删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

干湿循环对Pb污染土固化体力学和浸出特性的影响

本站小编 Free考研考试/2021-12-31

赵三青1,
1.武昌工学院土木工程学院,武汉 430065
基金项目: 武昌工学院教学研究项目(2015KYZ03)




Effect of wetting-drying cycles on mechanical and leaching properties of solidified lead-contaminated soils

ZHAO Sanqing1,
1.College of Civil Engineering, Wuchang Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430065,China

-->

摘要
HTML全文
(0)(0)
参考文献(24)
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件(0)
访问统计

摘要:为研究干湿循环作用对Pb污染土固化体力学和浸出特性的影响规律,采用普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)和磷酸镁水泥(MPC)2种固化剂对Pb污染土进行固化/稳定化处理。基于无侧限抗压强度实验、渗透实验和浸出实验,探讨干湿循环作用对Pb污染土固化体力学和浸出特性的影响规律,并结合压汞实验分析干湿循环作用对Pb污染土固化体力学和浸出特性影响的微观机制。结果表明:干湿循环作用均会降低OPC和MPC固化体的力学特性,MPC固化体耐久性要优于OPC固化体;通过浸出实验发现,OPC和MPC固化体浸出浓度均随干湿循环次数的增加而增加,当干湿循环次数大于5次时,OPC固化体浸出浓度高于浸出安全标准,而MPC固化体的浸出浓度均低于浸出安全标准;通过压汞实验发现,干湿循环作用破坏了固化土的结构完整性,增大了固化体中大孔隙(孔径>1 μm)体积。这是导致Pb污染土力学特性降低的根本原因,而固稳机制的不同是干湿循环作用下OPC和MPC固化体浸出浓度差异的本质原因。
关键词: 干湿循环/
Pb污染土/
力学特性/
浸出特性

Abstract:Portland cement (OPC) and magnesium phosphate cement (MPC) were used to stabilize/solidify lead-contaminated soils. Unconfined compressive strength test, permeability test, leaching test and MIP test were conducted to investigate the variation of mechanical properties and leaching properties of OPC and MPC treated lead-contaminated soils along with wetting-drying cycle tests. Results showed that wetting-drying cycles could reduced mechanical property of OPC and MPC solidified soil, while wetting-drying cycles durability of OPC solidified soil is worse than MPC solidified soil. Lead concentration of OPC and MPC solidified soil were increased with the times of wetting-drying cycle, the lead concentration of OPC solidified soil was above the regulations, when the times of wetting-drying cycle exceed 5, while the lead concentration of MPC solidified soil was conformed with the regulations in the whole wetting-drying cycle test. MIP test results showed that the pore volume of diameter larger than 1 μm for OPC and MPC solidified soil were increased significantly with the times of wetting-drying cycle. The changing in mechanical properties of OPC and MPC can be attributed to the increases of the pore volume of diameter larger than 1 μm, and the difference of lead concentration of OPC and MPC solidified soil can be attributed to the difference of solidified/stabilized mechanism.
Key words:wetting-drying cycle/
lead-contaminated soils/
mechanical properties/
leaching properties.

加载中
[1] 杜延军,金飞,刘松玉,等.重金属工业污染场地固化/稳定处理研究进展[J].岩土力学,2011,2(1):116-124
[2] 陈蕾, 刘松玉, 杜延军,等.水泥固化重金属铅污染土的强度特性研究[J].岩土工程学报,2010,2(12):1898-1903
[3] 张亭亭,李江山,王平,等.磷酸镁水泥固化铅污染土的应力-应变特性研究[J].岩土力学,2016,7(增刊1):215-224
[4] 陈蕾, 杜延军, 刘松玉,等.水泥固化铅污染土的基本应力-应变特性研究[J].岩土力学,2011,2(3):715-721
[5] 魏明俐,杜延军,张帆.水泥固化/稳定锌污染土的强度和变形特性试验研究[J].岩土力学,2011,32(S2):306-312
[6] DU Y J, WEI M L, REDDY K R, et al.Effect of acid rain pH on leaching behavior of cement stabilized lead-contaminated soil[J].Journal Hazard Materials,2014,1:131-140
[7] LI J S, XUE Q, WANG P, et al.Comparison of solidification/stabilization of lead contaminated soil between magnesia-phosphate cement and ordinary portland cement under the same dosage[J].Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy,2016,5(1):88-94
[8] 查甫生,刘晶晶,许龙,等.水泥固化重金属污染土干湿循环特性试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2013,35(7):1246-1252
[9] 曹智国,章定文,刘松玉.固化铅污染土的干湿循环耐久性试验研究[J].岩土力学,2011,34(12):3485-3490
[10] 廖晓勇, 崇忠义, 阎秀兰, 等.城市工业污染场地:中国环境修复领域的新课题[J].环境科学,2011,2(3):784-794
[11] 张亭亭,李江山,王平,等.磷酸镁水泥固化铅污染土的力学特性试验研究及微观机制[J].岩土力学,2016,7(S2):279-286
[12] BOARDMAN D J.Lime stabilization:Clay-metallime in teractions[D].Leice Stershire, UK:Loughboroug University, 1999
[13] BUJ I, TORRAS J, CASELLAS D, et al.Effect of heavy metals and water content on the strength of magnesium phosphate cements[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,0(1):345-350
[14] American Society for Testing and Materials.Standard test method for wetting and drying test of solid wastes:ASTM D4843-88[S].Philadephta:ASTM Press, 1988
[15] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.土工试验方法标准:GB/T 50123-1999[S].北京,1999
[16] American Society for Test and Materials.Standard test method for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permameter:ASTM D5084-03[S].Philadelphia:ASTM Publisher, 2003
[17] Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.Test methods for evaluation of solid wastes, physical chemical methods:Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (method 1311)[R].Washington D C:U.S.EPA,1992
[18] YANG J H, SHIN J M, LEE C H, et al.Stabilization of Cs/Re trapping filters using magnesium phosphate ceramics[J].Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry,2013,5(1):211-219
[19] Wastewater Technology Centre.Proposed evaluation protocol for cement-based solidified wastes[R].Canada:Environment Canada,1991
[20] 中华人民共和国环境保护部.危险废弃物鉴别标准浸出毒性鉴别:GB/T 5085.3-2007[S].北京,2007
[21] BENTUR A, BERGER R L, LAWRENCE F V, et al.Creep and drying shrinkage of calcium silicate pastes III.A hypothesis of irreversible strains[J].Cement and Concrete Research,1979,9(1):83-95
[22] BASTA N T, MCGOWEN S L.Evaluation of chemical immobilization treatments for reducing heavy metal transport in a smelter-contaminated soil[J].Environmental Pollution,2004,7(1):73-82
[23] WANG A, ZHANG J, LI J, et al.Effect of liquid-to-solid ratios on the properties of magnesium phosphate chemically bonded ceramics[J].Materials Science and Engineering:C,2013,3(5):2508-2512
[24] HORPIBULSUK S, RACHAN R, RAKSACHON Y.Role of fly ash on strength and microstructure development in blended cement stabilized silty clay[J].Soils and Foundations,2009,9(1):85-98



加载中


Turn off MathJax -->
WeChat 点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:618
HTML全文浏览数:378
PDF下载数:362
施引文献:0
出版历程

刊出日期:2018-01-14




-->








干湿循环对Pb污染土固化体力学和浸出特性的影响

赵三青1,
1.武昌工学院土木工程学院,武汉 430065
基金项目: 武昌工学院教学研究项目(2015KYZ03)
关键词: 干湿循环/
Pb污染土/
力学特性/
浸出特性
摘要:为研究干湿循环作用对Pb污染土固化体力学和浸出特性的影响规律,采用普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)和磷酸镁水泥(MPC)2种固化剂对Pb污染土进行固化/稳定化处理。基于无侧限抗压强度实验、渗透实验和浸出实验,探讨干湿循环作用对Pb污染土固化体力学和浸出特性的影响规律,并结合压汞实验分析干湿循环作用对Pb污染土固化体力学和浸出特性影响的微观机制。结果表明:干湿循环作用均会降低OPC和MPC固化体的力学特性,MPC固化体耐久性要优于OPC固化体;通过浸出实验发现,OPC和MPC固化体浸出浓度均随干湿循环次数的增加而增加,当干湿循环次数大于5次时,OPC固化体浸出浓度高于浸出安全标准,而MPC固化体的浸出浓度均低于浸出安全标准;通过压汞实验发现,干湿循环作用破坏了固化土的结构完整性,增大了固化体中大孔隙(孔径>1 μm)体积。这是导致Pb污染土力学特性降低的根本原因,而固稳机制的不同是干湿循环作用下OPC和MPC固化体浸出浓度差异的本质原因。

English Abstract






--> --> --> 参考文献 (24)
相关话题/污染 实验 力学 岩土 结构