摘要:为探索地埂篱在喀斯特坡地水土保持中的价值,在重庆市酉阳县喀斯特顺层坡种植拉巴豆地埂篱,通过对根系灰度扫描、化学成分(木质素、纤维素、半纤维素)测定,单根抗拉试验和根-土复合体抗剪/冲试验,分析拉巴豆地埂篱根及根-土复合体的力学特性及影响因素。结果表明:(1)拉巴豆根系全根指标根长、根表面积、根体积、根重均表现为中坡 > 下坡 > 上坡,优势径级为0.0<d≤1.0 mm径级。全根根系纤维素的平均含量较木质素、半纤维素高,且与根系直径呈显著负相关。(2)根系平均极限抗拉力6.77 N、平均抗拉强度29.57 MPa。极限抗拉力与木质素含量呈对数函数正相关、与木质素/纤维素(木纤比)呈线性正相关,抗拉强度与纤维素含量、木纤比分别为对数函数正相关和负相关。(3)上坡位抗剪土样的根体积密度、根重密度和木纤比显著大于中、下坡;而抗冲土样的根体积密度、根重密度、纤维素和半纤维素含量则中坡较优,但不显著。(4)根系能有效提高土体抗剪性能,根-土复合体的内摩擦角与粘聚力均较对照裸地高,但仅上坡粘聚力存在显著性差异(较对照增大45.67%)。内摩擦角和抗冲指数均中坡、下坡较优,粘聚力最优值位于上坡位。根-土复合体的力学特性主要受根体积、根重、根表面积密度和纤维素的影响。综上,拉巴豆根及根-土复合体的力学特性主要贡献径级为0.0<d≤1.0 mm径级,中、下坡细根量大且根-土复合体抗冲性能表现较优,上坡根-土复合体抗剪切能力最强,但抗冲性能较弱。在推广拉巴豆地埂篱时,尽量种植于地势较低缓的中、下坡,更能凸显水土保持效益。
Abstract:To explore the effect of Dolichos lablab L. hedgerows on soil and water conservation, we planted Dolichos lablab L. at up, middle, and down slopes at bedding slopes of the karst valley in Youyang Chongqing. The roots and root-soil matrix were sampled. The mechanical properties of roots, soil anti-scourability, and soil shear strength of root-soil matrix were tested. To find the factors affecting mechanical properties, we scanned root grayscale and tested root chemical compositions (lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose), and also performed correlation analysis. The results showed that:(1) The whole root parameters (root length, root surface area, root volume, and root weight) had the highest value in the middle slope portion, followed by down slope portion; the corresponding value of the up slope portion was minimum. Root dominant diameter was in the range of 0.0<d≤1.0 mm. The average content of cellulose in plant root was higher than that of lignin and hemicellulose. The root cellulose content was significantly negatively correlated with root diameter. (2) The root average ultimate tensile force of Dolichos lablab L. was 6.77 N and the average tensile strength was 29.57 MPa. Cellulose and lignin had statistically significant influences on the root mechanical properties. Their regression relations are as follows:the ultimate tensile force increased logarithmically with lignin content and increased linearly with lignin/cellulose(wood fiber ratio); tensile strength increased logarithmically with cellulose content, decreased logarithmically with wood to fiber ratio. (3) The root volume density, root weight density, and wood fiber ratio of the up slope shear strength samples were significantly greater than those of the middle and down slopes. However, for the anti-scour samples, root volume density, root weight density, cellulose content, and lignin content were higher at middle slope portions but there was no significant difference. (4) The root system could effectively improve the shear performance of the soil. The internal friction angle and cohesion of the root-soil matrix were higher than those of the bare ground control. Significant differences in cohesion was only observed for the up slope portion, between the terrace hedgerow and bare ground control, increasing by 45.67%. The internal friction angle and anti-scourability were better at middle and down slopes. Our study showed that the mechanical properties of the root-soil matrix were mainly affected by root volume density, root weight density, root surface area density, and cellulose content. In summary, the root diameter in the range 0.0<d≤ 1.0 mm substantially contributed to the mechanical properties of Dolichos lablab L. root and root-soil matrix. The anti-scourability of root-soil matrix was better at the middle and down slope portions; the shear performance of root-soil matrix was the best at the up slope portion, but anti-scourability was the worst. When promoting the planting of terrace hedgerows of Dolichos lablab L. soil and water conservation would be improved when they are planted in low and flat terrains (such as the middle and down slope portions).
PDF全文下载地址:
https://www.ecologica.cn/stxb/article/pdf/stxb201901100085
删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)
喀斯特坡地拉巴豆地埂篱根及根-土复合体力学特性
本站小编 Free考研考试/2021-12-31
相关话题/力学 指标 纤维素 复合体 巴豆
生态效益评价内容和评价指标筛选
摘要:生态效益评价的重要性已经广为人知,但评价内容和指标不统一,大大影响了评价结果的可信度。基本上是各说各有理,很难相互比较。在分析国内外相关生态系统评价方法基础上,提出生态效益评价框架,强调生态效益与经济效益和社会效益共同构成了人类社会的价值判断标准和决策依据,是经济效益和社会效益的基础,应该包括 ...中科院生态环境研究中心 本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-31秸秆生物质炭对土壤结构体与活性碳分布、转化酶动力学参数及小麦生长的影响
摘要:为探明生物质炭输入土壤后与水稳性团聚体的作用机理,及对土壤活性碳库、微生物活性、作物生长的促进作用。以生物质炭和秸秆碳为外源碳材料,两者等碳量添加条件下,在小麦不同生育期采用湿筛法、电镜扫描、酶动力学方程等方法,测定土壤结构、酶活性、活性有机碳、及小麦产量等指标的响应情况。结果表明:生物质炭添 ...中科院生态环境研究中心 本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-31汉江中下游生态系统健康评价指标体系构建及其应用
摘要:水利工程建设影响了河流生态系统健康。为探究梯级水库、跨流域调水等水利工程建设对长江流域河流生态系统健康的影响,以汉江中下游为例,采用频次分析法和相关性分析法对评价指标进行筛选,用最小二乘法和熵系数法相结合的综合权重模型确定各评价指标权重,从整体性、稳定性及可持续性3个方面构建了河流生态系统健康 ...中科院生态环境研究中心 本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-31拉萨河河流健康评价指标体系构建及应用
摘要:为全面反映拉萨河干流生态环境现状,基于拉萨河特征和国内外研究构建了包含水文、水质、生物、生境、服务功能5个要素12个指标的河流健康评价指标体系,提出了赋值标准,并在拉萨干流进行了应用。评价所用数据来自资料收集、文献调研、现场监测和调查。评价结果显示拉萨河干流整体处于较为健康状态,且上游健康状况 ...中科院生态环境研究中心 本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-31·Cl引发萘的大气氧化机制及动力学
陈杰,马芳芳,郭熙瑞,谢宏彬大连理工大学环境学院,工业生态与环境工程教育部重点实验室,大连116024作者简介:陈杰(1995-),男,硕士,研究方向为环境化学,E-mail:jiechen@mail.dlut.edu.cn.基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(21677028)中图分类号:X171 ...中科院生态环境研究中心 本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-30白洋淀典型抗生素与底栖藻类群落指标相关性研究
张璐璐1,2,申立娜1,张玲菲1,秦珊1,姚波1,2,崔建升1,21.河北科技大学环境科学与工程学院,石家庄050000;2.河北省污染防治生物技术实验室,石家庄050000作者简介:张璐璐(1985-),女,博士,副教授,研究方向为环境变化对湖泊生态系统结构和功能的影响,E-mail:zhangl ...中科院生态环境研究中心 本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-30青霉素G钾在蔬菜地土壤中的降解动力学研究
张紫琴1,张洪昌2,沈根祥2,胡双庆2,顾海蓉2,赵晓祥11.东华大学环境科学与工程学院,上海201620;2.上海市环境科学研究院,上海200233作者简介:张紫琴(1996-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为抗生素对土壤微生物的作用,E-mail:zhangziqin185@163.com.基金项目 ...中科院生态环境研究中心 本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-30淡水生物和海水生物从基因到种群水平指标对毒性物质的敏感性差异研究——以铜为例
冯永亮,唐山学院基础教学部,唐山063000作者简介:冯永亮(1987-),男,博士研究生,讲师,研究方向为污染物的生态风险评价和水质基准构建,E-mail:yongliangfeng0511@126.com.通讯作者:冯永亮,yongliangfeng0511@126.com基金项目:“沂南县医药 ...中科院生态环境研究中心 本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-30大气PM2.5全身暴露对大鼠多脏器病理、氧化应激指标和炎症因子的影响
白丽荣,谭子康,龚航远,耿红,董川,李瑞金,山西大学环境科学研究所,太原030006作者简介:白丽荣(1995-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为环境污染与健康,E-mail:1564801337@qq.com.通讯作者:李瑞金,lirj@sxu.edu.cn基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(9154 ...中科院生态环境研究中心 本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-30青蟹对As和Cd的生物富集动力学特性
乔艺飘1,2,张龙飞1,2,刘欢3,娄晓祎1,黄冬梅1,黄宣运1,韩峰1,史永富1,,1.中国水产科学研究院东海水产研究所,农业农村部水产品质量监督检验测试中心(上海),上海200090;2.上海海洋大学食品学院,上海201306;3.中国水产科学研究院,农业农村部水产品质量安全重点实验室,北京10 ...中科院生态环境研究中心 本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-30