bacterial strains, cell lines and vectors E. coli strains DH5α and BL21(DE3) (Stratagene, USA) were used as the host strains for gene cloning or recombinant protein expression. E. coli strain HH10Bac (Invitrogen, USA) was used for Bacmid preparation in insect cells. Sf9 insect cells (Invitrogen, USA) were cultured in serum-free SF-900 Ⅱ medium (Gibco, USA) at 27 ℃ and agitated at 110 r/min. Human kidney AAV-293 cells (ATCC, USA) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Baculovirus vectors pFastBacTM 1 and pFastBacTM Dual (Invitrogen, USA) were used for generation of recombinant baculoviruses in insect cells. AAV vectors pAAV-RC, pAAV-CMV and pHelper (Stratagene, USA) were used for generation of rAAV in mammalian cells.
1.2 Construction of prokaryotic expression vector ELP fusion expression vector pEI/GFP was kindly provided by Professor Wood at Princeton University, USA. The modified vector pET-ELP was constructed as previously described[16]. Briefly, the coding sequence for ELP was excised from pEI/GFP vector with Nde I and Sac I digestion, and cloned into pET-30a (+) vector (Invitrogen, USA) after digestion with the same restriction enzymes. The coding sequences for PKD1 and PKD2 domains of AAVR (GenBank accession: NM_024874) were adapted to E. coli codon usage using JAVA Codon Adaption Tool[17]. The synthetic sequence was cloned into pET-ELP vector with Hind Ⅲ and Xho I digestion. The recombinant vector pELP-PKD was identified by restriction digestion and sequence analysis.
1.3 ELP-PKD fusion protein expression The pELP-PKD vector was transformed into BL21(DE3) E. coli. After growing for 5 h at 37 ℃ in 2× YT medium (10 g yeast extract, 16 g tryptone, 5 g NaCl/L) containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin, the expression of ELP-PKD fusion protein was induced for 18 h at 20 ℃ with 0.2 mmol/L IPTG (Isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside). After centrifugation for 10 min at 500 g, cells were washed and disrupted in PBS (pH 7.2) by sonication treatment. Following centrifugation for 20 min at 12000×g at 4 ℃, the cell lysate was used for ELP-PKD protein purification.
1.4 ELP-PKD fusion protein purification ELP-PKD fusion protein was purified by ITC as previously described[18]. Briefly, the centrifuged cell lysate was mixed with an equal volume of 6 mol/L NaCl and incubated for 10 min at different temperatures. After centrifugation for 5 min at room temperature, the protein pellet was dissolved in cold PBS, centrifuged for 10 min at 4 ℃, and analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE for protein purity. Then, the cell lysate was incubated for 10 min with different concentrations of NaCl at the determined temperature, and centrifuged for 5 min at room temperature. The protein pellet was dissolved in cold PBS and analyzed as described. Finally, 200 mL of the cell lysate was incubated for 10 min at the determined temperature with the determined concentration of NaCl. After centrifugation for 5 min at room temperature, the protein pellet was washed, dissolved in cold PBS and centrifuged for 10 min at 12000×g before SDS-PAGE analysis.
1.5 Generation of rAAV-GFP in Sf9 insect cells Recombinant baculovirus (rBac) rBac-RC and rBac-GFP were prepared as previously described[19]. Briefly, the rep and cap genes of AAV2 were codon-optimized for optimal expression in insect cells. The synthetic genes were cloned into pFasBactTM Dual vector with Bgl Ⅱ and Xba I or Sma I and Sph I digestion. The recombinant vector was called pBac-RC. The inverse terminal repeats (ITRs) of AAV2 were excised from pAAV-CMV vector and cloned into pFastBacTM 1 vector with BamH I and Hind Ⅲ digestion. The resultant vector was called pBac-ITR. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene was amplified from pEGFP-N1 vector (Clontech, USA) using the sense primer (5′-ATCTCGAGATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAG-3′) and the antisense primer (5′-CGAAGCTTTTACT TGTACAGCTCGTCC-3′). The PCR product was cloned into pBac-ITR vector with EcoR I and BamH I digestion. The recombinant vector was called pBac-GFP. Both pBac-RC and pBac-GFP vectors were transformed individually into HH10Bac E. coli and the purified recombinant bacmids were transfected individually into Sf9 insect cells using LipofectamineTM 3000 transfecting agent (Invitrogen, USA) by following the manufacturer's instruction. The rBac-RC and rBac-GFP were harvested at 72 h post transfection. Sf9 cells were co-infected with rBac-RC and rBac-GFP (MOI of 1). The resultant rAAV-GFP was harvested at 72 h post infection (hpi), titrated on AAV-293 cells and expressed as fluorescence formation units (FFU)/mL as previously described[20].
1.6 Generation of AAV-GFP in AAV-293 cells GFP gene was amplified from pEGFP-N1 vector using the sense primer (5′-GCCACCATGGT GAGAGAGAG-3′) and the antisense primer (5′-TC ACTACTTATACAGCTCGTCCA-3′). The PCR product was cloned into pAAV-CMV vector with EcoR I and BamH I digestion. The recombinant pAAV-GFP vector, together with commercially available pAAV-RC and pHelper vectors, was transfected into AAV-293 cells using LipofectamineTM 3000 transfecting agent as described. The resultant rAAV-GFP was harvested 72 h post transfection and titrated on AAV-293 cells as described.
1.7 Virus binding assay The insect cell-derived rAAV-GFP (107 FFU/mL) was mixed with an equal volume (100 μL) of ELP-PKD fusion protein or ELP control protein (200 μg/mL). After incubation for 60 min at 4 ℃, 200 μL of 4 mol/L NaCl was added and incubated for 10 min at 26 ℃. After centrifugation for 5 min at 12000×g at room temperature, the protein-bound rAAV-GFP was washed three times with 2 mol/L NaCl and suspended in 100 μL of PBS. The viral DNA was extracted using Viral DNA Extraction Kit (OMEGA, China). PCR (50 μL) was performed using GFP-specific primer pair as described.
1.8 rAAV-GFP purification Firstly, ELP-PKD fusion protein was diluted to 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 μg/mL with PBS (pH 7) and mixed with an equal volume (100 μL) of the vector-transfected insect cell lysate. After incubation for 60 min at 4 ℃, the protein-bound rAAV-GFP was collected by ITC and titrated on AAV-293 cells as described. Secondly, ELP-PKD protein was diluted to the determined concentration with PBS (pH 7) and incubated with the insect cell lysate for 5, 15, 3, 45 or 60 min at 4 ℃ before rAAV-GFP recovery and titration. Thirdly, ELP-PKD protein was diluted to the determined concentration with PBS (pH 7) and incubated with the insect cell lysate for the determined time at 4, 20, 25, 30 or 37 ℃ before rAAV-GFP recovery and titration. Fourthly, ELP-PKD protein was diluted to the determined concentration with PBS (pH 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8) and incubated with the insect cell lysate for the determined time at the determined temperature before rAAV-GFP recovery and titration. Finally, rAAV-GFP was purified from 20 mL of the vector-transfected insect or AAV-293 cell lysate under the optimized conditions.
1.9 AAV-GFP elution Firstly, ELP-PKD-bound rAAV-GFP was eluted from ELP-PKD protein for 30 min at 4 ℃ with PBS of pH 3, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 10. After immediate neutralization to pH 7, ELP-PKD protein was removed by ITC and the recovered rAAV-GFP was titrated on AAV-293 cells as described. Secondly, the protein-bound rAAV-GFP was eluted for 5, 15, 30, 45 or 60 min at the determined pH at 4 ℃ before rAAV-GFP recovery and titration. Thirdly, the protein-bound rAAV-GFP was eluted for the determined time at the determined pH at 4, 20, 25, 30 or 37 ℃ before rAAV-GFP recovery and titration. Finally, rAAV-GFP was eluted from ELP-PKD protein under the optimized conditions.
1.10 AAV-GFP characterization To analyze the morphology of rAAV-GFP, the purified virus was absorbed onto copper grids (400-mesh) for 2.5 min at room temperature, stained with 3% phosphotungstic acid for 2.5 min, and observed under transmission electron microscope (Philips, Tecnai 12, Germany) at an acceleration voltage of 75 kV. To analyze the infectivity of rAAV-GFP, PK-15 cells were infected with the purified rAAV-GFP (MOI=1) and observed for GFP-positive cells under fluorescent microscope 48 h post transduction. To analyze the structural proteins of rAAV-GFP, the purified virus was separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking for 1 h at 37 ℃ with 5% defatted milk powder in PBS, Western blotting was performed using mouse anti-AAV Cap serum (1:2000) as the first antibody and DylightTM 800-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (1:10000; KPL, USA) as the second antibody. The hybridization signal was scanned on Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR, USA) at 800 nm.
2 Results 2.1 ELP-PKD protein expression The recombinant vector pELP-PKD (Figure 1-A) was transformed into BL21(DE3) E. coli for ELP-PKD fusion protein expression. For ITC to be useful, a large enough fraction of ELP-PKD fusion protein must be expressed as a soluble protein. Therefore, the expression of ELP-PKD fusion protein was slowly induced at 20 ℃ with 0.2 mmol/L IPTG. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that, compared to the non-induced cell control, an expected 67-kDa extra protein was present in the cell extract of pELP-PKD recombinant E. coli, more than 90% of which was present in the soluble fraction of centrifuged cell extract (Figure 1-B).
Figure 1 SDS-PGE analysis of ELP-PKD fusion protein expression and purification. A: The schematic structure of pELP-PKD vector. The PKD1 and PKD2 gene segments of AAVR were fused in frame with ELP coding sequence and the expression of ELP-PKD fusion gene is under the control of T7 promoter (PT7). B: SDS-PAGE analysis of ELP-PKD fusion protein expression. The un-induced cell extract (1), IPTG-induced cell extract (2), supernatant (3) and pellet (4) of centrifuged cell extract are shown. C: SDS-PAGE analysis of purified ELP-PKD fusion protein. D: Western blotting of ELP-PKD fusion protein.
图选项





2.2 ELP-PKD protein purification To optimize the ITC conditions for ELP-PKD protein purification, the bacterial extract was incubated first at different temperatures in 3 mol/L NaCl solution, and then at the determined temperature in different concentrations of NaCl solution. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the optimal ITC conditions for ELP-PKD protein purification was incubation for 10 min at 26 ℃ in 2 mol/L NaCl solution. After once cycle of ITC, ELP-PKD fusion protein was purified to 92% purity (Figure 1-C), which reacted positively with the mAb specific for His-tag at its C-terminus (Figure 1-D).
2.3 Binding of ELP-PKD protein to rAAV-GFP The rAAV-GFP was incubated with ELP-PKD protein or ELP control protein and then precipitated by one cycle of ITC. The protein-bound rAAV-GFP was collected for DNA extraction and PCR analysis using GFP-specific primers. An expected 720-bp product was amplified from ELP-PKD-incubated rAAV-GFP, but not from the control protein-incubated rAAV-GFP (Figure 2).
Figure 2 The viral DNA was extracted from rAAV- GFP (1), ELP-PKD-bound rAAV-GFP (2) or ELP control protein-incubated rAAV-GFP (3), and amplified by PCR using gfp-specific primers with negative control (4).
图选项





2.4 Purification of rAAV-GFP To optimize the conditions for rAAV-GFP purification, rBac-infected insect cell extract was incubated for different times at different temperatures at different pH values with different concentrations of ELP-PKD protein. The protein-bound rAAV-GFP was precipitated by one cycle of ITC. Virus titration showed that the binding of ELP-PKD protein to rAAV-GFP was protein concentration-, pH-, temperature- and time-dependent (Figure 3). Finally, rAAV-GFP was purified from 20 mL of cell extracts under the optimized conditions (pH 7.0/4 ℃/15 min/100 μg of ELP-PKD protein/mL) with 58% recovery from insect cells or 56% recovery from AAV-293 cells.
Figure 3 Optimization of the conditions for rAAV-GFP purification by ELP-PKD-binding capture. The rAAV was incubated with different concentrations ELP-PKD protein (A) for different times (B) at different temperatures (C) and at different pH 7 values (D). The protein-bound rAAV was precipitated by ITC and titrated directly on AAV-293 cells.
图选项





The rAAV was incubated with ELP-PKD fusion protein or ELP control protein and the protein-bound rAAV was precipitated by ITC. The viral DNA was extracted from rAAV (1), ELP-PKD-bound rAAV (2) or ELP-bound rAAV (3) and detected by PCR using gfp-specific primers with PBS as the negative control (4).
2.5 Elution of rAAV-GFP To optimize the conditions for rAAV-GFP elution, ELP-PKD protein-bound rAAV-GFP was incubated for different times at different temperatures at different pH values, and the eluted rAAV-GFP was recovered after an additional round of ITC. Virus titration showed that elution of rAAV-GFP was pH-, temperature-dependent and slightly time-dependent (Figure 4). Finally, rAAV-GFP was eluted under the optimized conditions (pH 3/25 ℃/30 min) with final recovery of 47% from insect cells or 44% from AAV-293 cells.
Figure 4 Optimization of the conditions for rAAV-GFP elution. The protein-bound rAAV was eluted at different pH values (A) for different times (B) at different temperatures (C). ELP-PKD protein was removed by ITC and the recovered rAAV-GFP was titrated on AAV-293 cells.
图选项





2.6 rAAV-GFP characterization Electron microscopy showed that the purified rAAV-GFP had the typical AAV morphology with a diameter of about 22 nm (Figure 5-A). Cell infection assay showed that the purified rAAV-GFP was highly infectious for AAV-293 cells (Figure 5-B). Western blotting analysis showed that rAAV-GFP before and after purification was recognized by anti-AAV antibody (Figure 5-C).
Figure 5 Identification of rAAV-GFP purified with ELP-PKD-binding capture. A: Electron microscopy of virus particles; B: Western blotting of viral structural proteins; C: Fluorescent analysis of virus infectivity in AAV-293 cells.
图选项





3 Discussion The current methods for rAAV purification are time-consuming, expensive and/or scale-limited. Although AAVR is a 150-kDa glycoprotein, the glycosylation is not strictly required for AAV binding or functional transduction[15]. PKD domains of AAVR with different affinities for AAV binding have been expressed in E. coli as maltose or glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins and purified by affinity chromatography[14-15]. This warranted us to develop a novel method for rAAV purification by combining PKD-binding capture with ELP-mediated precipitation. To this end, both PKD1 and PKD2 domains of AAVR were expressed as an ELP fusion protein and purified simply by ITC. Under the optimized conditions, a sufficient amount of ELP-PKD fusion protein was expressed as a soluble protein and purified to high purity (> 90%) after one cycle of ITC. Although the ELP used in this study is a 55-kDa large protein, the ELP-PKD fusion protein remained the specific affinity for rAAV binding, confirming that ELPs do not interfere with recombinant protein folding[21].
The optimization experiments showed that the binding of ELP-PKD protein to rAAV-GFP was pH-, temperature-, time- and protein concentration-dependent. Under the optimized conditions, the rAAV was efficiently captured from the vector-transfected insect cell extract after one cycle of ITC. The purification process could be accomplished within 30 min, confirming the simplicity and speediness of ELP-PKD-binding capture for rAAV purification.
Although the main principle of ELP- PKD-binding capture for rAAV purification is similar to that of ELP-CAR-binding capture for rAd purification[13], the two purification methods have the following differences. Although the recovery of ELP-PKD-bound rAAV-GFP was lower than that of ELP-CAR-bound rAd-GFP, the final recovery of rAAV-GFP was higher than that of rAd-GFP after elution. This indicates that elution of rAAV from ELP-PKD protein was more easier than rAd from ELP-CAR protein, which could be explained by different binding affinities of the two virus receptors[13]. In addition, the cell transduction efficiency of ELP-CAR-bound rAd-GFP is significantly lower than that of eluted rAd-GFP. In contrast, the cell transduction efficiency of ELP-PKD-bound rAAV-GFP was similar to or even higher than the eluted rAAV-GFP, which could be explained by the finding that ELPs can enhance AAV-mediated gene delivery into mammalian cells[22]. These data suggest that ELP-PKD-bound rAAV can be used directly for gene therapy and vaccine development.
Recombinant AAVs can be prepared in mammalian and insect cells with significant difference in yield. To evaluate the feasibility of ELP-PKD-binding capture for rAAV purification from different cell types, two versions of rAAV-GFP were generated in insect and AAV-293 cells. After ELP-PKD-binding capture, the recovery rate (58%) of ELP-PKD-bound rAAV-GFP from insect cells was similar to that (56%) from AAV-293 cells. After elution, the final recovery rates of rAAV-GFP from the two cell types were also similar (47% vs. 44%). Such rAAV recovery rates were comparable to that with iodixanol gradient centrifugation[3] or with the combination of affinity and ion exchange chromatography[23].
In conclusion, the PKD1 and PKD2 domains of AAVR were expressed as an ELP fusion protein and purified to high purity simply by ITC. The ELP-PKD-binding capture method developed is feasible for quick purification of rAAVs from different cell types.

References
[1] Berns KI, Muzyczka N. AAV: an overview of unanswered questions. Human Gene Therapy, 2017, 28(4): 308-313. DOI:10.1089/hum.2017.048
[2] Nieto K, Salvetti A. AAV vectors vaccines against infectious diseases. Frontiers in Immunology, 2014, 5: 5.
[3] Lock M, Alvira M, Vandenberghe LH, Samanta A, Toelen J, Debyser Z, Wilson JM. Rapid, simple, and versatile manufacturing of recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors at scale. Human Gene Therapy, 2010, 21(10): 1259-1271. DOI:10.1089/hum.2010.055
[4] Zolotukhin S, Byrne BJ, Mason E, Zolotukhin I, Potter M, Chesnut K, Summerford C, Samulski RJ, Muzyczka N. Recombinant adeno-associated virus purification using novel methods improves infectious titer and yield. Gene Therapy, 1999, 6(6): 973-985. DOI:10.1038/sj.gt.3300938
[5] Hermens WT, Brake O, Dijkhuizen PA, Sonnemans MA, Grimm D, Kleinschmidt JA, Verhaagen J. Purification of recombinant adeno-associated virus by iodixanol gradient ultracentrifugation allows rapid and reproducible preparation of vector stocks for gene transfer in the nervous system. Human Gene Therapy, 1999, 10(11): 1885-1891. DOI:10.1089/10430349950017563
[6] Kaludov N, Handelman B, Chiorini JA. Scalable purification of adeno-associated virus type 2, 4, or 5 using ion-exchange chromatography. Human Gene Therapy, 2002, 13(10): 1235-1243. DOI:10.1089/104303402320139014
[7] Pan LW, Zhang QG, Li X, Tian P. Detection of human norovirus in cherry tomatoes, blueberries and vegetable salad by using a receptor-binding capture and magnetic sequestration (RBCMS) method. Food Microbiology, 2012, 30(2): 420-426. DOI:10.1016/j.fm.2011.12.026
[8] Tian P, Yang D, Pan LW, Mandrell R. Application of a receptor-binding capture quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay to concentrate human norovirus from sewage and to study the distribution and stability of the virus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(2): 429-436. DOI:10.1128/AEM.06875-11
[9] Tong HI, Connell C, Boehm AB, Lu YN. Effective detection of human noroviruses in Hawaiian waters using enhanced RT-PCR methods. Water Research, 2011, 45(18): 5837-5848. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.030
[10] Meyer DE, Chilkoti A. Purification of recombinant proteins by fusion with thermally-responsive polypeptides. Nature Biotechnology, 1999, 17(11): 1112-1115. DOI:10.1038/15100
[11] Hassouneh W, Christensen T, Chilkoti A. Elastin-like polypeptides as a purification tag for recombinant proteins. Current Protocols in Protein Science, 2010, 61(1): Unit-6.11.
[12] Yeboah A, Cohen RI, Rabolli C, Yarmush ML, Berthiaume F. Elastin-like polypeptides: a strategic fusion partner for biologics. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2016, 113(8): 1617-1627. DOI:10.1002/bit.25998
[13] Wu Q, Liu WJ, Xu B, Zhang XY, Xia XL, Sun HC. Single-step concentration and purification of adenoviruses by coxsackievirus-adenovirus receptor-binding capture and elastin-like polypeptide-mediated precipitation. Archives of Virology, 2016, 161(2): 279-287. DOI:10.1007/s00705-015-2664-z
[14] Pillay S, Meyer NL, Puschnik AS, Davulcu O, Diep J, Ishikawa Y, Jae LT, Wosen JE, Nagamine CM, Chapman MS, Carette JE. An essential receptor for adeno-associated virus infection. Nature, 2016, 530(7588): 108-112. DOI:10.1038/nature16465
[15] Pillay S, Zou W, Cheng F, Puschnik AS, Meyer NL, Ganaie SS, Deng XF, Wosen JE, Davulcu O, Yan ZY, Engelhardt JF, Brown KE, Chapman MS, Qiu JM, Carette JE. Adeno-associated Virus (AAV) serotypes have distinctive interactions with domains of the cellular AAV Receptor. Journal of Virology, 2017, 91(18): e00391-17.
[16] Zong Y, Tan X, Xiao JJ, Zhang XY, Xia XL, Sun HC. Half-life extension of porcine interferon-α by fusion to the IgG-binding domain of streptococcal G protein. Protein Expression and Purification, 2019, 153: 53-58. DOI:10.1016/j.pep.2018.08.012
[17] Grote A, Hiller K, Scheer M, Münch R, N?rtemann B, Hempel DC, Jahn D. JCat: a novel tool to adapt codon usage of a target gene to its potential expression host. Nucleic Acids Research, 2005, 33(S2): W526-W531.
[18] Liu WJ, Wu Q, Xu B, Zhang XY, Xia XL, Sun HC. Single-step purification of recombinant proteins using elastin-like peptide-mediated inverse transition cycling and self-processing module from Neisseria meningitides FrpC. Protein Expression and Purification, 2014, 98: 18-24. DOI:10.1016/j.pep.2014.02.016
[19] Urabe M, Ding CT, Kotin RM. Insect cells as a factory to produce adeno-associated virus type 2 vectors. Human Gene Therapy, 2002, 13(16): 1935-1943. DOI:10.1089/10430340260355347
[20] Koeberl DD, Alexander IE, Halbert CL, Russell DW, Miller AD. Persistent expression of human clotting factor IX from mouse liver after intravenous injection of adeno-associated virus vectors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997, 94(4): 1426-1431. DOI:10.1073/pnas.94.4.1426
[21] Floss DM, Sack M, Stadlmann J, Rademacher T, Scheller J, St?ger E, Fischer R, Conrad U. Biochemical and functional characterization of anti-HIV antibody-ELP fusion proteins from transgenic plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2008, 6(4): 379-391. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00326.x
[22] Kim JS, Chu HS, Park KI, Won JI, Jang JH. Elastin-like polypeptide matrices for enhancing adeno-associated virus-mediated gene delivery to human neural stem cells. Gene Therapy, 2012, 19(3): 329-337. DOI:10.1038/gt.2011.84
[23] Nass SA, Mattingly MA, Woodcock DA, Burnham BL, Ardinger JA, Osmond SE, Frederick AM, Scaria A, Cheng SH, O'Riordan CR. Universal method for the purification of recombinant AAV vectors of differing serotypes. Molecular Therapy-Methods & Clinical Development, 2018, 9: 33-46.

相关话题/病毒 细胞 江苏 通信 结构

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 单核细胞增多性李斯特菌谷胱甘肽还原酶GR的生物学特性
    单核细胞增多性李斯特菌谷胱甘肽还原酶GR的生物学特性吕洁婷#,孙静#,郑光辉,韩月,成炯泽,宋厚辉,程昌勇浙江农林大学动物科技学院·动物医学院,浙江省畜禽绿色生态健康养殖应用技术研究重点实验室,浙江杭州311300收稿日期:2020-06-20;修回日期:2020-08-29;网络出版日期:2021 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 兔出血症病毒2型理化特性研究
    兔出血症病毒2型理化特性研究陈婉婷1#,周明忠2#,陈斌2,张鹏飞1,姜睿姣1,曾红梅1,涂藤1,陈弟诗2,杨泽晓1,3,罗燕1,3,姚学萍1,3,王印1,31.四川农业大学动物医学院,四川成都611130;2.四川省动物疫病预防控制中心,四川成都610041;3.动物疫病与人类健康四川省重点实验室 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 为人类健康奉献一生的病毒学家——曾毅*
    为人类健康奉献一生的病毒学家——曾毅*曾毅,曾用名曾汉忠,外文名TsengYi,YiZeng。1929年3月8日生于广东省揭西县五经富镇坡头墟村,2020年7月13日卒于北京。曾毅5岁开始在坡头墟小学启蒙,1943年在五经富初级中学毕业后,到梅县东山中学上高中,1946年毕业;在复旦大学商学院统计系 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 贵阳地区蝉花微生态系统中细菌种群结构与功能
    贵阳地区蝉花微生态系统中细菌种群结构与功能牟丹1,曾召英1,钟文琳1,周家喜1,瞿娇娇2,邹晓11.贵州大学生命科学学院真菌资源研究所,贵州贵阳550025;2.贵州大学茶学院,贵州贵阳550025收稿日期:2020-08-19;修回日期:2020-09-29;网络出版日期:2020-11-05基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 病毒感染性疾病与肠道微生物关系研究进展
    病毒感染性疾病与肠道微生物关系研究进展曹德民1,2,宋晓峰3,朱宝利1,2,4,51.中国科学院大学存济医学院,北京100049;2.中国科学院病原微生物与免疫学重点实验室,北京100101;3.中国疾病预防控制中心传染病预防控制所,北京102206;4.病原微生物耐药与耐药基因组学北京市重点实验室 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • NDM-1结构功能及抑制剂的抑制机理
    NDM-1结构功能及抑制剂的抑制机理崔灿1,杨海涛2,王泽方11.天津大学生命科学学院,结构生物学实验中心,天津300072;2.上海科技大学生命科学与技术学院,上海免疫化学研究所,上海201210收稿日期:2020-03-09;修回日期:2020-05-16;网络出版日期:2020-07-08基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 单细胞稳定同位素标记技术在固氮微生物中的应用研究
    单细胞稳定同位素标记技术在固氮微生物中的应用研究辛雨菡1,2,崔丽11.中国科学院城市环境研究所,中科院城市环境与健康重点实验室,福建厦门361021;2.中国科学院大学,北京100049收稿日期:2020-03-29;修回日期:2020-05-01;网络出版日期:2020-05-20基金项目:国家 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 不同致泻性大肠杆菌感染调控细胞信号通路的研究进展
    不同致泻性大肠杆菌感染调控细胞信号通路的研究进展连思琪1,2,吴云平1,2,杨敏卉1,2,夏芃芃1,2,朱国强1,21.扬州大学兽医学院,比较医学研究院,江苏扬州225009;2.江苏省动物重要疫病与人兽共患病防控协同创新中心,江苏扬州225009收稿日期:2019-11-19;修回日期:2020- ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • MicroRNA-98促进猪圆环病毒2型在3D4/21细胞中的复制
    MicroRNA-98促进猪圆环病毒2型在3D4/21细胞中的复制王小敏1,徐祥兰2,徐鹏1,王兴开1,惠禄露1,范红结3,何孔旺21.遵义医科大学微生物学教研室,贵州遵义563000;2.江苏省农业科学院兽医研究所,江苏南京210014;3.南京农业大学动物医学院,江苏南京210095收稿日期:2 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 西方蜜蜂工蜂肠道菌群定殖起始点和定殖稳态点的结构比较分析
    西方蜜蜂工蜂肠道菌群定殖起始点和定殖稳态点的结构比较分析董志祥1,李宏伟1,郭军1,2,林连兵1,2,张棋麟1,21.昆明理工大学生命科学与技术学院,云南昆明650500;2.云南省高校饲用抗生素替代技术工程研究中心,云南昆明650500收稿日期:2019-10-09;修回日期:2019-12-11 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26