删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

儿童在不同卷入情境下基于资源价值的分配行为特点:内群体偏爱的作用

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

刘璐, 肖雪, 刘丽莎, 徐良苑, 张旭然, 李燕芳()
北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心, 北京 100875
收稿日期:2018-05-04出版日期:2019-05-25发布日期:2019-03-20
通讯作者:李燕芳E-mail:liyanfang@bnu.edu.cn

基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目(15BRK011);北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心研究生自主课题(BJSM-2016A1-16002)

Children’s quality-based resource allocation in different involvement contexts: The role of in-group favoritism

LIU Lu, XIAO Xue, LIU Lisha, XU Liangyuan, ZHANG Xuran, LI Yanfang()
Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Received:2018-05-04Online:2019-05-25Published:2019-03-20
Contact:LI Yanfang E-mail:liyanfang@bnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 为探究不同卷入情境下儿童基于资源价值的分配行为特点以及内群体偏爱在其中的作用, 呈现给儿童两种实验情境:实验1, 134名5~8岁儿童在第一方情境下与来自内、外群体的一名儿童分配不同价值的物品, 结果发现7~8岁儿童公平分配比例与5~6岁儿童无显著差异; 实验2, 130名5~8岁儿童在第三方情境下给来自特定群体的两名儿童分配资源, 结果发现7~8岁儿童公平分配比例显著高于5~6岁儿童。两个实验均发现儿童的分配行为表现出内群体偏爱, 5~6岁儿童比7~8岁儿童更明显。并且, 5~6岁女生比男生有更明显的内群体偏爱, 但在7~8岁组无性别差异。此外, 只有7~8岁儿童的公平分配行为表现出卷入情境上的差异, 他们在第三方情境比第一方情境下更能做出公平分配, 但5~6岁儿童的公平分配行为并无情境差异。综上可见, 比起年幼儿童, 年长儿童基于资源价值的公平行为发展得更好, 并且在两种卷入情境下受内群体偏爱的影响均更小。



图1实验情境示意图(以外群体条件为例)
图1实验情境示意图(以外群体条件为例)



图2实验材料示意图
图2实验材料示意图


表1儿童在第一方情境中的各类分配行为的人数(百分比)
分配行为类型 群体条件 5~6岁(N = 61) 7~8岁(N = 73)
男生(n = 30) 女生(n = 31) 男生(n = 40) 女生(n = 33)
公平 内群体 16 (53.33) 14 (45.16) 24 (60.00) 17 (51.52)
外群体 14 (46.67) 15 (48.39) 27 (67.50) 19 (57.58)
利他 内群体 7 (23.33) 11 (35.48) 13 (32.50) 14 (42.42)
外群体 2 (6.67) 3 (9.68) 9 (22.50) 12 (36.36)
利己 内群体 7 (23.33) 6 (19.35) 3 (7.50) 2 (6.06)
外群体 14 (46.67) 13 (41.94) 4 (10.00) 2 (6.06)

表1儿童在第一方情境中的各类分配行为的人数(百分比)
分配行为类型 群体条件 5~6岁(N = 61) 7~8岁(N = 73)
男生(n = 30) 女生(n = 31) 男生(n = 40) 女生(n = 33)
公平 内群体 16 (53.33) 14 (45.16) 24 (60.00) 17 (51.52)
外群体 14 (46.67) 15 (48.39) 27 (67.50) 19 (57.58)
利他 内群体 7 (23.33) 11 (35.48) 13 (32.50) 14 (42.42)
外群体 2 (6.67) 3 (9.68) 9 (22.50) 12 (36.36)
利己 内群体 7 (23.33) 6 (19.35) 3 (7.50) 2 (6.06)
外群体 14 (46.67) 13 (41.94) 4 (10.00) 2 (6.06)



图3不同年龄的儿童在第一方情境中不同群体条件下的分配行为的人数比例
图3不同年龄的儿童在第一方情境中不同群体条件下的分配行为的人数比例


表2儿童在第三方情境中的公平分配人数(百分比)
群体条件 5~6岁(N = 64) 7~8岁(N = 66)
男生(n = 29) 女生(n = 35) 男生(n = 33) 女生(n = 33)
外-外群体 14(48.28) 23(65.71) 28(84.85) 31(93.94)
内-内群体 15(51.72) 23(65.71) 26(78.79) 29(87.88)
内-外群体 10(34.48) 8(22.86) 18(54.55) 23(69.70)

表2儿童在第三方情境中的公平分配人数(百分比)
群体条件 5~6岁(N = 64) 7~8岁(N = 66)
男生(n = 29) 女生(n = 35) 男生(n = 33) 女生(n = 33)
外-外群体 14(48.28) 23(65.71) 28(84.85) 31(93.94)
内-内群体 15(51.72) 23(65.71) 26(78.79) 29(87.88)
内-外群体 10(34.48) 8(22.86) 18(54.55) 23(69.70)



图4不同年龄的儿童在第三方情境中不同群体条件下的公平分配行为的人数比例
图4不同年龄的儿童在第三方情境中不同群体条件下的公平分配行为的人数比例







1 Aguilar-Pardo D., Martinez-Arias R., & Colmenares F . ( 2013). The role of inhibition in young children's altruistic behaviour. Cognitive Processing, 14( 3), 301-307.
2 Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L . ( 1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2( 2), 107-122.
3 Blake, P. R., & McAuliffe, K . ( 2011). "I had so much it didn't seem fair": Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition, 120( 2), 215-224.
4 Blake, P. R., & Rand, D. G . ( 2010). Currency value moderates equity preference among young children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31( 3), 210-218.
5 Böhm, R., & Buttelmann, D . ( 2017). The impact of resource valence on children's other-regarding preferences. Developmental Psychology, 53( 9), 1656-1665.
6 Buttelmann, D., & Böhm, R . ( 2014). The ontogeny of the motivation that underlies in-group bias. Psychological Science, 25( 4), 921-927.
7 Chen, T., & Wu, Z . ( 2017). Children’s distributive justice: The role of Theory of Mind. Advances in Psychological Science, 25( 8), 1299-1309.
[ 陈童, 伍珍 . ( 2017). 儿童的分配公平性: 心理理论的作用. 心理科学进展, 25( 8), 1299-1309.]
8 Chernyak, N., & Sobel, D. M . ( 2016). Equal but not always fair: Value-laden sharing in preschool-aged children. Social Development, 25( 2), 340-351.
9 Cooley, S., & Killen, M . ( 2015). Children's evaluations of resource allocation in the context of group norms. Developmental Psychology, 51( 4), 554-563.
10 Davies, P. T., & Lindsay, L. L . ( 2004). Interparental conflict and adolescent adjustment: Why does gender moderate early adolescent vulnerability? Journal of Family Psychology, 18( 1), 160-170.
11 Deutsch, M. ( 1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31( 3), 137-149.
12 Elenbaas, L., & Killen, M . ( 2016). Children rectify inequalities for disadvantaged groups. Developmental Psychology, 52( 8), 1318-1329.
13 Elenbaas L., Rizzo M. T., Cooley S., & Killen M . ( 2016). Rectifying social inequalities in a resource allocation task. Cognition, 155, 176-187.
14 Fehr E., Bernhard H., & Rockenbach B . ( 2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454( 7208), 1079-1083.
15 Gao F. Y., Qiu X. L., & Mo S. L . ( 2015). The comprehension of distributive justice in children: Characteristics, mechanism and influencial factors, Psychological Research, 8( 5), 40-48.
[ 高凤阳, 仇小莉, 莫书亮 . ( 2015). 儿童对分配公平性的理解: 发展特征、机制和影响因素. 心理研究, 8( 5), 40-48.]
16 House B. R., Henrich J., Brosnan S. F., & Silk J. B . ( 2012). The ontogeny of human prosociality: Behavioral experiments with children aged 3 to 8. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33( 4), 291-308.
17 Hsu M., Anen C. D., & Quartz S. R . ( 2008). The right and the good: Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science, 320( 5879), 1092-1095.
18 Jordan J. J., McAuliffe K., & Warneken F . ( 2014). Development of in-group favoritism in children's third-party punishment of selfishness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111( 35), 12710-12715.
19 Kogut, T. ( 2012). Knowing what I should, doing what I want: From selfishness to inequity aversion in young children's sharing behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33( 1), 226-236.
20 Lam C. B., Solmeyer A. R., & McHale S. M . ( 2012). Sibling relationships and empathy across the transition to adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41( 12), 1657-1670.
21 Li J., Wang W., Yu J., & Zhu L. Q . ( 2016). Young children's development of fairness preference. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1274.
22 Liang F. C., Wang X. Y., Tang W. H . ( 2015). The development of children’s fair behavior in different distribution situations. Psychological Development and Education, 31( 6), 648-653.
[ 梁福成, 王心怡, 唐卫海 . ( 2015). 不同分配情境下儿童公平行为的发展. 心理发展与教育, 31( 6), 648-653.]
23 Liu W., Zhang X., Fan L . ( 2016). Development of 3 to 5 years old children’s altruistic punishment behavior under different perspectives. Studies in Early Childhood Education,( 12), 35-43.
[ 刘文, 张雪, 范琳琳 . ( 2016). 不同利益情境下3~5岁幼儿利他惩罚行为的发展特点. 学前教育研究, ( 12), 35-43.]
24 Liu W., Zhang X., Zhang Y., & Yu R. W . ( 2017). Fairness cognition-behavior gap in 4~8 year-old children: The role of social comparison. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49( 12), 1504-1512.
[ 刘文, 张雪, 张玉, 俞睿玮 . ( 2017). 4~8岁儿童公平认知与行为差距: 社会比较的作用. 心理学报, 49( 12), 1504-1512.]
25 Liu W., Zhu L., & Wen G. Q . ( 2014). Equity sensitivity of infants and young children under the allocation condition. Advances in Psychological Science, 22( 4), 618-624.
[ 刘文, 朱琳, 温国旗 . ( 2014). 分配情境下的婴幼儿公平敏感性. 心理科学进展, 22( 4), 618-624.]
26 Mao, N. N . ( 2007). The study on the development of 3-6-year- olds’understanding of economic concepts (Unpublished master’s thesis). East China Normal University
[ 毛尼娜 . ( 2007). 3-6岁儿童对经济学知识理解的发展研究(硕士论文). 华东师范大学.]
27 McAuliffe, K., & Dunham, Y . ( 2017). Fairness overrides group bias in children's second-party punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146( 4), 485-494.
28 McGillicuddy-De Lisi A. V., De Lisi R., & Van Gulik K . ( 2008). The effects of grade level, context, and family type on male and female adolescents' distributive justice reasoning. Journal of Adolescence, 31( 1), 107-124.
29 Monteiro M. B., de Franca D. X., & Rodrigues R . ( 2009). The development of intergroup bias in childhood: How social norms can shape children's racial behaviours. International Journal of Psychology, 44( 1), 29-39.
30 Moore, C. ( 2009). Fairness in children's resource allocation depends on the recipient. Psychological Science, 20( 8), 944-948.
31 Mulvey K. L., Buchheister K., & McGrath K . ( 2016). Evaluations of intergroup resource allocations: The role of theory of mind. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 142, 203-211.
32 Mulvey K. L., Hitti A., Rutland A., Abrams D., & Killen M . ( 2014). Context differences in children's ingroup preferences. Developmental Psychology, 50( 5), 1507-1519.
33 Nie R., Zhou N., Zhang Y., & Fang X . ( 2017). Associations among interpersonal relationships and high students’ internalizing and externalizing problems: The mediating roles of self-esteem and gender differences. Psychological Development and Education, 33( 6), 708-718.
[ 聂瑞虹, 周楠, 张宇驰, 方晓义 . ( 2017). 人际关系与高中生内外化问题的关系: 自尊的中介及性别的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 33( 6), 708-718.]
34 Raabe, T., & Beelmann, A . ( 2011). Development of ethnic, racial, and national prejudice in childhood and adolescence: A multinational meta-analysis of age differences. Child Development, 82( 6), 1715-1737.
35 Rilling, J. K., & Sanfey, A. G . ( 2011). The neuroscience of social decision-making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 23-48.
36 Rizzo M. T., Elenbaas L., Cooley S., & Killen M . ( 2016). Children's recognition of fairness and others' welfare in a resource allocation task: Age related changes. Developmental Psychology, 52( 8), 1307-1317.
37 Rochat P., Dias M. D. G., Liping G., Broesch T., Passos-Ferreira C., Winning A., & Berg B . ( 2009). Fairness in distributive justice by 3-and 5-year-olds across even cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40( 3), 416-442.
38 Shaw, A., & Olson, K. R . ( 2012). Children discard a resource to avoid inequity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141( 2), 382-395.
39 Shaw, A., & Olson, K. R . ( 2013). All inequality is not equal: Children correct inequalities using resource value. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 393.
40 Sheskin M., Nadal A., Croom A., Mayer T., Nissel J., & Bloom P . ( 2016). Some equalities are more equal than others: Quality equality emerges later than numerical equality. Child Development, 87( 5), 1520-1528.
41 Sloane S., Baillargeon R., & Premack D . ( 2012). Do infants have a sense of fairness? Psychological Science, 23( 2), 196-204.
42 Su Y. J., Zhang H., & Zhang K ., ( 2012). Social decision- making: The equilibrium between self-interest and the interests of others. Journal of Psychological Science, 35( 6), 1423-1428.
[ 苏彦捷, 张慧, 张康 . ( 2012). 社会决策: 自我利益与他人利益的权衡. 心理科学, 35( 6), 1423-1428.]
43 Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C . ( 1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations( pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
44 Tapias M. P., Glaser J., Keltner D., Vasquez K., & Wickens T . ( 2007). Emotion and prejudice: Specific emotions toward outgroups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10( 1), 27-39.
45 Wang, S., & Su, Y. J . ( 2013). From understanding to utilizing: Theory of mind and children’s distributive justice in different contexts. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45( 11), 1242-1250.
[ 王斯, 苏彦捷 . ( 2013). 从理解到使用: 心理理论与儿童不同情境中的分配公平性. 心理学报, 45( 11), 1242-1250.]
46 Wang Y. W., Zhang Z., Zhang W., Huang L., Guo F. B., & Yuan S . ( 2014). Group membership modulates the recipient’s fairness consideration in ultimatum game. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46( 12), 1850-1859.
[ 王益文, 张振, 张蔚, 黄亮, 郭丰波, 原胜 . ( 2014). 群体身份调节最后通牒博弈的公平关注. 心理学报, 46( 12), 1850-1859.]
47 Wen, P., & Li, H . ( 2007). A development research about the executive function of 6~11 years children. Psychological Exploration, 27( 3), 38-43.
[ 文萍, 李红 . ( 2007). 6~11岁儿童执行功能发展研究. 心理学探新, 27( 3), 38-43.]
48 Wu, Z., & Gao, X. H . ( 2018). Preschoolers' group bias in punishing selfishness in the ultimatum game. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 280-292.
49 Yu J., Zhu L. Q., & Leslie A. M . ( 2016). Children's sharing behavior in mini-dictator games: The role of in-group favoritism and theory of mind. Child Development, 87( 6), 1747-1757.
50 Zhang X., Liu W., Zhu L., & Zhang Y . ( 2014). Distributive justice of young children Based on the principle of equity. Advances in Psychological Science, 22( 11), 1740-1746.
[ 张雪, 刘文, 朱琳, 张玉 . ( 2014). 基于贡献原则的幼儿分配公平性. 心理科学进展, 22( 11), 1740-1746.]




[1]盖笑松, 许洁, 闫艳, 王元, 谢笑春. 体感游戏促进儿童的执行功能:运动强度和认知参与的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 505-514.
[2]黄垣成, 赵清玲, 李彩娜. 青少年早期抑郁和自伤的联合发展轨迹:人际因素的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 515-526.
[3]骆方, 姜力铭, 田雪涛, 肖梦格, 马彦珍, 张生. 小学生羞怯特质预测及语言风格模型构建[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(2): 155-169.
[4]刘晓薇, 潘斌, 陈亮, 李腾飞, 纪林芹, 张文新. 受欺负与青少年外化问题关系的“健康环境悖论”:敌意性归因的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(2): 170-181.
[5]熊猛, 刘若瑾, 叶一舵. 单亲家庭儿童相对剥夺感与心理适应的循环作用关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 67-80.
[6]田相娟, 曹衍淼, 张文新. 母亲消极教养、同伴侵害与FKBP5基因对青少年抑郁的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(12): 1407-1420.
[7]王堂生, 杨春亮, 钟年. 记忆的前向测试效应对老年人学习新事物的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(11): 1266-1277.
[8]王元, 李柯, 盖笑松, 曹逸飞. 基于即时反馈的反应抑制训练对青少年和成人执行功能的训练效应和迁移效应[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(10): 1212-1223.
[9]张景焕, 付萌萌, 辛于雯, 陈佩佩, 沙莎. 小学高年级学生创造力的发展:性别差异及学校支持的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(9): 1057-1070.
[10]曹贤才, 王大华, 王岩. 情节模拟对预期伴侣反应性及依恋安全感的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 982-992.
[11]何晓丽, 袁小龙, 胡铭, 周丽晨. 父母元情绪理念与青少年问题行为:迷走神经的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 971-981.
[12]常淑敏, 郭明宇, 王靖民, 王玲晓, 张文新. 学校资源对青少年早期幸福感发展的影响:意向性自我调节的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(7): 874-885.
[13]雷怡, 夏琦, 莫志凤, 李红. 面孔可爱度和客观熟悉度对婴儿面孔注意偏向效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(7): 811-822.
[14]杨婉晴, 肖容, 梁丹丹. 2~4岁普通话儿童前注意阶段的声调感知机制[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6): 730-741.
[15]陈曦梅, 罗一君, 陈红. 友谊质量与青少年直觉进食:链式中介模型及性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 485-496.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4440
相关话题/心理 实验 比例 青少年 科学