教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津师范大学心理学部, 国民心理健康评估与促进协同创新中心, 天津 300387
收稿日期:2021-03-10出版日期:2022-01-15发布日期:2021-11-25通讯作者:李琳, E-mail: linpsy@outlook.com基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金(32000790)资助Understanding mechanisms of prediction error cost in Chinese reading for older adults
LI Lin, ZHAO Sainan, ZHANG Lijuan, WANG JingxinKey Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University; Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University; Center of Collaborative Innovation for Assessment and Promotion of Mental Health, Tianjin 300387, China
Received:2021-03-10Online:2022-01-15Published:2021-11-25摘要/Abstract
摘要： 阅读的认知加工机制随年龄变老只发生了量变还是也产生了质变, 是毕生发展研究领域的重要问题。要进行有效的语言处理, 读者必须结合已有的经验知识和当前语境对即将出现的信息进行预测加工。因此, 要解决上述问题就要回答老年人阅读中预测加工机制发生了怎样变化, 即预测误差成本是如何产生的。研究拟采用眼动脑电同步记录技术, 在自然阅读过程中实时获取语言处理的行为和神经指标, 聚焦老年人预测误差成本的产生机制, 主要从副中央凹视觉、工作记忆负荷及语言能力三方面解释预测误差成本产生的原因。研究成果对构建汉语阅读的毕生发展模型有重要意义。
参考文献
| [1] 白学军, 曹玉肖, 顾俊娟, 郭志英, 闫国利. (2011). 可预测性和空格对中文阅读影响的眼动研究. [2] 白学军, 李馨, 闫国利. (2015). 汉语阅读眼动控制: 20年研究的总结. [3] 白学军, 闫国利. (2017). 阅读心理学. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社. [4] 国家统计局. (202020202020). 中华人民共和国2019年国民经济和社会发展统计公报. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/ 202002/t20200228_1728913.html. [5] 何文广. (2017). 语言认知老化机制及其神经基础. [6] 李诸洋, 刘璐. (2017). 眼动与脑电同步记录技术在心理语言学研究中的新进展. [7] 刘志方, 仝文, 张骏. (2019). 中文阅读中词汇加工的年老化: 眼动证据. [8] 苏衡, 刘志方, 曹立人. (2016). 中文阅读预视加工中的词频和预测性效应及其对词切分的启示: 基于眼动的证据. [9] 王敬欣, 徐倩倩, 郝立莎, 张雪. (2020). 汉字间空格大小对青年人和老年人阅读的影响: 眼动研究. [10] 吴翰林, 于宙, 王雪娇, 张清芳. (2020). 语言能力的老化机制: 语言特异性与非特异性因素的共同作用. [11] 杨玉芳. (2015). 心理语言学. 北京: 科学出版社. [12] Baccino, T. (2011). Eye movements and concurrent event- related potentials': Eye fixation-related potential investigations in reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 857- 870). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [13] Balota D. A., Pollatsek A., & Rayner K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading.Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 364-390. [14] Camos, V., & Barrouillet, P. (2018). [15] Campbell K. L., Lustig C., & Hasher L. (2020). Aging and Inhibition: Introduction to the Special Issue.Psychology and Aging, 35(5), 605-631. [16] Choi W., Lowder M. W., Ferreira F., Swaab T. Y., & Henderson J. M. (2017). Effects of word predictability and preview lexicality on eye movements during reading: A comparison between young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 32(3), 232-242. [17] Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181-204. [18] de Beni R., Borella E., & Carretti B. (2007). Reading comprehension in aging: The role of working memory and metacomprehension.Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(2), 189-212. [19] DeLong K. A., Quante L., & Kutas M. (2014). Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension.Neuropsychologia, 61, 150-162. [20] DeLong K. A., Troyer M., & Kutas M. (2014). Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure.Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(12), 631-645. [21] Dimigen O., Sommer W., Hohlfeld A., Jacobs A., & Kliegl R. (2011). Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: Analyses and review.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 552-572. [22] Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(6), 641-655. [23] Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2005). Aging in context: Age-related changes in context use during language comprehension.Psychophysiology, 42(2), 133-141. [24] Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2019). What's “left”? Hemispheric sensitivity to predictability and congruity during sentence reading by older adults.Neuropsychologia, 133, 107-173. [25] Frisson S., Harvey D. R., & Staub A. (2017). No prediction error cost in reading: Evidence from eye movements.Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 200-214. [26] Henderson J. M., Luke S. G., Schmidt J., & Richards J. E. (2013). Co-registration of eye movements and event-related potentials in connected-text paragraph reading.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 28. [27] Huettig, F., & Brouwer, S. (2015). Delayed anticipatory spoken language processing in adults with dyslexia— Evidence from eye-tracking. [28] Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (2016). Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. [29] Janse, E., & Jesse, A. (2014). Working memory affects older adults' use of context in spoken-word recognition. [30] Juhasz B. J., White S. J., Liversedge S. P., & Rayner K. (2008). Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1560-1579. [31] Kliegl R., Grabner E., Rolfs M., & Engbert R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 262-284. [32] Kretzschmar F., Schlesewsky M., & Staub A. (2015). Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG. [33] Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? [34] Kutas M.,DeLong, K. A., & Smith, N. J. (2011). A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing In M Bar (Ed), Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future (pp 190-207) Oxford: Oxford University Press Prediction and predictability in language processing. In M. Bar (Ed.), Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future (pp. 190-207). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [35] Laubrock J., Kliegl R., & Engbert R. (2006). SWIFT explorations of age differences in eye movements during reading.Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 872-884. [36] Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.Cognition, 106(3), 1126-1177. [37] Li L., Li S., Xie F., Chang M., McGowan V. A., & Wang J. X. (2019). Establishing a role for the visual complexity of linguistic stimuli in age-related reading difficulty: Evidence from eye movements during Chinese reading.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(8), 2626-2634. [38] Li S., Li L., Wang J. X., McGowan V. A., & Paterson K. B. (2018). Effects of word length on eye guidance differ for young and older Chinese readers.Psychology and Aging, 33(4), 685-692. [39] Liu X. M., Stine-Morrow E. A. L., & McCall G. S. (2019). The role of print exposure in supporting cognitive ability among older adults.Innovation in Aging, 3, (S1). 651. [40] Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading.Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139-1162. [41] Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2016). Limits on lexical prediction during reading.Cognitive Psychology, 88, 22-60. [42] McGowan, V. A., & Reichle, E. D. (2018). The “risky” reading strategy revisited: New simulations using E-Z Reader.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 179-189. [43] Norris, D. (2006). The Bayesian Reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process.Psychological Review, 113(2), 327-357. [44] Owsley, C. (2016). Vision and Aging. [45] Parker A. J., Kirkby J. A., & Slattery T. J. (2017). Predictability effects during reading in the absence of parafoveal preview.Journal of Cognitive Psychology (Hove, England), 29(8), 902-911. [46] Payne, B. R., & Federmeier, K. D. (2018). Contextual constraints on lexico-semantic processing in aging: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials.Brain Research, 1687, 117-128. [47] Rayner, K. (1975). Parafoveal identification during a fixation in reading.Acta Psychologica, 39(4), 271-281. [48] Rayner K., Li X. S., Juhasz B. J., & Yan G. (2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers. [49] Rayner K., Reichle E. D., Stroud M. J., Williams C. C., & Pollatsek A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 448-465. [50] Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: Afurther examination.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 504-509. [51] Rayner K., Yang J. M., Schuett S., & Slattery T. J. (2013). Eye movements of older and younger readers when reading unspaced text.Experimental Psychology, 26(1), 354-361. [52] Salthouse, T. (2012). Consequences of age-related cognitive declines.Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 201-226. [53] Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review, 103(3), 403-428. [54] Schotter E. R., Lee M., Reiderman M., & Rayner K. (2015). The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 118-139. [55] Schotter E. R., Reichle E. D., & Rayner K. (2014). Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial-attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and N+2 preview effects.Visual Cognition, 22(3-4), 309-333. [56] Schuster S., Himmelstoss N. A., Hutzler F., Richlan F., Kronbichler M., & Hawelka S. (2021). Cloze enough? hemodynamic effects of predictive processing during natural reading. NeuroImage, 228, 117687. [57] Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (2003). Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 489-493. [58] Staub, A. (2015). The effect of lexical predictability on eye movements in reading: Critical review and theoretical interpretation. [59] Stine-Morrow E. A. L., Shake M. C., Miles J. R., Lee K., Gao X. F., & McConkie G. (2010). Pay now or pay later: Aging and the role of boundary salience in self-regulation of conceptual integration in sentence processing.Psychology and Aging, 25(1), 168-176. [60] Taylor, W. L. (1953). “Cloze procedure”: A new tool for measuring readability. [61] Wang J. X., Li L., Li S., Xie F., Chang M., Paterson K. B., … McGowan V. A. (2018). Adult age differences in eye movements during reading: The evidence from Chinese.The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(4), 584-593. [62] Wang J. X., Li L., Li S., Xie F., Liversedge S. P., & Paterson K. B. (2018). Effects of aging and text-stimulus quality on the word-frequency effect during Chinese reading. [63] Warrington K. L., McGowan V. A., Paterson K. B., & White S. J. (2019). Effects of adult aging on letter position coding in reading: Evidence from eye movements.Psychology and Aging, 34(4), 598-612. [64] White S. J., Rayner K., & Liversedge S. P. (2005). The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(3), 466-471. [65] Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2017). The effects of word frequency and word predictability during first-and second- language paragraph reading in bilingual older and younger adults.Psychology and Aging, 32(2), 158-177. [66] Willems R. M., Frank S. L., Nijhof A. D., Hagoort P., & van den Bosch, A. (2016). Prediction during natural language comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 26(6). 2506-2516. [67] Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2012). Age-related changes in the impact of contextual strength on multiple aspects of sentence comprehension.Psychophysiology, 49(6), 770-785. [68] Xu N. N., Chen S. Y., Yang Y. M., & Zhu Z. D. (2020). Increased world knowledge in older adults does not prevent decline in world knowledge comprehension: An ERP study.Brain and Cognition. 140: 105534. [69] Yao, P. P, Staub, A., & Li, X. S. (in press). Predictability eliminates neighborhood effects during Chinese sentence reading. [70] Zang C. L., Zhang M. M., Bai X. J., Yan G. L., Paterson K. B., & Liversedge S. P. (2016). Effects of word frequency and visual complexity on eye movements of young and older Chinese readers.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(7), 1409-1425. [71] Zhao S. M., Li L., Chang M., Wang J. X., & Paterson K. B. (2021). A further look at ageing and word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from one-character words.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(1), 68-76. [72] Zhao S. N., Li L., Chang M., Xu Q. Q., Zhang K., Wang J. X., & Paterson K. B. (2019). Older adults make greater use of word predictability in Chinese reading.Psychology and Aging, 34(4), 780-790. [73] Zhu Z. D., Wang S. P., Xu N. N., Li M. Y., & Yang Y. M. (2019). Semantic integration declines independently of working memory in aging. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(6), 1481-1494. |
相关文章 5
| [1] | 赵婧. 发展性阅读障碍的视觉注意广度技能[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 20-26. |
| [2] | 孟泽龙, 赵婧, 毕鸿燕. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的视觉大细胞通路功能探究：一项ERPs研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 2-2. |
| [3] | 任桂琴;韩玉昌;刘颖. 句子语境中汉语词汇识别的即时加工过程[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(4): 493-503. |
| [4] | 李鹤;丁妮; 董奇. 情绪加工老化效应的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(2): 356-361. |
| [5] | 陈宝国;彭聃龄. 词汇识别中句子与课文语境效应的研究进展[J]. 心理科学进展, 1999, 7(1): 12-16. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5709
