1华侨大学工商管理学院;
2华侨大学人力资源管理研究中心, 福建 泉州 362021
收稿日期:2020-09-28出版日期:2022-01-15发布日期:2021-11-25通讯作者:张向前, E-mail: xqzhang2018@163.com基金资助:* 2020年度中国人才研究会课题(面向2035年我国青年科技人才激励机制研究, 课题编号：ZRH-2007); 华侨大学研究生科研创新能力培育项目(18011120001)What characteristics should the supervisor-subordinate relationship have? The supervisor-subordinate relational schema
DAI Yufang1, ZHANG Xiangqian2, ZHENG Wenzhi11School of Management, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China;
2Human Resource Management Research Center, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China
Received:2020-09-28Online:2022-01-15Published:2021-11-25摘要/Abstract
摘要： 以往上下级关系研究大多聚焦于关系的实然特征, 缺乏对关系应有特征或模式的探讨。上下级关系图式是个体对上下级之间关系应有模式或特征的内隐认知, 这种内隐认知有助于揭示上级与下属之间的互动过程, 并为促进上级和下属的积极心理与行为提供理论启示。经过对文献的系统梳理, 将上下级关系图式与内隐关系理论、追随力认知图式、关系自我和关系认同等概念进行区分。个体传统性和现代性、依恋风格、领导行为以及文化因素能够预测上下级关系图式; 上下级关系图式能影响领导的态度与行为、下属忠诚、下属工作绩效、角色外行为、领导评价(道德领导)以及上下级关系评价; 移情的社会认知模型、泛家族主义、社会学习理论、信息加工理论解释了上下级关系图式的前因后果。未来可以从识别预测因素、拓展后果研究以及挖掘作用机制等方面推动上下级关系图式的研究。
参考文献
| [1] 蔡松纯. (2012). [2] 蔡松纯, 郑伯埙, 周丽芳. (2015). 领导者与部属上下关系认定之理论模式建构. [3] 蔡松纯, 郑伯埙, 周丽芳, 姜定宇, 郑弘岳. (2009). 领导者上下关系认定与部属利社会行爲:权力距离之调节效果. [4] 陈靖枫. (2018). [5] 陈鹏宇, 孙剑, 贾铖. (2020). 越级指挥的代价:高管越级指挥对中层领导多重交换关系的影响. [6] 冯蛟, 罗文豪, 徐奇, 吴永林. (2019). 领导者-员工关系类型及对员工创新行为的影响. [7] 付博, 于桂兰, 梁潇杰. (2019). 上下级关系实践对员工工作绩效的“双刃剑”效应:一项跨层次分析. [8] 郭晓薇, 范伟. (2018). 基于整合构念的中国情境下员工上下级关系量表开发与检验. [9] 郭晓薇, 李成彦. (2015). 中国人的上下级关系:整合构念的建立与初步检验. [10] 郭一蓉, 宋继文, 朱丽. (2018). 领导对创造力的作用机制与理论基础探讨. [11] 姜定宇. (2005). [12] 姜定宇, 郑伯埙. (2014). 华人差序式领导的本质与影响历程. [13] 孔茗, 袁悦, 钱小军. (2019). “看好”与“做好”:内隐原型交互对员工行为的影响. [14] 梁潇杰, 于桂兰, 付博. (2019). 与上级关系好的员工一定会建言吗?基于资源保存理论的双中介模型. [15] 刘超, 刘军, 陈星汶, 李巧, 朱丽. (2020). 本土组织情境下上下级匹配模型的构建与探讨. [16] 刘翔平, 郭文静, 邓衍鹤. (2016). 关系图式的理论发展及其实践意义. [17] 刘颖. (2005). 组织中的上下级信任. [18] 彭坚, 王霄. (2015). 追随力认知图式:概念解析与整合模型. [19] 彭坚, 王震. (2019). 领导者言行一致对下属工作绩效的影响:基于工作与非工作双重情境的研究. [20] 彭坚, 王震, 侯楠. (2019). 你和上司合拍吗?组织中的上下级匹配. [21] 王震, 许灏颖, 宋萌. (2018). “说话算话”的领导让下属更效忠: 中国传统“报”文化视角下的领导言行一致与下属忠诚. [22] 卫武, 倪慧. (2020). 工作家庭冲突对员工工作行为的影响:基于资源保存理论和身份认同理论的视角. [23] 谢佩儒. (2015). [24] 杨国枢. (2008). 华人社会取向的理论分析. 见杨国枢, 黄光国, 杨中芳 (编), 华人本土心理学 (pp. 171-209). 重庆大学出版社. [25] 杨静芳, 林尚平. (2019). 从涓滴模式探讨伦理领导对企业社会责任与组织公民行为之影响. [26] 周丽芳, 姜定宇, 郑伯埙. (2008年10月). [27] 周婉茹, 周丽芳, 郑伯埙, 任金刚. (2010). 专权与尚严之辨:再探威权领导的内涵与恩威并济的效果. [28] 祝振兵, 占小军, 李志成. (2019). 皮格马利翁理论视角下追随原型与团队创新的关系研究. [29] Andersen, S. M., & Cole, S. W. (1990). "Do I know you?": The role of significant others in general social perception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 384-399. [30] Andersen S. M.,& Glassman, N. S. (1996). Responding to significant others when they are not there: Effects on interpersonal inference, motivation, and affect In R M Sorrentino & E T Higgins (Eds), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol 3 The interpersonal context (pp 262- 321) New York: The Guilford Press Effects on interpersonal inference, motivation, and affect. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3. The interpersonal context. (pp. 262- 321). New York: The Guilford Press. [31] Avolio B. J., Zhu W., Koh W., & Bhatia P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. [32] Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839. [33] Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information.Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 461-484. [34] Baldwin, M. W. (1997). Relational schemas as a source of if-then self-inference procedures.Review of General Psychology, 1(4), 326-335. [35] Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press. [36] Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-244. [37] Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Need-to-belong theory. [38] Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83-93. [39] Brunson, J. A. (2014). [40] Choi D., Kraimer M. L., & Seibert S. E. (2020). Conflict, justice, and inequality: Why perceptions of leader-member exchange differentiation hurt performance in teams. [41] DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. [42] Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G. (1997). Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. [43] Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2017). [44] Flynn, F. J. (2005). Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations.Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 737-750. [45] Foti R. J., Hansbrough T. K., Epitropaki O., & Coyle P. T. (2017). Dynamic viewpoints on implicit leadership and followership theories: Approaches, findings, and future directions.The Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), 261-267. [46] Giessner, S., & van Quaquebeke, N. (2010). Using a relational models perspective to understand normatively appropriate conduct in ethical leadership. [47] Gottfredson R. K., Wright S. L., & Heaphy E. D. (2020). A critique of the Leader-Member Exchange construct: Back to square one. [48] Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. [49] Huang L., Krasikova D. V., & Harms P. D. (2020). Avoiding or embracing social relationships? A conservation of resources perspective of leader narcissism, leader-member exchange differentiation, and follower voice. [50] Huang X., Wright R. P., Chiu W. C. K., & Wang C. (2008). Relational schemas as sources of evaluation and misevaluation of leader-member exchanges: Some initial evidence.The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 266-282. [51] Keck N., Giessner S. R., van Quaquebeke N., & Kruijff E. (2020). When do followers perceive their leaders as ethical? A relational models perspective of normatively appropriate conduct. [52] Koopman J., Scott B. A., Matta F. K., Conlon D. E., & Dennerlein T. (2019). Ethical leadership as a substitute for justice enactment: An information-processing perspective.Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(9), 1103-1116. [53] Lee A., Gerbasi A., Schwarz G., & Newman A. (2018). Leader-member exchange social comparisons and follower outcomes: The roles of felt obligation and psychological entitlement. [54] Lord R. G., Epitropaki O., Foti R. J., & Hansbrough T. K. (2020). Implicit leadership theories, implicit followership theories, and dynamic processing of leadership information.Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 49-74. [55] Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). [56] MacBlain, S. (2018). [57] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. [58] Mattingly B. A., McIntyre K. P., Knee C. R., & Loving T. J. (2019). Implicit theories of relationships and self- expansion: Implications for relationship functioning.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1579-1599. [59] Miranda, R., & Andersen, S. M. (2007). The therapeutic relationship: Implications from social cognition and transference. In P. Gilbert, & R. L. Leahy,(Eds.). [60] Offermann, L. R., & Coats, M. R. (2018). Implicit theories of leadership: Stability and change over two decades.The Leadership Quarterly, 29(4), 513-522. [61] Robert, V., & Vandenberghe, C. (2021). Laissez-Faire Leadership and Affective Commitment: The Roles of Leader-Member Exchange and Subordinate Relational Self-concept. [62] Sanchez-Burks J., Nisbett R. E., & Ybarra O. (2000). Cultural styles, relationship schemas, and prejudice against out-groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 174-189. [63] Sherman S. J., Judd C. M., & Park B. (1989). Social cognition.Annual Review of Psychology, 40(1), 281-326. [64] Shih M., Ambady N., Richeson J. A., Fujita K., & Gray H. M. (2002). Stereotype performance boosts: The impact of self-relevance and the manner of stereotype activation. [65] Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships.Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9-32. [66] Smircich, L., & Morgan, G. (1982). Leadership: The management of meaning.The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18(3), 257-273. [67] Sy, T. (2010). What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 73-84. [68] Thomas G., Martin R., Epitropaki O., Guillaume Y., & Lee A. (2013). Social cognition in leader-follower relationships: Applying insights from relationship science to understanding relationship-based approaches to leadership.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), S63-S81. [69] Tsai C. Y., Dionne S. D., Wang A. C., Spain S. M., Yammarino F. J., & Cheng B. S. (2017). Effects of relational schema congruence on leader-member exchange.The Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), 268-284. [70] Tse H. H. M., Troth A. C., Ashkanasy N. M., & Collins A. L. (2018). Affect and leader-member exchange in the new millennium: A state-of-art review and guiding framework. [71] Warren, J. M. (1954). Perceptual dominance in discrimination learning by monkeys. [72] Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory. [73] Zhou, X. T., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2010). Quantitative and qualitative examination of propositions concerning supervisor-subordinate convergence in descriptions of leader-member exchange (LMX) quality.The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 826-843. |
相关文章 4
| [1] | 任俊, 朱琼嫦. 内隐情绪调节：一种有效的自我保护[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(12): 2054-2063. |
| [2] | 陈昭蓉;李晔. 关系模式框架下的具身社会关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(4): 702-710. |
| [3] | 祁顺生;贺宏卿. 组织内信任的影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(6): 918-923. |
| [4] | 张卫. 问题解决中的内隐认知[J]. 心理科学进展, 1999, 7(2): 7-12. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5725
