动作的主动控制感与因果关系的主动控制感：主动动作时间压缩效应的产生机制

删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

吴迪¹^,², 顾晶金¹^,², 李明³, 张淼¹^,², 张明⁴^,⁵(

), 赵科¹^,², 傅小兰¹^,²

1 中国科学院心理研究所, 脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
2 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
3 吉首大学, 湖南吉首 416000
4 中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室, 北京 100101
5 大连医科大学心理学系, 辽宁大连 116044

收稿日期:2018-03-31出版日期:2019-05-15发布日期:2019-03-20
通讯作者:张明E-mail:zhaok@psych.ac.cn

基金资助:* 中国国家自然科学基金(31400876);中国国家自然科学基金(61632004);中国国家自然科学基金(61621136008);德国研究基金项目(DFG TRR-169)

Sense of agency based on action and causation: The mechanism of intentional binding effect for voluntary action

WU Di¹^,², GU Jingjin¹^,², LI Ming³, ZHANG Miao¹^,², ZHANG Ming⁴^,⁵(

), ZHAO Ke¹^,², FU Xiaolan¹^,²

1 State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2 Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3 Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China
4 Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
5 Department of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China, Beijing 116044, China

Received:2018-03-31Online:2019-05-15Published:2019-03-20
Contact:ZHANG Ming E-mail:zhaok@psych.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 主动动作的时间压缩效应指主动动作到动作结果之间存在时间上的主观压缩。基于动作的主动控制感和因果关系的主动控制感是该效应的两种理论解释。本文首先分别介绍动作的主动控制感和因果关系的主动控制感, 并从行为和脑机制角度提供相应的证据解释时间压缩效应的机制。同时, 本文提出了在主动动作时间压缩效应中动作的主动控制感与因果关系的主动控制感之间可能存在的序列加工和平行加工的关系。

图/表 2

图1Haggard等人(2002)研究结果示意图。当要求被试主动按键时, 被试报告的动作发生时刻点靠后(15 ms), 而报告的声音刺激出现的时刻点提前(46 ms)。

图2主动动作时间压缩效应的两阶段序列加工示意图

参考文献 43

[1]	Band G. P. H., van Steenbergen H., Ridderinkhof K. R., Falkenstein M., & Hommel B . ( 2009). Action-effect negativity: Irrelevant action effects are monitored like relevant feedback. Biological Psychology, 82( 3), 211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.06.011 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.06.011 URL
[2]	Bastian, A. J . ( 2006). Learning to predict the future: The cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16( 6), 645-649. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.08.016 doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.08.016 URL
[3]	Blakemore S. J., Frith C. D., & Wolpert D. M . ( 1999a). Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11( 5), 551-559. doi: 10.1162/089892999563607 URL
[4]	Blakemore S. J., Frith C. D., & Wolpert D. M . ( 2001). The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action. Neuroreport, 12( 9), 1879-1884. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200107030-00023 doi: 10.1097/00001756-200107030-00023 URL
[5]	Blakemore S. J., Wolpert D. M., & Frith C. D . ( 1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1( 7), 635-640. doi: 10.1038/2870
[6]	Blakemore S. J., Wolpert D. M., & Frith C. D . ( 1999b). The cerebellum contributes to somatosensory cortical activity during self-produced tactile stimulation. Neuroimage, 10( 4), 448-459. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0478 doi: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0478 URL
[7]	Buehner, M. J . ( 2012). Understanding the past, predicting the future: Causation, not intentional action, is the root of temporal binding. Psychological Science, 23( 12), 1490-1497. doi: 10.1177/0956797612444612 doi: 10.1177/0956797612444612 URL
[8]	Buehner, M. J., & Humphreys, G. R . ( 2009). Causal binding of actions to their effects. Psychological Science, 20( 10), 1221-1228. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02435.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02435.x URL
[9]	Capozzi F., Becchio C., Garbarini F., Savazzi S., & Pia L . ( 2016). Temporal perception in joint action: This is MY action. Consciousness and Cognition, 40, 26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.12.004 doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.12.004 URL
[10]	Caspar E. A., Christensen J. F., Cleeremans A., & Haggard P . ( 2016). Coercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain. Current Biology, 26( 5), 585-592. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.067 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.067 URL
[11]	Cavazzana A., Begliomini C., & Bisiacchi P. S . ( 2014). Intentional binding effect in children: Insights from a new paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 651. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00651
[12]	Desantis A., Roussel C., & Waszak F . ( 2011). On the influence of causal beliefs on the feeling of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 20( 4), 1211-1220. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.012 doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.012 URL
[13]	Eagleman, D. M., & Holcombe A.O, . ( 2002). Causality and the perception of time. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6( 8), 323-325. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01945-9 URL
[14]	Elsner B., Hommel B., Mentschel C., Drzezga A., Prinz W., Conrad B., & Siebner H . ( 2002). Linking actions and their perceivable consequences in the human brain. Neuroimage, 17( 1), 364-372. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1162 doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1162 URL
[15]	Engbert, K. & Wohlschlager A. , ( 2007). Intentions and expectations in temporal binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 16( 2), 255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.010 doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.010 URL
[16]	Eppinger B., Kray J., Mock B., & Mecklinger A . ( 2008). Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN. Neuropsychologia, 46( 2), 521-539. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.001 URL
[17]	Haggard, P. ( 2017). Sense of agency in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18( 4), 196-207.
[18]	Haggard P., Clark S., & Kalogeras J . ( 2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5( 4), 382-385. doi: 10.1038/nn827
[19]	Hume D., . ( 1888). Treatise of human nature. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1777)
[20]	Humphreys, G. R., & Buehner M.J, . ( 2009). Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35( 5), 1542-1549. doi: 10.1037/a0014492 doi: 10.1037/a0014492 URL
[21]	James W., .( 1890). The Principles of Psychology: Vol. 2 . New York: Dover.
[22]	Jo H. G., Wittmann M., Hinterberger T., & Schmidt S . ( 2014). The readiness potential reflects intentional binding. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 421. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00421
[23]	Kawabe T., Roseboom W., & Nishida S . ( 2013). The sense of agency is action-effect causality perception based on cross-modal grouping. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280( 1763). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0991
[24]	Melcher T., Weidema M., Eenshuistra R. M., Hommel B., & Gruber O . ( 2008). The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: An event-related fMRI analysis. Neuroimage, 39( 3), 1274-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.049 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.049 URL
[25]	Moore J. & Haggard P. , ( 2008). Awareness of action: Inference and prediction. Consciousness and Cognition, 17( 1), 136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.12.004 doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.12.004 URL
[26]	Moore J. W., Cambridge V. C., Morgan H., Giorlando F., Adapa R., & Fletcher P. C . ( 2013). Time, action and psychosis: Using subjective time to investigate the effects of ketamine on sense of agency. Neuropsychologia, 51( 2), 377-384. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.005 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.005 URL
[27]	Moore, J. W., & Obhi S.S . ( 2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 21( 1), 546-561. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002 doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002 URL
[28]	Pacherie E., . (2008). The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition, 107( 1), 179-217. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003 URL
[29]	Ruess M., Thomaschke R., & Kiesel A . ( 2018). Intentional binding of visual effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80( 3), 713-722. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1479-2
[30]	Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet P.D, . ( 2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4( 8), 299-309. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0 doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0 URL
[31]	Sidarus N. & Haggard P. ,( 2016). Difficult action decisions reduce the sense of agency: A study using the Eriksen flanker task. Acta Psychologica, 166, 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.03.003 doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.03.003 URL
[32]	Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., & Newen A . ( 2008). Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and cognition, 17( 1), 219-239.
[33]	Ticini L. F., Schutz-Bosbach S., Weiss C., Casile A., & Waszak F . ( 2012). When sounds become actions: Higher- order representation of newly learned action sounds in the human motor system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24( 2), 464-474. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00134 doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00134 URL
[34]	Voss M., Chambon V., Wenke D., Kuhn S., & Haggard P . ( 2017). In and out of control: Brain mechanisms linking fluency of action selection to self-agency in patients with schizophrenia. Brain, 140( 8), 2226-2239. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx136 doi: 10.1093/brain/awx136 URL
[35]	Voss M., Moore J., Hauser M., Gallinat J., Heinz A., & Haggard P . ( 2010). Altered awareness of action in schizophrenia: A specific deficit in predicting action consequences. Brain, 133( 10), 3104-3112. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq152 doi: 10.1093/brain/awq152 URL
[36]	Waszak F., Cardoso-Leite P., & Hughes G . ( 2012). Action effect anticipation: Neurophysiological basis and functional consequences. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36( 2), 943-959. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.004 URL
[37]	Wen W., Yamashita A., & Asama H . ( 2015). The influence of action-outcome delay and arousal on sense of agency and the intentional binding effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.004 doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.004 URL
[38]	Wolpert, D. M . ( 1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1( 6), 209-216. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01070-X doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01070-X URL
[39]	Woods A. J., Hamilton R. H., Kranjec A., Minhaus P., Bikson M., Yu J., & Chatterjee A . ( 2014). Space, time, and causality in the human brain. Neuroimage, 92, 285-297. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.015 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.015 URL
[40]	Yabe Y., & Goodale M.A, . ( 2015). Time flies when we intend to act: Temporal distortion in a go/no-go task. Journal of Neuroscience, 35( 12), 5023-5029. doi: 10.1523/Jneurosci.4386-14.2015 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4386-14.2015 URL
[41]	Zhao K., Chen Y. H., Yan W. J., & Fu X . ( 2013). To bind or not to bind? Different temporal binding effects from voluntary pressing and releasing actions. PLoS One, 8( 5), e64819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064819 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064819 URL
[42]	Zhao K., Gu R., Wang L., Xiao P., Chen Y. H., Liang J., .. Fu X. L . ( 2014). Voluntary pressing and releasing actions induce different senses of time: Evidence from event-related brain responses. Scientific Reports, 4, 6047. doi: 10.1038/srep06047
[43]	Zhao K., Hu L., Qu F. B., Cui Q., Piao Q. H., Xu H., .. Fu X. L . ( 2016). Voluntary action and tactile sensory feedback in the intentional binding effect. Experimental Brain Research. 234( 8), 2283-2292. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4633-5