

ÄÚÃɹŴóѧ ÉúÃü¿ÆÑ§Ñ§Ôº£¬ÄÚÃɹŠºôºÍºÆÌØ 010021
ÍøÂç³ö°æÊ±¼ä£º2016-01-07
»ù½ðÏîÄ¿£ºÄÚÃɹÅ×ÔÖÎÇø×ÔÈ»¿ÆÑ§»ù½ðÏîÄ¿ (No. 2015BS0201)£¬ÄÚÃɹŴóѧ2014Ä격ʿÒý½ø¿ÆÑÐÆô¶¯¾·Ñ (No. 21400-5145138) ×ÊÖú
ÕªÒª: ÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼¾ßÓÐÇå½à¡¢°²È«¡¢¿ÉÔÙÉúµÈÓŵ㣬ÊÇÐÂÄÜÔ´·¢Õ¹µÄÖØÒª·½Ïò£¬Êܵ½¸÷¹úÕþ¸®¡¢ÆóÒµµÄ¹ã·º¹Ø×¢¡£ÂÛÎÄÊ×ÏȽéÉÜÁËÌð²ËÉúÎïÑ§ÌØÐÔ£¬ËæºóÖØµã²ûÊöÌð²Ë¼°Æä¸±²úÎïÌð²ËÔüÔÚÈý´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼¿ª·¢ÖеÄÓÅÔ½ÐÔ¼°Ó¦ÓýøÕ¹¡£ÔÚ´Ë»ù´¡ÉÏÌá³öÁËÌð²ËÔüÏËÎ¬ËØ×ª»¯ÒÒ´¼¼°×é·Ö·ÖÀë×ÛºÏÀûÓõÄÑо¿Ë¼Â·£¬ÈÏΪÌð²ËÔü½«»á×÷ΪһÖÖÖØÒªÔÁÏÔÚÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼¿ª·¢Öз¢»Ó×÷Óá£
¹Ø¼ü´Ê: ÉúÎïÄÜÔ´ ÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼ Ìð²ËÔü ×é·Ö·ÖÀë
Progress on cellulosic ethanol produced from beet pulp
Dan Li, Lin Yuan, Meng Li, Guanhua Li


School of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, Inner Mongolia, China
Received: September 10, 2015; Accepted: December 21, 2015
Supported by:Desconstruction of Recalcitrance to Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Sugar-beet Pulp: Technology and Mechanism (No. 2015BS0201), Solid State Fermentation of Cellulase (No. 21400-5145138)
Corresponding authors:Guanhua Li. Tel/Fax: +86-471-4992476; E-mail: liguanhua1984@126.com
Abstract: Cellulosic ethanol, with the advantages of renewable resource, cleanliness and safety, is the mainstream of new energy development and has obtained extensive attention worldwide. In this review, the biological characteristics of beets were introduced, and then the superiority and application progress of beets and its by-product sugar beet pulp in the bioethanol production were stated. At last, cellulosic ethanol production coupled with the component separation and comprehensive utilization of beet pulp was proposed.
Key words: bioenergy cellulosic ethanol sugar beet pulp fractionation
ÄÜÔ´·ÖΪ´«Í³»¯Ê¯ÄÜÔ´ºÍ¿ÉÔÙÉúÄÜÔ´¡£´«Í³»¯Ê¯ÄÜÔ´²»¿ÉÔÙÉú£¬´óÁ¿Ê¹Óû¯Ê¯ÄÜÔ´»áÒýÆðÎÂÊÒЧӦ£¬Ôì³É»·¾³ÎÛȾ£¬ÇÒ´¢´æÁ¿ÒѲ»ÄÜÂú×ãÈËÀྼÃÉç»á·¢Õ¹µÄÐèÇó£¬Òò´Ë¿ÉÔÙÉúÄÜÔ´Öð½¥Êܵ½ÈËÀàµÄÖØÊÓ¡£¸ù¾ÝÃÀ¹ú¿ÉÔÙÉúȼÁϱê×¼ (RFS) ÒªÇó£¬2022ÄêÃÀ¹ú¿ÉÔÙÉúȼÁÏʹÓÃÁ¿Ðè´ï1.4¡Á1011 L£¬ÆäÖÐÉúÎïÖÊȼÁÏʹÓÃÁ¿Ó¦´ïµ½60%×óÓÒ[1]¡£
ÉúÎïÖÊȼÁÏÊÇÖ¸ÒÔÉúÎïÖÊΪÔÁÏת»¯ÖƱ¸µÃµ½ÉúÎïÒÒ´¼¡¢ÕÓÆø¡¢ÇâÆø¡¢ÉúÎï²ñÓ͵Ȼ¯¹¤²úÆ·[2]¡£ÉúÎïÒÒ´¼ÒÔÆäÐÁÍéÖµ¸ß[3] (±í 1)¡¢°²È«ÐԺ㬿É×÷Ϊº¬ÑõÌí¼Ó¼ÁÌæ´ú¼×»ùÊå¶¡»ùÃÑ¡¢ÒÒ»ùÊå¶¡»ùÃÑ£¬Ò²¿ÉÍêÈ«Ìæ´úÆûÓÍ×÷ΪȼÁ϶ø±¸ÊܹØ×¢¡£Ëæ×Ÿ÷¹úÉç»á¾¼ÃµÄ¿ìËÙ·¢Õ¹¼°ÄÜÔ´½á¹¹µ÷Õû£¬ÉúÎïÒÒ´¼¿ª·¢³ÉΪµ±Ç°¿ÆÑ§Ñо¿µÄÈȵ㡣
±í 1 ¼¸ÖÖ²»Í¬È¼ÁϵÄÄÜÔ´º¬Á¿¶Ô±ÈTable 1 Energy content of some fuels compared with ethanol
Fuel type | Energy content (MJ/L) | Energy content (MJ/kg) | Octane |
Liquefied natural gas | 25.3 | 55.0 | ¡ª |
Diesel | 38.6 | 45.4 | 25 |
Methanol | 17.9 | 19.9m 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; height: | 108.7 |
Ethanol | 21.2 | 26.8 | 108.6 |
Regular gasoline | 34.8 | 44.4 | 91 |
E85 (85% ethanol,15% gasoline) | 25.2 | 33.2 | 105 |
Gasohol (10% ethanol,90% gasoline) | 33.7 | 47.1 | 93/94 |
±íÑ¡Ïî
ÉúÎïÒÒ´¼µÄÑо¿Ó¦ÓÃÓµÓÐ×ÅÓÆ¾ÃµÄÀúÊ·£¬ÖйúÔçÔÚ2 000¶àÄêǰ¾ÍÀûÓùÌ̬·¢½Í¼¼ÊõÒÔ¹ÈÀàÎïÖÊΪÔÁÏÖÆ±¸ÒÒ´¼£¬ËæºóµÄ¼¸Ç§ÄêÖÐÒÒ´¼Ê¼ÖÕ×÷Ϊ¾ÆÆ·¹©ÈËÀàÒûÓá£Ö±µ½1925Ä꣬Henry FordÊ×´ÎÌá³öÒÒ´¼¿ÉÒÔ×÷ΪδÀ´Ö÷Á÷ÄÜԴΪÈËÀà·þÎñ£¬Í¬Ê±´óµ¨Ô¤²âÒÒ´¼Éú²úÔÁϽ«»áÓɹÈÀàÎïÖÊת±ä³É¹û¿Ç¡¢½Õ¸Ñ¡¢¾âм¡¢Æ»¹ûÔüµÈÁ®¼ÛÒ׵õÄÉúÎïÖÊÔÁÏ£¬ÓÉ´Ë¿ªÊ¼ÁËÉúÎïÒÒ´¼×÷ΪÄÜÔ´µÄÑо¿¡£½üÄêÀ´ÃÀ¹ú¡¢Å·ÃË¡¢°ÍÎ÷µÈ¹ú¼ÒºÍµØÇø·×·×°ä²¼Ïà¹Ø·¨°¸£¬·¢Õ¹±¾¹úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼²úÒµ£¬ÏȺó·¢Õ¹³öÁËÒÔÌÇ»òµí·ÛΪÔÁϵġ°µÚÒ»´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼¡±¼¼ÊõºÍÒÔÅ©ÁÖ·ÏÆúÎïΪÔÁϵġ°µÚ¶þ´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼¡±¼¼Êõ[4]¡£ÓÉÓÚ¡°µÚÒ»´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼¡±·¢Õ¹ÃæÁÙ×Å¡°ÓëÈËÕùÁ¸£¬ÓëÁ¸ÕùµØ¡±µÄÕùÒ飬Òò´Ë·¢Õ¹ÒÔÅ©ÁÖ·ÏÆúÎïµÈ·ÇÁ¸×÷ÎïΪÔÁÏת»¯ÖƱ¸ÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼µÄ¡°µÚ¶þ´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼¡±¼¼Êõ³ÉΪ¸÷¹úÑо¿µÄÖØÒª·½Ãæ¡£
Ìð²ËÊôΪֲÎï½ç±»×ÓÖ²ÎïÃÅË«×ÓÒ¶Ö²Îï¸Ù£¬ÆäÔÔÅàÖÖÓÐ4¸ö±äÖÖ£ºÌÇÓÃÌð²Ë¡¢Ò¶ÓÃÌð²Ë¡¢¸ùÓÃÌð²ËºÍËÇÓÃÌð²Ë[5]¡£Ìð²ËÊÊÒËÉú³¤ÔÚδøµØÇø£¬Æ½¾ùÖØÁ¿Îª0.5?1.0 kg¡£Ìð²ËҶƬ·±Ã¯£¬Ò¶Æ¬³¤¶ÈÄÜ´ï35 cm£¬Í¨¹ýҶƬ½øÐйâºÏ×÷ÓÃÉú³ÉÌÇ£¬´¢´æÔÚ¸ùÖС£Ìð²Ë¿é¸ùº¬ÓиßŨ¶ÈµÄÕáÌÇ£¬ÊÇĿǰÖ÷ÒªµÄÖÆÌÇÔÁÏÖ®Ò»[6]¡£Ìð²ËµÄº¬ÌÇÁ¿¸ß´ï16%£¬¶ø¸ÊÕáµÄº¬ÌÇÁ¿Ö»ÓÐ12%?13%¡£2009Ä꣬Ìð²Ë²úÌÇÁ¿Õ¼È«ÇòʳÌÇ×ܲúÁ¿µÄ20%£¬²¢³ÊÖðÄêÉÏÉýÇ÷ÊÆ[7]¡£
1 Ìð²ËÔüת»¯ÉúÎïÒÒ´¼µÄÓÅÔ½ÐÔ¼°²»×ã1.1 Ìð²ËÔüת»¯ÉúÎïÒÒ´¼µÄÓÅÔ½ÐÔ1.1.1 Ìð²ËÔü²úÁ¿´óÈ«ÇòÌð²ËÖÖÖ²×ÜÃæ»ý´ï8¡Á106 hm2£¬ÔÚÊÀ½çÅ©²úÆ·×ܲúÁ¿ÖÐÅÅÃûµÚ10£¬Ô¼Õ¼ÌÇÁÏ×÷ÎïµÄ48%£¬´ÎÓÚ¸ÊÕá¶ø¾ÓµÚ2λ¡£2009?2013ÄêÊÀ½ç
Ìð²ËÖ÷²úÇøµÄ²úÁ¿¼û±í 2¡£
±í 2 2009-2013ÄêÌð²Ë²úÁ¿ÅÅÃûǰʮµÄ¹ú¼ÒTable 2 Top ten sugar beet producer during 2009 to 2013
2009 ¡Á107(t/y) | 2010 ¡Á107(t/y) | 2011 ¡Á107(t/y) | 2012 ¡Á107(t/y) | 2013 ¡Á107(t/y) | Average annual production ¡Á107 (t/y) | |
Russia | 2.49 | 2.23 | 4.76 | 4.51 | 3.93 | 3.58 |
France | 3.51 | 3.19 | 3.81 | 3.37 | 3.36 | 3.45 |
United States | 2.70 | 2.91 | 2.62 | 3.20 | 2.98 | 2.88 |
Germany | 2.59 | 2.34 | 2.96 | 2.77 | 2.28 | 2.59 |
Turkey | 1.73 | 1.79 | 1.61 | 1.50 | 1.65 | 1.66 |
Ukraine | 1.01 | 1.37 | 1.87 | 1.84 | 1.08 | 1.44 |
Poland | 1.08 | 1.00 | 1.17 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 1.11 |
China | 0.72 | 0.93 | 1.07 | 1.17 | 0.93 | 0.96 |
Egypt | 0.53 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.80 |
United Kingdom | 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.78 |
World | 22.81 | 22.86 | 27.81 | 26.96 | 24.65 | 25.02 |
Source: FAOSTAT |
±íÑ¡Ïî
ÎÒ¹úÌð²ËÄê²úÁ¿¸ßÓÚÊÀ½çƽ¾ùˮƽ£¬Ìð²Ë¹¤ÒµÉú²úºó»áµÃµ½´óÁ¿µÄÌð²ËÔü¡£Ìð²ËÔüÊÇÌð²ËÌáÈ¡ÕáÌǺóµÄÊ£Óà·ÏÆúÎÓÐÐí¶à×ÛºÏÀûÓÃǰ¾°¡£Óɼӹ¤¸±²úÎïϵÊýȡֵ[8]£¬¼ÆËã¿ÉÖªÎÒ¹ú2010-2014ÄêµÄÌð²ËÔü²úÁ¿·Ö±ðΪ4.65¡Á108¡¢5.37¡Á108¡¢5.87¡Á108ºÍ4.63¡Á108 kg¡£
1.1.2 Ìð²ËÔüľÖÊËØº¬Á¿µÍÌð²ËÔü¸ÉÎïÖÊ×é³ÉΪ£ºÏËÎ¬ËØ26%¡¢°ëÏËÎ¬ËØ28%¡¢Ä¾ÖÊËØ3%¡¢¹û½º28%¡¢µ°°×5%¡¢»Ò·Ö3%¡¢ÆäËû27%[9]¡£Ä¾ÖÊËØ×÷Ϊ°û¼ä²ã½ºð¤ÎïÖÊÆðµ½¼Ó¹ÌľÖÊ»¯Ö²Îï×éÖ¯µÄ×÷Ó᣸ߺ¬Á¿Ä¾ÖÊËØµÄ´æÔÚÌá¸ßÖ²Îï×éÖ¯µÄÉúÎïÎȶ¨ÐԺͶԸ÷ÖÖ»¯Ñ§ÊÔ¼Á×÷ÓõÄÎȶ¨ÐÔ¡£Ä¾ÖÊËØ×è°ÏËÎ¬ËØÃ¸¶ÔÏËÎ¬ËØµÄ½Ó´¥£¬»òÕßÓëÏËÎ¬ËØ²»¿ÉÄæ½áºÏ¶ø×è°ÏËÎ¬ËØË®½â[10]¡£±í 3¿ÉÖª£¬ÓëÆäËûľÖÊÏËÎ¬ËØÔÁÏÏà±È£¬Ìð²ËÔüÖÐÏËÎ¬ËØº¬Á¿½Ï¸ß£¬¶øÄ¾ÖÊËØº¬Á¿½ÏµÍ£¬ÊÇÖÆ±¸ÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼µÄÀíÏëÔÁÏ¡£
±í 3 ³£¼ûľÖÊÏËÎ¬ËØÔÁϼ°Æä3ÖÖ×é·Öº¬Á¿[9]Table 3 Common lignocellulosic biomass feedstock and their components[9]
Feedstock | Cellulose (%) | Hemicellulose (%) | Lignin (%) |
Corn stalks | 40 | 30 | 24 |
Wheat straw | 33-38 | 26-32 | 17-19 |
Bagasse | 43 | 31 | 11 |
Beet pulp | 26 | 28 | 3 |
Newsprint | 40-55 | 25-40 | 18-30 |
Wastepaper | 60-70 | 10-20 | 5-10 |
±íÑ¡Ïî
1.1.3 Ìð²ËÔü¼¯Öжѷţ¬Ò×ÓÚÊÕ¼¯Çҳɱ¾µÍÁ®½Õ¸ÑµÈÅ©ÁÖ·ÏÆúÎï·Ö²¼·ÖÉ¢£¬²úÁ¿Ëæ¼¾½Ú²¨¶¯´ó£¬Òò´ËÔÁÏÊÕ¼¯ºÍÔËÊäÀ§ÄÑ£¬³É±¾½Ï¸ß£¬ÖÆÔ¼×ÅÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼µÄ·¢Õ¹¡£Ìð²ËÔüÊÇÌdz§ÀûÓÃÌð²ËÕ¥ÌǺóµÄÊ£Óั²úÎ´óÁ¿¼¯ÖжѷűãÓÚÊÕ¼¯ÀûÓ᣻ùÓÚ´Ë£¬Ìð²ËÔüµÄÊÕ¼¯³É±¾ºÍÔËÊä³É±¾ÏÔÖø½µµÍ[11]¡£½¨Á¢Ìð²ËÖÆÌǺÍÌð²ËÔüÖÆÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼Ò»Ì廯ÏÖ´úÖÆÌÇģʽ³ÉΪµ±Ç°Ñо¿Èȵ㡣
1.1.4 Ìð²ËÔü³ÖÐøÀûÓÃÓÐÀûÓÚÌÇÒµ¿É³ÖÐø·¢Õ¹Ìð²ËÔüµÄ´«Í³ÀûÓ÷½Ê½ÖгýÉÙÁ¿ÓÃΪ¶¯ÎïËÇÁϹ©¸øÖܱßÅ©»§Í⣬´ó²¿·Ö¾ÍµØ¶Ñ·Å£¬´¦Àí²»µ±»áÒýÆð»ýѹÓëùÀã¬Ôì³É×ÊÔ´À˷ѵÄͬʱÑÏÖØÎÛȾÖܱ߻·¾³¡£Ìð²ËÔüº¬ÓÐ26%µÄÏËÎ¬ËØ£¬½«Æäת»¯ÖƱ¸ÎªÉúÎïÒÒ´¼£¬Äܹ»ÊµÏÖ×ÊÔ´³ä·ÖÀûÓã¬Ìá¸ßÆóÒµ¾¼ÃÐ§Òæ£¬¼õÉÙ»·¾³ÎÛȾ£¬ÓÐÀûÓÚÌÇÒµµÄ¿É³ÖÐø·¢Õ¹¡£
1.2 Ìð²ËÔüת»¯ÉúÎïÒÒ´¼µÄ²»×ãÓëÆäËûľÖÊÏËÎ¬ËØÔÁÏÏà±È£¬Ìð²ËÔü¹û½ºº¬Á¿¸ß´ï28%£¬¹û½ºµÄ´óÁ¿´æÔÚʹÆä¾ßÓиü¸ßÇ¿¶ÈµÄð¤ÐԺ͵¯ÐÔ[12]£¬ÏàÁÚϸ°ûð¤½ÓÔÚÒ»Æð£¬Ó°ÏìÏËÎ¬ËØÃ¸µÄ×÷ÓÃЧÂÊ¡£Ô¤´¦Àí½×¶Î¹û½º·Ö½âÉú³É°ëÈéÌÇÈ©Ëá¼°ÆäÑÜÉúÎÉÏÊöÎïÖʵĴæÔÚ»á¶Ôø½âÓë·¢½Í²úÉúÒÖÖÆ×÷ÓÃ[13]¡£ÐÂÏÊÌð²ËÔüË®·Öº¬Á¿¿É´ï90%ÒÔÉÏ£¬´¦Àí²»¼°Ê±ÒýÆðù¾ú¡¢½Íĸ¾úµÈ΢ÉúÎïÉú³¤£¬µ¼ÖÂÌð²ËÔü¸¯°Ü¡£ºæ¸ÉÊÇÍѳýÌð²ËÔüË®·ÖµÄ³£Ó÷½·¨£¬¹æÄ£»¯Ó¦ÓÃʱ¶ÔÉ豸ºÍ¹¤ÒÕ¶¼ÓнϸßÒªÇó¡£ÇàÖüÒ²ÊÇ´æ·ÅÌð²ËÔüµÄ·½·¨£¬µ«Ñо¿·¢ÏÖÇàÖü¹ý³ÌÖÐÌí¼Ó΢ÉúÎïÒÖÖÆ¼ÁµÈ»áÓ°ÏìÏËÎ¬ËØ×ª»¯ÒÒ´¼µÄЧ ÂÊ[14]¡£»ùÓÚÌð²ËÔüÌØÊâÐÔ½¨Á¢Ïà¹ØÅäÌ×¼¼ÊõÊÇ¿ª·¢Ìð²ËÔüÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼µÄǰÌá¡£
2 Ìð²Ë¼°Ìð²ËÔüÔÚÉúÎïÒÒ´¼ÖеÄÓ¦ÓÃ2.1 Ìð²ËÔÚµÚÒ»´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼ÖеÄÓ¦ÓõÚÒ»´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼µÄÉú²úÔÁÏÖ÷ÒªÊǵí·ÛÀàÎïÖÊ (СÂó¡¢ÓñÃס¢ÍÁ¶¹ºÍľÊí) ºÍÌÇÎïÖÊ (¸ÊÕáÖºÍÌÇÃÛ)£¬ÔÁϳɱ¾Õ¼ÒÒ´¼Éú²ú×ܳɱ¾70%?80%[15]¡£ÃÀ¹úºÍ°ÍÎ÷Òѳɹ¦ÊµÏÖÁ˵ÚÒ»´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼²úÒµ»¯£¬¶þÕ߸ù¾Ý±¾¹ú¹úÇé·Ö±ð½¨Á¢ÁËÒÔÓñÃ׺͸ÊÕáÌÇΪÔÁϵÄÉúÎïÒÒ´¼Éú²úÏß¡£°ÍÎ÷Éú²úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼µÄÔÁÏ£¬69%À´×Ô¸ÊÕáºÍÌð²Ë[16]¡£
Ìð²Ë¸»º¬ÕáÌÇ£¬ÔÚµÚÒ»´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼Öеõ½¹ã·ºÓ¦Óá£2005Ä꣬ºÉÀ¼Ê×ÏÈÀûÓÃÌð²ËÕáÌÇת»¯ÖƱ¸ÒÒ´¼[17]£»Dodi?µÈÌá³öÌð²ËÔÖÉú²úÒÒ´¼µÄ¶¯Á¦Ñ§Ä£ÐÍ£¬¶ÔÌdz§½øÐиÄÔ죬½¨Á¢²úÌÇÓëÒÒ´¼·¢½ÍÉú²úÏß[18]£»JuanµÈ¿ª·¢ÁËÌð²ËÔÖ±£´æ·½·¨£¬½á¹û±íÃ÷23 ¡æ£¬ÕáÌÇÖ´æ·Å24Öܺ󣬿ÉÓÃÓÚ·¢½ÍÉú²úÒÒ´¼µÄÕáÌÇÈԸߴï99%£¬ÎªÌð²Ë¹æÄ£»¯Éú²úÒÒ´¼´òÏ»ù´¡[19]¡£ÒÔÌð²Ë×÷ΪÔÁÏÖÆÈ¡ÉúÎïÒÒ´¼µÄÐ§ÒæÈÕÒæµÃµ½´ó¼ÒµÄ¿Ï¶¨¡£
2.2 Ìð²ËÔüÔÚµÚ¶þ´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼ÖеÄÓ¦Óõڶþ´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼ÒÔÅ©ÁÖ·ÏÆúÎïΪÖ÷ÒªÔÁÏ£¬²ÉÓÃø½â-·¢½ÍÏà½áºÏµÄÄ£Ê½ÖÆ±¸ÉúÎïÒÒ´¼¡£ÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼µÄÉú²úÊÇÒ»¸ö¸´ÔӵĹý³Ì£ºÏËÎ¬ËØ (°ëÏËÎ¬ËØ) Ê×ÏÈø½âÉú³ÉÆÏÌÑÌÇ (ľÌǺͰ¢À²®ÌÇ)£¬Î¢ÉúÎïת»¯µ¥ÌÇÉú³ÉÒÒ´¼¡£¾Ý¹À¼Æ£¬È«ÇòÿÄê´óÔ¼²úÉú51ÒÚt (¸ÉÖØ) ũҵ·ÏÆúÎïºÍ501Íòt (¸ÉÖØ) ÁÖÒµ·ÏÆúÎï[20]¡£****ÒÔµÚÒ»´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼Éú²ú¼¼ÊõΪ»ù´¡£¬ÖصãÑо¿½«Å©ÁÖºÍÊÐÕþ·ÏÆúÎïת»¯ÎªÒÒ´¼µÄµÚ¶þ´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼¼¼Êõ[21]¡£
¼ÓÄôóµÄIogen¹«Ë¾ÓµÓÐÏȽøµÄÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼ÖƱ¸¼¼Êõ£¬ÔçÔÚ1982Ä꽨Á¢ÁËÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼ÖÐÊÔ×°Öã¬Ã¿ÌìÄÜ´¦Àí1ÍòtľÖÊÏËÎ¬ËØÔÁÏ£»2004Ä꣬½¨³ÉÉÌÒµÏúÊÛµÄÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼Ê¾·¶¹¤³§£¬Ëæ×ż¼ÊõÉý¼¶£¬ÊµÏÖÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼¹æÄ£»¯Éú²ú£»2014Ä꣬Iogen¹«Ë¾ÔÚ°ÍÎ÷¿ªÕ¹Ò»¸ö¼ÛÖµ30ÒÚÃÀÔªµÄÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼ÏîÄ¿£¬¿ªÊ¼½¨Á¢ÉÌÒµ»¯ÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼¹¤³§[22]¡£Èðµä»ñµÃÅ·ÃËίԱ»á5 460ÍòÅ·ÔªµÄ²¦¿î£¬½¨Á¢ÁËÒÔÔìÖ½·ÏÆúÎïΪÔÁϵÄÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼Éú²úÆóÒµ[23]¡£ÃÀ¹úÄÜÔ´²¿¹ú¼Ò¿ÉÔÙÉúÄÜԴʵÑéÊÒ (NREL) ¿ªÕ¹Á˶à¸öÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼Éú²úÏîÄ¿[24]¡£Öйúɽ¶«ÔóÉú¹«Ë¾ÀûÓÃChenµÈÑо¿µÄ½Õ¸ÑÏËÎ¬ËØ¹Ì̬ø½â¼¼Êõ£¬½¨Á¢ÁËÄê²ú3 000 t½Õ¸ÑÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼Éú²úʾ·¶¹¤³Ì[25]¡£¹ú¼ÊÄÜÔ´»ú¹¹Ö¸³ö£¬Ëæ×ÅÑо¿µÄ²»¶ÏÉîÈëÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼½«Öð²½È¡´ú´«Í³È¼ÁÏ£¬³ÉΪÈËÀàÀµÒÔÉú´æµÄÐÂÄÜÔ´¡£
Ìð²ËÖÆÌǺÍÌð²ËÔüÖÆÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼µÄÒ»Ì廯ÏÖ´úÖÆÌÇÆóÒµÐÂģʽ£¬ÒòÌð²ËÔü¶ÀÌØµÄÓÅÔ½ÐÔ£¬¾ßÓÐÖØÒªµÄÓ¦ÓÃǰ¾°¡£¹¤ÒÕ·Ïß°üÀ¨£ºÌð²ËÕáÌÇÌáÈ¡¡¢¹ÌÒº·ÖÀë¡¢ÌÇҺŨËõÖÆÌÇ¡¢Ìð²ËÔü¸ÉÔïÖü²Ø¡¢Ìð²ËÔüÔ¤´¦Àí¡¢Ìð²ËÔüÏËÎ¬ËØÃ¸½â¡¢µ¥ÌÇ·¢½ÍºÍÒÒ´¼ÕôÁóµÈ¹¤ÒÕ¡£µ«Ä¿Ç°ÉÏÊöÑо¿ÈÔ¶à´¦ÓÚʵÑéÊÒÑо¿½×¶Î¡£FosterµÈ°±±¬Ô¤´¦ÀíÌð²ËÔü£¬ÀûÓÃÏËÎ¬ËØÃ¸¡¢°ëÏËÎ¬ËØÃ¸ºÍ¹û½ºÃ¸Ðͬø½â£¬ÏÔÖøÌá¸ßÏËÎ¬ËØµÄø½âÂÊ£¬µ«´¦Àíºó°ëÏËÎ¬ËØÃ¸ºÍ¹û½ºÃ¸ÓÃÁ¿Ôö¼Ó£¬±íÃ÷°±±¬´¦Àí´Ù½øÁËÏËÎ¬ËØµÄ½µ½â£¬¶Ô°ëÏËÎ¬ËØºÍ¹û½ºµÄ½µ½âûÓÐ×÷ÓÃ[26]¡£K¨¹hnelµÈ¿¼²ìÁËÌð²ËÔü¾¹ý²»Í¬Ô¤´¦Àíºóø½âÂʲîÒ죬·¢ÏÖ140 ¡æË®ÖÐÈÈ´¦Àí15 minÄܹ»Èܽâ60% (W/W) µÄ×Ü̼ˮ»¯ºÏÎÏÔÖø³ýÈ¥¹û½º£¬ÁíÒ»·½Ãæ¾çÁÒÌõ¼þ»áÆÆ»µÈÜÒºÖеÄÌÇ£¬Éú³ÉÌǽµ½â²úÎï¿·È©¡¢ôǼ׻ù¿·È©¡¢ÒÒËáºÍ¼×Ëá[12]¡£ZhengµÈÑо¿·¢ÏÖÇàÖü²»½ö¿ÉÒÔʵÏÖÌð²ËÔüÖü²Ø£¬¶øÇÒÇàÖüÆÚ¼äÆÆ»µÌð²ËÔüÀí»¯½á¹¹£¬´Ù½øÃ¸½â[27]¡£Ìð²ËÔüΪÔÁÏ£¬²ÉÓûùÒò¹¤³Ì¾úÖ꣬ͬ²½ÌÇ»¯·¢½ÍÒÒ´¼¡£´ó³¦°£Ï£ÊϾúÍ»±äÖêEscherichia coli M. KO11ÄÜÓÐЧת»¯°¢À²®ÌǺͰëÈéÌÇÈ©ËáΪÒÒ´¼[28]¡£RorickµÈ¶Ô±ÈE. coli KO11ºÍÄð¾Æ½ÍĸSaccharomyces cerevisiae H. YSC2ת»¯Ìð²ËÔüΪÒÒ´¼µÄЧÂÊ£¬·Ö±ðµÃµ½ÒÒ´¼²úÁ¿0.144 g/g (ÒÒ´¼/Ìð²ËÔü¸ÉÖØ) ºÍ0.092 g/g (ÒÒ´¼/Ìð²ËÔü¸ÉÖØ)[29]¡£ZhengµÈ·¢ÏÖÏ¡ËáÔ¤´¦ÀíËäÈ»»áÉú³É·¢½ÍÒÖÖÆÎµ«Ìð²ËÔüµÄÒÒ´¼²úÁ¿ÈÔ»áÌá¸ß£¬Ìð²ËÔüËùº¬µ°°×ÖÊÁ¿½ÏÉÙ£¬²»×ãÒÔÖ§³ÖE. coli KO11Éú³¤£¬ËùÒÔÔÚ·¢½Í¹ý³ÌÖÐÐè²¹³ä½ÍĸÌáÈ¡ÎïºÍµ°°×ëË[30]¡£Y¨¹celµÈÓÃÊ÷¸É±Ï³à½ÍĸPichia stipitis P. ·¢½ÍÌð²ËÔüµÄË®½âÒºÉú²úÒÒ´¼£¬²¢ÀûÓûîÐÔÌ¿Îü¸½ÒÒËᣬ½â³ý·¢½ÍÒÖÖÆ[31]¡£BellidoµÈÓðÝÊÏËó¾úClostridium beijerinckii D. ·¢½ÍÌð²ËÔüø½âÒºÉú²ú±ûͪ-¶¡´¼-ÒÒ´¼£¬·¢ÏÖÔ¤´¦ÀíʱpHÖµºÍ¹ÌÒº±È¶ÔÖÕ²úÎï²úÂÊÓ°Ïì½Ï´ó[32]¡£
¶ÔÌð²ËÔü½øÐÐÔ¤´¦ÀíÊÇÆäÖÆ±¸ÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼±ØÒªµÄ²½Ö裬°üÀ¨»¯Ñ§´¦ÀíºÍÉúÎï´¦ÀíµÈ[33-34]¡£Ìð²ËÔü¸»º¬¹û½º£¬Ê¹ÆäÓëũҵ·ÏÆúÎľ²ÄµÈÆäËûľÖÊÏËÎ¬ËØÔÁϾßÓÐÏÔÖø²»Í¬µÄ×é³ÉºÍ½á¹¹ÌØÕ÷¡£»ùÓÚÌð²ËÔü½¨Á¢ÐµÄÔ¤´¦Àí·½·¨ºÍø½â¹¤ÒÕÊǵ±Ç°Ñо¿µÄÖØÒª·½Ãæ¡£ÉúÎï·¨Ô¤´¦ÀíÊÇÀûÓÃ΢ÉúÎï»ò΢ÉúÎï²úÉúµÄÃ¸ÆÆ»µÉúÎïÖʽṹµÄ·½·¨¡£¾ßÓÐÌõ¼þκ͡¢Äܺĵ͡¢ÒÖÖÆÎïÉÙµÈÓŵ㡣µ«ÊÇÉúÎïÔ¤´¦Àíʱ¼ä³¤¡¢Ð§Âʵ͡¢²»ÊÊÒ˹¤ÒµÓ¦Óᣱ¾¿ÎÌâ×éÒÔÉúÎïÔ¤´¦ÀíΪºËÐĽ¨Á¢ÁË×éºÏÔ¤´¦Àí¹¤ÒÕ£¬ÊµÑé·¢ÏÖ½¨Á¢µÄÆû±¬ñîºÏÕæ¾úÐͬԤ´¦ÀíÊÇÒ»ÖÖÓÐЧ×éºÏÔ¤´¦Àí·½·¨¡£Æû±¬ÆÆ»µÓñÃ׽ոѵĸÕÐԽṹ£¬Ôö´ó±íÃæ¿×¾¶ºÍ¿×϶£¬±©Â¶ÏËÎ¬ËØ½á¾§½á¹¹£¬Ìá¸ßÕæ¾ú×÷ÓÃЧÂÊ[35]¡£Ä¿Ç°£¬ÎÒÃÇÕý³¢ÊÔ½¨Á¢Ò»ÖÖÒº°±µÍÎÂÔ¤½þÐͬӲë´Ö¸Ç¿×¾úÔ¤´¦ÀíÌð²ËÔüµÄ¹¤ÒÕ[36]£¬Ô¤´¦Àí¹ý³ÌÌõ¼þÏà¶Ôκ͡¢·¢½ÍÒÖÖÆÎïÉú³ÉÉÙ¡¢»¯Ñ§¸¯Ê´ÐÔС¡¢¼Û¸ñµÍ£¬ÊÇÔ¤´¦ÀíÌð²ËÔüµÄÀíÏë·½·¨¡£
2.3 Ìð²ËÔüÔÚµÚÈý´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼ÖеÄÓ¦ÓõÚÈý´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼ÓÐÁ½ÖÖ£ºÒ»ÖÖÊÇÖ¸ÒÔº£ÔåÓÍΪÔÁÏÉú²úÒÒ´¼£¬º£ÔåÅàÑøºÍº£ÔåÓ͵ÄÝÍÈ¡ÊǺËÐIJ½Öè[37]¡£ÁíÒ»ÖÖͨ¹ýÏÖ´ú·Ö×ÓÉúÎïѧ¼¼Êõ¹¹½¨»ùÒò¹¤³Ì¾úÖ꣬½«ÉúÎïÖÊÔ¤´¦Àí£¬ÏËÎ¬ËØÃ¸½â£¬ÒÒ´¼·¢½Íͨ¹ýͬһ΢ÉúÎïÔÚµ¥Ò»µÄ¹¤ÒÕ²½ÖèÖÐʵÏÖ[38-39]¡£µÚÈý´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼´¦ÓÚʵÑé½×¶Î£¬ÄÜ·ñ³É¹¦¿ª·¢µÚÈý´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼£¬ºÜ´ó³Ì¶ÈÉÏÈ¡¾öÓÚ¶ÔÏËÎ¬ËØ·Ö½â¾úг´úлµÄÁ˽â³Ì¶È¡£Õâ¸öÉú²úϵͳ°üÀ¨Á˾úÖÖ´úл¡¢»ùÒòÖØ×顢ø½â·´Ó¦ÒÔ¼°ÈÈÁ¦Ñ§»úÖÆÕâЩ¸´ÔÓ¹ý³Ì¡£
Ñо¿¸ÄÔìÒÒ´¼Éú²ú¾úÖ꣬ʹÆä¿ÉÒÔ¼¯Ô¤´¦Àí¡¢Ã¸½â¼°·¢½ÍΪһÌ壬ÊÇ·¢Õ¹µÚÈý´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼µÄǰÌá¡£ShahbaziµÈÓÕ±äÀïÊÏľùTrichoderma reesei S.£¬Í»±ä¾úÖêT. reesei NRCAM5Äܹ»²úÉúÍâÇÐÆÏ¾ÛÌÇø¡¢ÄÚÇÐÆÏ¾ÛÌÇø¡¢ÏËά¶þÌÇÍÑÇâøµÈ£¬ÕâЩø¹²Í¬×÷Óã¬Ìá¸ßÌð²ËÔüø½âÌÇ»¯ÂÊ[40]¡£LiµÈÓÃ×ÏÍâÕÕÉäÐݹþËþ¼ÙË¿½ÍĸCandida shehatae B.&U.£¬»ñµÃÍ»±äÌåC. shehatae Cs3512¡£C. shehatae Cs3512¶ÔÉúÎïÖʽøÐÐÔ¤´¦Àí£¬»¹¿É½«ÆÏÌÑÌǺÍľÌÇת»¯ÎªÒÒ´¼[41]¡£Fern¨¢ndez-SandovalµÈͨ¹ý´úл¹¤³Ì£¬³É¹¦½« E. coli MG1655¸ÄÔìΪÒÒËáÄÍÊܾúÖêE. coli MS04ÓÃÓÚÉú²úÒÒ´¼[42]¡£NakamuraµÈÖØ×éS. cerevisiae£¬Ê¹Æä±í´ïBGL»ùÒò£¬ÊµÏÖľÌÇ/ÏËά¶þÌǸßЧ¹²·¢½Í[43]¡£ÖÐÁ¸¼¯Íʹ½¨µÄ¹¤³Ì¾úÖêS. cerevisiae 424A (LNH-ST) ¿ÉÒÔͬʱת»¯Áù̼ÌǺÍÎå̼ÌÇÉú³ÉÒÒ´¼£¬×ÜÌÇÀûÓÃÂʳ¬¹ý85.0%£¬³É¹¦ÊµÏÖ500 t/yµÄÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼ÖÐÊÔ¹æÄ£[44]¡£ÒÔÌð²ËÔüΪµ×ÎïÉú²úµÚÈý´úÉúÎïÒÒ´¼Ñо¿½ÏÉÙ£¬µ«ÉÏÊöÒÒ´¼Éú²ú¾úÖêµÄ³É¹¦¸ÄÔ죬ÏàÐÅ¿ÉÒÔ¸üºÃµØ·¢»ÓÌð²ËÔüµÄÓÅÔ½ÐÔ¡£
3 Ìð²ËÔü×é·Ö·ÖÀë¼°×ÛºÏÀûÓÃÌð²Ë¸»º¬ÕáÌÇ¡¢ÏËÎ¬ËØ¡¢°ëÏËÎ¬ËØºÍ¹û½ºµÈ¡£ÔÚ½¨Á¢Ìð²ËÖÆÌǺÍÌð²ËÔüÖÆ±¸ÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼Ò»Ì廯µÄ»ù´¡ÉÏ£¬Ó¦½øÒ»²½¶ÔÌð²ËÆäËû×é·Ö½øÐзÖÀëÓëÀûÓá£
ͼ 1¿ÉÖª£¬Ìð²ËÔüÖÐÄܹ»»ñµÃ¹û½º¡¢´Ö¶àÌÇ¡¢ÏËά¡¢¼×Íé¡¢±û¶þ´¼µÈ¶àÖÖÎïÖÊ[45-46]¡£ÈçÌð²ËÔüÖаëÈéÌÇÈ©ËáºÍ°¢À²®ÌǽøÒ»²½×ª»¯Îªõ£°·»òÔöËܼÁµÈ¸ß¼ÛÖµ»¯Ñ§Æ·»ò²ÄÁÏ£»ÈéËỹÔÉú²ú±û¶þ´¼£»Ã¸½âÌð²ËÔüÓë¾ÆÔã»ìºÏÉú²ú¼×Íé[47-50]¡£WardµÈ´ÓÌð²ËÔüË®½âÒºÖзÖÀëµ¥ÌÇ£¬ÔÙ½«Æäת»¯Îª¸ü¸ß¼ÛÖµµÄ»¯Ñ§Æ·ºÍÒ½Ò©Öмä Ìå[51]¡£×é·Ö·ÖÀë¼°×ÛºÏÀûÓÃÌá¸ßÌð²ËÔü×ÊÔ´ÀûÓÃÂʵÄͬʱ¿ÉÒÔ·Öµ£ÒÒ´¼Éú²ú³É±¾£¬Ìá¸ßÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼Êг¡¾ºÕùÁ¦£¬´Ù½ø²úÒµ»¯·¢Õ¹¡£
![]() |
ͼ 1 Ìð²Ë¸÷×é·Ö¼°ÓÃ; Figure 1 Application of components of sugar beet. |
ͼѡÏî |
4 Õ¹ÍûÌð²ËÔü²úÁ¿´ó£¬ÏËÎ¬ËØº¬Á¿¸ß£¬Ò×ÓÚÊÕ¼¯Çҳɱ¾µÍÁ®£¬ÊÇÖÆ±¸ÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼µÄÀíÏëÔÁÏ¡£Ìð²ËÔüÏËÎ¬ËØ×ª»¯ÖƱ¸ÒÒ´¼µÄͬʱ£¬¶ÔÌð²ËÔüÆäËû×é·Ö½øÐзּ¶·ÖÀ룬¸÷¸ö×é·ÖµÄ×ÛºÏÀûÓ㬿ÉÒÔʵÏÖÐ§ÒæµÄ×î´ó»¯¡£Ìð²ËÔüת»¯ÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼¼°×é·Ö×ÛºÏÀûÓÃÉæ¼°ÔÁÏÔ¤´¦Àí¼¼Êõ¡¢ÏËÎ¬ËØÃ¸½â·¢½Í¼¼Êõ¡¢×é·Ö·ÖÀ뼰ת»¯µÈ¡£Ïà¹Ø¼¼ÊõÉîÈëÑо¿µÄͬʱ£¬Ó¦½øÒ»²½¿ªÕ¹¼¯³É´´ÐµĹ¤×÷£¬´Ó¹¤³Ì²ãÃæÊµÏÖ¸÷¹¤ÒÕµÄ×îÓÅ¡£Ëæ×ÅÐÂÀíÂÛµÄÌá³öÓë¼¼ÊõµÄ¸ïУ¬Ìð²ËÔüÖÆ±¸ÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼·½Ã潫»á»ñµÃ¸ü¿ì·¢Õ¹¡£
²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×
[1] | Energy sugar beets to biofuel: field to fuel production system and cost estimates [EB/OL]. [2015-11-15]. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/ bitstream/196777/2/P-Energy%20Beet-SAEA%202015.pdf. |
[2] | Youngs H, Somerville C. Best practices for biofuels.Science, 2014, 344(6188): 1095¨C1096(in Chinese). |
[3] | Ziemi¨½ski K, Romanowska I, Kowalska-Wentel M, et al. Effects of hydrothermal pretreatment of sugar beet pulp for methane production.Bioresour Technol, 2014: 187¨C193(in Chinese). |
[4] | Lennartsson PR, Erlandsson P, Taherzadeh MJ. Integration of the first and second generation bioethanol processes and the importance of by-products.Bioresour Technol, 2014: 3¨C8(in Chinese). |
[5] | Biancardi E, Panella LW, Lewellen RT. Beta Maritima: the origin of beets.New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2014: 4¨C6(in Chinese). |
[6] | McGrath JM, Townsend BJ. Sugar beet, energy beet, and industrial beet//Cruz VMV, Dierig DA, Eds. Industrial Crops. New York: Springer, 2015: 81-99. |
[7] | Cooke DA, Scott RK. The sugar beet crop.United Kingdom: Chapman &Hall.1993: 3-7(in Chinese). |
[8] | Guo LL, Wang XY, Tao GC, et al. Assessment of field crop process residues production among different Provinces in China.J China Agric Univ, 2012, 17(6): 45¨C55(in Chinese). ¹ùÀûÀÚ, ÍõÏþÓñ, ÌÕ¹â²Ó, µÈ. Öйú¸÷Ê¡´óÌï×÷Îï¼Ó¹¤¸±²úÎï×ÊÔ´Á¿ÆÀ¹À.Öйúũҵ´óѧѧ±¨,2012,17(6):45¨C55. |
[9] | Leijdekkers AGM, Bink JPM, Geutjes S, et al. Enzymatic saccharification of sugar beet pulp for the production of galacturonic acid and arabinose; a study on the impact of the formation of recalcitrant oligosaccharides.Bioresour Technol, 2013: 518¨C525(in Chinese). |
[10] | El-Naggar NEA, Deraz S, Khalil A. Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks based on enzymatic hydrolysis: current status and recent developments.Biotechnology, 2014, 13(1): 1¨C21(in Chinese). |
[11] | Henke S, Bubn¨ªk Z, Hinkov¨¢ A, et al. Model of a sugar factory with bioethanol production in program Sugars?.J Food Eng, 2006, 77(3): 416¨C420(in Chinese). |
[12] | K¨¹hnel S, Schols HA, Gruppen H. Aiming for the complete utilization of sugar-beet pulp: examination of the effects of mild acid and hydrothermal pretreatment followed by enzymatic digestion.Biotechnol Biofuels, 2011: 14(in Chinese). |
[13] | Edwards MC, Doran-Peterson J. Pectin-rich biomass as feedstock for fuel ethanol production.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2012, 95(3): 565¨C575(in Chinese). |
[14] | Dole?al P, Pyrochta V, Dole?al J. Effects of chemical preservative and pressing of ensiled sugar-beet pulp on the quality of fermentation process.Czech J Anim Sci, 2005, 50(12): 553¨C560(in Chinese). |
[15] | Taylor MP, Eley KL, Martin S, et al. Thermophilic ethanologenesis: future prospects for second-generation bioethanol production.Trends Biotechnol, 2009, 27(7): 398¨C405(in Chinese). |
[16] | Jurado M, Prieto A, Mart¨ªnez-Alcal¨¢ , et al. Laccase detoxification of steam-exploded wheat straw for second generation bioethanol.Bioresour Technol, 2009, 100(24): 6378¨C6384(in Chinese). |
[17] | Carere CR, Sparling R, Cicek N, et al. Third generation biofuels via direct cellulose fermentation.Int J Mol Sci, 2008, 9(7): 1342¨C1360(in Chinese). |
[18] | Dodi? JM, Vu?urovi? DG, Dodi? SN, et al. Kinetic modelling of batch ethanol production from sugar beet raw juice.Appl Energy, 2012: 192¨C197(in Chinese). |
[19] | Vargas-Ramirez JM, Haagenson DM, Pryor SW, et al. Determination of suitable storage conditions to preserve fermentable sugars in raw thick beet juice for ethanol production.Biomass Bioenergy, 2013: 362¨C369(in Chinese). |
[20] | Ho DP, Ngo HH, Guo WS. A mini review on renewable sources for biofuel.Bioresour Technol, 2014: 742¨C749(in Chinese). |
[21] | Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, et al. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials.Science, 2006, 311(5760): 484¨C489(in Chinese). |
[22] | IOGEN Corporation. History of Iogen [EB/OL]. [2015-11-15]. http://www.iogen.ca/about-iogen/ history. html. |
[23] | European Commission. State aid: Commission approves Swedish €55 million aid for αDomsjö≈ R&D project [EB/OL]. [2015-11-15]. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-11-67_en.htm?locale=en. |
[24] | National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Innovation for Our Energy Future. [EB/OL]. [2015-11-15]. http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/pdfs/ 40742.pdf. |
[25] | Chen HZ, Li GH. An industrial level system with nonisothermal simultaneous solid state saccharification, fermentation and separation for ethanol production.Biochem Eng J, 2013: 121¨C126(in Chinese). |
[26] | Foster BL, Dale BE, Doran-Peterson JB. Enzymatic hydrolysis of ammonia-treated sugar beet pulp.Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2001, 91(1/9): 269¨C282(in Chinese). |
[27] | Zheng Y, Yu CW, Cheng YS, et al. Integrating sugar beet pulp storage, hydrolysis and fermentation for fuel ethanol production.Appl Energy, 2012: 168¨C175(in Chinese). |
[28] | Doran JB, Cripe J, Sutton M, et al. Fermentations of pectin-rich biomass with recombinant bacteria to produce fuel ethanol//Finkelstein M, Davison BH, Eds. Twenty-First Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals. United States: Humana Press, 2000: 141-152. |
[29] | Rorick R, Nahar N, Pryor S. Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of sugar beet pulp.Amer Soc Agric Biol Eng, 2009: 2975(in Chinese). |
[30] | Zheng Y, Lee C, Yu CW, et al. Dilute acid pretreatment and fermentation of sugar beet pulp to ethanol.Appl Energy, 2013: 1¨C7(in Chinese). |
[31] | Y¨¹cel HG, Aksu Z. Ethanol fermentation characteristics of Pichia stipitis yeast from sugar beet pulp hydrolysate: use of new detoxification methods.Fuel, 2015: 793¨C799(in Chinese). |
[32] | Bellido C, Infante C, Coca M, et al. Efficient acetone-butanol-ethanol production by Clostridium beijerinckii from sugar beet pulp.Bioresour Technol, 2015: 332¨C338(in Chinese). |
[33] | Dhiman SS, Haw JR, Kalyani D, et al. Simultaneous pretreatment and saccharification: green technology for enhanced sugar yields from biomass using a fungal consortium.Bioresour Technol, 2015: 50¨C57(in Chinese). |
[34] | Imman S, Arnthong J, Burapatana V, et al. Effects of acid and alkali promoters on compressed liquid hot water pretreatment of rice straw.Bioresour Technol, 2014: 29¨C36(in Chinese). |
[35] | Li GH, Chen HZ. Synergistic mechanism of steam explosion combined with fungal treatment by Phellinus baumii for the pretreatment of corn stalk.Biomass Bioenergy, 2014: 1¨C7(in Chinese). |
[36] | Li GH, Li D, Yuan L. Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose by aqueous ammonium pretreatment combined with Funalia trogii: CN, 201510120457.0 (in Chinese). Àî¹Ú»ª, À, Ô·ÁÕ. Ò»ÖÖÒº°±µÍÎÂÔ¤½þÐͬӲë´Ö¸Ç¿×¾úÔ¤´¦ÀíÌá¸ßľÖÊÏËÎ¬ËØÉúÎïÖÊø½âÂʵķ½·¨. Öйú, 201510120457.0. |
[37] | Goh CS, Lee KT. A visionary and conceptual macroalgae-based third-generation bioethanol (TGB) biorefinery in Sabah, Malaysia as an underlay for renewable and sustainable development.Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev, 2010, 14(2): 842¨C848(in Chinese). |
[38] | Langeveld JWA, van de Ven GWJ, De Vries SC, et al. Ethanol from sugar beet in the Netherlands: energy production and efficiency.Int J Sustain Dev, 2014, 17(1): 78¨C88(in Chinese). |
[39] | Kracher D, Oros D, Yao WY, et al. Fungal secretomes enhance sugar beet pulp hydrolysis.Biotechnol J, 2014, 9(4): 483¨C492(in Chinese). |
[40] | Shahbazi S, Askari H, Naseripour T. Enzymatic saccharification of sugar beet pulp by novel mutants of Trichoderma reeseii NRCAM 5 for bioethanol production.Int J Agric Crop Sci, 2014, 7(15): 1560¨C1569(in Chinese). |
[41] | Li Y, Park JY, Shiroma R, et al. Improved ethanol and reduced xylitol production from glucose and xylose mixtures by the mutant strain of Candida shehatae ATCC 22984.Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2012, 166(7): 1781¨C1790(in Chinese). |
[42] | Fern¨¢ndez-Sandoval MT, Huerta-Beristain G, Trujillo-Martinez B, et al. Laboratory metabolic evolution improves acetate tolerance and growth on acetate of ethanologenic Escherichia colii under non-aerated conditions in glucose-mineral medium.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2012, 96(5): 1291¨C1300(in Chinese). |
[43] | Nakamura N, Yamada R, Katahira S, et al. Effective xylose/cellobiose co-fermentation and ethanol production by xylose-assimilating S. cerevisiae via expression of ¦Â-glucosidase on its cell surface.Enzyme Microb Technol, 2008, 43(3): 233¨C236(in Chinese). |
[44] | Yue GJ, Wu GQ, Lin X. Insights into engineering of cellulosic ethanol.Chin J Biotech, 2014, 30(6): 816¨C827(in Chinese). ÔÀ¹úÇì, Îä¹úÇì, ÁÖöÎ. ÏËÎ¬ËØÒÒ´¼¹¤³Ì»¯Ì½ÌÖ.ÉúÎ﹤³Ìѧ±¨,2014,30(6):816¨C827. |
[45] | Ziemi¨½ski K, Kowalska-Wentel M. Effect of enzymatic pretreatment on anaerobic co-digestion of sugar beet pulp silage and vinasse.Bioresour Technol, 2015: 274¨C280(in Chinese). |
[46] | Berlowska J, Binczarski M, Dudkiewicz M, et al. A low-cost method for obtaining high-value bio-based propylene glycol from sugar beet pulp.RSC Adv, 2015, 5(3): 2299¨C2304(in Chinese). |
[47] | Li DQ, Du GM, Jing WW, et al. Combined effects of independent variables on yield and protein content of pectin extracted from sugar beet pulp by citric acid.Carbohydr Polym, 2015: 108¨C114(in Chinese). |
[48] | Yapo BM, Robert C, Etienne I, et al. Effect of extraction conditions on the yield, purity and surface properties of sugar beet pulp pectin extracts.Food Chem, 2007, 100(4): 1356¨C1364(in Chinese). |
[49] | Li M, Wang LJ, Li D, et al. Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from de-pectinated sugar beet pulp.Carbohydr Polym, 2014: 136¨C143(in Chinese). |
[50] | Chen HM, Fu X, Luo ZG. Properties and extraction of pectin-enriched materials from sugar beet pulp by ultrasonic-assisted treatment combined with subcritical water.Food Chem, 2015: 302¨C310(in Chinese). |
[51] | Ward DP, C¨¢rdenas-Fern¨¢ndez M, Hewitson P, et al. Centrifugal partition chromatography in a biorefinery context: separation of monosaccharides from hydrolysed sugar beet pulp.J Chromatogr A, 2015: 84¨C91(in Chinese). |