删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

“没有”为什么隐含着“消极情绪”?——否定加工中的情绪表征

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

高志华1,2, 鲁忠义1()
1河北师范大学教育学院, 石家庄 050024
2华北理工大学心理学院, 唐山 063210
收稿日期:2018-02-09出版日期:2019-02-25发布日期:2018-12-24
通讯作者:鲁忠义E-mail:zhongyilu@126.com

基金资助:国家社会科学基金(12BYY048);教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目成果(16YJC190005);唐山心理健康与认知神经科学重点实验室和唐山市脑与认知功能研究基础创新团队专项经费资助(17130204D)

Why “no” implies “negative emotion”? Emotional representation in negation processing

GAO Zhihua1,2, LU Zhongyi1()
1 College of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
2 College of Psychology, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China
Received:2018-02-09Online:2019-02-25Published:2018-12-24
Contact:LU Zhongyi E-mail:zhongyilu@126.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 采用情感错误归因范式(AMP)和经典情感启动范式(BFP), 在汉语双音节中性名词的前面加上否定或肯定词, 构成“没有/有XX”短语, 作为启动材料, 以中性俄语词或汉语情绪词为目标材料, 探讨了汉语否定加工的情绪表征。在实验1的AMP范式中, 刺激反应不同步(SOA)时间为200 ms和500 ms, 结果显示, 否定短语比肯定短语有显著高的消极反应概率; 在实验2的BFP范式中, 否定短语比肯定短语同样启动了更高的消极反应概率。实验结果表明, 否定本身具有消极效价, 否定加工通过消极情绪实现具身化。


表1实验1两种SOA条件下中性短语启动的消极反应概率(M ± SD)
启动项 SOA: 200 ms (N = 38) SOA: 500 ms (N = 40)
否定短语 0.64 ± 0.20 0.63 ± 0.19
肯定短语 0.30 ± 0.19 0.30 ± 0.20

表1实验1两种SOA条件下中性短语启动的消极反应概率(M ± SD)
启动项 SOA: 200 ms (N = 38) SOA: 500 ms (N = 40)
否定短语 0.64 ± 0.20 0.63 ± 0.19
肯定短语 0.30 ± 0.19 0.30 ± 0.20


表2实验2目标项的词频和情绪维度各指标分析
情绪词指标 消极效价 积极效价 F p
词频 50.06 ± 48.09 49.21 ± 48.98 0.01 0.912
效价 3.12 ± 0.24 6.80 ± 0.20 10937.67 < 0.001
唤醒水平 4.86 ± 0.63 4.69 ± 0.60 3.01 0.085
优势水平 5.08 ± 0.54 5.78 ± 0.56 64.78 < 0.001
熟悉程度 4.91 ± 0.44 5.63 ± 0.45 104.35 < 0.001

表2实验2目标项的词频和情绪维度各指标分析
情绪词指标 消极效价 积极效价 F p
词频 50.06 ± 48.09 49.21 ± 48.98 0.01 0.912
效价 3.12 ± 0.24 6.80 ± 0.20 10937.67 < 0.001
唤醒水平 4.86 ± 0.63 4.69 ± 0.60 3.01 0.085
优势水平 5.08 ± 0.54 5.78 ± 0.56 64.78 < 0.001
熟悉程度 4.91 ± 0.44 5.63 ± 0.45 104.35 < 0.001


表3实验2不同条件下消极反应概率与反应正确率(M ± SD)
启动 目标 SOA: 200 ms (N = 43) 启动 目标 SOA: 500 ms (N = 46)
消极反应 正确率 消极反应 正确率
否定中性 积极 0.11 ± 0.15 0.89 ± 0.15 否定中性 积极 0.09 ± 0.16 0.91 ± 0.16
消极 0.93 ± 0.09 0.93 ± 0.09 消极 0.96 ± 0.18 0.96 ± 0.18
肯定中性 积极 0.09 ± 0.09 0.91 ± 0.87 肯定中性 积极 0.05 ± 0.05 0.95 ± 0.05
消极 0.89 ± 0.15 0.89 ± 0.15 消极 0.94 ± 0.22 0.94 ± 0.22

表3实验2不同条件下消极反应概率与反应正确率(M ± SD)
启动 目标 SOA: 200 ms (N = 43) 启动 目标 SOA: 500 ms (N = 46)
消极反应 正确率 消极反应 正确率
否定中性 积极 0.11 ± 0.15 0.89 ± 0.15 否定中性 积极 0.09 ± 0.16 0.91 ± 0.16
消极 0.93 ± 0.09 0.93 ± 0.09 消极 0.96 ± 0.18 0.96 ± 0.18
肯定中性 积极 0.09 ± 0.09 0.91 ± 0.87 肯定中性 积极 0.05 ± 0.05 0.95 ± 0.05
消极 0.89 ± 0.15 0.89 ± 0.15 消极 0.94 ± 0.22 0.94 ± 0.22







1 Alter A. L., Oppenheimer D. M., Epley N., & Eyre R. N . ( 2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 136( 4), 569-576.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569URL
2 Anderson S. E., Huette S., Matlock T., & Spivey M . ( 2010). On the temporal dynamics of negated perceptual simulations. In Parrill, F., Tobin, V., & Turner, M.( Eds.), Meaning, form and body (pp. 1-20). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publication.
3 Armstrong, A.M., & Dienes Z. ( 2013). Subliminal understanding of negation: Unconscious control by subliminal processing of word pairs. Consciousness and Cognition, 22( 3), 1022-1040.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.06.010URL
4 Autry, K.S., & Levine W.H, . ( 2014). Presupposition processing and the (re)activation of negated concepts. Discourse Processes, 51( 7), 535-564.
doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2013.871192URL
5 Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek B.A, . ( 2014). A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures. Behavior Research Methods, 46( 3), 668-688.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0410-6URL
6 Chen G. Y., Wu M. Y., Wei X. P., Zhou M., He X. Y., & Mo L . ( 2014). The processing of isolated negative sentences with uncertain states. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46( 2), 204-215.
[ 陈广耀, 吴洺仪, 魏小平, 周苗, 何先友, 莫雷 . ( 2014). 状态不确定独立否定句的加工机制. 心理学报, 46( 2), 204-215.]
7 Cui R. X., Gao Z.H., Tang Y. L., He H. P., & Lu Z. Y . ( 2016). The two-steps mental simulation process of Chinese definite unbounded negative sentences. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48( 6), 607-616.
[ 崔如霞, 高志华, 唐艺琳, 何皓璠, 鲁忠义 . ( 2016). 汉语确定性无界否定句模拟加工的时间进程. 心理学报, 48( 6), 607-616.]
8 Deutsch, R., & Gawronski B. ( 2009). When the method makes a difference: Antagonistic effects on “automatic evaluations” as a function of task characteristics of the measure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45( 1), 101-114.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.001URL
9 Deutsch R., Kordts-Freudinger R., Gawronski B., & Strack F . ( 2009). Fast and fragile: A new look at the automaticity of negation processing. Experimental Psychology, 56( 6):434-446.
doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.6.434URL
10 Eddy, M.D., & Holcomb P.J, . ( 2010). The temporal dynamics of masked repetition picture priming effects: Manipulations of stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) and prime duration. Brain Research, 1340( 9), 24-39.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.024URL
11 Fazio R. H., Sanbonmatsu D. M., Powell M. C., & Kardes F. R . ( 1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 50( 2), 229-238.
12 Flaisch T., Imhof M., Schmälzle R., Wentz K. U., Ibach B., & Schupp H. T . ( 2015). Implicit and explicit attention to pictures and words: An fMRI-study of concurrent emotional stimulus processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6( 1351), 1861.
13 Foroni, F., & Semin G.R, . ( 2013). Comprehension of action negation involves inhibitory simulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7( 7), 62-77.
14 Gao Z. H., Lu Z. Y., & Cui X. Y . ( 2017). What is the mechanism of negation processes? Introduction and commentary on psychological theories on negation. Advances in Psychological Science, 25( 3), 413-423.
[ 高志华, 鲁忠义, 崔新颖 . ( 2017). 否定加工的机制到底是什么?——否定加工的心理学理论述评. 心理科学进展, 25( 3), 413-423.]
15 Gao Z. H., Lu Z. Y., & Ma H. X . ( 2011). The simulation process of Chinese simple negative declarative sentence. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43( 12), 1380-1387.
[ 高志华, 鲁忠义, 马红霞 . ( 2011). 汉语简单否定陈述句理解的心理模拟过程. 心理学报, 43( 12), 1380-1387.]
16 Gawronski B., & Houwer, J. D .( 2014) . Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17 Gawronski B., & Strack, F . (Eds.).( 2012). Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18 Gawronski, B., & Yang Y. ( 2015). Prevention of intention invention in the affect misattribution procedure. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 6( 1), 101-108.
19 Haran D., Mor N., & Mayo R . ( 2011). Negating in order to be negative: The relationship between depressive rumination, message content and negation processing. Emotion, 11( 5), 1105-1111.
doi: 10.1037/a0025301URL
20 Havas D. A., Glenberg A. M., & Rinck M . ( 2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14( 3), 436-441.
21 Herbert C., Deutsch R., Platte P., & Pauli P . ( 2013). No fear, no panic: Probing negation as a means for emotion regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Advance, 8( 6), 654-661.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nss043URL
22 Herbert C., Deutsch R., Sütterlin S., Kübler A., & Pauli P . ( 2011). Negation as a means for emotion regulation? Startle reflex modulation during processing of negated emotional words. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 11( 2), 199-206.
doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0026-1URL
23 Hermans D., Spruyt A., & Eelen P . ( 2003). Automatic affective priming of recently acquired stimulus valence: Priming at SOA 300 but not at SOA 1000. Cognition and Emotion, 17( 1), 83-99.
doi: 10.1080/02699930302276URL
24 Hill H., Ott F., & Weisbrod M . ( 2005). SOA-dependent N400 and P300 semantic priming effects using pseudoword primes and a delayed lexical decision. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 56( 3), 209-221.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.12.004URL
25 Jiang Z. Q., Li W. H., Liu Y., Luo Y. J., Luu P., & Tucker D. M . ( 2014). When affective word valence meets linguistic polarity: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 28, 19-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.11.001URL
26 Jordan, M.P . ( 1998). The power of negation in English: Text, context, and relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 29( 6), 705-752.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00086-6URL
27 Kaup B., Lüdtke J., Zwaan R.A . ( 2006). Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed? Journal of Pragmatics, 38( 7), 1033-1050.
doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.012URL
28 Kaup B., Yaxley R. H., Madden C. J., Zwaan R. A., & Lüdtke J . ( 2007). Experiential simulations of negated text information. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60( 7), 976-990.
doi: 10.1080/17470210600823512URL
29 Khemlani S., Orenes I., Johnson-Laird P. N . ( 2012). Negation: A theory of its meaning, representation, and use. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24( 5), 541-559.
doi: 10.1080/20445911.2012.660913URL
30 Kousta S. T., Vigliocco G., Vinson D. P., Andrews M., & Del Campo E . ( 2011). The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140( 1), 14-34.
doi: 10.1037/a0021446URL
31 Kousta S. T., Vinson D. P., & Vigliocco G . ( 2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112( 3), 473-481.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007URL
32 Li F., Bai X., & Shen D . ( 2007). The reverse priming effect of high-frequency words' affective priming. Psychological Science, 30( 6), 1287-1289.
[ 李芳, 白学军, 沈德立 . ( 2007). 高频靶词情绪启动的反转效应. 心理科学, 30( 6), 1287-1289.]
33 Lü, J. M. & Lu, Z.Y . ( 2013). The vertical-spatial metaphor of emotions in text reading. Journal of Psychological Science, 36( 2), 328-334.
[ 吕军梅, 鲁忠义 . ( 2013). 为什么快乐在“上”, 悲伤在“下”——语篇阅读中情绪的垂直空间隐喻. 心理科学, 36( 2), 328-334.]
34 Mayo R., Schul Y., & Burnstein E . ( 2004). “I am not guilty” vs. “I am innocent”: Successful negation may depend on the schema used for its encoding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40( 4), 433-449.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.008URL
35 Mendes W. B., Blascovich J., Hunter S. B., Lickel B., & Jost J. T . ( 2007). Threatened by the unexpected: Physiological responses during social interactions with expectancy-violation partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92( 4), 698-716.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.698URL
36 Mitchell D. G. V., Nakic M., Fridberg D., Kamel N., Pine D. S., & Blair, R. J. R. ( 2007). The impact of processing load on emotion . Neuroimage, 34( 3), 1299-1309.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.012URL
37 Moffat M., Siakaluk P. D., Sidhu D. M., & Pexman P. M . ( 2015). Situated conceptualization and semantic processing: effects of emotional experience and context availability in semantic categorization and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22( 2), 408-419.
38 Nosek B. A., Hawkins C. B., & Frazier R. S . ( 2011). Implicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15( 4), 152-159.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005URL
39 Oosterwijk S., Mackey S., Wilson-Mendenhall C., Winkielman P., & Paulus M. P . ( 2015). Concepts in context: Processing mental state concepts with internal or external focus involves different neural systems. Social Neuroscience, 10( 3), 294-307.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.998840URL
40 Oosterwijk S., Winkielman P., Pecher D., Zeelenberg R., Rotteveel M., & Fischer A. H . ( 2012). Mental states inside out: switching costs for emotional and nonemotional sentences that differ in internal and external focus. Memory & Cognition, 40( 1), 93-100.
41 Payne B. K., Cheng C. M., Govorun O., & Stewart B. D . ( 2005). An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 89( 3), 277-293.
42 Siakaluk P. D., Knol N., & Pexman P. M . ( 2014). Effects of emotional experience for abstract words in the stroop task. Cognitive Science, 38( 8), 1698-1717.
doi: 10.1111/cogs.2014.38.issue-8URL
43 Topolinski, S. ( 2014). A processing fluency-account of funniness: Running gags and spoiling punchlines. Cognition and Emotion, 28( 5), 811-820.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.863180URL
44 van Gaal S., Naccache L., Meuwese J. D. I., van Loon A. M., Leighton A. H., Cohen L., & Dehaene S . ( 2014). Can the meaning of multiple words be integrated unconsciously? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 369( 1641), 58-68.
45 Vermeulen N., Niedenthal P. M., & Luminet O . ( 2007). Switching between sensory and affective systems incurs processing costs. Cognitive Science, 31( 1), 183-192.
doi: 10.1080/03640210709336990URL
46 Vigliocco G., Kousta S. T., Della Rosa P. A., Vinson D. P., Tettamanti M., Devlin J. T., & Cappa S. F . ( 2014). The neural representation of abstract words: the role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex, 24( 7), 1767-1777.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht025URL
47 Wang Y. N., Zhou L. M., Luo Y. J . ( 2008). The pilot establishment and evaluation of Chinese Affective Words System. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 22( 8), 608-612.
[ 王一牛, 周立明, 罗跃嘉 . ( 2008). 汉语情感词系统的初步编制及评定. 中国心理卫生杂志, 22( 8), 608-612.]
48 Williams, L.E., & Bargh J.A, . ( 2008 a). Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 19( 3), 302-308.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02084.xURL
49 Williams, L.E., & Bargh J.A, . ( 2008 b). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322, 606-607.
doi: 10.1126/science.1162548URL
50 Yao Z., Yu D. S., Wang L. L., Zhu X. G., Guo J. J., & Wang Z. H . ( 2016). Effects of valence and arousal on emotional word processing are modulated by concreteness: Behavioral and ERP evidence from a lexical decision task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 110, 231-242.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.07.499URL
51 Zwaan, R.A .( 2008). Experiential traces and mental simulations in language comprehension. In M. DeVega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C.Graesser (Eds.), Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition (pp.165-180). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.




[1]程瑞, 卢克龙, 郝宁. 愤怒情绪对恶意创造力的影响及调节策略[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 847-860.
[2]宋琪, 陈扬. 需求和接受的授权型领导匹配对下属工作结果的影响:情绪耗竭的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 890-903.
[3]熊承清, 许佳颖, 马丹阳, 刘永芳. 囚徒困境博弈中对手面部表情对合作行为的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 919-932.
[4]袁加锦, 张祎程, 陈圣栋, 罗利, 茹怡珊. 中国情绪调节词语库的初步编制与试用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 445-455.
[5]宋锡妍, 程亚华, 谢周秀甜, 龚楠焰, 刘雷. 愤怒情绪对延迟折扣的影响:确定感和控制感的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 456-468.
[6]莫李澄, 郭田友, 张岳瑶, 徐锋, 张丹丹. 激活右腹外侧前额叶提高抑郁症患者对社会疼痛的情绪调节能力:一项TMS研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 494-504.
[7]杨伟文, 李超平. 资质过剩感对个体绩效的作用效果及机制:基于情绪-认知加工系统与文化情境的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 527-554.
[8]侯娟, 朱英格, 方晓义. 手机成瘾与抑郁:社交焦虑和负性情绪信息注意偏向的多重中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(4): 362-373.
[9]刘宇平, 李姗珊, 何赟, 王豆豆, 杨波. 消除威胁或无能狂怒?自恋对暴力犯攻击的影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(3): 244-258.
[10]雷震, 毕蓉, 莫李澄, 于文汶, 张丹丹. 外显和内隐情绪韵律加工的脑机制:近红外成像研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 15-25.
[11]黄月胜, 张豹, 范兴华, 黄杰. 无关工作记忆表征的负性情绪信息能否捕获视觉注意?一项眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 26-37.
[12]苗晓燕, 孙欣, 匡仪, 汪祚军. 共患难, 更同盟:共同经历相同负性情绪事件促进合作行为[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 81-94.
[13]华艳, 李明霞, 王巧婷, 冯彩霞, 张晶. 左侧眶额皮层在自动情绪调节下注意选择中的作用:来自经颅直流电刺激的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(9): 1048-1056.
[14]李树文, 罗瑾琏. 领导-下属情绪评价能力一致与员工建言:内部人身份感知与性别相似性的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(9): 1121-1131.
[15]张琪, 邓娜丽, 姜秀敏, 李卫君. 自我相关性影响情绪词汇加工的时间进程[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 946-957.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4381
相关话题/心理 实验 概率 汉语 指标