删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

工作场所中的助人决策过程

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

杨建锋1, 郭晓虹1,2, 明晓东1
1江西财经大学工商管理学院, 南昌 330013;
2南昌工程学院工商管理学院, 南昌 330099
收稿日期:2021-01-11出版日期:2022-01-15发布日期:2021-11-25
通讯作者:明晓东, E-mail: jxmingxiaodong@163.com

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目(72062017, 72101103); 江西省研究生创新专项资金项目(YC2020—B094)

The decision-making process of offering help in the workplace

YANG Jianfeng1, GUO Xiaohong1,2, MING Xiaodong1
1School of Business Adeministration, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China;
2School of Business Adeministration, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China
Received:2021-01-11Online:2022-01-15Published:2021-11-25







摘要/Abstract


摘要: 本项目突破了以往研究过于聚焦“助人行为”这一瞬时行为的局限, 把工作场所中的助人决策理解为一种基于动态性心理契约的社会性风险投资决策过程, 认为人力资源管理的相关实践能够在组织内部为员工之间的这种社会性风险投资决策, 创建和维持适宜的投资环境, 促使员工愿意、能够、敢于进行助人这种社会性风险投资决策。基于上述思路, 项目首先构建工作场所中助人决策的过程机制模型, 然后就该模型与以往模型存在的核心差异——反思调整——进行深入探索。随后, 就影响助人决策投资环境的重要因素, 从人力资源管理职能的角度, 分别探讨工作设计和薪酬管理两个方面的重要变量对助人决策的影响机制。最后, 基于本项目研究成果, 提出能切实促进员工助人决策的、体系化的人力资源管理实践建议。


[1] 陈晓暾, 陈欢, 罗文春. (2020). 助人行为与职业成长的倒 U 型关系:角色压力的中介作用和工作自主性的调节作用.中国人力资源开发, 37(4), 51-63.
[2] 费孝通. (1947). 乡土中国. 上海: 上海观察社.
[3] 刘军, 陈星汶, 肖宁, 周爱钦. (2016). 当协作要求遇上“山头主义”:领地行为与任务相依性对团队绩效的影响研究.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (5), 99-109.
[4] 邱力生, 王文军, 任晓怡. (2012). 论“圈式缘聚”理论在管理学的作用.管理世界, (2), 183-185.
[5] 宋珂, 金国华, 李铭泽. (2018). 组织中的助人行为:前因、后果及作用机制. 中国人力资源开发, 35(6), 6-16+108.
[6] 孙灵希, 滕飞. (2013). 新进科研人员工作特征与工作投入之间关系的纵向研究.科技管理研究, (23), 150-154.
[7] 王静, 骆南峰, 石伟, 李祯. (2019). 施助的代价:助人行为的负面影响及其潜在机制.中国人力资源开发, 36(7), 67-93.
[8] 王如鹏. (2009). 简论圈子文化.学术交流, (11), 128-132.
[9] 王艳子, 罗瑾琏, 史江涛. (2014). 任务互依性对团队创造力影响机理研究.科技进步与对策, 31(24), 146-150.
[10] 阎云翔. (2006). 差序格局与中国文化的等级观.社会学研究, (4), 201-213.
[11] 杨红明, 廖建桥. (2011). 公务员敬业度及其影响因素的实证研究.管理学报, 8(6), 865-871.
[12] 杨新敏. (2010). 中国圈子文化与社交网站传播.苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 31(5), 148-152.
[13] 张桂平, 廖建桥. (2009). 用“圈子”文化管理员工沉默行为.中国人力资源开发, (6), 29-31.
[14] 张豪, 张向前. (2020). 指导理论背景下帮助行为影响因素研究: 基于扎根理论的探索.中国人力资源开发, 37(8), 107-119.
[15] 张维迎, 柯荣住. (2002). 信任及其解释:来自中国的跨省调查分析. 经济研究(10), 59-70+96.
[16] 张莹瑞, 佐斌. (2006). 社会认同理论及其发展.心理科学进展, 14(3), 475-480.
[17] 赵祁, 李锋. (2016). 团队领导与团队有效性:基于社会认同理论的多层次研究.心理科学进展, 24(11), 1677-1689.
[18] 周天爽, 胡琴, 崔丽娟. (2018). 共同内群体认同与群际帮助意愿:群际威胁的中介作用.心理研究, 11(4), 333-342.
[19] 周文娟, 段锦云, 朱月龙. (2013). 组织中的助人行为:概念界定、影响因素与结果.心理研究, 6(1), 59-65.
[20] Amabile T., Fisher C. M., & Pillemer J. (2014). IDEO's culture of helping: By making collaborative generosity the norm, the design firm has unleashed its creativity.Harvard Business Review, (2), 57-64.
[21] Bachrach D. G., Powell B. C., Collins B. J., & Richey R. G. (2006). Effects of task interdependence on the relationship between helping behavior and group performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1396-1405.
[22] Bamberger, P. A., & Levi, R. (2009). Team‐based reward allocation structures and the helping behaviors of outcome‐interdependent team members. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(4), 300-327.
[23] Beal, D. J., & Ghandour, L. (2011). Stability, change, and the stability of change in daily workplace affect.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 526-546.
[24] Becker J. C., Ksenofontov I., Siem B., & Love A. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of autonomy- and dependency-oriented help toward refugees.European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), 831-838.
[25] Bergeron D. M., Shipp A. J., Rosen B., & Furst S. A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen.Journal of Management, 39(4), 958-984.
[26] Billet, M. I., & Fekken, G. C. (2020). The influence of instrumentality in trusting Dark Triad members.Personality and Individual Differences, 154(1), 109690.
[27] Bolino M. C., Turnley W. H., & Bloodgood J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations.Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 505-522.
[28] Burks S., Carpenter J., & Goette L. (2009). Performance pay and worker cooperation: Evidence from an artefactual field experiment.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(3), 458-469.
[29] Burnstein E., Crandall C., & Kitayama S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 773-789.
[30] Calderwood C., Bennett A. A., Gabriel A. S., Trougakos J. P., & Dahling J. J. (2018). Too anxious to help? Off-job affective rumination as a linking mechanism between work anxiety and helping.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(3), 681-687.
[31] Choi, J. N. (2009). Collective dynamics of citizenship behaviour: What group characteristics promote group-level helping?Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1396-1420.
[32] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper.
[33] Dabos, G. E., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 52-72.
[34] Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377-383.
[35] Darley, J. M., & Latané, Β. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help? New York, NY: Appleton Century-Crofts.
[36] Deckop J. R., Mangel R., & Cirka C. C. (1999). Getting more than you pay for: Organizational citizenship behavior and pay-for-performance plans.Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 420-428.
[37] Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice.Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.
[38] Dovidio J. F., Piliavin J. A., Schroeder D. A., & Penner L. A. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
[39] Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. (2009). The value of value congruence.Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 654-677.
[40] Ellemers N., Gilder D. D., & Haslam S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance.Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 459-478.
[41] Elsbach, K. D., & Hargadon, A. B. (2006). Enhancing creativity through “mindless” work: A framework of workday design.Organization Science, 17(4), 470-483.
[42] Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships.Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1-19.
[43] Gerhart, B., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Compensation: Theory, evidence, and strategic implications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[44] Gläser D., van Gils S., & van Quaquebeke N. (2017). Pay-for-performance and interpersonal deviance: Competitiveness as the match that lights the fire.Journal of Personnel Psychology, 16(2), 77-90.
[45] Greenberg M. S.(1980). A theory of indebtedness. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Wills (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 3-26). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
[46] Grodal S., Nelson A. J., & Siino R. M. (2015). Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work.Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 136-168.
[47] Guinote A., Cotzia I., Sandhu S., & Siwa P. (2015). Social status modulates prosocial behavior and egalitarianism in preschool children and adults.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(3), 731-736.
[48] Guzzo R. A.,& Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
[49] Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey.Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.
[50] Halbesleben J. R. B., Harvey J., & Bolino M. C. (2009). Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family.Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1452-1465.
[51] Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Wheeler, A. R. (2015). To invest or not? The role of coworker support and trust in daily reciprocal gain spirals of helping behavior.Journal of Management, 41(6), 1628-1650.
[52] Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework.Biological Psychology, 45(1-3), 73-93.
[53] Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts.Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140.
[54] Human L. J., Woolley J. D., & Mendes W. B. (2018). Effects of oxytocin administration on receiving help.Emotion, 18(7), 980-988.
[55] Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work.Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
[56] Kenny D. A., Kashy D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
[57] Kim, H., & Gong, Y. (2009). The roles of tacit knowledge and OCB in the relationship between group-based pay and firm performance.Human Resource Management Journal, 19(2), 120-139.
[58] Kogut T., Slovic P., & Västfjäll D. (2015). Scope insensitivity in helping decisions: Is it a matter of culture and values?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(6), 1042-1052.
[59] Koopman J., Lanaj K., & Scott B. A. (2016). Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others.Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 414-435.
[60] Kraus, M. W., & Callaghan, B. (2016). Social class and prosocial behavior: The moderating role of public versus private contexts.Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 769-777.
[61] Lanaj, K., & Jennings, R. E. (2020). Putting leaders in a bad mood: The affective costs of helping followers with personal problems.Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(4), 355-371.
[62] Lanaj K., Johnson R. E., & Wang M. (2016). When lending a hand depletes the will: The daily costs and benefits of helping.Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1097-1110.
[63] Laulié, L., & Tekleab, A. G. (2016). A multi‐level theory of psychological contract fulfillment in teams.Group and Organization Management, 41(5), 658-698.
[64] Lee H. W., Bradburn J., Johnson R. E., Lin S.-H., Chang C.-H., & Lee H. W. (2019). The benefits of receiving gratitude for helpers: A daily investigation of proactive and reactive helping at work.Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(2), 197-213.
[65] Lepine J. A., Piccolo R. F., Jackson C. L., Mathieu J. E., & Saul J. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273-307.
[66] Lepine, J. A., & van Dyne, L. (2001). Peer responses to low performers: An attributional model of helping in the context of groups.Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 67-84.
[67] Lin K. J., Savani K., & Ilies R. (2019). Doing good, feeling good? The roles of helping motivation and citizenship pressure.Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(8), 1020-1035.
[68] Lin W., Koopmann J., & Wang M. (2018). How does workplace helping behavior step up or slack off? Integrating enrichment-based and depletion-based perspectives.Journal of Management, 46(3), 385-413.
[69] Marques, J. M. (2010). Black sheep effect. In J. M. Levine & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[70] Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., & Schoorman F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust.Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
[71] McDonald M. L., Keeves G. D., & Westphal J. D. (2018). One step forward, one step back: White male top manager organizational identification and helping behavior toward other executives following the appointment of a female or racial minority CEO.Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 405-439.
[72] Milkovich G., Newman J., & Gerhart B. (2013). Compensation (11th ed.). Homewood, AL: McGraw-Hill Education.
[73] Montes, S. D., & Irving, P. G. (2008). Disentangling the effects of promised and delivered inducements: Relational and transactional contract elements and the mediating role of trust.Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1367-1381.
[74] Mueller, J. S., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Why seeking help from teammates is a blessing and a curse: A theory of help seeking and individual creativity in team contexts.Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 263-276.
[75] Nadler, A. (2012). From help-giving to helping relations: Belongingness and independence in social interaction. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 394-419). New York: Oxford University Press.
[76] Nadler, A. (2020). Social psychology of helping relations: Solidarity and hierarchy (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
[77] Nadler, A., & Halabi, S. (2006). Intergroup helping as status relations: Effects of status stability, identification, and type of help on receptivity to high-status group's help.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 97-110.
[78] Newark D. A., Bohns V. K., & Flynn F. J. (2017). A helping hand is hard at work: Help-seekers' underestimation of helpers' effort.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 18-29.
[79] Ouyang K., Xu E., Huang X., Liu W., & Tang Y. (2018). Reaching the limits of reciprocity in favor exchange: The effects of generous, stingy, and matched favor giving on social status.Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(6), 614-630.
[80] Park, S., & Sturman, M. C. (2016). Evaluating form and functionality of pay-for-performance plans: The relative incentive and sorting effects of merit pay, bonuses, and long-term incentives.Human Resource Management, 55(4), 697-719.
[81] Perlow, L., & Weeks, J. (2002). Who's helping whom? Layers of culture and workplace behavior.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 345-361.
[82] Pierce J. L., Jussila I., & Cummings A. (2009). Psychological ownership within the job design context: Revision of the job characteristics model.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(4), 477-496.
[83] Piliavin J. A., Dovidio J. F., Gaertner S. L., & Clark, R. D. I. (1981). Emergency intervention. New York, NY: Academic.
[84] Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Paine J. B., & Bachrach D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research.Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
[85] Ramamoorthy, N., & Flood, P. C. (2004). Individualism/ collectivism, perceived task interdependence and teamwork attitudes among irish blue-collar employees: A test of the main and moderating effects?Human Relations, 57(3), 347-366.
[86] Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature.Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714.
[87] Rich B. L., Lepine J. A., & Crawford E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance.Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.
[88] Robinson S. L., Kraatz M. S., & Rousseau D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study.Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137-152.
[89] Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 245-259.
[90] Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles.Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 655-684.
[91] Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[92] Rousseau D. M., Hansen S. D., & Tomprou M. (2018). A dynamic phase model of psychological contract processes.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(9), 1081-1098.
[93] Ruci L., van Allen Z. M., & Zelenski J. M. (2018). Pro-social personality traits, helping behavior, and ego-depletion: Is helping really easier for the dispositionally pro-social?Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 32-39.
[94] Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
[95] Schein, E. H. (2009). Helping: How to offer, give and receive help. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
[96] Schoorman F. D., Mayer R. C., & Davis J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future.Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344-354.
[97] Siem, B., & Stürmer, S. (2019). Attribution of egoistic versus altruistic motives to acts of helping: The role of the helper's status and the act's intended publicity.Social Psychology, 50(1), 53-66.
[98] Spitzmuller, M., & van Dyne, L. (2013). Proactive and reactive helping: Contrasting the positive consequences of different forms of helping.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 560-580.
[99] Stea D., Pedersen T., & Foss N. J. (2017). The relational antecedents of interpersonal helping: ‘Quantity', ‘quality' or both?British Journal of Management, 28(2), 197-212.
[100] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations(pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nel-son-Hall.
[101] Tekleab, A. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2003). Aren't there two parties in an employment relationship? Antecedents and consequences of organization-employee agreement on contract obligations and violations.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 585-608.
[102] Thompson, J. A., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2017). Nepotistic preferences in a computerized trolley problem.Current Research in Social Psychology, 25(7), 36-44.
[103] Tse H. H. M., Lam C. K., Lawrence S. A., & Huang X. (2013). When my supervisor dislikes you more than me: The effect of dissimilarity in leader-member exchange on coworkers' interpersonal emotion and perceived help.Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 974-988.
[104] van der Vegt, G. S., Bunderson J. S., & Oosterhof A. (2006). Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least.Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 877-893.
[105] van der Vegt, G. S., & van de Vliert, E. (2005). Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams.Journal of Management, 31(1), 73-89.
[106] van Leeuwen, E., & Zagefka, H. (2017). Intergroup helping. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.
[107] Wang L., Law K. S., Zhang M. J., Li Y. N., & Liang Y. (2019). It's mine! Psychological ownership of one's job explains positive and negative workplace outcomes of job engagement.Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(2), 229-246.
[108] Weiner, B. (1996). Searching for order in social motivation.Psychological Inquiry, 7(3), 199-216.
[109] Weiner, B. (1980). May I borrow your class notes? An attributional analysis of judgments of help giving in an achievement-related context.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(5), 676-681.
[110] Zhao H., Wayne S. J., Glibkowski B. C., & Bravo J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work‐related outcomes: A meta‐analysis.Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647-680.




[1]施李晓云, 朱悦, 段锦云. 从征求到反应:建言行为链中的管理者角色[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(1): 206-215.
[2]金杨华, 陈世伟, 朱玥, 谢江佩. 工作场所中他人感知的员工工作-家庭冲突:刻板印象视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(1): 230-238.
[3]马双, 凌小蝶, 李纯青. 共享经济背景下顾客公民行为和不当行为:基于社会困境理论的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(11): 1920-1935.
[4]徐禕, 刘艺璇. 技术信任和领导信任对企业员工新技术接受的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(10): 1711-1723.
[5]刘豆豆, 胥彦, 李超平. 中国情境下家长式领导与员工绩效关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(10): 1829-1846.
[6]张凯丽, 尹奎, 唐宁玉. 在什么情况下员工会汇报差错?基于秘密分享视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1149-1162.
[7]尹奎, 赵景, 李璨, 王宏蕾, 王崇锋. 领导授权行为的形成机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1097-1110.
[8]林琳. 职场变革情境下的工作与工余塑造: 基于自我认同理论的双路径模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 773-786.
[9]吴论文, 杨付, 田薏欣, 裴玉蓉. 工作嵌入的影响结果及其理论解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 906-920.
[10]詹思群, 严瑜. 工作场所不文明行为与职场排斥间的螺旋效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 560-570.
[11]尹奎, 彭坚, 张君. 潜在剖面分析在组织行为领域中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1056-1070.
[12]倪渊, 李翠. 内隐创业领导与多层次积极追随力的互动机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(5): 711-730.
[13]李精精, 张剑, 田慧荣, Jeffrey B.Vancouver. 动态计算模型在组织行为学研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(2): 368-380.
[14]王婷, 杨付. 领导幽默的影响效果及其理论解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1631-1642.
[15]李倩, 龚诗阳, 李超凡. 团队文化多样性对团队创新的影响及作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1521-1539.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5710
相关话题/心理 科学 工作 人力资源 管理

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 儿童阅读与心理理论间的关系
    赵丽华,杨运梅,李晶中国科学院行为科学重点实验室,中国科学院心理研究所,北京100101中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2021-03-05出版日期:2022-01-15发布日期:2021-11-25通讯作者:李晶,E-mail:lij@psych.ac.cn基金资助:� ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 远程心理健康服务:应用、优势及挑战
    靳宇倡1,张政1,郑佩璇2,安俊秀31四川师范大学心理学院,成都610066;2阿拉巴马大学运动人体科学系,阿拉巴马州塔斯卡卢萨35401;3成都信息工程大学软件工程学院,成都610025收稿日期:2020-11-06出版日期:2022-01-15发布日期:2021-11-25通讯作者:安俊秀,E- ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理学视角下的道德损伤
    艾攀,戴艳四川师范大学心理学院,成都610068收稿日期:2020-12-31出版日期:2022-01-15发布日期:2021-11-25通讯作者:戴艳,E-mail:daiyanch@163.comMoralinjury:AreviewfromtheperspectiveofpsychologyA ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人工智能辅助下的心理健康新型测评
    姜力铭1,田雪涛2,任萍3,骆方11北京师范大学心理学部,北京100875;2北京交通大学计算机与信息技术学院,北京100044;3中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心,北京100875收稿日期:2021-02-22出版日期:2022-01-15发布日期:2021-11-25通讯作者:骆方,E-mail ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 从征求到反应:建言行为链中的管理者角色
    施李晓云,朱悦,段锦云华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海市心理健康与危机干预重点实验室,上海200062收稿日期:2021-02-08出版日期:2022-01-15发布日期:2021-11-25通讯作者:段锦云,E-mail:mgjyduan@hotmail.com基金资助:&国家 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 公平规范执行中内群体偏爱的心理发展机制
    张振,李海文,熊建萍,赵辉,刘瑞雪,齐春辉河南师范大学教育学部,新乡453007收稿日期:2021-02-03发布日期:2021-10-26基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年项目(32000754);教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(20YJC190030);河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2019CJY03 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 工作场所中他人感知的员工工作-家庭冲突:刻板印象视角
    金杨华,陈世伟,朱玥,谢江佩浙江工商大学工商管理学院,杭州310018收稿日期:2021-02-18出版日期:2022-01-15发布日期:2021-11-25通讯作者:谢江佩,E-mail:xiejiangpei@126.com基金资助:&浙江省哲学社会科学规划&之 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 多时点结果跨期选择的决策效应及其心理机制
    孙海龙1,安薪如2,熊冠星3()1广东外语外贸大学商学院,广州5100062暨南大学管理学院,广州5106323华南师范大学经济与管理学院,广州510006收稿日期:2020-09-17发布日期:2021-10-26通讯作者:熊冠星E-mail:xiongguanxing@163.com基金资助:国 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 中国社会转型过程中的心理变化:社会学视角的研究及其对心理学家的启示
    黄梓航1,2,3,王俊秀4,5,苏展2,3,敬一鸣2,3,蔡华俭2,3()1成都大学心理健康教育中心,成都6101062中国科学院心理研究所人格与社会心理研究中心,北京1001013中国科学院大学心理学系,北京1000494内蒙古师范大学心理学院,呼和浩特0100225中国社会科学院社会学研究所,北 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 教与学的大脑:人际神经科学助推教育研究
    成晓君1,刘美焕1,潘亚峰2,李红1()1深圳大学心理学院,深圳5180602卡罗琳斯卡医学院临床神经科学系,斯德哥尔摩,瑞典收稿日期:2020-11-06出版日期:2021-11-15发布日期:2021-09-23通讯作者:李红E-mail:lihongszu@szu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01