删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

从整合的角度看联结记忆中的项目再认

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

刘泽军1, 王余娟2, 郭春彦1()
1 首都师范大学心理学院, 北京市“学习与认知重点实验室”, 北京 100037
2 重庆理工大学知识产权学院, 重庆 400000
收稿日期:2018-01-23出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22
通讯作者:郭春彦E-mail:guocy@cnu.edu.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助(31671127);获首都师范大学科技创新服务能力建设基本科研业务费支持(025- 185305000/200)

Investigating the item recognition in associative memory: A unitization perspective

LIU Zejun1, WANG Yujuan2, GUO Chunyan1()
1 Beijing Key Laboratory of “Learning & Cognition”, Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100037, China
2 Intellectual Property School of Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China
Received:2018-01-23Online:2019-03-15Published:2019-01-22
Contact:GUO Chunyan E-mail:guocy@cnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 联结记忆由三种成分构成:项目1, 项目2以及项目1-项目2之间的联结, 其中, 对项目1和项目2的再认称之为项目再认, 而对项目1-项目2之间联结的再认称之为联结再认。双加工理论认为项目再认可以由熟悉性和回想加工来完成, 而联结再认只能由回想加工来完成。但近期有大量的研究发现:当要学习的项目对被整合为一个新的整体表征时, 熟悉性也能够支持联结再认。而关于整合对联结记忆中项目再认的研究较少, 总结已有研究提出两种观点:一种是“只有受益”观点(benefits-only)认为整合在增加联结再认的同时不影响项目再认; 另一种是“收支平衡”观点(costs and benefits)认为整合增加联结再认是以牺牲项目再认为代价的。未来研究应该关注整合对联结记忆中项目再认的影响及其神经机制, 了解整合对联结再认和项目再认的具体作用, 有助于针对具体记忆任务选择合适的编码方式来提高记忆表现。


[1] 梁九清, 郭春彦 . ( 2012). 跨领域项目间联结记忆中项目提取和关系提取的分离: 一项事件相关电位研究. 心理学报, 44( 5), 625-633.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.00625URL
[2] 郑志伟, 李娟, 肖凤秋 . ( 2015). 熟悉性能够支持联结记忆: 一体化编码的作用. 心理科学进展, 23( 2), 202-212.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00202URL
[3] Ahmad F.N., & Hockley W.E . ( 2014). The role of familiarity in associative recognition of unitized compound word pairs. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67( 12), 2301-2324.
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.923007URL
[4] Bader R., Mecklinger A., Hoppst?dter M., & Meyer P . ( 2010). Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: Evidence from event-related potentials. Neuroimage, 50( 2), 772-781.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.100URLpmid: 20045471
[5] Bastin C., Diana R. A., Simon J., Collette F., Yonelinas A. P., & Salmon E ., ( 2013). Associative memory in aging: The effect of unitization on source memory. Psychology & Aging, 28( 1), 275-283.
doi: 10.1037/a0031566URLpmid: 3760335
[6] Bastin C., Van der Linden M., Schnakers C., Montaldi D., & Mayes A. R . ( 2010). The contribution of familiarity to within-and between-domain associative recognition memory: Use of a modified remember/know procedure. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22( 6), 922-943.
doi: 10.1080/09541440903007834URL
[7] Cohen N. J., Ryan J., Hunt C., Romine L., Wszalek T., & Nash C . ( 1999). Hippocampal system and declarative (relational) memory: Summarizing the data from functional neuroimaging studies. Hippocampus, 9( 1), 83-98.
[8] Cohn M., Emrich S. M., Moscovitch M ., ( 2008). Age- related deficits in associative memory: The influence of impaired strategic retrieval. Psychology and Aging, 23( 1), 93-103.
doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.93URLpmid: 18361659
[9] Daselaar S. M., Fleck M. S., Dobbins I. G., Madden D. J., & Cabeza R . ( 2006). Effects of healthy aging on hippocampal and rhinal memory functions: An event- related fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 16( 12), 1771-1782.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj112URLpmid: 1810232
[10] Diana R. A., Yonelinas A. P., & Ranganath C . ( 2008). The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: Testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 730-740.
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.730URLpmid: 18605864
[11] Diana R. A., Yonelinas A. P., & Ranganath C . ( 2010). Medial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22( 8), 1808-1818.
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21335URLpmid: 2862119
[12] Donaldson D.I., & Rugg M.D . ( 1998). Recognition memory for new associations: Electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection. Neuropsychologia, 36, 377- 395.
doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00143-7URLpmid: 9699947
[13] Friedman D. , ( 2013). The cognitive aging of episodic memory: A view based on the event-related brain potential. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 7( 5), 111-125.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00111URLpmid: 3752587
[14] Giovanello K. S., Keane M. M., & Verfaellie M . ( 2006). The contribution of familiarity toassociative memory in amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 44( 10), 1859-1865.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.004URLpmid: 1698551
[15] Graf P., & Schacter D.L . ( 1989). Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 15( 5), 930-940.
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.930URL
[16] Guillaume F. & Etienne Y., ( 2015). Target-context unitization effect on the familiarity-related FN400: A face recognition exclusion task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 95( 3), 345-354.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.004URLpmid: 25583572
[17] Hockley W.E., & Consoli A. , ( 1999). Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 27( 4), 657-664.
doi: 10.3758/BF03211559URLpmid: 10479824
[18] Hockley W.E., & Cristi C. , ( 1996). Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information. Memory & Cognition, 24( 2), 202-216.
doi: 10.3758/bf03200881URLpmid: 8881323
[19] J?ger T., Mecklinger A., & Kipp K. H . ( 2006). Intra- and inter-item associations doubly dissociate the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection. Neuron, 52( 3), 535-545.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.013URLpmid: 17088218
[20] Kamp S-M., Bader R., & Mecklinger A . ( 2016). The effect of unitizing word pairs on recollection versus familiarity- based retrieval—Further evidence from ERPs. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 12( 4), 169-178.
doi: 10.5709/acp-0196-2URLpmid: 5279856
[21] Koen J.D., & Yonelinas A.P . ( 2014). The effects of healthy aging, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and alzheimer's disease on recollection and familiarity: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology Review, 24( 3), 332-354.
doi: 10.1007/s11065-014-9266-5URLpmid: 4260819
[22] Konkel A., & Cohen N.J . ( 2009). Relational memory and the hippocampus: Representations and methods. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3( 2), 166-174.
doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.023.2009URLpmid: 20011138
[23] Murray B.D., & Kensinger E.A . ( 2012). The effects of emotion and encoding strategy on associative memory. Memory & Cognition, 40( 7), 1056-1069.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0215-3URLpmid: 22592895
[24] Opitz B. & Cornell S., ( 2006). Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: Insights from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18( 9), 1595-1605.
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1595URLpmid: 16989559
[25] Parks C.M., & Yonelinas A.P . ( 2015). The importance of unitization for familiarity-based learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41( 3), 881-903.
doi: 10.1037/xlm0000068URLpmid: 25329077
[26] Pilgrim L. K., Murray J. G., & Donaldson D. I . ( 2012). Characterizing episodic memory retrieval: Electrophysiological evidence for diminished familiarity following unitization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24( 8), 1671-1681.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00186URLpmid: 22220725
[27] Quamme J. R., Yonelinas A. P., & Norman K. A . ( 2007). Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia. Hippocampus, 17( 3), 192-200.
[28] Rhodes S.M., & Donaldson D.I . ( 2007). Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering. Neuropsychologia, 45( 2), 412-424.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.022URLpmid: 16930640
[29] Rhodes S.M., & Donaldson D.I . ( 2008). Electrophysiological evidence for the effect of interactive imagery on episodic memory: Encouraging familiarity for non-unitized stimuli during associative recognition. NeuroImage, 39( 2), 873-884.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.041URLpmid: 17950624
[30] Shao H. Y., Opitz B., Yang J. J.., & Weng X. C . ( 2016). Recollection reduces unitised familiarity effect. Memory, 24( 4), 535-547.
doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1021258URLpmid: 25793354
[31] Shao H.Y., & Weng X.C . ( 2011). Unitization benefits associative recognition whereas impairs item recognition. Third International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security. 314-317.
doi: 10.1109/MINES.2011.46URL
[32] Shing Y. L., Werklebergner M., Brehmer Y., Müller V., Li S. C., & Lindenberger U . ( 2010). Episodic memory across the lifespan: The contributions of associative and strategic components. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Review, 34( 7), 1080-1091.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.002URLpmid: 19896974
[33] Tibon R., Ben-Zvi S., & Levy D. A . ( 2014). Associative recognition processes are modulated by modality relations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26( 8), 1785-1796.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00586URL
[34] Tibon R., Gronau N., & Levy D. A . ( 2017). Associative unitization via semantic relatedness benefits episodic recognition of component elements. PsyArXiv. Retrieved from
[35] Tibon R., Gronau N., Scheuplein A. L., Mecklinger A., & Levy D. A . ( 2014). Associative recognition processes are modulated by the semantic unitizability of memoranda. Brain and Cognition, 92, 19-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.09.009URLpmid: 25463136
[36] Tibon R., & Levy D.A . ( 2014 a). Temporal texture of associative encoding modulates recall processes. Brain and Cognition, 84( 1), 1-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.10.003URLpmid: 24215986
[37] Tibon R., & Levy D.A . ( 2014 b). The time course of episodic associative retrieval: Electrophysiological correlates of cued recall of unimodal and crossmodal pair-associate learning.Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14( 1), 220-235.
doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0199-xURLpmid: 23918600
[38] Yonelinas A.P . ( 1997). Recognition memory rocs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25( 6), 747-763.
doi: 10.3758/BF03211318URLpmid: 9421560
[39] Yonelinas A.P . ( 2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46( 3), 441-517.
doi: 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864URL
[40] Yonelinas A. P., Aly M., Wang W.C., & Koen J. D . ( 2010). Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus, 20( 11), 1178-1194.
doi: 10.1002/hipo.20864URLpmid: 20848606
[41] Yonelinas A. P., Kroll N. E. A., Dobbins I. G., & Soltani M . ( 1999). Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6( 4), 654-661.
[42] Zheng Z. W., Li J., Xiao F. Q., Broster L. S., Jiang Y., & Xi M. J . ( 2015). The effects of unitization on the contribution of familiarity and recollection processes to associative recognition memory: Evidence from event- related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 95( 3), 355-362.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.003URLpmid: 25583573
[43] Zheng Z. W., Li J., Xiao F. Q., Ren W. C., & He R. Q . ( 2016). Unitization improves source memory in older adults: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 89, 232-244.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.025URLpmid: 27343684




[1]贾磊, 徐玉帆, 王成, 任俊, 汪俊. γ节律神经振荡:反映自闭症多感觉整合失调的一项重要生物指标[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 31-44.
[2]杨伟平, 李胜楠, 李子默, 郭敖, 任艳娜. 老年人视听觉整合的影响因素及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(5): 790-799.
[3]谢菊兰, 刘小妹, 李见, 陈春燕, 龚艳萍. 社交电商中的社交-消费转换机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 405-415.
[4]张静, 陈巍. 身体拥有感及其可塑性:基于内外感受研究的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(2): 305-315.
[5]王爱君, 黄杰, 陆菲菲, 何嘉滢, 唐晓雨, 张明. 多感觉整合中的声音诱发闪光错觉效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1662-1677.
[6]李萍, 张明明, 李帅霞, 张火垠, 罗文波. 面孔表情和声音情绪信息整合加工的脑机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1205-1214.
[7]张爱珍, 王垚, 李晶. 路径知识习得的认知老化效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(2): 242-250.
[8]张晶晶, 杨玉芳. 语言和音乐层级结构的加工[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 2043-2051.
[9]赵梦阳, 郭若宇, 毛伟宾, 赵参参. 增龄性联结记忆损伤及其影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(10): 1677-1686.
[10]赵佩琼, 陈巍, 张静, 平贤洁. 橡胶手错觉:拥有感研究的实验范式及其应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 37-50.
[11]李涛涛, 胡金生, 王琦, 李骋诗, 李松泽, 何建青, 李辰洋, 刘淑清. 孤独症谱系障碍者的视听时间整合 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 1031-1040.
[12]王晓辰, 高欣洁, 郭攀博. 亲组织不道德行为的多层次模型 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 1111-1120.
[13]彭姓, 常若松, 任桂琴, 王爱君, 唐晓雨. 外源性注意与多感觉整合的交互关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(12): 2129-2140.
[14]罗霄骁, 康冠兰, 周晓林. McGurk效应的影响因素与神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 1935-1951.
[15]付 悦. 高管团队认知对组织双元能力开发的作用机理研究: 基于组织性格的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(1): 14-25.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4621
相关话题/心理 科学 神经 组织 首都师范大学