删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

跨期选择中的年龄差异及其机制

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

杨权1, 尹述飞1,2(), 胡兴1
1湖北大学教育学院心理学系, 武汉 430062
2应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 北京 100875
收稿日期:2019-04-25出版日期:2020-06-15发布日期:2020-04-22
通讯作者:尹述飞E-mail:yinshufei121@163.com

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目(31600904);湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究青年基金(18Q017)

Age differences in intertemporal choice and the mechanism underlying them

YANG Quan1, YIN Shufei1,2(), HU Xing1
1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
2 Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Received:2019-04-25Online:2020-06-15Published:2020-04-22
Contact:YIN Shufei E-mail:yinshufei121@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 随着老龄化形势日益严峻, 老年人的跨期选择受到越来越多****的关注。目前关于跨期选择的年老化研究尚存分歧:有研究发现老年人比年轻人更偏好未来获得更大收益; 也有研究发现老年人的选择偏好和年轻人一样, 甚至比年轻人更偏好近期收益。从时间表征和结果价值表征两个维度上的加工过程去分析其对老年人跨期选择的影响, 并进一步阐述认知、动机和情绪因素对两个维度加工过程的影响, 这对于理解当前老年人跨期选择领域研究的分歧有重要科学意义。


[1] 敖玲敏, 吕厚超, 黄希庭 . (2011). 社会情绪选择理论概述. 心理科学进展, 19(2), 217-223.
[2] 陈海贤, 何贵兵 . (2014). 心理距离对跨期选择和风险选择的影响. 心理学报, 46(5), 677-690.
[3] 胡雪, 刘启珍, 龚先旻, 尹述飞 . (2018). 时间知觉在老年人跨期选择中的作用. 心理科学, 41(2), 410-415.
[4] 蒋多, 何贵兵 . (2017). 心理距离视角下的行为决策. 心理科学进展, 25(11), 1992-2001.
[5] 蒋元萍, 孙红月 . (2019). 情绪对跨期决策的影响. 心理科学进展, 27(9), 1622-1630.
[6] 刘雷, 苏缇, 彭娟, 郭逸群, 冯廷勇 . (2014). 延迟折扣的认知与神经机制:特质性与状态性研究取向. 心理科学进展, 22(7), 1047-1061.
[7] 刘扬, 孙彦 . (2016). 时间分解效应及其对跨期决策的影响. 心理学报, 48(4), 362-370.
[8] 刘永芳, 范雯健, 侯日霞 . (2019). 从理论到研究, 再到应用:塞勒及其贡献. 心理科学进展, 27(3), 381-393.
[9] 马文娟, 索涛, 李亚丹, 罗笠铢, 冯廷勇, 李红 . (2013). 得失框架效应的分离 —— 来自收益与损失型跨期选择的研究. 心理学报, 44(8), 1038-1046.
[10] 张阳阳, 周蕾, 游旭群, 李纾, 梁竹苑 . (2018). 跨期决策是否基于“折扣计算”:来自双分离范式的证据. 中国科学: 生命科学, 48(5), 592-608.
[11] Addis, D. R., Musicaro, R., Pan, L., & Schacter, D. L . (2010). Episodic simulation of past and future events in older adults: Evidence from an experimental recombination task. Psychology and Aging, 25(2), 369-376.
[12] Ainslie, G . (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82(4), 463-496.
[13] Brandtstädter, J., Rothermund, K., Kranz, D., & Kühn, W . (2010). Final Decentrations. European Psychologist, 15(2), 152-163.
doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000019URL
[14] Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T . (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100(3), 432-459.
[15] Carstensen, L. L . (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312(5782), 1913-1915.
[16] Carstensen, L. L . (2019). Integrating cognitive and emotion paradigms to address the paradox of aging. Cognition and Emotion, 33(1), 119-125.
[17] Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T . (1999). Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165-181.
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165URL
[18] Chao, L. W., Szrek, H., Pereira, N. S., & Pauly, M. V . (2009). Time preference and its relationship with age, health, and survival probability. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(1), 1-19.
[19] Charles, S. T., & Carstensen, L. L . (2010). Social and emotional aging. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 383-409.
[20] Craik, F. I., & Hay, J. F . (1999). Aging and judgments of duration: Effects of task complexity and method of estimation. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(3), 549-560.
[21] Dai, J., & Busemeyer, J. R . (2014). A probabilistic, dynamic, and attribute-wise model of intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1489-1514.
[22] Dai, J., Pleskac, T. J., & Pachur, T . (2018). Dynamic cognitive models of intertemporal choice. Cognitive Psychology, 104, 29-56.
[23] English, T., & Carstensen, L. L . (2014). Selective narrowing of social networks across adulthood is associated with improved emotional experience in daily life. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(2), 195-202.
[24] Eppinger, B., Heekeren, H. R., & Li, S. C . (2018). Age differences in the neural mechanisms of intertemporal choice under subjective decision conflict. Cerebral Cortex, 28(11), 3764-3774.
[25] Eppinger, B., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D . (2012). Reduced sensitivity to immediate reward during decision- making in older than younger adults. PloS One, 7(5), e36953.
[26] Erikson, E. H. ( 1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Oxford, England: International Universities Press, 106-108.
[27] Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'Donoghue, T . (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351-401.
[28] Freund, A. M., & Blanchard-Fields, F . (2014). Age-related differences in altruism across adulthood: Making personal financial gain versus contributing to the public good. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1125-1136.
[29] Green, L., & Myerson, J . (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769-792.
[30] Green, L., Myerson, J., Lichtman, D., Rosen, S., & Fry, A . (1996). Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: The role of age and income. Psychology and Aging, 11(1), 79-84.
[31] Green, L., Myerson, J., & Ostaszewski, P . (1999). Discounting of delayed rewards across the life span: Age differences in individual discounting functions. Behavioural Processes, 46(1), 89-96.
[32] Gruber, R. P., Wagner, L. F., & Block, R. A . (2004). Relationships between Subjective Time and Information Processed (reduction of uncertainty). In P. A. Harris & M. Crawford (Eds.), Time and uncertainty( pp. 188-203). Boston: Brill.
[33] Halfmann, K., Hedgcock, W., & Denburg, N. L . (2013). Age-related differences in discounting future gains and losses. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 6(1), 42-54.
[34] Hernandez, C. M., Vetere, L. M., Orsini, C. A., McQuail, J. A., Maurer, A. P., Burke, S. N., ... Bizon, J. L . (2017). Decline of prefrontal cortical-mediated executive functions but attenuated delay discounting in aged Fischer 344 x brown Norway hybrid rats. Neurobiology of Aging, 60, 141-152.
[35] Huffman, D., Maurer, R., & Mitchell, O. S . (2019). Time discounting and economic decision-making in the older population. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 14, 100-121.
[36] Jimura, K., Myerson, J., Hilgard, J., Keighley, J., Braver, T. S., & Green, L . (2011). Domain independence and stability in young and older adults’ discounting of delayed rewards. Behavioural Processes, 87(3), 253-259.
[37] Kaplan, H. S., Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M . (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology( pp. 68-95). New York: Jhon Wiley & Sons.
[38] Li, S . (2004). A behavioral choice model when computational ability matters. Applied Intelligence, 20(2), 147-163.
doi: 10.1023/B:APIN.0000013337.01711.c7URL
[39] Liao, H. W., & Carstensen, L. L . (2018). Future time perspective: Time horizons and beyond. GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 31(3), 163-167.
[40] Liu, L.-l., Chen, X.-j., Cui, J.-f., Wang, J., Zhang, Y.-b., Neumann, D. L., ... Chan, R. C. K . (2016). Age differences in delay discounting in Chinese adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 205-209.
[41] Liu, L., Feng, T., Suo, T., Lee, K., & Li, H . (2012). Adapting to the destitute situations: Poverty cues lead to short-term choice. PloS One, 7(4), e33950.
[42] Lockenhoff, C. E . (2011). Age, time, and decision making: From processing speed to global time horizons. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235(1), 44-56.
[43] Löckenhoff, C. E . (2017). Aging and decision-making: A conceptual framework for future research - a mini-review. Gerontology, 64(2), 140-148.
[44] Lockenhoff, C. E., O'Donoghue, T., & Dunning, D . (2011). Age differences in temporal discounting: The role of dispositional affect and anticipated emotions. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 274-284.
[45] Lockenhoff, C. E., Rutt, J. L., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., O'Donoghue, T., & Reyna, V. F . (2019). Preferences for temporal sequences of real outcomes differ across domains but do not vary by age. Journals of Gerontology. Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 74(3), 430-439.
[46] Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G . (2016). Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 260-281.
[47] Read, D., & Read, N. L . (2004). Time discounting over the lifespan. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94(1), 22-32.
[48] Reed, A. E., Chan, L., & Mikels, J. A . (2014). Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: Age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychology and Aging, 29(1), 1-15.
[49] Richter, D., & Mata, R . (2018). Age differences in intertemporal choice: U-shaped associations in a probability sample of German households. Psychology and Aging, 33(5), 782-788.
doi: 10.1037/pag0000266URL
[50] Rieger, M., & Mata, R . (2015). On the generality of age differences in social and nonsocial decision making. Journals of Gerontology. Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(2), 202-214.
[51] Samuelson, P. A . (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155-161.
[52] Scholten, M., & Read, D . (2010). The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs. Psychological Review, 117(3), 925-944.
[53] Seaman, K. L., Brooks, N., Karrer, T. M., Castrellon, J. J., Perkins, S. F., Dang, L. C., ... Samanez-Larkin, G. R . (2018). Subjective value representations during effort, probability and time discounting across adulthood. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(5), 449-459.
[54] Seaman, K. L., Gorlick, M. A., Vekaria, K. M., Hsu, M., Zald, D. H., & Samanez-Larkin, G. R . (2016). Adult age differences in decision making across domains: Increased discounting of social and health-related rewards. Psychology and Aging, 31(7), 737-746.
doi: 10.1037/pag0000131URL
[55] Shefrin, H. M., & Thaler, R. H . (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 392-406.
[56] Simon, H. A . (1978). Information-processing theory of human problem solving. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
[57] Smith, C. T., Steel, E. A., Parrish, M. H., Kelm, M. K., & Boettiger, C. A . (2015). Intertemporal choice behavior in emerging adults and adults: Effects of age interact with alcohol use and family history status. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 627.
[58] Sparrow, E. P., Armstrong, B. A., Fiocco, A. J., & Spaniol, J . (2018). Acute stress and altruism in younger and older adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 100, 10-17.
[59] Sparrow, E. P., & Spaniol, J . (2018). Aging and altruism in intertemporal choice. Psychology and Aging, 33(2), 315-324.
[60] Stephens, E. C., & Johnson, M. M. S . (2000). Dr. Mom and other influences on younger and older adults’ otc medication purchases. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 19(4), 441-459.
[61] Steward, T., Mestre-Bach, G., Fernandez-Aranda, F., Granero, R., Perales, J. C., Navas, J. F., ... Jimenez-Murcia, S . (2017). Delay discounting and impulsivity traits in young and older gambling disorder patients. Addictive Behaviors, 71, 96-103.
[62] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N . (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.
[63] Turgeon, M., Lustig, C., & Meck, W. H . (2016). Cognitive aging and time perception: Roles of bayesian optimization and degeneracy. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 8, 102.
[64] Wang, X. T., Kruger, D. J., & Wilke, A . (2009). Life history variables and risk-taking propensity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(2), 77-84.
[65] Wittmann, M., & Lehnhoff, S . (2005). Age effects in perception of time. Psychological Reports, 97(3), 921-935.
[66] Zauberman, G., Kim, B. K., Malkoc, S. A., & Bettman, J. R . (2009). Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(4), 543-556.
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.46.4.543URL




[1]何清华, 李丹丹. 中国儿童青少年跨期决策的发展与脑发育机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 381-389.
[2]江程铭, 谢铠杰, 何铨. 跨期选择研究:从单时点结果到多时点结果[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(5): 922-927.
[3]张顺民;冯廷勇. 拖延的认知神经机制与基因:行为−脑−基因的多角度研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(3): 393-403.
[4]任天虹;胡志善;孙红月;刘扬;李纾. 选择与坚持:跨期选择与延迟满足之比较[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(2): 303-315.
[5]汪强;张恩茂. 降低决策冲动性的方法及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(1): 101-109.
[6]彭娟;冯廷勇. 成瘾人群跨期选择的神经机制及干预方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 810-821.
[7]赵宇晗;余林. 人格特质与认知能力的关系及其年龄差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(12): 1924-1934.
[8]金泓;黄希庭. 时空隐喻研究的新问题:时间表征的左右方向性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(9): 1364-1371.
[9]梁竹苑;刘欢. 跨期选择的性质探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(7): 959-966.
[10]孙彦. 风险条件下的跨期选择[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(1): 28-34.
[11]吕厚超. 关于时间透视的研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 1999, 7(3): 13-18.
[12]姜涛;. 国外有关时间表征的研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 1993, 1(1): 17-22.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5059
相关话题/心理 科学 神经 过程 基因

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 行为贫困陷阱的心理机制与管理对策:基于认知与动机双视角
    徐富明1,黄龙2,3(),张慧4,相鹏5(),刘腾飞6,李亚红71南宁师范大学教育科学学院,南宁5302992皖南医学院人文与管理学院,芜湖3410023江西师范大学心理学院,南昌3300224华中科技大学社会学院,武汉4300745南京财经大学法学院,南京2100236广东医科大学人文与管理学院, ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人声加工的神经机制
    伍可1,2,陈杰1,2(),李雯婕1,2,陈洁佳1,2,刘雷3,刘翠红1,21湖南师范大学教育科学学院2湖南师范大学认知与人类行为湖南省重点实验室,长沙4100813北京大学心理与认知科学学院,北京100080收稿日期:2019-07-11出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03-27 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 老年人视听觉整合的影响因素及其神经机制
    杨伟平1,3(),李胜楠1,李子默1,郭敖1,任艳娜2()1湖北大学教育学院心理学系,武汉4300622贵州中医药大学人文与管理学院心理学教研室,贵阳5500253湖北大学教育学院脑与认知研究中心,武汉430062收稿日期:2019-08-13出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03- ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 信任的认知神经网络模型
    陈瀛,徐敏霞,汪新建()南开大学周恩来政府管理学院社会心理学系,天津300350收稿日期:2019-09-20出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03-27通讯作者:汪新建E-mail:wangxj@nankai.edu.cn基金资助:&教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 稀缺对个体心理和行为的影响:基于一个更加整合视角下的阐释
    雷亮(),王菁煜,柳武妹兰州大学管理学院,兰州730000收稿日期:2019-05-13出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03-27通讯作者:雷亮E-mail:leil@lzu.edu.cn基金资助:&国家自然科学基金面上项目(71972092);国家自然科学基金重点 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 空间频率影响恐惧面孔表情加工的神经通路
    贺则宇,张紫琦,李可轩,何蔚祺()辽宁师范大学脑与认知神经科学研究中心,大连116029收稿日期:2019-06-20出版日期:2020-04-15发布日期:2020-02-24通讯作者:何蔚祺E-mail:weiqi79920686@sina.com基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目(319709 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 儿童行为抑制性与心理障碍关联的认知神经过程
    尤媛,王莉()北京大学心理与认知科学学院,北京100871收稿日期:2019-05-05出版日期:2020-04-15发布日期:2020-02-24通讯作者:王莉E-mail:liwang@pku.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金(31771230)Cognitiveneurologicalp ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 勿以恶小而为之:滑坡效应的心理机制及预防策略
    欧红蕾1,孙炳海1,2,张文海3,李伟健4()1浙江师范大学教师教育学院2浙江师范大学田家炳德育研究中心,金华3210043盐城工学院心理健康教育中心,江苏盐城2240034浙江师范大学心理研究所,金华321004收稿日期:2019-07-02出版日期:2020-04-15发布日期:2020-02- ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理健康服务的文化胜任力:理论取向与实践策略
    陈子晨(),姜鹤南开大学周恩来政府管理学院社会心理学系,天津300350收稿日期:2019-05-14出版日期:2020-04-15发布日期:2020-02-24通讯作者:陈子晨E-mail:chenzc@nankai.edu.cn基金资助:天津市哲学社会科学规划项目(TJJXQN18-001)Cu ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 文学阅读如何影响读者的心理理论
    陈丽娟,徐晓东()南京师范大学外国语学院,南京210097收稿日期:2019-06-11出版日期:2020-03-15发布日期:2020-01-18通讯作者:徐晓东E-mail:412alix@gmail.com基金资助:&国家社科基金项目&汉英违实语义加工的认知及神 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01