HTML
--> --> --> -->3.1. Dynamics and trajectory analysis
During the spring months (March, April and May) of 2011, there were numerous episodes of biomass burning smoke being transported via the Gulf of Mexico to the SGP region. Synoptic and mesoscale dynamics play important roles in governing the movement of the air masses that transport aerosols from their source to sink regions (Logan et al., 2010, 2014; Tao et al., 2013). Figure 1 shows the NOAA/ESRL reanalysis mean 850 hPa geopotential heights (Kalnay et al., 1996) along with the mean positions of two upper-level high pressure systems (ridges) and an upper-level low pressure system (trough) during the MC3E campaign. A ridge centered over the Atlantic Ocean is responsible for the southerly transport of Gulf of Mexico moisture and aerosols from Mexico and Central America. Continental aerosols are transported from the combination of a ridge centered over the eastern Pacific Ocean and a trough centered near the Great Lakes region. The NOAA Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) (Rolph, 2012; Draxler and Rolph, 2013; Stein et al., 2015) model computes the backward trajectories of parcels within the air masses (Leng et al., 2014). The model is initialized at 1800 UTC and is run each day from 25 April to 25 May 2011 using a height of 500 m (represents near-surface or sub-cloud, boundary layer air). There is a clear distinction between the southerly and northerly trajectories denoting the direction of air transport to the SGP region via continental and marine air masses (Fig. 1).As illustrated in Fig. 2, the trajectories are partitioned by N CCN magnitude, which range from clean (N CCN<500 cm-3) to strongly polluted (N CCN>1500 cm-3) conditions. AOD retrievals from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer onboard the Terra satellite (MODIS-Terra) Combined Deep Blue/Dark Target product (e.g., NASA Giovanni) are used to show not only the general aerosol loading during the entire MC3E campaign, but also hotspots of aerosol activity. The cleaner trajectories are primarily from regions north of the ARM-SGP site. This reflects source regions of continental air that are generally devoid of active fires (fire data provided by satellite at http://earthdata.nasa.gov/data/near-real-time-data/data/hazards-and-disasters/fires). Note that there are few densely populated areas and no megacities along the paths of the clean trajectories. The weakly and moderately polluted trajectories (N CCN~500-1500 cm-3) have origins both south and north of the ARM-SGP site and denote air parcels that likely contain aerosols from satellite-confirmed fires in the midwestern and southwestern regions of the United States (Figs. 2b and c). The strongly polluted trajectories are mainly observed as coming from the south via the Gulf of Mexico (Fig. 2d). Figure 3 illustrates the origins of air masses containing carbonaceous (BC) aerosols. Though the trajectories with the highest BC content come primarily from the south, there are instances of weakly and moderately polluted trajectories originating from the west. During the period of the MC3E campaign, there were confirmed incidences of wildfires and dust events in areas west of the ARM-SGP site. For example, there are instances of elevated mean AOD (~ 0.2) in the Texas panhandle, northeastern New Mexico, eastern Colorado, and western Arizona.
Figure2. MODIS-Terra AOD with HYSPLIT sub-cloud backward trajectories during MC3E. 30-day area-averaged AOD values are used with trajectories denoting clean (blue lines), weakly polluted (purple lines), moderately polluted (black lines), and strongly polluted (red lines) air parcels. Note the trajectories that pass over the Gulf Coast and Gulf of Mexico (to the south) are typically more polluted than trajectories that pass over land (from the north and west).
Figure3. As in Fig. 2 but for carbonaceous aerosols (BC). Note that, similar to Fig. 2, air masses originating from the north contain less BC than air masses originating from the north. Trajectories that are weakly and moderately polluted that originate from the west are indicative of biomass burning smoke from confirmed wildfires within the United States.
Figure4. ARM-SGP surface observations and sub-cloud backward trajectory analysis during MC3E: (a) N CCN at 0.2% supersaturation (black diamonds) along with the aerosol scattering coefficient (σ sp) at the 550 nm wavelength in units of Mm-1 (green solid line), MERRA-2 AOD data (red-diamond line with values multiplied by 175 for fit), and daily-averaged aerosol-to-CCN activation ratios (gold-box line with values multiplied by 100 for fit) on the secondary y-axis; (b) carbonaceous (black solid line) and inorganic chemical constituents (purple, blue, and red solid lines) of the surface aerosols (sulfate, ammonium, and nitrate, respectively) along with MERRA-2 BC data in units of kg m-2 (gold-triangle line multiplied by 60 000 for fit); (c) PWV and cloud LWP retrieved from microwave radiometer brightness measurements (black and green solid lines, respectively).
Figure5. Conceptual model of a biomass burning smoke particle becoming a cloud droplet (A-C). The hydrophobic smoke particle (A) are aged and oxidized by sunlight and/or gas-phase radicals to a more water-soluble form (B) and becomes a CCN. Net condensation (hygroscopic growth) occurs around the smoke particle (C) to create cloud droplets or ice particles (D) depending on the updraft strength in the cloud (i.e., strong updrafts can lift CCN above the freezing level).
As previously discussed, biomass burning smoke has been observed during the spring season over the Gulf of Mexico for decades and is mainly attributed to agricultural burns and wildfires in Mexico and Central America (Peppler et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2009). In addition, the Gulf Coast has numerous urban/industrial areas that include the megacity of Houston, Texas, along with petrochemical facilities and shipping lanes generating pollution throughout the year. The pollution and smoke aerosols tend to be confined closer to the surface during humid, stagnant conditions, while long-range transported aerosols, in general, are able to reach the surface via subsidence, entrainment, and turbulent processes between the interface of the free troposphere and boundary layer (Leng et al., 2014; Logan et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2015).
2
3.2. Physical and chemical properties of aerosol particles and N CCN during MC3E
Figure 4a shows the time series of σ sp,550, N CCN, and CCN activation rates given by the ratio of condensation nuclei number concentration (N CN) to N CCN from 0000 UTC 25 April to 0000 UTC 25 May 2011. In general, N CCN increases (decreases) with increasing (decreasing) σ sp,550, with a strong correlation (R-value) of 0.8, suggesting that the surface aerosol particles easily activate as CCN. In fact, when σ sp,550 exceeds 60 Mm-1, the N CCN exceeds 1000 cm-3. The highest N CCN value (~ 2000 cm-3) corresponds to the highest σ sp,550 value (~ 100 Mm-1) on 11 May 2011, while the lowest values occur during the period 12-17 May 2011 (σ sp≤ 20 Mm-1, N CCN≤ 500 cm-3). The sharp decrease in N CCN and σ sp is indicative of a mesoscale precipitation event occurring on 11 May 2011 that removed aerosols via wet deposition (Wang et al., 2016).The daily-averaged N CCN/N CN ratio values show similar variations, with increases corresponding to periods of strong aerosol loading and decreases corresponding to cleaner conditions. The lowest ratios denote continental aerosols that do not activate efficiently as CCN, such as mineral dust observed over the SGP region by satellite (not shown) on 12-14 May 2011. After the passage of a strong cold front on 11 May 2011, westerly winds transported dust from New Mexico and the Texas panhandle into the region. In this instance, the dust aerosols do not activate well as CCN given the drier conditions after the frontal passage (Logan et al., 2014). Moreover, all ratios that are less than 10% correspond to trajectories that are north and west of the ARM-SGP site (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3), further denoting continental air. The highest ratios are observed during polluted conditions as a result of smoke being transported from the south, as shown by the trajectories in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. The ratios approach 60% on May 11, which suggests the majority of smoke aerosols do activate as CCN. However, it is important to note that aging, hygroscopicity (or "kappa"), and the overall chemical nature of the smoke particles can impact the activation rate and subsequent contribution to overall aerosol loading (Petters and Kreidenweis, 2007). In fact, long-term future investigations will attempt to quantify this behavior using more observation and modeling data.
Figure 4b shows the surface aerosol chemical properties from the AOS measurements where the carbonaceous concentration is dominant with an order of magnitude higher than those from sulfate, ammonium, and nitrate. The maxima of the chemical species concentrations and N CCN are also strongly correlated (R~ 0.84). This suggests that both smoke and pollution aerosols influence the aerosol particle chemistry, with smoke being the largest contributor (Lyons et al., 1998; Kreidenweis et al., 2001; Hudson et al., 2004; Koren et al., 2005). Note that the smoke aerosols are not initially hygroscopic, but can undergo aging during transport and oxidize to a more water-soluble form, and therefore readily activate as CCN, as demonstrated in the conceptual model depicted in Fig. 5.
PWV is the vertically integrated amount of water vapor in an atmospheric column, while the LWP is the total amount of column liquid water (Liljegren et al., 2001). PWV describes the maximum amount of precipitation observed if all moisture in a given area could condense, while LWP is more related to cloud properties such as droplet size, optical depth, and cloud LWC (Dong et al., 2000). Figure 4c shows examples of collocated peaks of PWV (>30 mm) and LWP (>1000 g m-2), which denote precipitation events and a subsequent change in air mass (wind direction) from polluted (southerly wind) to clean (northerly wind). This is synonymous with a change in moisture conditions from marine (humid) to continental (dry), which is supported by the trajectory analysis (Fig. 2). The overall trend in PWV is similar to the aerosol loading, N CCN and chemical species, with a moderate correlation (R~ 0.5), suggesting that the water vapor and aerosols are likely in-phase and aligned along the same transport pathway. The observed trends in σ sp, N CCN, and PWV during MC3E further illustrate the shared transport pathway of Gulf moisture, pollution, and biomass burning smoke, which stresses the importance of conducting a long-term research effort that investigates the sensitivity of clouds and precipitation processes to changes in air mass type.
2
3.3. MERRA-2 simulations of AOD and BC
MERRA-2 offers a large improvement over the previous generation of MERRA model data products. MERRA-2 uses an updated version of the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System atmospheric data assimilation system, which is capable of incorporating newer types of satellite data (e.g., Aura, MODIS, Suomi NPP, GOES) (Buchard et al., 2015; McCarty et al., 2015). The data have a spatial coverage of 0.5°× 0.625° and are output either hourly or monthly, with the former being used in this study. The AOD and BC data products are compared with the ARM-SGP σ sp and carbonaceous content observations during the entire MC3E campaign, along with a heavily polluted episode (5-12 May 2011) over the SGP.Figures 4a and 4b show the temporal variations in AOD and BC assimilated by MERRA-2 during MC3E. Compared to the ARM-SGP observations, there are similarities between the MERRA-2 simulations and ARM-SGP observations; notably, sharp increases in aerosols during 30 April to 1 May 2011, a gradual increase during 5-11 May 2011, and peaks at 20 May and 23 May 2011. Recall that the largest aerosol loading occurred on 11 May 2011. Though the trends in MERRA-2 are not perfectly in-phase with the ARM-SGP results, the model does an adequate job of capturing the same timeframe and magnitude of the aerosol episodes as the surface-based instruments.
The correlations between MERRA-2 and ARM-SGP AOD and BC data are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. In addition, correlations with PWV (moisture content) are also provided. Two scenarios are presented: correlations for the entire month, and a selected pollution event (5-11 May 2011). MERRA-2 AOD has an overall weaker correlation with ARM-SGP σ sp and N CCN during MC3E (R<0.6). This is likely due to a combination of uncertainties associated with comparing column to point measurements and the assumption that all aerosols can act as CCN, especially at the surface. In addition, (Buchard et al., 2015) pointed out that the satellite retrieval algorithms used by MERRA-2 suffer from uncertainties in the presence of clouds and have large differences over land and ocean. However, during the pollution episode, where the aerosols and moisture were aligned along the same transport pathway, there are higher correlations between the two datasets (R>0.7). This suggests that the smoke aerosols that dominated the aerosol content do convert to CCN efficiently, especially over the SGP region. Note that, even during the pollution event, the MERRA-2 AOD correlation only increases from 0.31 to 0.5, which again is due to uncertainties in just how efficient the aerosol activation to CCN process is captured in the model, and therefore warrants further study (e.g., long-term study of the AIE) (Buchard et al., 2015). Two additional causes of uncertainty, (1) representation error between the MERRA-2 (column measurement) and surface AOS (point source) datasets and (2) hygroscopic particle swelling that can lead to increases in total AOD, will also be addressed in future long-term studies.
There are similar findings when taking into account the MERRA-2 BC product, in that higher correlations are observed with ARM-SGP carbonaceous species measurements during the pollution episode (R>0.8). This suggests that there are probably multiple source regions for the smoke aerosols, especially when the air mass switches from the warm and moist Gulf of Mexico air to drier, continental air that may contain smoke from remnant fires west of the ARM-SGP site. Though the MERRA-2 data product can show a larger picture of the aerosol burden over the SGP, surface-based ARM-SGP observations do show relatively good agreement with the satellite-ingested data assimilation methods used by MERRA-2.
2
3.4. Continental boundary layer and marine boundary layer N CCN
Since it is assumed that boundary layer CCN are the primary agents in cloud development, how do aerosols that activate as CCN over land compare to those over the ocean? Previous work suggests that wind-driven sea salt is the dominant contributor to aerosol content over the ocean and can regularly activate as CCN, thus contributing to cloud formation (Logan et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2015; Wood et al., 2015). Sulfate aerosols and aged biomass burning smoke also make excellent CCN, while mineral dust activates poorly as CCN, though none of these aerosol types was consistently observed over the Azores region in the study by (Logan et al., 2014); specifically, there were only seven cases of moderate aerosol loading (σ sp>30 Mm-1) over 19 months.Over land, the present study shows that biomass burning smoke is an excellent source of continental boundary layer CCN, and has similar episodic intrusions. A future goal of this line of study is to compare and contrast long-term cloud development over land and ocean as a function of the AIE in both regions using surface-based, satellite-retrieved and reanalysis data products of aerosol, cloud, and precipitation properties. In addition, model simulations will also be performed to see which aerosol types have the greatest impacts on precipitation processes.