中文关键词移动床生物膜反应器固定床生物膜反应器全程自养脱氮工艺高氨氮污水处理改性聚乙烯 英文关键词moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR)fixed-bed biofilm reactor (FBBR)CANON processhigh-ammoniawastewater treatmentmodified polyethylene

作者	单位	E-mail
付昆明	北京建筑大学城市雨水系统与水环境省部共建教育部重点实验室, 中-荷污水处理技术研发中心, 北京 100044	fukunming@163.com
李慧	北京建筑大学城市雨水系统与水环境省部共建教育部重点实验室, 中-荷污水处理技术研发中心, 北京 100044
周厚田	北京建筑大学城市雨水系统与水环境省部共建教育部重点实验室, 中-荷污水处理技术研发中心, 北京 100044
仇付国	北京建筑大学城市雨水系统与水环境省部共建教育部重点实验室, 中-荷污水处理技术研发中心, 北京 100044

中文摘要 控制温度为30℃±1℃，在移动床式生物膜反应器（MBBR）采用以改性聚乙烯为填料的全程自养脱氮（CANON）工艺，以无机高NH₄⁺-N（约400 mg·L^-1）人工模拟废水为连续进水，研究MBBR对生物膜CANON工艺脱氮性能的优化.试验控制pH在7.8左右，HRT为6 h，填料填充率为35%，经过一个月调试与培养，NH₄⁺-N及TN平均去除率达到74.28%和87.93%，最高分别可达84.68%和98.82%，此时ΔNO₃^-/ΔTN为0.12，接近理论值0.127，由此判断CANON污泥在MBBR工艺中逐渐适应并得以稳定运行.同时，对比采用相同进水基质及控制条件的固定床式生物膜反应器（FBBR），计算发现MBBR与FBBR工艺NH₄⁺-N去除率、TN去除率及去除负荷3组均方差分别为：8.31%和14.06%，7.09%和11.79%，0.17 kg·（m³·d）^-1和0.27 kg·（m³·d）^-1，前者均低于后者；并且，在MBBR与FBBR的DO平均浓度分别为1.96 mg·L^-1和3.09 mg·L^-1的情况下，MBBR与FBBR中每升氮去除负荷分别为0.53 kg·（m³·d）^-1和0.37 kg·（m³·d）^-1.因此，①相比FBBR，MBBR具有更加稳定的脱氮性能；②相比FBBR，MBBR中每升填料中的微生物具有更高的O₂利用效率及总氮去除负荷. 英文摘要 To optimize the performance of completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite (CANON), a CANON process with modified polyethylene as carriers was operated in a moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), using synthetic inorganic ammonia-rich wastewater (NH₄⁺-N about 400 mg ·L^-1) as influent at 30℃±1℃. With an HRT of 6 h, pH at 7.8, and filling rate of 35%, the average removal rate of NH₄⁺-N and TN reached 74.28% and 87.93%, respectively, and the highest removals reached 84.68% and 98.82%, respectively, while the value of ΔNO₃^-/ΔTN was 0.12, which was close to the theoretical value of 0.127. This suggested that CANON sludge gradually adapted to the environment in the MBBR and began to enter the stable stage. Compared with a fixed-bed biofilm reactor (FBBR) under the same influent and operating conditions, the mean square error of MBBR and FBBR in terms of NH₄⁺-N removal rate, TN removal rate, and TN removal load were 8.31% and 14.06%, 7.09% and 1.79%, 0.17 kg ·(m³ ·d)^-1 and 0.27 kg ·(m³ ·d)^-1, respectively, the former are lower than the latter. Moreover, while DO concentrations of MBBR and FBBR were 1.96 mg·L^-1 and 3.09 mg ·L^-1, respectively, their TN removals of per liter carriers were 0.53 kg ·(m³ ·d)^-1 and 0.37 kg ·(m³ ·d)^-1. Therefore, it was concluded that:① MBBR had a more stable nitrogen removal performance than did of FBBR, and ② MBBR had a higher TN removals of per liter carriers than did FBBR in addition to the higher utilization rate of oxygen.

PDF全文下载地址:

https://www.hjkx.ac.cn/hjkx/ch/reader/create_pdf.aspx?file_no=20180533&flag=1&journal_id=hjkx&year_id=2018