删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

绿色消费的困境:身份建构抑或环境关心?

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

王财玉1(), 郑晓旭2, 余秋婷1, 雷雳3
1 信阳师范学院心理学系, 河南 信阳 464000
2 安阳工学院经济管理学院, 河南 安阳 455000
3 中国人民大学心理学系, 北京 100872
收稿日期:2018-08-25出版日期:2019-07-26发布日期:2019-06-25
通讯作者:王财玉E-mail:wangcaiyu80@163.com

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目(71502157);河南省教师教育课程改革研究项目(2019-JSJYYB-037);信阳师范学院“南湖****奖励计划”青年项目(Nanhu Scholars Program for Young Scholars of XYNU)资助

The dilemma of green consumption: identity construction or environmental concern?

WANG Caiyu1(), Zheng Xiaoxu2, YU Qiuting1, LEI Li3
1 Department of Psychology, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China
2 Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang 455000, China
3 Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
Received:2018-08-25Online:2019-07-26Published:2019-06-25
Contact:WANG Caiyu E-mail:wangcaiyu80@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 绿色消费具有道德属性, 消费者既有可能是为了建构道德身份, 实现自我保护或自我提升(自我导向), 也有可能是源于内在的道德信念, 实现对环境的关心(环境导向)。基于身份建构的绿色消费会导致行为不稳定、甚至撒谎和盗窃等, 其心理机制是道德自我调节; 基于环境关心的绿色消费则与之相反, 它植根于更广泛的道德联想网络, 与节俭、自我控制等紧密相关, 道德认同机制在其中发挥作用。那么, 究竟是身份建构还是环境关心呢?在阐述调节因素基础上, 我们构建了基于个体生活方式的绿色消费模型, 从个体差异的视角回答了该问题。未来研究需要从理论和实践上进一步展开。



图1基于个体生活方式的绿色消费模式建构
图1基于个体生活方式的绿色消费模式建构







[1] 李谷, 周晖, 丁如一 . (2013). 道德自我调节对亲社会行为和违规行为的影响. 心理学报, 45( 6), 672-679.
[2] 李鹏娜, 王延伸, 杨金花, 孙彦 . (2017). 行为决策理论在能源节约管理中的应用. 心理科学, 40( 3), 760-76.
[3] Nicolao B., Constantinos H., & Michele G. (2018). 绿色助推. 心理学报, 50( 8), 814-826.
[4] 王财玉, 雷雳, 吴波 . (2017). 伦理消费者为何“言行不一”:解释水平的视角. 心理科学进展, 25( 3), 511-522.
[5] 王财玉, 吴波 . (2018). 时间参照对绿色消费的影响:环保意识与产品环境怀疑的调节作用. 心理科学, 41( 3), 621-626.
[6] 王建明, 孙彦 . (2018). 定制化信息对家庭节能行为决策过程影响的追踪研究. 心理科学进展, 26( 4), 571-583.
[7] 吴波, 李东进, 王财玉 . (2016). 基于道德认同理论的绿色消费心理机制. 心理科学进展, 24( 12), 1829-1843.
[8] 吴波, 李东进, 王财玉 . (2016). 绿色还是享乐?参与环保活动对消费行为的影响. 心理学报, 48( 12), 1574-1588.
[9] Almeida C., Altintzoglou T., Cabral H., & Vaz S . (2015). Does seafood knowledge relate to more sustainable consumption? British Food Journal,117(2), 894-914.
[10] Bandura A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review,3(3), 193-209.
[11] Barbarossa C., Beckmann S. C., de Pelsmacker P., Moons I., & Gwozdz W . (2015). A self-identity based model of electric car adoption intention: A cross-cultural comparative study. Journal of Environmental Psychology,42 149-160.
[12] Binder M. &Blankenberg A-K., (2017). Green lifestyles and subjective well-being: More about self-image than actual behavior? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,137 304-323.
[13] Bratman G. N., Hamilton J. P., & Daily G. C . (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1249(1) 118-136.
[14] Brough A. R., Wilkie J. E. B., Ma J., Isaac M. S., & Gal D . (2016). Is eco-friendly unmanly? The green-feminine stereotype and its effect on sustainable consumption. Journal of Consumer Research,43 567-582.
[15] Carlson L., Grove S. J., & Kangun N . (1993). A content analysis of environmental advertising claims: A matrix method approach. Journal of Advertising,22(3), 27-39.
[16] Carrington M. J., Neville B. A., & Whitwell G. J . (2014). Why ethical consumers don't walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics,97(1), 139-158.
[17] Chen M-F. &Lee C-L., (2015). The impacts of green claims on coffee consumers' purchase intention. British Food Journal,117(1), 195-209.
[18] Chong H. &Verma R., (2013). Hotel sustainability: Financial analysis shines a cautious green light. Cornell Hospitality Reports,13(10), 4-13.
[19] Clayton S. &Myers G., (2015). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
[20] de Medeiros J. F., Ribeiro J. L. D., & Cortimiglia M. N . (2016). Influence of perceived value on purchasing decisions of green products in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production,110 158-169.
[21] Deng X. (2015). Understanding Chinese consumers’ ethical purchasing decision-making process: A combination of qualitative and quantitative study. Geoforum,67 204-213.
[22] Dong J., Deng C., Li R., & Huang J . (2017). Moving low-carbon transportation in Xinjiang: Evidence from STIRPAT and rigid regression models. Sustainability,9(1), 24.
[23] Dunlap, R E., Van Liere K. D., Mertig A. G., & Jones R. E . (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues,56(3), 425-442.
[24] Erdogan M. (2015). The effect of summer environmental education program (SEEP) on elementary school students' environmental literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education,10 165-181.
[25] Eskine K. . (2013). Wholesome foods and wholesome morals? Organic foods reduce prosocial behavior and harshen moral judgments. Social Psychology and Personality Science,4(2), 251-254.
[26] Fishbach A., Dhar R., & Zhang Y . (2006). Subgoals as substitutes or compliments: The role of goal accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,91(2), 232-242.
[27] Fujia K., Eyal T., Chaiken S., Trope Y., & Liberman N . (2008). Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,44(3), 562-572.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.005
[28] Gao Y.., &Mattila A.S . (2016). The impact of option popularity, social inclusion/exclusion, and self-affirmation on consumers’ propensity to choose green. Journal of Business Ethics,136(3), 575-585
[29] Gentina E., Shrum L. J., & Lowrey T. M . (2016). Coping with loneliness through materialism: Strategies matter for adolescent development of unethical behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics,152(1), 1-20.
[30] Gosling E. &Williams K. J.H . (2010). Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: Testing connectedness theory among farmers. Journal of Environmental Psychology,30 298-304.
[31] Griskevicius V., Tybur J. M ., &van den Bergh B.. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,98(3), 392-404.
[32] Gupta R. & Sen S . (2013). The effect of evolving resource synergy beliefs on the intentions-behavior discrepancy in ethical consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology,23(1), 114-121.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2012.07.004
[33] Haidt J. (2012). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science,316(5827), 998-1002.
[34] Han H. &Kim Y., (2010). An investigation of green hotel customers’ decision formation: Developing an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management,29(4), 659-668.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.01.001
[35] Hartmann P. &Apaolaza-Ibá?ez V., (2012). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. Journal of Business Research,65(9), 1254-1263.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.11.001
[36] Haws K. L., Bearden W. O., & Nenkov G. Y . (2012). Consumer spending self-control effectiveness and outcome elaboration prompts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,40(5), 695-710.
doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0249-2
[37] Janoff-Bulman R., Sheikh S., & Hepp S . (2009). Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,96(3), 521-537.
[38] Jia F., Soucie K., Alisat Susan., Curtin D., & Pratt M . (2017). Are environmental issues moral issues? Moral identity in relation to protecting the natural world. Journal of Environmental Psychology,52 104-113.
[39] Jiang J., Zhang Y., Ke Y. N., Hawk S. T., & Qiu H . (2015). Can’t buy me friendship? Peer rejection and adolescent materialism: Implicit self-esteem as a mediator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,58 48-55.
[40] Kanchanapibul M., Lacka E., Wang X. J., & Chan H. K . (2014). An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. Journal of Cleaner Production,66 528-536.
[41] Kashima Y., Paladino A., & Margetts E. A . (2014). Environmentalist identity and environmental striving. Journal of Environmental Psychology,38(7), 64-75.
[42] Kasser T. (2016). Materialistic values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology,67 489-514.
[43] Khan U. &Dhar R., (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research,43(2), 259-266.
[44] Koenig-Lewis N., Palmer A., Dermody J., & Urbye A . (2014). Consumers’ evaluations of ecological packaging - Rational and emotional approaches. Journal of Environmental Psychology,37 94-105
[45] Kraus M. W., Piff P. K., Mendoza-Denton R., Rheinschmidt M. L., & Keltner D . (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review,119(3), 546-572.
[46] Krettenauer T. (2017). Pro-Environmental behavior and adolescent moral development. Journal of Research on Adolescence,27(3), 1-13.
[47] Krettenauer T. &Hertz S., (2015). What develops in moral Identities? A critical review. Human Development,5 137-153.
[48] Krettenauer T., Murua L. A., & Jia F . (2016). Age-related differences in moral identity across adulthood. Developmental Psychology,52(6), 972-984.
[49] Lam A. Y., Lau M. M., & Cheung R . (2016). Modelling the relationship among green perceived value, green trust, satisfaction, and repurchase intention of green products. Contemporary Management Research,12(1), 47-60.
[50] Lee K. (2008). Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning,26(6), 573-586.
[51] Lin Y-C &Chang C-C.A . (2012). Double standard: The role of environmental consciousness in green product usage. Journal of Marketing,76(5), 125-134.
[52] Longoni C., Gollwitzer P. M., & Oettingen G . (2014). A green paradox: Validating green choices has ironic effects on behavior, cognition, and perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,50 158-165.
[53] Luchs M. G., Naylor R. W., Irwin J. R., & Rajagopal R . (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing,74(5), 18-31.
[54] Lumber R., Richardson M., Sheffield D . (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS One,12(5), 1-24.
[55] Matsuba M. K., Alisat S. , & Pratt, M.(2017). Environmental activism in emerging adulthood. In L. M. Paddila-Walker, & L. J. Nelson (Eds.), Flourishing in emerging adulthood:Positive development during the third decade of life (pp. 175-201) .Oxford:Oxford University Press.
[56] Mazar N. &Zhong C-B, (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science,21(4), 494-498.
[57] Mead N. L., Baumeister R. F., Stillman T. F., Rawn C. D., & Vohs K. D . (2011). Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Journal of Consumer Research,37(5), 902-919.
doi: 10.1086/656667
[58] Miller D.., &Effron D.A . (2010). Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,43 115-155.
[59] Mitchell M. S., Baer M. D., Ambrose M. L., Folger R., & Palmer N. F . (2018). Cheating under pressure: A self-protection model of workplace cheating behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology,103(1), 54-73
[60] NewmanG.,GorlinM., &Dhar R.., (2014). When going green backfires: How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. Journal of Consumer Research,41(3), 823-839.
doi: 10.1086/677841
[61] Newton J. D., Tsarenko Y., Ferraro C., & Sands S . (2015). Environmental concern and environmental purchase intentions: The mediating role of learning strategy. Journal of Business Research,68(9), 1974-1981.
[62] Nolan J. M., Schultz P. W., Cialdini R. B., Griskevicius, & Goldstein N . (2008). Normative social influence underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,34(7), 913-923.
[63] Peloza J., White K., & Hang J . (2013). Good and guilt-free: The role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing,77(1), 104-119.
[64] Poon K-T., Teng F., Chow J. T., & Chen Z . (2015). Desiring to connect to nature: The effect of ostracism on ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology,42 116-122.
[65] Richardson M. &Sheffield D., (2016). Three good things in nature: Noticing nearby nature brings sustained increases in connection with nature. Psyecology,8(1), 1-32.
[66] Richardson M., Hallam J., & Lumber R . (2015). One thousand good things in nature: Aspects of nearby nature associated with improved connection to nature. Environmental Values,24(5), 603-619.
[67] Rogers T. &Bazerman M.H . (2008). Future lock-in: Future implementation increases selection of ‘should’ choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,106(1), 1-20.
[68] Romero-Canyas R., Downey G., Reddy K. S., Rodriguez S., Cavanaugh T. J., & Pelayo R . (2010). Paying to belong: When does rejection trigger ingratiation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,99(5), 802-823.
[69] Sachdeva S., Iliev R., & Medin D. L . (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. P sychological Science,20(4), 523-528.
[70] Seegebarth B., Peyer M., Balderjahn I., & Wiedmann K-P . (2016). The sustainability roots of anticonsumption lifestyles and initial insights regarding their effects on consumers' well‐being. Journal of Consumer Affairs,50(1), 68-99.
[71] Segev S., Shoham A., & Gavish Y . (2015). A closer look into the materialism construct: The antecedents and consequences of materialism and its three facets. Journal of Consumer Marketing,32(2), 85-98.
[72] Shao R., Aquino K., Freeman D . (2008). Beyond moral reasoning: A review of moral identity research and its implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly,18(4), 513-540.
[73] Shrum L. J., Wong N., Arif F., Chugani S. K., Gunz A., Lowrey T. M., & Sundie J . (2013). Reconceptualizing materialism as identity goal pursuits: Functions, processes, and consequences. Journal of Business Research,66(8), 1179-1185.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.010
[74] Small K. &Dender K., (2007). Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: The declining rebound effect. The Energy Journal,28(1), 25-51.
[75] Steg L., Bolderdijk J. W., Keizer K., & Perlaviciute G . (2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology,38(3), 104-115.
[76] Steinhart Y., Kamins M., Mazursky D., & Noy A . (2014). Effects of product type and contextual cues on eliciting naive theories of popularity and exclusivity. Journal of Consumer Psychology,24(4), 472-483.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.04.004
[77] Stern P. C., Dietz T., Abel T. D., Guagnano G. A., & Kalof L . (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review,6(2), 81-98.
[78] Teng C-C. &Chang J-H., (2014). Effects of temporal distance and related strategies on enhancing customer participation intention for hotel eco-friendly programs. International Journal of Hospitality Management,40 (7), 92-99.
[79] Trudel R. &Murray K.B . (2013). Self-regulatory strength amplification through selective information processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology,23(1), 61-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2012.02.002
[80] Twenge J. M., Campbell W. K., & Freeman E. C . (2012). Generational differences in young adults' life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966-2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,102(5), 1045-1062.
doi: 10.1037/a0027408
[81] van der Werff E., Steg L., & Keizer K . (2014). I am what I am, by looking past the preset: The influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity. Environment and Behavior,46(5), 626-657.
doi: 10.1177/0013916512475209
[82] Verhofstadt E., van Ootegem L., Defloor B., & Bleys B . (2016). Linking individuals' ecological footprint to their subjective well-being. Ecological Economics,127 80-89.
[83] Wan E. W., Xu J., & Ding Y . (2014). To be or not to be unique? The effect of social exclusion on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research,40(6), 1109-1122.
doi: 10.1086/674197
[84] Wang W., Krishna A., & Mcferran B . (2017). Turning off the lights: Consumers’ environmental efforts depend on visible efforts of firms. Journal of Marketing Research,54(3), 478-494.
[85] Wang Z., Zhang B., & Liu T . (2016). Empirical analysis on the factors influencing national and regional carbon intensity in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 34-42.
[86] White K. &Simpson B., (2013). When do (and don’t) normative appeals influence sustainable consumer behaviors? Journal of Marketing,77(2), 78-95.
[87] White K., Simpson B., & Argo J. J . (2014). The motivating role of dissociative out-groups in encouraging positive consumer behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 51( 4), 433-447.
[88] Williston B. (2015). Moral progress and Canada's climate failure. Journal of Global Ethics,7(2), 149-160.
[89] Wray-Lake L., Syvertsen A. K., & Flanagan C. A . (2015). Developmental change in social responsibility during adolescence: An ecological perspective. Developmental Psychology,52(1), 130-142.
[90] Zelenski J.., &Nisbet E.K . (2014). Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior,46(1), 3-23.
doi: 10.1177/0013916512451901
[91] Zerach G. (2016). The mediating role of emptiness and materialism in the association between pathological narcissism and compulsive buying. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction,14(4), 424-437.




[1]戚海峰, 于辉, 向伟林, 孙韵益, 徐昌皓. 绿色消费情境下消费者为什么会言行不一?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1307-1319.
[2]吴波;李东进;王财玉. 基于道德认同理论的绿色消费心理机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(12): 1829-1843.
[3]张宏伟;李晔. 两种道德自我调节机制下的道德行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(7): 1178-1187.
[4]杜伟强;曹花蕊. 基于自身短期与社会长远利益两难选择的绿色消费机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(5): 775-784.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4774
相关话题/心理 科学 环境 信阳师范学院 河南

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 1993至2016年医学生心理健康变迁的横断历史研究
    辛素飞1(),姜文源1,辛自强21鲁东大学教育科学学院,烟台2640112中央财经大学社会与心理学院,北京100081收稿日期:2018-09-14出版日期:2019-07-15发布日期:2019-05-22通讯作者:辛素飞E-mail:xinsufei2005@163.com基金资助:*国家社会科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 素食的心理过程及影响因素
    刘潇肖1,田启瑞2(),曾雅丽11厦门大学管理学院,厦门3610052山东师范大学心理学院,济南250358收稿日期:2018-08-12出版日期:2019-07-15发布日期:2019-05-22通讯作者:田启瑞E-mail:tianqirui@sdnu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金青 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 和谐医患关系的心理机制及其促进技术
    孙连荣1,王沛2()1上海师范大学天华学院,上海2018152华东师范大学教育学部特殊教育系,上海200062收稿日期:2018-03-07出版日期:2019-06-15发布日期:2019-04-22通讯作者:王沛E-mail:wangpei1970@163.com基金资助:国家社会科学重大招标项目 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 风险决策的概率权重偏差:心理机制与优化策略
    孙庆洲,邬青渊,张静,江程铭,赵雷,胡凤培()浙江工业大学管理学院,杭州310023收稿日期:2018-08-23出版日期:2019-05-15发布日期:2019-03-20通讯作者:胡凤培E-mail:fengpei@zjut.edu.cn基金资助:*教育部人文社科青年基金项目(18YJC6301 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 不道德传染的心理机制及其影响
    王悦1,龚园超1,2,3,李莹1()1郑州大学教育学院,郑州4500012中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京1001013中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2018-06-05出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:李莹E-mail:liyin ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 揭秘经济管理中的行为异象:心理账户理论的应用启示
    刘培,冯一丹,李爱梅(),刘伟,谢健飞暨南大学管理学院广州510632收稿日期:2018-04-23出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:李爱梅E-mail:tliaim@jnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71271101);国家自然科学基金项目(7 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理表征的可视化途径:基于噪音的反向相关图像分类技术
    侯春娜1(),刘志军21东北师范大学心理学院,长春1300242长春理工大学社会学系,长春130022收稿日期:2018-07-17出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:侯春娜E-mail:houcn359@nenu.edu.cn基金资助:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 回溯式时距估计的动态性及心理机制
    杨莲莲,黄希庭(),刘培朵,岳童西南大学心理学部,重庆400715收稿日期:2018-03-30出版日期:2019-02-15发布日期:2018-12-25通讯作者:黄希庭E-mail:xthuang@swu.edu.cn基金资助:&西南大学重庆市人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“社区领 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 为何越减越肥?——限制性饮食者过度进食的心理机制及影响因素
    王劭睿1,陈红1,2()1西南大学心理学部2认知与人格教育部重点实验室,重庆400715收稿日期:2018-03-21出版日期:2019-02-15发布日期:2018-12-25通讯作者:陈红E-mail:chenhg@swu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31771237);中央高 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理韧性及其神经机制:来自非人类动物模型的证据
    刘浩然1,张晨风1,杨莉1,2()1华南师范大学心理学院2华南师范大学脑科学与康复医学研究院,广州510631收稿日期:2017-11-13出版日期:2019-02-15发布日期:2018-12-25通讯作者:杨莉E-mail:yang_li@m.scnu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金( ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01