删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

手势认知功能研究的新视角:“空间化”手势假设

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

于文华1, 鲁忠义2()
1 河北师范大学学前教育学院
2 河北师范大学教育学院心理系, 石家庄 050024
收稿日期:2018-09-20出版日期:2020-03-15发布日期:2020-01-18
通讯作者:鲁忠义E-mail:zhongyilu@126.com

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金资助项目(31271111)

A new perspective on the cognitive function of gestures: The “spatializing” gesture hypothesis

YU Wenhua1, LU Zhongyi2()
1 College of Preschool Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
2 Department of Psychology, College of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
Received:2018-09-20Online:2020-03-15Published:2020-01-18
Contact:LU Zhongyi E-mail:zhongyilu@126.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 人类在说话或思考的时候常常伴随着手势。手势是在认知加工或交流过程中自动产生的, 具有表征性, 同时, 手势能够影响人类的认知加工。尽管研究者对手势的概念界定各有侧重, 但普遍认为手势不同于直接行动, 具有认知功能。手势认知功能的代表性理论模型有词汇索引模型、信息打包假设、表象保持理论、语义特殊性假设和嵌入/延展观。根据手势认知功能研究中主要自变量的不同, 可以把手势认知功能分成三种不同的研究范式, 即允许-限制手势的研究范式、侧重手势模式改变的研究范式、侧重情境改变的研究范式。今后值得关注的研究方向除了深入探讨手势认知功能的神经机制、加强对手势认知功能的干预研究外, 提出了建立更具解释力的手势认知功能的理论模型——“空间化”手势假设。


[1] 张盼, 鲁忠义 . (2013). 句子理解中颜色信息的心理表征. 心理学报, 45(4), 406-415.
[2] Alibali M. W., Spencer R. C., Knox L., & Kita S . (2011). Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1138-1144.
[3] Arbib M. A . (2005). From monkey-like action recognition to human language: an evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(2), 105-124.
[4] Beaudoin-Ryan L., & Goldin-Meadow S . (2014). Teaching moral reasoning through gesture. Developmental Science, 17(6), 984-990.
[5] Buccino G., Binkofski F., Fink G. R., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., & Gallese V., ... Freund H. J . (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13(2), 400-404.
[6] Chu M. Y., & Kita S . (2008). Spontaneous gestures during mental rotation tasks: Insights into the microdevelopment of the motor strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 706-723.
[7] Chu M. Y., & Kita S . (2011). The nature of gestures' beneficial role in spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 140(1), 102-116.
[8] Chu M. Y., & Kita S . (2015). Co-thought and co-speech gestures are generated by the same action generation process. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 42(2), 257-270.
[9] Clark A . (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
[10] Connell L . (2007). Representing object colour in language comprehension. Cognition, 102(3), 476-485.
[11] Cook S. W., & Tanenhaus M. K . (2009). Embodied communication: speakers' gestures affect listeners' actions. Cognition, 113(1), 98-104.
[12] Gentner D . (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. technical report no. 257. Child Language, 2, 86.
[13] Glenberg A. M., & Gallese V . (2012). Action-based Language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48(7), 905-922.
[14] Glenberg A. M., & Kaschak M. P . (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558-565.
[15] Goldin-meadow S . (2000). Beyond words: the importance of gesture to researchers and learners. Child Development, 71(1), 231-239.
[16] Goldin-Meadow S., Nusbaum H., Kelly S. D., & Wagner S . (2001). Explaining math: gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12(6), 516-522.
[17] Goldin-Meadow S., & Wagner S. M . (2005). How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(5), 234-241.
[18] Goodrich W., & Hudson Kam, C. L . (2009). Co-speech gesture as input in verb learning. Developmental Science, 12(1), 81-87.
[19] Grade S., Badets A., & Pesenti M . (2016). Influence of finger and mouth action observation on random number generation: an instance of embodied cognition for abstract concepts. Psychological Research, 81(3), 538-548.
[20] Hasegawa D., Shirakawa S., Shioiri N., Hanawa T., Sakuta H., & Ohara K . (2015). The effect of metaphoric gestures on schematic understanding of instruction performed by a pedagogical conversational agent. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 361-371.
[21] Hostetter A. B., & Alibali M. W . (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495-514.
[22] Hostetter A. B., & Alibali M. W . (2010). Language, gesture, action! A test of the gesture as simulated action framework. Journal of Memory & Language, 63(2), 245-257.
[23] Kang S., Tversky B., & Black J. B . (2015). Coordinating gesture, word, and diagram: Explanations for experts and novices. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 15(1), 1-26.
[24] Kaup B., Yaxley R. H., Madden C. J., Zwaan R. A., & Lüdtke J . (2007). Experiential simulations of negated text information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(7), 976-990.
[25] Kirk E., & Lewis C . (2017). Gesture facilitates children's creative thinking. Psychological Science, 28(2), 225-232.
[26] Kita S., Alibali M. W., & Chu M. Y . (2017). How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The gesture-for- conceptualization hypothesis. Psychological Review, 124(3), 245-266.
[27] Kita S., & Davies T. S . (2009). Competing conceptual representations trigger co-speech representational gestures. Language & Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 761-775.
[28] Kita S., de Condappa O., & Mohr C . (2007). Metaphor explanation attenuates the right-hand preference for depictive co-speech gestures that imitate actions. Brain & Language, 101(3), 185-197.
[29] Krauss R. M., Chen Y., & Gottesman R. F . (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp.261-283). Britain: Cambridge University Press.
[30] Leung A. K.-Y., Kim S., Polman E., Ong L. S., Qiu L., Goncalo J. A., & Sanchez-Burks J . (2012). Embodied metaphors and creative "acts". Psychological Science, 23(5), 502-509.
[31] Lhommet M., & Marsella S . (2014). Metaphoric gestures: Towards grounded mental spaces. 14th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents Conference. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing.
[32] Loughlin V . (2016). Zdravko radman, the hand: an organ of the mind, what the manual tells the mental. Phenomenology & the Cognitive Sciences, 15(2), 291-296.
[33] Mcgregor K. K., Rohlfing K. J., Bean A., & Marschner E . (2009). Gesture as a support for word learning: The case of under. Journal of Child Language, 36(4), 807-828.
[34] Mcneill D . (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal?. Psychological Review, 92(3), 350-371.
[35] Mcneill D . (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[36] Mol L., & Kita S . (2012). Gesture structure affects syntactic structure in speech. Cognitive Science Society, 34(34), 761-766.
[37] Mumford K. H., & Kita S . (2013). Children use gesture to interpret novel verb meanings. Child Development, 85(3), 1181-1189.
[38] Novack M. A., Congdon E. L., Hemani-Lopez N., & Goldin- Meadow S . (2014). From action to abstraction: using the hands to learn math. Psychological Science, 25(4), 903-910.
[39] Novack M. A., & Goldin-Meadow S . (2016). Gesture as representational action: A paper about function. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(3), 1-14.
[40] Novack M. A., Wakefield E. M., & Goldin-Meadow S . (2016). What makes a movement a gesture?. Cognition, 146, 339-348.
[41] Özçalışkan S., Lucero C., & Goldin-meadow S . (2016). Does language shape silent gesture?. Cognition, 148, 10-18.
[42] Pine K. J., Gurney D. J., & Fletcher B . (2010). The semantic specificity hypothesis: when gestures do not depend upon the presence of a listener. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(3), 169-178.
[43] Pouw W. T. J. L., de Nooijer J. A., van Gog T., Zwaan R. A., & Paas F . (2014). Toward a more embedded/extended perspective on the cognitive function of gestures. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(5), 1-14.
[44] Raos V., Umilta M-A., Murata A., Fogassi L., & Gallese V . (2006). Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95(2), 709-729.
[45] Rimé B., Schiaratura L., Hupet M., & Ghysselinckx A., . (1984). Effects of relative immobilization on the speaker’s nonverbal behavior and on the dialogue imagery level. Motivation & Emotion, 8(4), 311-325.
[46] Rizzolatti G., Camarda R., Fogassi M., Gentilucci M., Luppino G., Matelli M . (1988). Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey: II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Experimental Brain Research, 71(3), 491-507.
[47] Romano D., Marini F., & Maravita A . (2017). Standard body-space relationships: Fingers hold spatial information. Cognition, 165, 105-112.
[48] Sixtus E., Fischer M. H., & Lindemann O . (2017). Finger posing primes number comprehension. Cognitive Processing, 18(3), 237-248.
[49] So W. C., Ching T. H.-W., Lim P. E., Cheng X. Q., & Lp K. Y . (2014). Producing gestures facilitates route learning. Plos One, 9(11), e112543.
[50] Straube B., Green A., Bromberger B., & Kircher T . (2011). The differentiation of iconic and metaphoric gestures: Common and unique integration processes. Human Brain Mapping, 32(4), 520-533.
[51] Tucker M., & Ellis R . (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8(6), 769-800.
[52] Umilta M. A., Brochier T., Spinks R. L., Lemon R. N . (2007). Simultaneous recording of macaque premotor and primary motor cortex neuronal populations reveals different functional contributions to visuomotor grasp. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(1), 488-501
[53] Wagner S. M., Nusbaum H., & Goldin-meadow S . (2004). Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial?. Journal of Memory & Language, 50(4), 395-407
[54] Wesp R., Hesse J., Keutmann D., & Wheaton K . (2001). Gestures maintain spatial imagery. American Journal of Psychology, 114(4), 591-600.
[55] Wheeler M . (2013). Is cognition embedded or extended? The case of gestures. In Z. Radman (Ed.), The hand, an organ of the mind: What the manual tells the mental (pp. 269-301). Cambridge, Britain: MIT Press.
[56] Zwaan R. A., & Taylor L. J . (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 1-11.




[1]钱柳, 汝涛涛, 罗雪, 牛佳兴, 马永骏, 周国富. 睡眠限制对认知功能的影响及其潜在作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1493-1507.
[2]殷融. “动手不动口”:手部动作与语言进化的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1141-1155.
[3]熊素红, 孙洪杰, 陆佶, 姚琦, 张全成. 具身认知视角的饮食消费行为——基于心理模拟“具身”方式[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 486-496.
[4]杨瑜, 李鸣, 陈红. 母性应激对母性行为和心理功能的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(1): 128-140.
[5]谢家全, 谢昌颐, 杨文登. 饥饿对认知与社会行为的影响及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(1): 141-149.
[6]李莹, 张灿, 王悦. 道德情绪在道德隐喻映射中的作用及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1224-1231.
[7]张恒超. 交流手势认知理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 499-507.
[8]汝涛涛, 李芸, 钱柳, 陈庆伟, 钟罗金, 李静华, 周国富. 环境光照的认知功效及其调节因素与作用机理[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(10): 1687-1702.
[9]陈琳, 田晓明, 段锦云. 建议采纳的认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 149-159.
[10]魏华, 段海岑, 周宗奎. 具身认知视角下的消费者行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1294-1306.
[11]李恒. “前”、“后”轴上的内隐时空映射及其影响因素 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 975-983.
[12]张恒超. 交流手势的认知特征[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(5): 796-809.
[13]路红, 张心园, 韦文琦, 刘毅. 空间物理秩序对心理和行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 560-570.
[14]刘传军, 廖江群. 具身效应何处寻:解决可重复性危机的分析性途径[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(12): 2260-2271.
[15]任智, 邹夏, 钟沙沙, 刘伟. 吸烟:促进还是损害前瞻记忆?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(9): 1521-1526.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4983
相关话题/心理 科学 交流 河北师范大学 空间