![](http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/images/email.png)
1 山东师范大学心理学院, 济南 250358
2 山东行政学院, 济南 250014
3 首都师范大学心理系, 北京市“学习与认知”重点实验室, 北京 100048;
收稿日期:
2017-07-07出版日期:
2018-09-15发布日期:
2018-07-27基金资助:
山东省自然科学基金青年基金项目(ZR2013CQ025);国家自然科学基金面上项目(31371048);国家社会科学基金项目(12CYY022);山东省自然科学基金培养基金项目(ZR2016EEP13);山东省“十二五”特色重点学科“发展与教育心理学”专项经费资助Interaction effects between BDNF gene rs6265 polymorphism and parent-involved education on basic mathematical ability in primary school children
ZHANG Mingliang1,2, SI Jiwei1(![](http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/images/email.png)
1 School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China
2 Shandong Administrative Institute, Jinan 250014, China
3 Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition and Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
Received:
2017-07-07Online:
2018-09-15Published:
2018-07-27摘要/Abstract
摘要: 数学能力发展的遗传机制日益成为研究者关注的前沿课题之一, 但既有研究尚处于起步阶段。本研究以602名小学儿童及其父母作为被试, 旨在考察BDNF基因rs6265多态性与父母教育卷入对儿童基本数学能力的潜在交互影响。结果显示, (1) rs6265多态性可显著预测儿童的逻辑思维与空间-视觉功能领域能力(AA基因型携带者的基本数学能力显著高于G等位基因携带者); (2) rs6265多态性与父母教育卷入交互作用于儿童的逻辑思维与空间-视觉功能领域能力, 父母教育卷入能显著正向预测G等位基因儿童的逻辑思维与空间-视觉功能领域能力, 但对AA基因型儿童的预测作用不显著, 该交互作用可能更加符合强素质-压力模型假说(rs6265位点G等位基因可能是风险基因)。上述发现推进了数学能力遗传机制的研究, 并为素质-压力假说提供了新的研究证据。
图/表 4
表1年级、性别、基因多态性、父母教育卷入与儿童基本数学能力两成分的描述统计量及相关分析结果
变量 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 年级 | 1 | |||||
2 性别 | -0.07 | 1 | ||||
3 rs6265 | 0.01 | -0.07 | 1 | |||
4父母教育卷入 | 0.01 | -0.15** | 0.00 | 1 | ||
5 MT1 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.09* | 0.12** | 1 | |
6 MT2 | -0.15** | -0.01 | 0.11* | 0.09* | 0.69** | 1 |
n | 527 | 297 | 114(21.63%) 413(73.37%) |
表1年级、性别、基因多态性、父母教育卷入与儿童基本数学能力两成分的描述统计量及相关分析结果
变量 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 年级 | 1 | |||||
2 性别 | -0.07 | 1 | ||||
3 rs6265 | 0.01 | -0.07 | 1 | |||
4父母教育卷入 | 0.01 | -0.15** | 0.00 | 1 | ||
5 MT1 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.09* | 0.12** | 1 | |
6 MT2 | -0.15** | -0.01 | 0.11* | 0.09* | 0.69** | 1 |
n | 527 | 297 | 114(21.63%) 413(73.37%) |
![](http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/fileup/0439-755X/FIGURE/2018-50-9/Images/0439-755X-50-9-1007/img_1.png)
图1不同基因型逻辑思维与空间-视觉功能领域能力(MT2)的人口金字塔图
![](http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/fileup/0439-755X/FIGURE/2018-50-9/Images/0439-755X-50-9-1007/img_1.png)
表2儿童基本数学能力两成分对rs6265多态性与父母教育卷入的分层回归分析
变量 | ΔR2 | b (SE) | β | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MT1 | |||||
第一层 | 年级(控制变量) | 0.15** | 0.04 (0.05) | 0.03 | 0.44 |
智商(控制变量) | 0.02 (0.00) | 0.38 | 0.00** | ||
第二层 | rs6265 | 0.02** | 0.14 (0.10) | 0.06 | 0.19 |
父母教育卷入 | 0.17 (0.05) | 0.17 | 0.00** | ||
第三层 | rs6265×父母教育卷入 | 0.01 | -0.16 (0.10) | -0.08 | 0.12 |
MT2 | |||||
第一层 | 年级(控制变量) | 0.14** | -0.11 (0.05) | -0.10 | 0.02* |
智商(控制变量) | 0.01 (0.00) | 0.34 | 0.00** | ||
第二层 | rs6265 | 0.02** | 0.22 (0.10) | 0.09 | 0.04* |
父母教育卷入 | 0.16 (0.05) | 0.16 | 0.00** | ||
第三层 | rs6265×父母教育卷入 | 0.01* | -0.25 (0.10) | -0.13 | 0.01*a |
表2儿童基本数学能力两成分对rs6265多态性与父母教育卷入的分层回归分析
变量 | ΔR2 | b (SE) | β | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MT1 | |||||
第一层 | 年级(控制变量) | 0.15** | 0.04 (0.05) | 0.03 | 0.44 |
智商(控制变量) | 0.02 (0.00) | 0.38 | 0.00** | ||
第二层 | rs6265 | 0.02** | 0.14 (0.10) | 0.06 | 0.19 |
父母教育卷入 | 0.17 (0.05) | 0.17 | 0.00** | ||
第三层 | rs6265×父母教育卷入 | 0.01 | -0.16 (0.10) | -0.08 | 0.12 |
MT2 | |||||
第一层 | 年级(控制变量) | 0.14** | -0.11 (0.05) | -0.10 | 0.02* |
智商(控制变量) | 0.01 (0.00) | 0.34 | 0.00** | ||
第二层 | rs6265 | 0.02** | 0.22 (0.10) | 0.09 | 0.04* |
父母教育卷入 | 0.16 (0.05) | 0.16 | 0.00** | ||
第三层 | rs6265×父母教育卷入 | 0.01* | -0.25 (0.10) | -0.13 | 0.01*a |
表3rs6265多态性与父母教育卷入对MT2交互作用的再参数化回归模型检验
参数 | 差别易感模型 | 素质-压力模型 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
强:模型a | 弱:模型b | 强:模型c | 弱:模型d | |
B1 | 0.00 (—)a | -0.09 (0.09) | 0.00 (—)a | -0.02 (0.06) |
C | 1.37( 0.77) | 0.86 (0.55) | 1.69 (—)a | 1.69 (—)a |
95% CI of C | [-0.14, 2.89] | [-0.23,1.95] | —a | —a |
B2 | 0.16 (0.05)** | 0.16 (0.05)** | 0.15 (0.04)*** | 0.14 (0.05)** |
B3 | -0.11 (0.05)* | -0.11 (0.05) | -0.11 (0.05)* | -0.11 (0.05)* |
B4 | 0.01 (0.00)*** | 0.01 (0.00)*** | 0.01 (0.00)*** | 0.01 (0.00)*** |
R2 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
F(df) | 22.32 (4,439)*** | 18.06 (5,438)*** | 29.77 (3,440)*** | 22.32 (4,439)*** |
F vs.c (df) | 0.12 (1,439) | 0.96 (2,438) | — | 0.12 (1,439) |
F vs. d (df) | — | 0.84 (1,438) | 0.12 (1,439) | — |
AIC | 1177.75 | 1178.71 | 1175.89 | 1177.75 |
BIC | 1202.32 | 1207.38 | 1196.37 | 1202.33 |
表3rs6265多态性与父母教育卷入对MT2交互作用的再参数化回归模型检验
参数 | 差别易感模型 | 素质-压力模型 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
强:模型a | 弱:模型b | 强:模型c | 弱:模型d | |
B1 | 0.00 (—)a | -0.09 (0.09) | 0.00 (—)a | -0.02 (0.06) |
C | 1.37( 0.77) | 0.86 (0.55) | 1.69 (—)a | 1.69 (—)a |
95% CI of C | [-0.14, 2.89] | [-0.23,1.95] | —a | —a |
B2 | 0.16 (0.05)** | 0.16 (0.05)** | 0.15 (0.04)*** | 0.14 (0.05)** |
B3 | -0.11 (0.05)* | -0.11 (0.05) | -0.11 (0.05)* | -0.11 (0.05)* |
B4 | 0.01 (0.00)*** | 0.01 (0.00)*** | 0.01 (0.00)*** | 0.01 (0.00)*** |
R2 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
F(df) | 22.32 (4,439)*** | 18.06 (5,438)*** | 29.77 (3,440)*** | 22.32 (4,439)*** |
F vs.c (df) | 0.12 (1,439) | 0.96 (2,438) | — | 0.12 (1,439) |
F vs. d (df) | — | 0.84 (1,438) | 0.12 (1,439) | — |
AIC | 1177.75 | 1178.71 | 1175.89 | 1177.75 |
BIC | 1202.32 | 1207.38 | 1196.37 | 1202.33 |
参考文献 55
1 | Belsky, J., &Pluess, M. ( 2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135( 6), 885-908. doi: 10.1037/a0017376URLpmid: 19883141 |
2 | Belsky J., Pluess M., & Widaman K. F . ( 2013). Confirmatory and competitive evaluation of alternative gene-environment interaction hypotheses. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54( 10), 1135-1143. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12075URLpmid: 23617948 |
3 | Benjamini, Y., &Hochberg, Y. ( 1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57( 1), 289-300. doi: 10.2307/2346101URL |
4 | Cao B., Bauer I. E., Sharma A. N., Mwangi B., Frazier T., Lavagnino L., .. Soares J. C . ( 2016). Reduced hippocampus volume and memory performance in bipolar disorder patients carrying the BDNF val66met met allele. Journal of Affective Disorders, 198, 198-205. |
5 | Cao C., Wang M. P., Ji L. Q., Wei X., Cao Y. M., & Zhang W. X . ( 2016). The MAOA rs6323 polymorphism interacts with maternal supportive parenting in predicting adolescent depression: Testing the diathesis-stress and differential susceptibility hypotheses. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48( 1), 22-35. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00022URL |
6 | [ 曹丛, 王美萍, 纪林芹, 魏星, 曹衍淼, 张文新 . ( 2016). MAOA基因rs6323多态性与母亲支持性教养对青少年抑郁的交互作用: 素质-压力假说与不同易感性假说的检验. 心理学报, 48( 1), 22-35.] |
7 | Carvalho M. R. S., Vianna G., Oliveira L. de F., Costa A. J., Pinheiro-Chagas P., Sturzenecker R., .. Haase V. G . ( 2014). Are 22q11.2 distal deletions associated with math difficulties?. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 164( 9), 2256-2262. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36649URLpmid: 24989330 |
8 | Caspi, A., &Moffitt, T. E . ( 2006). Gene-environment interactions in psychiatry: Joining forces with neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7( 7), 583-590. |
9 | Castro M., Expósito-Casas E., López-Martín E., Lizasoain L., Navarro-Asencio E., & Gaviria J. L . ( 2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33-46. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002URL |
10 | Chen H., Gu X. H., Zhou Y. X., Ge Z., Wang B., Siok W. T., .. Sun Y. M . ( 2017). A genome-wide association study identifies genetic variants associated with mathematics ability. Scientific Reports, 7, 40365. doi: 10.1038/srep40365URLpmid: 5388075 |
11 | Chen J., Li X. Y., & McGue M . ( 2013). The interacting effect of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and stressful life events on adolescent depression is not an artifact of gene-environment correlation: Evidence from a longitudinal twin study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54( 10), 1066-1073. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12099URL |
12 | Davis O. S., Band G., Pirinen M., Haworth C. M., Meaburn E. L., Kovas Y., ..Spencer C. C . ( 2014). The correlation between reading and mathematics ability at age twelve has a substantial genetic component. Nature Communications, 5, 4204. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5204URL |
13 | Docherty S. J., Davis O. S. P., Kovas Y., Meaburn E. L., Dale P. S., Petrill S. A., .. Plomin R . ( 2010). A genome-wide association study identifies multiple loci associated with mathematics ability and disability. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 9( 2), 234-247. doi: 10.1111/gbb.2010.9.issue-2URL |
14 | Docherty S. J., Kovas Y., & Plomin R . ( 2011). Gene-environment interaction in the etiology of mathematical ability using SNP sets. Behavior Genetics, 41( 1), 141-154. doi: 10.1007/s10519-010-9405-6URLpmid: 3029801 |
15 | Elfving B., Buttensch?n H. N., Foldager L., Poulsen P. H. P., Andersen J. H., Grynderup M. B., .. Mors O . ( 2012). Depression, the Val66Met polymorphism, age, and gender influence the serum BDNF level. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 46( 9), 1118-1125. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.05.003URL |
16 | Fan, X. T . ( 2001). Parental involvement and students' academic achievement: A growth modeling analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70( 1), 27-61. doi: 10.1080/00220970109599497URL |
17 | Gatt J. M., Nemeroff C. B., Dobson-Stone C., Paul R. H., Bryant R. A., Schofield P. R., .. Williams L. M . ( 2009). Interactions between BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and early life stress predict brain and arousal pathways to syndromal depression and anxiety. Molecular Psychiatry, 14( 7), 681-695. doi: 10.1038/mp.2008.143URL |
18 | González-Castro T. B., Nicolini H., Lanzagorta N., López-Narváez L., Genis A., Pool García S., & Tovilla-Zárate C. A . ( 2015). The role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met genetic polymorphism in bipolar disorder: A case-control study, comorbidities, and meta-analysis of 16,786 subjects. Bipolar Disorders, 17( 1), 27-38. |
19 | González-Giraldo Y., Rojas J., Novoa P., Mueller S. T., Piper B. J., Adan A., & Forero D. A . ( 2014). Functional polymorphisms in BDNF and COMT genes are associated with objective differences in arithmetical functioning in a sample of young adults. Neuropsychobiology, 70( 3), 152-157. doi: 10.1159/000366483URL |
20 | Grasby K. L., Coventry W. L., Byrne B., Olson R. K., & Medland S. E . ( 2016). Genetic and environmental influences on literacy and numeracy performance in Australian school children in Grades 3, 5, 7, and 9. Behavior Genetics, 46( 5), 627-648. doi: 10.1007/s10519-016-9797-zURL |
21 | Halldorsdottir, T., &Binder, E. B . ( 2017). Gene × environment interactions: From molecular mechanisms to behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 68( 1), 215-241. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044053URLpmid: 27732803 |
22 | Hart S. A., Petrill S. A., & Thompson L. A . ( 2010). A factorial analysis of timed and untimed measures of mathematics and reading abilities in school aged twins. Learning and Individual Differences, 20( 2), 63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.004URL |
23 | Heldt S. A., Stanek L., Chhatwal J. P., & Ressler K. J . ( 2007). Hippocampus-specific deletion of BDNF in adult mice impairs spatial memory and extinction of aversive memories. Molecular Psychiatry, 12( 7), 656-670. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001957URL |
24 | Keith T. Z., Keith P. B., Troutman G. C., Bickley P. G., Trivette P. S., & Singh K . ( 1993). Does parental involvement affect eighth-grade student achievement? Structural analysis of national data. School Psychology Review, 22( 3), 474-496. |
25 | Kovas Y., Haworth C. M. A., Dale P. S., Plomin R., Weinberg R. A., Thomson J. M., & Fischer K. W . ( 2007). The genetic and environmental origins of learning abilities and disabilities in the early school years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72(3), i, iii-v, vii, 1-156. |
26 | Kovas Y., Haworth C. M. A., Harlaar N., Petrill S. A., Dale P. S., & Plomin R . ( 2007). Overlap and specificity of genetic and environmental influences on mathematics and reading disability in 10-year-old twins. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48( 9), 914-922. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01748..xURL |
27 | Kovas Y., Haworth C. M. A., Petrill S. A., & Plomin R . ( 2007). Mathematical ability of 10-year-old boys and girls: Genetic and environmental etiology of typical and low performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40( 6), 554-567. doi: 10.1177/00222194070400060601URL |
28 | Lee Y., Lim S. W., Kim S. Y., Chung J. W., Kim J., Myung W., .. Kim D. K . ( 2013). Association between the BDNF val66Met polymorphism and chronicity of depression. Psychiatry Investigation, 10( 1), 56-61. doi: 10.4306/pi.2013.10.1.56URLpmid: 3590431 |
29 | Li, L. ( 2005). Study on the developmental level of pupil’s basic mathematical abilities (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan. |
30 | [ 李丽 . ( 2005). 小学生基本数学能力发展水平研究(博士学位论文). 华中科技大学, 武汉.] |
31 | Lin C. D. ( 2003). Learning and development: Development and cultivation of mental abilities of primary and middle school students (Rev. ed.). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. |
32 | [ 林崇德 . ( 2003). 学习与发展: 中小学生心理能力发展与培养(修订版). 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.] |
33 | Ludwig K. U., S?mann P., Alexander M., Becker J., Bruder J., Moll K., .. Czamara D . ( 2013). A common variant in Myosin-18B contributes to mathematical abilities in children with dyslexia and intraparietal sulcus variability in adults. Translational Psychiatry, 3, e229. doi: 10.1038/tp.2012.148URL |
34 | Marino C., Mascheretti S., Riva V., Cattaneo F., Rigoletto C., Rusconi M., .. Molteni M . ( 2011). Pleiotropic effects of DCDC2 and DYX1C1 genes on language and mathematics traits in nuclear families of developmental dyslexia. Behavior Genetics, 41( 1), 67-76. doi: 10.1007/s10519-010-9412-7URL |
35 | Mascheretti S., Riva V., Giorda R., Beri S., Lanzoni L. F. E., Cellino M. R., & Marino C . ( 2014). KIAA0319 and ROBO1: Evidence on association with reading and pleiotropic effects on language and mathematics abilities in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Human Genetics, 59( 4), 189-197. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2013.141URL |
36 | Miyajima F., Ollier W., Mayes A., Jackson A., Thacker N., Rabbitt P., .. Payton A . ( 2008). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor polymorphism Val66Met influences cognitive abilities in the elderly. Genes, Brain & Behavior, 7( 4), 411-417. |
37 | Nakajo Y., Miyamoto S., Nakano Y., Xue J.-H., Hori T., & Yanamoto H . ( 2008). Genetic increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels enhances learning and memory. Brain Research, 1241, 103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.08.080URLpmid: 18801341 |
38 | Nederhof E., Bouma E. M. C., Oldehinkel A. J., & Ormel J . ( 2010). Interaction between childhood adversity, brain-derived neurotrophic factor val/met and serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism on depression: The TRAILS study. Biological Psychiatry, 68( 2), 209-212. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.04.006URL |
39 | Pei Y., Smith A. K., Wang Y. J., Pan Y. L., Yang J., Chen Q., .. Ma X . ( 2012). The brain-derived neurotrophic-factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism is associated with geriatric depression: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 159B( 5), 560-566. |
40 | Perea C. S., Paternina A. C., Gomez Y., & Lattig M. C . ( 2012). Negative affectivity moderated by BDNF and stress response. Journal of Affective Disorders, 136( 3), 767-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.09.043URLpmid: 22044630 |
41 | Ritchie, S. J., & Bates, T. C . ( 2013). Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychological Science, 24( 7), 1301-1308. doi: 10.1177/0956797612466268URL |
42 | Seginer, R. ( 2006). Parents' educational involvement: A developmental ecology perspective. Parenting: Science and Practice, 6( 1), 1-48. doi: 10.1207/s15327922par0601_1URL |
43 | Siegler, R. S., & Braithwaite, D. W . ( 2017). Numerical development. Annual Review of Psychology, 68( 1), 187-213. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044101URL |
44 | Tian, X. J., & Wang, M. P . ( 2016). BDNF gene and depression. Advances in Psychological Science, 24( 10), 1583-1591. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01583URL |
45 | [ 田相娟, 王美萍 . ( 2016). BDNF基因与抑郁. 心理科学进展, 24( 10), 1583-1591.] |
46 | Tosto, M. G., Haworth, C. M. A., & Kovas, Y. ( 2015) . Behavioural genomics of mathematics. In R. C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 993-1017). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
47 | Widaman K. F., Helm J. L., Castro-Schilo L., Pluess M., Stallings M. C., & Belsky J . ( 2012). Distinguishing ordinal and disordinal interactions. Psychological Methods, 17( 4), 615-622. doi: 10.1037/a0030003URLpmid: 22984788 |
48 | Wu Y. F., Han X. H., Wei W., & Luo L . ( 2013). Theoretical model construction and testing of parental involvement in primary school children education. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science),( 1), 61-69. |
49 | [ 吴艺方, 韩秀华, 韦唯, 罗良 . ( 2013). 小学生父母教育卷入行为理论模型的建构与验证. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), ( 1), 61-69.] |
50 | Zhang, H. C., & Wang, X. P . ( 1989). Standardization research on RAVEN’s standard progressive matrices in China. Acta Psychologica Sinica,( 2), 113-121. |
51 | [ 张厚粲, 王晓平 . ( 1989). 瑞文标准推理测验在我国的修订. 心理学报, ( 2), 113-121.] |
52 | Zhang L. L., Li Z., Chen J., Li X. Y., Zhang J. X., & Belsky J . ( 2016). The BDNF val66met polymorphism interacts with maternal parenting influencing adolescent depressive symptoms: Evidence of differential susceptibility model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45( 3), 471-483. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0378-xURL |
53 | Zhou X., & Kang, D. ( 2015) . Causes and interference of early childhood mathematics learning difficulties. Shanghai: Huadong Normal University Press. |
54 | [ 周欣, 康丹 . ( 2015). 儿童早期数学学习困难成因与干预. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.] |
55 | Zhu B., Chen C. S., Moyzis R. K., Dong Q., & Lin C. D . ( 2015). Educational attainment-related loci identified by GWAS are associated with select personality traits and mathematics and language abilities. Personality & Individual Differences, 72, 96-100. |
相关文章 11
[1] | 赵鑫,李红利,金戈,李世峰,周爱保,梁文佳,郭红霞,蔡亚亚. 语音记忆和中央执行功能在不同年级儿童解码和语言理解中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 469-484. |
[2] | 陈红君,赵英,伍新春,孙鹏,谢瑞波,冯杰. 小学儿童词汇知识与阅读理解的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(8): 924-934. |
[3] | 刘电芝,黄希庭. 简算策略教学提高小学四年级儿童的计算水平及延迟效应[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(01): 47-53. |
[4] | 徐芬,董奇,杨洁,王卫星. 小学儿童英语语音意识的发展[J]. 心理学报, 2005, 37(02): 218-223. |
[5] | 毕鸿燕,方格,翁旭初. 小学儿童两维空间方位传递性推理能力的发展[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(02): 174-178. |
[6] | 方格,田学红. 小学儿童对日常生活事件时间关系推理能力的初探[J]. 心理学报, 2002, 34(06): 52-58. |
[7] | 毕鸿燕,方格. 小学儿童一维空间方位传递性推理能力的发展[J]. 心理学报, 2002, 34(06): 59-63. |
[8] | 张庆林,司继伟,王卫红. 小学儿童假设检验思维策略的发展[J]. 心理学报, 2001, 33(5): 48-53. |
[9] | 田学红,方格,方富熹. 小学儿童空间物体位置编码(I)[J]. 心理学报, 2001, 33(4): 67-74. |
[10] | 徐芬,傅根耀. 小学儿童对说谎及说真话的评价[J]. 心理学报, 1998, 30(4): 452-459. |
[11] | 方富熹,王文忠. 小学儿童奖赏公平性的认知发展[J]. 心理学报, 1994, 26(4): 354-361. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4257