删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

Characterization of the aflatoxin B1 degradation role of laccases in Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila

本站小编 Free考研考试/2021-12-26

Characterization of the aflatoxin B1 degradation role of laccases in Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila
Hong Jiang1, Zhengjun Du1, Yingying Qian1, Nan Chen1, Mengyu Cai1, Qingru Fei1, Jingjing Chen2, Yu Zhou1
1. State Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Utilization, School of Tea and Food Science Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, Anhui Province, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu Province, China
Received: 7 March 2020; Revised: 28 March 2020; Published online: 15 April 2020
Foundation item: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31671949), by the Anhui Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (1608085J08) and by the National Key R & D Program of China (2017YFC1600902)
Corresponding author: Jingjing Chen, Tel/Fax:+86-551-65786701;E-mail:jingjinc@jiangnan.edu.cn; Yu Zhou, E-mail:microbes@ahau.edu.cn.

Abstract: [Objective] Characterization of the aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) degradation roles of the laccases screened from Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila CW117.[Methods] Two laccase genes lc1 and lc2 from strain CW117 genome were screened, and their AFB1 degrading activity was examined in vitro by heterologous expressed proteins of rLC1 and rLC2 in E. coli BL21. On the basis of in vitro test, two laccase-deficient strains CW117lc1 and CW117lc1-lc2 were constructed by homologous recombination method by using suicide plasmid pK18mobsacB, and the laccases (lc1 and lc2) AFB1 degradation role on strain CW117 was validation in vivo.[Results] Laccase rLC1 showed the AFB1 degradation activity in vitro, but rLC2 did not show degradation activity. Degradation activity of rLC1 was improved by redox mediators of 2, 2-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid), acetosyringone or syringaldehyde. The degrading activity of mutants CW117lc1 and CW117lc1-lc2 showed similar degradation activity to the wild-type strain CW117 in most evaluation time-points.[Conclusion] Laccase LC1 from S. acidaminiphila showed AFB1 degradation activity, and the degradation activity could be enhanced by redox mediators as previous study. However, the laccases' contribution to AFB1 degradation in strain CW117 was minimal, and other degradation pathways existed in the strain.
Keywords: detoxificationlaccaseaflatoxin B1degradation genemutant
微嗜酸寡养单胞菌中的漆酶对黄曲霉毒素B1降解脱毒的生物活性
姜宏1, 杜郑君1, 钱莺莺1, 陈楠1, 蔡梦宇1, 费晴如1, 陈静静2, 周育1
1. 安徽农业大学茶树生物学与资源利用国家重点实验室, 安徽 合肥 230036;
2. 江南大学食品科学与技术国家重点实验室, 江苏 无锡 214122
收稿日期:2020-03-07;修改日期:2020-03-28;网络出版日期:2020-04-15
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(31671949);安徽省****基金(1608085J08);国家重点研发计划(2017YFC1600902)
通信作者:陈静静, Tel/Fax:+86-551-65786701;E-mail:jingjinc@jiangnan.edu.cn; 周育, E-mail:microbes@ahau.edu.cn.

摘要[目的] 探究微嗜酸寡养单胞菌中的漆酶对AFB1的降解活性,并确定漆酶在菌株CW117降解代谢AFB1过程中的贡献。[方法] 从微嗜酸寡养单胞菌基因组中,共筛选到两个漆酶基因lc1lc2,并用大肠杆菌BL21外源表达蛋白rLC1和rLC2,在体外检测其对AFB1的降解活性。同时参考前人报道,研究了氧化性辅剂对漆酶AFB1降解的促进作用。在体外实验基础上,利用自杀质粒pK18mobsacB,以同源重组方法构建了两株漆酶缺失株CW117lc1和CW117lc1-lc2,验证了漆酶基因(lc1lc2)对AFB1体内降解作用。[结果] 体外实验显示,重组酶rLC1具有AFB1降解活性,氧化性辅剂ABTS、AS或SA可显著地提高rLC1降解活性,但rLC2未显示降解活性。突变株CW117lc1和CW117lc1-lc2对AFB1仍显示了较高的降解活性,且在大多数降解时间点与野生株CW117无显著差异。[结论] 微嗜酸寡养单胞菌CW117菌株中,LC1在体外显示了AFB1的降解活性,且降解活性可以被氧化性辅助因子增强,LC2未显示体外降解活性;体内试验发现,漆酶基因lc1lc2对菌株CW117降解AFB1的贡献较小,该菌株还存在其他降解途径。
关键词:解毒漆酶黄曲霉毒素B1降解基因突变菌株
The aflatoxins' chemical structures consist of a coumarin and bifuran rings; the natural contaminants are mainly produced by fungi Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus[1]. As well-known, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is recognized as the most potent and prevalent aflatoxin; the extremely toxic effects of mutagenic, carcinogenic and teratogenic on humans and livestock pose a serious health and economic hazards[2-3].
At present, various microbial species (or genera) have been isolated and characterized for aflatoxins degradation, and the microbial transformation (or degradation) has been considered as one of the most effective means to aflatoxins detoxification. The most investigated microbial species including Armillaria spp.[4-6], Pleurotus spp.[7], Pseudomonas spp.[8], Bacillus spp.[9-11], Flavobacterium spp.[1213], Mycobacterium spp.[1415], Rhodococcus spp.[1517] and Stenotrophomonas spp.[18]. Besides the degrading microbial strains characterization, aflatoxins degrading enzymes (including degrading genes) equally received great attention. For instance, manganese peroxidase (MnP)[19], aflatoxin-oxidase (AFO)[6] and pyridoxamine 5′-phosphate oxidases (PNPOxs)[20] were determined as aflatoxins detoxification enzymes. Among these aflatoxins detoxification enzymes from microbial strains, the laccases were the most focused and recognized degrading agent for aflatoxin detoxification[21-23]. Laccases belong to the superfamily of multicopper oxidases and widely present in bacteria and fungi[24-26], and laccase catalyze ring cleavage of aromatic compounds, and are generally considered as an important biotransformation candidate to environmental pollutants[27]. In previous studies, laccases from Pleurotus pulmonarius[21], Pleurotus eryngii[22-23] and Trametes versicolor[28] were determined as the aflatoxin detoxification agents. After degraded by laccases from the microbial species, the biotoxicities (or mutagenicity) of degraded products were significantly reduced or even disappeared[29]. Degradation results in previous studies indicated that laccases were the general recognized detoxification agent to aflatoxin degradation.
Our previous study found that strain S. acidaminiphila CW117 showed efficient degrading activity to aflatoxin B1, and the 24 h degrading ratio higher than 85%. One laccase gene lc1 from strain CW117 were screened and heterologous expressed by E. coli BL21. However, AFB1 degrading test showed that rLC1 showed relatively low degrading activity in vitro[30]. In view of the results, the following possibilities might be included: (i) laccases were the sole bioagents (enzymes) for AFB1 transfomation, but the heterologously produced rLC1 proteins in E. coli system were not appropriate folded (or mismodified) and resulted in low degradation activity; (ii) Other than laccases, some cofactors (e.g., coenzymes or redox mediators) in strain CW117 can significantly assist the degradation ability of laccases, but the cofactors (or coenzymes) are absent in E. coli system; (iii) Other efficient degrading enzymes (or other degrading agents) are responsible for AFB1 degradation, and laccases were only a secondary degradation agent in strain CW117. In this study, other laccase genes were further screened, and the AFB1 degradation characteristics of all laccase genes were investigated by methods of in vitro and in vivo, and the laccase degradation role was examined.
1 Materials and methods 1.1 Chemicals, bacterial strains and plasmids The AFB1 degrading strain S. acidaminiphila CW117 was previous isolated and preserved in our laboratory. AFB1 standard was obtained from Pribolab Pte. Ltd (Bejing, China), other analytical reagents were purchased from Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Chromatographically grade solvents (i.e., methanol, acetonitrile) were purchased from TEDIA (Shanghai, China). The analytical grade (purity > 98%) of ABTS [2, 2-azino-bis-(3-ethyl benzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid)], AS (acetosyringone) and SA (syringaldehyde) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). The strains, plasmids and the PCR primers used in this study are shown in Table 1. The antibiotics (i.e., gentamycin and kanamycin) used for mutant screening were purchased from Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and the antibiotic solutions were prepared by diluting in distilled water at the final concentration of 50 μg/mL for each. Bacterial culture media of Luria-Bertani (LB), nutrient broth (NB) and nutrient agar (NA) are the products of Difco (Lawrence, Kansas, USA). The affinity chromatography resin (ProteIniso? GST Resin) used for heterologous expressed protein purification is the TransGen Biotech (Beijing, China) product. The DNA polymerase (PrimerSTAR Max DNA Polymerase), restriction endonuclease (XbaⅠ and Hind Ⅲ) and DNA ligase (solution Ⅰ) used in this study are the products of TaKaRa (Dalian, China). Agarose gel DNA recovery kit is the Tiangen (Beijing China) product, and the plasmid MiniPrep kit is product of AxyPrep (Axygen, CA, USA).
Table 1. Thestrains, plasmids and primers used in this study
Strains, plasmids or primers Characterization Reference or restriction sites
Strain CW117
pGEX/lc1 LC1 expression strain This study
pGEX/lc2 LC2 expression strain This study
CW117?lc1 The gene lc1 deletion mutant of CW117 This study
CW117?lc1-lc2 The gene lc1 and lc2 deletion mutant of CW117 This study
Escherichia coli Trans1-T1 phage resistant Receptive cells TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China
Escherichia coli BL21 Expression cells TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China
pK18mobsacB Allelic exchange vector, KanR [40]
lc1-F* CGGGATCCATGGCCGCCGCGTTGCC BamHⅠ
lc1-R CCGCTCGAGTCACCGCGCCATCCACAC Xho
lc2-F CGGAATTCATGAAAAACGATTTCCTTTCCG EcoRⅠ
lc2-R CCGCTCGAGTCATGCCTCGATCCTCACT Xho
lc1-US-F GCTCTAGAGCGTCGGTATCGGTATGCG Xba
lc1-US-R ACTGGCGGGTGGACCTGTA
lc1-DS-F# gtacaggtccacccgccagtGCCCAGGTTGAAACTGTCG Lowercase indicates adapter sequence for overlapping PCR
lc1-DS-R CCCAAGCTTATCCCGCTGTCGGTCCTGT Hind Ⅲ
ver1-F CCTGCCCGGCCTAATCCA lc1 deletion identification primer
ver1-R TCCCGCCTGAGCGAATGG lc1 deletion identification primer
lc2-US-F GCTCTAGACCGGAATCAGGTGGGTATCG Xba
lc2-US-R GGGAACTCCATCGGCCGC
lc2-DS-F gggcggccgatggagttcccAGACGACGACCCGATCCCT lowercase indicates adapter sequence for overlapping PCR
lc2-DS-R CCCAAGCTTCGCGTCCAGCGACCACTC Hind Ⅲ
ver2-F CGGGTGGCTGGACTCGT lc2 deletion identification primer
ver2-R CACCACGGTGAGATGGAATG lc2 deletion identification primer
*Underlined sequences represent the digestion site.


表选项






1.2 Laccase genes cloning, expression and AFB1 degradation During genome sequence analysis, two laccase genes (i.e., lc1 and lc2) were screened from complete genome sequence (NZ_CP012900.1) of strain S. acidaminiphila ZAC14D2_NAIMI4_2 which showed the closest taxonomic affiliation to strain CW117. Laccase genes were amplified by using CW117 genomic DNA and the primer pairs of lc1-F/R and lc2-F/R with PrimerSTAR Max DNA Polymerase (Table 1). The PCR condition was 5 min denaturing at 98 ℃, followed by 30 cycles of 5 s denaturing at 98 ℃, 5 s annealing at 61 ℃, 5 s extension at 72 ℃, and a final 10 min extension at 72 ℃. The purified PCR product and expression plasmid pGEX-4T-1 were digested by BamHⅠ (or EcoRⅠ) and XhoⅠ at 37 ℃ overnight, respectively. The digest mixture contained 1.0 μL XhoⅠ, 1.0 μL BamH Ⅰ (or EcoRⅠ), 1 μg of purified lc1 or lc2 (or 1 μg pGEX-4T-1) and 5 μL of 10×H buffer (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and then supplemented distilled water to 50 μL. The digested lc1 (or lc2) fragment and expression plasmid was purified using an agarose gel DNA recovery kit according to manufacturer's instructions, and the purified lc1 or lc2 fragment was ligated to digested pGEX-4T-1 by incubation with solution Ⅰ DNA ligase for 1 h at 16 ℃. The ligation mixture consists of 2 μL digested pGEX-4T-1, 4 μL digested lc1 or lc2 and 6 μL solution Ⅰ DNA ligase. After ligation, 5 μL of the recombinant plasmid (pGEX/lc1 or pGEX/lc2) was transformed to E. coli Trans1-T1 by heated shock and identified by PCR sequencing. The positive clone was enriched in AmpR LB broth which containing 50 μg/mL ampicillin, and the recombinant plasmid was extracted by an Plasmid MiniPrep kit according to manufacturer's instructions and transformed to E. coli BL21 by heated shock.
The laccase transformant (containing pGEX/lc1 or pGEX/lc2) was incubated in AmpR LB brothat 16 ℃ with agitation of 150 r/min; until the culture OD600 reached 0.6, about 0.2 mmol/L isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added, and followed by additional 4 hours incubation. The recombinant proteins of rLC1 and rLC2 were purified by ProteIniso GST resin according to manufacturer's instructions. The purity of obtained rLC1 (or rLC2) recombinant protein was examined by SDS-PAGE (BioRad, Hercules, USA), and the protein concentration was evaluated by spectrophotometrically method[31]. The method of Cai et al.[30] was used to determine the rLCs' AFB1 degradation activity, and the method of Loi et al.[21, 23] with minor modification was used to evaluate the redox mediators' (i.e., ABTS, AS and SA) assistant effects on AFB1 degradation. Briefly, 0.1 mL of purified rLC1 (1.0 mg/mL) and 0.1 mL redox mediator (50 mmol/L) were added to 0.3 mL AFB1 working solution (40 μg/L) to make the final degradation mixture. The redox mediator and AFB1 working solution were prepared by glycine- hydrochloric acid buffer (pH 4.0). The redox mediator (without rLC1) degradation test and rLC1 (without redox mediator) degradation test were selected as controls. The degradation tubes were incubated for 24 h at 37 ℃, and AFB1 residues were analyzed by using HPLC[32].
1.3 Construction of mutant CW117?lc1 and double mutant CW117?lc1-lc2 The protocols of recombinant plasmid pK18mobsacB_US-DS construction and the laccase mutants CW117?lc1and CW117?lc1-lc2 screening (as shown in Figure 1) were followed as the methods of previous[33-35]. The upstream (lc1-US) and downstream (lc1-DS) DNA fragments which ?anking the lc1 open reading frame (ORF) were amplified by PCR using the PrimerSTAR Max DNA Polymerase. A primer pair of lc1-US-F and lc1-US-R, and a primer pair of lc1-DS-F and lc1-DS-R were employed for lc1-US and lc1-DS in PCR amplification, respectively (Table 1). The PCR condition of lc1-US (or lc1-DS) were 5 min denaturing at 98 ℃, followed by 30 cycles of 5 s denaturing at 98 ℃, 5 s annealing at 61 ℃, 5 s extension at 72 ℃, and a final 10 min extension at 72 ℃. After PCR amplification, both PCR products were purified using an agarose gel DNA recovery kit according to manufacturer's instruction. The overlap PCR was performed using the primer pair of lc1-US-F and lc1-DS-R (Table 1) with the PrimerSTAR Max DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), the purified PCR products of lc1-US and lc1-DS (1 μL for each) were selected as DNA templates. The overlap PCR conditions of lc1-US-DS were 5 min denaturing at 98 ℃, followed by 30 cycles of 5 s denaturing at 98 ℃, 10 s annealing at 61 ℃, 10 s extension at 72 ℃, and a final 10 min extension at 72 ℃.
Figure 1 Schematic description of recombinant plasmid pK18mobsacB_US-DS construction and gene mutant screening. A: pK18mobsacB_US-DS construction; B: genemutant screening.
图选项





The purified overlap PCR product (lc1-US-DS) and suicide plasmid pK18mobsacB were digested with Hind Ⅲ and XbaⅠat 37 ℃ overnight, respectively. The digest mixture contained 1.0 μL XbaⅠ, 1.0 μL Hind Ⅲ, 1.0 μL purified lc1-US-DS (or 1 μg pK18mobsacB) and 5 μL of 10×M buffer (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), then supplemented distilled water to 50 μL. The digested lc1-US-DS fragment and suicide plasmid was purified using an agarose gel DNA recovery kit, respectively. The purified lc1-US-DS fragment was ligated to digested pK18mobsacB by incubation with solution Ⅰ DNA ligase 1 h at 16 ℃. The ligation mixture consists of 2 μL digested pK18mobsacB, 4 μL digested lc1-US-DS and 6 μL solutionⅠ DNA ligase. After ligation, 5 μL of the ligation product were transformed to E. coli Trans1-T1, and screened by KanR LB agar which containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin. Positive clones were identified by PCR sequencing, and the successful recombinant plasmid was defined as pK18mobsacB_lc1-US-DS. The positive clone was enriched by KanR LB medium, and extracted by a Plasmid MiniPrep kit. The recombinant plasmid pK18mobsacB_lc1-US-DS was transformed into strain CW117 (wild-type) by electroporation method as previous[36]. After transformation, cell solution was evenly coated on the KanR nutrient agar (NA). Single colony on KanR NA screening plates was inoculated into 5 mL KanR NB, and incubated at 37 ℃, with agitation of 180 r/min. Until the culture OD600 reached 0.6, bacteria cells (0.5 mL) were collected by centrifugation (5000×g), and washed twice by sterile NB, and resuspended in 0.5 mL NB. The serial NB diluted bacteria suspensions were coated on the NA containing 13% sucrose (named "sucrose screening agar"), and the positive clones in sucrose plate were rescreened by KanR NA which containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin. The resulting colonies which grown on sucrose plate but sensitive to 50 μg/mL kanamycin were considered as the mutant candidate of CW117?lc1. The mutant candidate was identified by PCR sequencing with PrimerSTAR Max DNA Polymerase, and the primer pair of ver1-F and ver1-R (Table 1). The PCR conditions were 5 min denaturing at 98 ℃, followed by 30 cycles of 5 s denaturing at 98 ℃, 5 s annealing at 55 ℃, 10 s extension at 72 ℃, and a final 10 min extension at 72 ℃.
The construction and screening protocols of double gene lc1 and lc2 mutant CW117?lc1-lc2 were followed the construction and screening methods of CW117?lc1, and the mutant CW117?lc1 was selected as starting strain (original strain) for CW117?lc1-lc2 construction. The PCR primer pairs of lc2-US (lc2-US-F, lc2-US-R), lc2-DS (lc2-DS-F, lc2-DS-R) and gene lc2 deletion verification (ver2-F and ver2-R) were shown as Table 1.
1.4 The AFB1 degradation tests by wide-type strain and mutants Strains of CW117, CW117?lc1 and CW117?lc1-lc2 were inoculated on NA, and single colonies were selected, inoculated and incubated in 5 mL NB at 37 ℃, with agitation of 180 r/min. Until the culture OD600 absorbance reached 0.6, the fresh culture (0.5 mL) transferred to 50 mL NB containing 20 μg/L AFB1. The degradation tests were performed at 37 ℃, with agitation of 180 r/min. The 50 mL NB containing 20 μg/L AFB1 without bacteria inoculation was used as control. During degradation, AFB1 residues at 0th, 12th, 24th, 36th, 48th, 60th and 72th hour were determined by HPLC following the method as previous[31].
1.5 The AFB1 degradation tests by culture supernatant of wide-type strain and mutants Fresh culture (0.5 mL) of CW117, CW117?lc1 or CW117?lc1-lc2 was inoculated into 50 mL NB, incubated at 37 ℃ with agitation of 180 r/min for 48 h. The bacterial culture (CW117, CW117?lc1 or CW117?lc1-lc2) was centrifuged at 5000×g for 10 min at 4 ℃, and the supernatant and cell pellet were separated. Culture supernatant was prepared by passing the supernatant through a sterile filter (0.22 μm, Millipore, Billerica, USA). During the degradation test, 25 mL culture supernatant was mixed with 25 mL PBS (pH 6.8) which containing 40 μg/L AFB1.The degradation tubes were incubated at 37 ℃ without agitation. During degradation, AFB1 residues at 0th, 1th, 3th, 6th, 9th, 12th and 24th hour were determined by HPLC following the method as previous[31].
1.6 Data analysis There were three biological repeats in the experimental data. One way ANOVA and t-test (*P < 0.05) were used to analyze the data by Graphpad prism (5.0) software.
2 Results 2.1 Laccase genes cloning, expression and protein purification As shown in Figure 2, gene lc1 (780 bp) was cloned by the primer pair of lc1-F/R and the PCR condition, and recombinant plasmid pGEX/lc1 was successfully constructed and transformed to E. coli BL21. Similarly, gene lc2 (1773 bp) was cloned by the primer pair of lc2-F/R and the PCR condition, and recombinant plasmid pGEX/lc2 was also successfully constructed and transformed to E. coli BL21 (Figure 3). After heterologous expressed in E. coli BL21, the recombinant proteins of rLC1 and rLC2 were purified by affinity chromatography by using ProteIniso? GST Resin. The size of GST tagfrom pGEX-4T-1 is about 26 kDa, and the protein sizes of LC1 and LC2 were about 27.1 kDa and 65.08 kDa, respectively; thereby, the recombinant protein sizes of rLC1 and rLC2 are about 53 kDa and 91 kDa, respectively. As shown in Figure 4, a single protein band of 45–60 kDa was observed in lane 2, and a single protein band of 80–100 kDa was observed in lane 3 in SDS-PAGE, and the results indicated that genes lc1 and lc2 were successfully expressed in E. coli BL21, and electrophoretic homogeneous rLC1 and rLC2 were obtained by ProteIniso? GST Resin.
Figure 2 Gene cloning and heterologous expression (pGEX/lc1) of laccase gene lc1 in strain E. coli BL21. A: the PCR fragment of gene lc1. B: lc1 PCR product and pGEX plasmid double digestion (M: DNA marker; lane 1: lc1 double digestion; lane 2: lc1 PCR product; lane 3: pGEX-4T-1 double digestion products; lane 4: pGEX-4T-1). C: lc1 PCR verification from recombinant plasmid pGEX/lc1 in E. coli Trans1-T1. D: lc1 PCR verification from recombinant plasmid pGEX/lc1 in E. coli BL21.
图选项





Figure 3 Gene cloning and heterologous expression (pGEX/lc2) of laccase gene lc1 in strain E. coli BL21. A: the PCR fragment of gene lc2. B: lc2 PCR product and pGEX plasmid double digestion. M: DNA marker; lane 1: lc2 double digestion; lane 2: lc2 PCR product; lane 3: pGEX-4T-1 double digestion; lane 4: pGEX-4T-1. C: lc2 PCR verification from recombinant plasmid pGEX/lc2 in E. coli Trans1-T1. D: lc2 PCR verification from recombinant plasmid pGEX/lc2 in E. coli BL21.
图选项





Figure 4 SDS-PAGE analysis of rLC1 and rLC2 purified protein. M: protein marker; lane 1: purified protein of GST tag; lane 2: purified protein rLC1; lane 3: purified protein rLC2.
图选项





2.2 Degradation activity of laccase, and the redox mediators assistance to rLC1 The preliminary test showed that 24 hours AFB1 degradation ratio of rLC1 was about 12% in degradation condition of this study, but degradation activity was not observed on rLC2. As indicated by Loi et al.[21, 23], redox mediators can enhance the AFB1 degradation activity of microbial laccases. In this study, the redox mediators of ABTS, AS and SA were tested for aflatoxin degradation assistance to rLCs. As a result, the three redox mediators of ABTS, AS and SA equal significantly enhanced the AFB1 degradation activity of rLC1; the most significant improvement was observed on ABTS as the additive, which improved the degradation ratio from 10.4% to 27.0% (Figure 5). However, the redox mediator ABTS also showed the AFB1 degradation activity (5.6%) which was not observed on the other two redox mediators (Figure 5).
Figure 5 Aflatoxin B1 degrading activity of rLC1 supplemented with different redox mediators. A: the effect of ABTS. B: the effect of AS. C: the effect of SA. **: P < 0.01, and ***: P < 0.001, compared with the control (Laccase group).
图选项





2.3 Mutants CW117?lc1 and CW117?lc1-lc2 construction By the PCR primer pairs of lc1-US and lc1-DS, the expected fragments of upstream (US, 1006 bp, Figure 6-A) and downstream (DS, 860 bp, Figure 6-B) flanking the gene lc1 were successfully cloned. Then, the US and DS fragments were further lingated by overlap PCR with the primers of lc1-US-F and lc1-DS-R, and the overlap PCR product of lc1-US-DS fragment was 1886 bp. After the purification and sequencing validation, the purified PCR product lc1-US-DS was digested with Hind Ⅲ and XbaⅠ, and ligated to digested suicide plasmid pK18mobsacB. The recombinant plasmid pK18mobsacB_lc1-US-DS was successfully constructed and validated in E. coli Trans1-T1 by PCR sequencing (Figure 6-C). After electroporation, the mutant CW117?lc1 was produced by 13% sucrose and screened by KanR NA, and validated by PCR sequencing. The PCR fragment on the successful mutant CW117?lc1 was expected as 2202 bp, but the PCR fragment on wild-type CW117 was 2683 bp by using the same primer pair of ver1-F and ver1-R (Table 1). The screening results of this study showed that the band sizes (about 2.7 kb) of lanes 5, 6, 10 were consistent to wild-type CW117; while, the band sizes (about 2.2 kb) of lanes 1, 4 and 8 were considered as mutant CW117?lc1candidates (Figure 6-D). The screening results indicated that the monoclonal strains represented by lanes 5, 6, 10 probably restored to wild type, and the monoclonal strains represented by lanes 1, 4 and 8 might be the expected mutants. PCR sequencing results further validated the colonies from lanes 1, 4 and 8 was the positive mutant CW117?lc1.
Figure 6 The gene lc1 mutant construction from wide-type strain CW117. A: the upstream PCR fragment of gene lc1. B: the downstream PCR fragment of gene lc1. C: the PCR fragment of lc1-US-DS from pK18mobsacB_US-DS. D: the PCR validation on gene lc1 mutant screening. M: DNA marker; lanes 1, 4, 8: positive candidates; lanes 5–6: negative colonies; lane 10: wild-type CW117.
图选项





By the PCR primer pairs of lc2-US and lc2-DS, we can see that the upstream and downstream fragments flanking the gene lc2 were successfully amplified and connected together (Figure 7-A, B and C). The PCR fragment on the successful mutant CW117?lc1-lc2 was expected as 1637 bp, but the PCR fragment on starting strain CW117?lc1 without lc2 deficiency was 3410 bp using the same primer pair of ver2-F and ver2-R (Table 1). The screening result showed that the band size of lane 2 were consistent to starting strain CW117?lc1; while, the band size of lane 1 was considered as mutant CW117?lc1-lc2 candidate (Figure 7-D). PCR sequencing validated the clone from lane 1 was the positive mutant CW117?lc1-lc2.
Figure 7 The genes lc1-lc2 double mutant construction from staring strain CW117?lc1. A: the upstream PCR fragment of gene lc2. B: the downstream PCR fragment of gene lc2. C: the PCR fragment of lc2-US-DS from pK18mobsacB_US-DS. D: the PCR validation on gene lc1-lc2 double mutant screening. M: DNA marker; lane 1: positive candidate; lane 2: staring strain CW117?lc1.
图选项





2.4 The AFB1 degrading activity of wide-type and mutants The degradation ratios of wild-type strain CW117 and the mutants (CW117?lc1 and CW117?lc1-lc2) were about 23% after 12 h incubation (no significant difference). After 24 h incubation, the degradation ratio of wide-type increased to 42.2% which a little higher than that of mutant CW117?lc1 (35.9%) and mutant CW117?lc1-lc2 (34.7%); however, the three strains (wide-type and two mutants) showed no significant difference from each other after 48 h incubation (Figure 8-A).
Figure 8 The AFB1 degradation dynamics of wide-type and mutants. A: the degradation dynamics of bacterial strains. B: the degradation dynamics of culture supernatant. Error bars indicate Mean±SD.
图选项





2.5 The AFB1 degradation activity of culture supernatant from wide-type and mutants In previous study, we found that the AFB1 degradation agent(s) mainly distributed in culture supernatants (cell-free) the strain CW117[30]; thereby, the culture supernatants from the wide-type strain and mutants were further evaluated here. Similar as the AFB1 degradation dynamics by bacterial strains (i.e., CW117, CW117?lc1and CW117?lc1-lc2), the degradation activity by culture supernatants from wild type and mutants showed no significant difference from each other. The culture supernatants from three type strains (wide-type, lc1 mutant and double genes mutant) degraded above 50% AFB1 within 3 h incubation, and degradation ratios increased to 80% within 9 h incubation (Figure 8-B).
3 Discussion The degradation result of culture supernatant of CW117 was similar to the degradation characteristics of several previous studies, which equally showed the aflatoxin degrading agents in culture supernatant. For instance, the AFB1 degradation ratios by culture supernatant of Bacillus shakletonii L7[11], Bacillus velezensis DY3108[37], Stenotrophomonas maltopholia 35-3[18], Mycobacterium FA4[14] and Rhodococcus erythropolis[16] were 77.9%, 81.97%, 78.7%, 80% and 66.8% within 72 hours, respectively. The supernatants of Candida versatilis CGMCC 3790[38] and Tetragenococcus halophilus CGMCC 3792[39] also showed degradation activity to AFB1, the degradation ratios by the two strains' culture supernatant were 29.61% and 14% in 60 minutes, respectively. The similar degradation characteristics of the microbial strains might indicate the same degrading mechanism.
The redox mediators improvement on rLC1 of this study were much lower than the study of Lac2 from Pleurotus pulmonarius[21], which obtained an efficient degradation of AFB1 by adding 10 mmol/L AS (degradation ratio of 90%), SA (degradation ratio of 72%) and ABTS (degradation ratio of 81%) as redox mediators. Similarly, the additive improvements on rLC1 in this study were lower than the study of laccase Ery4 from Pleurotus eryngii[23], which obtained AFB1 degradation ratios of 73%, 68%, and 39% by adding 1 mmol/L AS, 1 mmol/L SA and 10 mmol/L ABTS, respectively. The original laccases of Lac2 and Ery4 also showed more efficient degradation than rLC1 of this study.
Substrate AFB1 in the culture medium could be degraded completely by any of the wide-type or mutant strain with increasing of incubation time. This result indicated that gene lc1 showed degrading activity to AFB1, but the laccases (i.e., lc1 and lc2) could not be considered as the primary degradation agent in Stenotrophomonas sp. CW117.
The AFB1 degradation ratio of Lac2 purified from Pleurotus pulmonarius was 23% within 72 h, this degradation activity was similar to rLC1 of this study[21]. However, some other laccases, especially of laccases from several fungi strains showed more efficient aflatoxins degradation activity than rLC1. For instance, the laccase Ery4 from Pleurotus eryngii showed an AFB1 degradation ratio of 74% within 72 h[23]; the purified laccase (1 U/mL) from Aspergillus niger showed degradation ratio of 87.3% to AFB1 within 72 h[26]; the laccase from Trametes versicolor showed a degradation ratio of 67% to AFB1 within 48 h[29].
These studies suggested that laccases have been recognized as an effective aflatoxin degradation agent and widely distributed in microbial strains. For some degrading strains (e.g., Pleurotus pulmonarius and Stenotrophomonas sp. of this study), the laccases degradation activity was not as efficient as their host strains. However, whether laccase(s) were the sole degradation agents in these degrading strains are not investigated further, the exact reasons for the degradation difference between laccase(s) and the host strains still unknown. In this study, when the laccase genes lc1 and lc2 were deleted, the mutant CW117?lc1and CW117?lc1-lc2 showed the similar degradation activity to wide-type strain CW117. The validation results of lc1 and lc2 degradation test in vivo indicated that laccases are not the sole degrading agents (even not the primary degrading agent) in Stenotrophomonas sp. CW117.
Degradation activity of culture supernatants were much higher than those of bacterial strains on the first 12 h. As we know, during the strains degradation test, first 12–24 hours are required for bacterial growth, but degrading agent(s) already existed in culture supernatants at the beginning of the test. The culture supernatant degradation tests equally showed that the laccase genes were not the sole (or even not the critical) degrading agent in Stenotrophomonas sp. CW117.
4 Conclusion Laccases are the well-known aflatoxins degrading agent and widely distributed in microbial strains. In several previous studies, the aflatoxin degradation activities of laccases were not as efficient as the host strains, but the exact reasons were not investigated. In this study, two laccase genes (lc1 and lc2) were isolated and evaluated for AFB1 degradation by heterologous expression. Compared to host strain CW117, laccase rLC1 showed much lower AFB1 degrading activity and rLC2 showed no activity on AFB1 transformation. The degradation results of mutants CW117?lc1and CW117?lc1-lc2 indicated that laccases are not the sole degrading agents (even not the critical factor) in Stenotrophomonas sp. CW117. And the finding of this study should be significant to further mechanism investigations on aflatoxins degradation.

References
[1] Wogan GN. Chemical nature and biological effects of the aflatoxins. Bacteriology Reviews, 1966, 30(2): 460-470. DOI:10.1128/BR.30.2.460-470.1966
[2] Karlovsky P. Biological detoxification of fungal toxins and its use in plant breeding, feed and food production. Natural Toxins, 1999, 7(1): 1-23. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1522-7189(199902)7:1<1::AID-NT37>3.0.CO;2-9
[3] Mishra HN, Das C. A review on biological control and metabolism of aflatoxin. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2003, 43(3): 245-264.
[4] Liu DL, Yao DS, Liang YQ, Zhou TH, Song YP, Zhao L, Ma L. Production, purification, and characterization of an intracellular aflatoxin-detoxifizyme from Armillariella tabescens (E-20). Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2001, 39(5): 461-466.
[5] Cao H, Liu DL, Mo XM, Xie CF, Yao DS. A fungal enzyme with the ability of aflatoxin B1 conversion:Purification and ESI-MS/MS identification. Microbiological Research, 2011, 166(6): 475-483. DOI:10.1016/j.micres.2010.09.002
[6] Xu TT, Xie CF, Yao DS, Zhou CZ, Liu JS. Crystal structures of Aflatoxin-oxidase from Armillariella tabescens reveal a dual activity enzyme. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2017, 494(3/4): 621-625.
[7] Motomura M, Toyomasu T, Mizuno K, Shinozawa T. Purification and characterization of an aflatoxin degradation enzyme from Pleurotus ostreatus. Microbiological Research, 2003, 158(3): 237-242. DOI:10.1078/0944-5013-00199
[8] Altalhi AD. Plasmid-mediated detoxification of mycotoxin zearalenone in Pseudomonas sp. ZEA-1. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2007, 3(3): 150-158. DOI:10.3844/ajbbsp.2007.150.158
[9] Farzaneh M, Shi ZQ, Ghassempour A, Sedaghat N, Ahmadzadeh M, Mirabolfathy M, Javan-Nikkhah M. Aflatoxin B1 degradation by Bacillus subtilis UTBSP1 isolated from pistachio nuts of Iran. Food Control, 2012, 23(1): 100-106.
[10] Petchkongkaew A, Taillandier P, Gasaluck P, Lebrihi A. Isolation of Bacillus spp. from Thai fermented soybean (Thua-nao):screening for aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A detoxification. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2008, 104(5): 1495-1502. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03700.x
[11] Xu L, Eisa Ahmed MF, Sangare L, Zhao YJ, Selvaraj JN, Xing FG, Wang Y, Yang HP, Liu Y. Novel aflatoxin-degrading enzyme from Bacillus shackletonii L7. Toxins, 2017, 9(1): 36.
[12] Line JE, Brackett RE, Wilkinson RE. Evidence for degradation of aflatoxin B1 by Flavobacterium aurantiacum. Journal of Food Protection, 1994, 57(9): 788-791. DOI:10.4315/0362-028X-57.9.788
[13] Smiley RD, Draughon FA. Preliminary evidence that degradation of aflatoxin B1 by Flavobacterium aurantiacum is enzymatic. Journal of Food Protection, 2000, 63(3): 415-418. DOI:10.4315/0362-028X-63.3.415
[14] Hormisch D, Hormisch D, Brost I, Kohring GW, Giffhorn F, Kroppenstedt RM, Stackebrandt E, F?rber P, Holzapfel WH. Mycobacterium fluoranthenivorans sp. nov., a fluoranthene and aflatoxin B1 degrading bacterium from contaminated soil of a former coal gas plant. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 2004, 27(6): 653-660. DOI:10.1078/0723202042369866
[15] Teniola OD, Addo PA, Brost IM, F?rberc P, Jany KD, Alberts JF, van Zyl WH, Steyn PS, Holzapfelc WH. Degradation of aflatoxin B1 by cell-free extracts of Rhodococcus erythropolis and Mycobacterium fluoranthenivorans sp. nov. DSM44556T. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2005, 105(2): 111-117.
[16] Alberts JF, Engelbrecht Y, Steyn PS, Holzapfel WH, Van Zyl WH. Biological degradation of aflatoxin B1 by Rhodococcus erythropolis cultures. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2006, 109(1/2): 121-126.
[17] Kong Q, Zhai CP, Guan B, Li CJ, Shan SH, Yu JJ. Mathematic modeling for optimum conditions on aflatoxin B1 degradation by the aerobic bacterium Rhodococcus erythropolis. Toxins, 2012, 4(11): 1181-1195.
[18] Guan S, Ji C, Zhou T, Li JX, Ma QG, Niu TG. Aflatoxin B1 degradation by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and other microbes selected using coumarin medium. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2008, 9(8): 1489-1503.
[19] Yehia RS. Aflatoxin detoxification by manganese peroxidase purified from Pleurotus ostreatus. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2014, 45(1): 127-134.
[20] Taylor MC, Jackson CJ, Tattersall DB, French N, Peat TS, Newman J, Briggs LJ, Lapalikar GV, Campbell PM, Scott C, Russell RJ, Oakeshott JG. Identification and characterization of two families of F420H2-dependent reductases from Mycobacteria that catalyse aflatoxin degradation. Molecular Microbiology, 2010, 78(3): 561-575.
[21] Loi M, Fanelli F, Zucca P, Liuzzi VC, Quintieri L, Cimmarusti MT, Monaci L, Haidukowski M, Logrieco AF, Sanjust E, Mulè G. Aflatoxin B1 and M1 degradation by Lac2 from Pleurotus pulmonarius and redox mediators. Toxins, 2016, 8(9): 245.
[22] Branà MT, Cimmarusti MT, Haidukowski M, Logrieco AF, Altomare C. Bioremediation of aflatoxin B1-contaminated maize by king oyster mushroom (Pleurotus eryngii). PLoS One, 2017, 12(8): e0182574.
[23] Loi M, Fanelli F, Cimmarusti MT, Mirabelli V, Haidukowski M, Logrieco AF, Caliandro R, Mule G. In vitro single and combined mycotoxins degradation by Ery4 laccase from Pleurotus eryngii and redox mediators. Food Control, 2018, 90: 401-406.
[24] Alexandre G, Zhulin IB. Laccases are widespread in bacteria. Trends in Biotechnology, 2000, 18(2): 41-42.
[25] Hoegger PJ, Kilaru S, James TY, Thacker JR, Kües U. Phylogenetic comparison and classification of laccase and related multicopper oxidase protein sequences. The FEBS Journal, 2006, 273(10): 2308-2326.
[26] Alberts JF, Gelderblom WCA, Botha A, Van Zyl WH. Degradation of aflatoxin B1 by fungal laccase enzymes. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2009, 135(1): 47-52.
[27] Claus H. Laccases:structure, reactions, distribution. Micron, 2004, 35(1/2): 93-96.
[28] Dellafiora L, Galaverna G, Reverberi M, Dall'Asta C. Degradation of aflatoxins by means of laccases from Trametes versicolor:an in silico insight. Toxins, 2017, 9(1): 17.
[29] Zeinvand-Lorestani H, Sabzevari O, Setayesh N, Amini M, Nili-Ahmadabadi A, Faramarzi MA. Comparative study of in vitro prooxidative properties and genotoxicity induced by aflatoxin B1 and its laccase-mediated detoxification products. Chemosphere, 2015, 135: 1-6.
[30] Cai MY, QianYY, Chen N, Ling TJ, Wang JJ, Jiang H, Wang X, Qi KZ, Zhou Y. Detoxification of aflatoxin B1 by Stenotrophomonas sp. CW117 and characterization the thermophilic degradation process. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 261: 114178.
[31] Pace CN, Vajdos F, Fee L, Grimsley G, Gray T. How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein. Protein Science, 1995, 4(11): 2411-2423.
[32] Mwakinyali SE, Ming Z, Xie HL, Zhang Q, Li PW. Investigation and characterization of Myroides odoratimimusstrain 3J2MO aflatoxin B1 degradation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2019, 67(16): 4595-4602.
[33] Sch?fer A, Tauch A, J?ger W, Kalinowski J, Thierbach G, Pühler A. Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19:selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene, 1994, 145(1): 69-73.
[34] Sun J, Qian SQ, Lu J, Liu Y, Lu FX, Bie XM, Lu ZX. Knockout of rapC improves the bacillomycin D yield based on de novo genome sequencing of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens fmbJ. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66(17): 4422-4430.
[35] Wang D, Xue HY, Wang YW, Yin RC, Xie F, Luo L. The Sinorhizobium meliloti ntrX gene is involved in succinoglycan production, motility, and symbiotic nodulation on alfalfa. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2013, 79(23): 7150-7159.
[36] Sheng YL, Mancino V, Birren B. Transformation of Escherichia coli with large DNA molecules by electroporation. Nucleic Acids Research, 1995, 23(11): 1990-1996.
[37] Shu X, Wang YT, Zhou Q, Li MH, Hu H, Ma YH, Chen X, Ni J, Zhao WW, Huang SW, Wu LF. Biological degradation of aflatoxin B1 by cell-free extracts of Bacillus velezensis DY3108 with broad PH stability and excellent thermostability. Toxins, 2018, 10(8): 330.
[38] Li JL, Huang J, Jin Y, Wu CD, Shen DZ, Zhang SY, Zhou RQ. Mechanism and kinetics of degrading aflatoxin B1 by salt tolerant Candida versatilis CGMCC 3790. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 359: 382-387.
[39] Li JL, Huang J, Jin Y, Wu CD, Shen DZ, Zhang SY, Zhou RQ. Aflatoxin B1 degradation by salt tolerant Tetragenococcus halophilus CGMCC 3792. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2018, 121: 430-436.
[40] Harighi B. Genetic evidence for CheB-and CheR-dependent chemotaxis system in A. tumefaciens toward acetosyringone. Microbiological Research, 2009, 164(6): 634-641.

相关话题/基因 通信 原文 实验 实验室

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 丝裂原活化蛋白激酶基因CfMKK1调控果生炭疽菌的生长发育和致病力
    丝裂原活化蛋白激酶基因CfMKK1调控果生炭疽菌的生长发育和致病力肖宇,李河南方人工林病虫害防控国家林草局重点实验室,森林有害生物防控湖南省重点实验室,经济林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,中南林业科技大学,湖南长沙410004收稿日期:2020-03-07;修回日期:2020-04-28;网络出版日期 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 基因编辑技术对大肠杆菌yjjW基因点突变的两步法策略
    基因编辑技术对大肠杆菌yjjW基因点突变的两步法策略张琦,梁雅静,张宇馨,陈玲慧,韩钟娆,李贝贝,金一,何晓青北京林业大学生物科学与技术学院,北京100083收稿日期:2020-03-15;修回日期:2020-05-12;网络出版日期:2020-07-09基金项目:国家自然科学基金(31971398 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 氮磷营养盐添加对二甲基巯基丙酸内盐合成与降解细菌及其功能基因的影响
    氮磷营养盐添加对二甲基巯基丙酸内盐合成与降解细菌及其功能基因的影响谭斯尹1,孙浩1,梁金昌1,张晓华1,2,31.中国海洋大学海洋生命学院,山东青岛266003;2.青岛海洋科学与技术试点国家实验室海洋生态与环境科学功能实验室,山东青岛266071;3.中国海洋大学深海圈层与地球系统前沿科学中心,山 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 四环素与3, 4-苯并芘复合污染对抗性基因tetA(C)产生高抗性突变的影响
    四环素与3,4-苯并芘复合污染对抗性基因tetA(C)产生高抗性突变的影响俞珊珊,李根,黄萌,程思,武俊南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院,江苏南京210095收稿日期:2019-10-09;修回日期:2019-12-25;网络出版日期:2020-05-20基金项目:国家自然科学基金(31470551, ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 鼠伤寒沙门氏菌Ⅵ型分泌系统相关基因敲除及其功能特性
    鼠伤寒沙门氏菌Ⅵ型分泌系统相关基因敲除及其功能特性王志林1,董震1,2,3,武珊珊1,敬文宪1,陈启伟1,尚佑军1,王琬凝1,刘永生1,兰喜11.中国农业科学院兰州兽医研究所,家畜疫病病原生物学国家重点实验室,甘肃兰州730046;2.华南农业大学动物医学院,广东省重大临床动物疾病预防控制重点实验室 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 副溶血弧菌的毒力基因表达调控的分子机制
    副溶血弧菌的毒力基因表达调控的分子机制张婷,杨梦华浙江农林大学动物科技学院,浙江杭州311300收稿日期:2019-10-15;修回日期:2020-01-01;网络出版日期:2020-06-11基金项目:国家自然科学基金(31470244,31770151);浙江农林大学科研发展基金(2013FR0 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 基因组编辑对酿酒酵母DNA的损伤作用及修复响应
    基因组编辑对酿酒酵母DNA的损伤作用及修复响应张首1,2,王震2,蔺玉萍2,戎倩倩2,3,王丽贤2,齐显尼2,刘浩1,王钦宏21.天津科技大学生物工程学院,天津300457;2.中国科学院天津工业生物技术研究所,中国科学院系统微生物工程重点实验室,天津300308;3.中国科学院大学,北京10004 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • lpxL和lpxM基因对O1、O78血清型禽致病性大肠杆菌毒力的影响
    lpxL和lpxM基因对O1、O78血清型禽致病性大肠杆菌毒力的影响屈香,杨梓纯,许炎辉,王娅玲,喻婷,樊毛迪,王航,高清清,高崧,刘秀梵江苏省动物重要疫病与人兽共患病防控协同创新中心,农业部禽用生物制剂创制重点实验室,扬州大学兽医学院,江苏扬州225009收稿日期:2020-01-20;修回日期: ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 创伤弧菌毒力相关因子的全基因组关联分析研究
    创伤弧菌毒力相关因子的全基因组关联分析研究张嘉鑫1,2,武雅蓉2,杨超2,康琳2,王景林1,2,崔玉军1,21.安徽医科大学,安徽合肥230032;2.军事科学院军事医学研究院微生物流行病研究所,病原微生物生物安全国家重点实验室,北京100071收稿日期:2019-12-31;修回日期:2020-0 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26
  • 海洋氮循环过程及基于基因组代谢网络模型的预测
    海洋氮循环过程及基于基因组代谢网络模型的预测张日钊1,3#,李斐然2#,袁倩倩3,马红武31.天津科技大学生物工程学院,天津300457;2.ChalmersUniversityofTechnology,Gothenburg,SwedenSE-41258;3.中国科学院天津工业生物技术研究所,中国科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2021-12-26