付雪1,2,3,
赵鑫磊1,2,3,
邢嘉伟1,2,3,
安芳娇1,2,3,
陈永志1,2,3,,
1.兰州交通大学环境与市政工程学院,兰州 730070
2.甘肃省污水处理行业技术中心,兰州 730070
3.甘肃省黄河水环境重点实验室,兰州 730070
作者简介: 毛佩玥(1996—),女,硕士研究生。研究方向:水污染控制理论与技术。E-mail:573933623@qq.com.
通讯作者: 陈永志,476411589@qq.com
中图分类号: X703.1
Effect of COD/${ {\bf{NH}}_4^ + }$ -N ratio on nitrogen removal by a coupling system of anaerobic ammonium oxidation and denitrification
MAO Peiyue1,2,3,, FU Xue1,2,3,
ZHAO Xinlei1,2,3,
XING Jiawei1,2,3,
AN Fangjiao1,2,3,
CHEN Yongzhi1,2,3,,
1.School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2.Technical Center of Sewage Treatment Industry in Gansu, Lanzhou 730070, China
3.Key laboratory of Yellow River Water Environment in Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China
Corresponding author: CHEN Yongzhi,476411589@qq.com
CLC number: X703.1
-->
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要:将实现半亚硝化的生活污水通入厌氧氨氧化反应器(ASBR),在室温下同步添加乙酸钠调控COD/
关键词: 厌氧氨氧化(anammox)/
生活污水/
COD/$ {\rm{NH}}_4^ + $-N比/
脱氮贡献率/
高斯模型
Abstract:The domestic sewage which had achieved partial nitrification was treated by an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) when sodium acetate was synchronously fed to control the COD/
Key words:anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox)/
domestic sewage/
COD/$ {\rm{NH}}_4^ + $-N ratio/
contribution rate of denitrification/
Gaussian model.
图1ASBR反应器
Figure1.Schematic diagram of ASBR reactor
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图2氮素的变化特征
Figure2.Nitrogen variations
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图3氮负荷变化特征和COD去除特征
Figure3.Total nitrogen loading variation and COD removal
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图4厌氧氨氧化反应化学计量比变化特征
Figure4.Stoichiometric ratio relationship of anammox system under different COD/
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图5典型周期内污染物降解特性
Figure5.Degradation characteristics of pollutants during typical cycles
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图6不同COD/
Figure6.Contribution of each system at different COD/
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图7高斯拟合
Figure7.Gaussian fitting
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
表1厌氧氨氧化进水水质
Table1.Quality of influent of amammox
COD/ | COD/(mg·L?1) | |||
2~3 | 92.87~117.06 | 39.40~46.99 | 39.85~47.75 | 1.55~3.06 |
3~5 | 160.11~219.63 | 42.07~47.54 | 39.40~46.60 | 1.55~3.06 |
5~7 | 224.78~269.75 | 37.40~47.60 | 39.40~45.60 | 1.55~3.06 |
7~9 | 306.05~357.49 | 38.40~45.60 | 39.40~47.20 | 1.55~3.06 |
COD/ | COD/(mg·L?1) | |||
2~3 | 92.87~117.06 | 39.40~46.99 | 39.85~47.75 | 1.55~3.06 |
3~5 | 160.11~219.63 | 42.07~47.54 | 39.40~46.60 | 1.55~3.06 |
5~7 | 224.78~269.75 | 37.40~47.60 | 39.40~45.60 | 1.55~3.06 |
7~9 | 306.05~357.49 | 38.40~45.60 | 39.40~47.20 | 1.55~3.06 |
下载: 导出CSV
表2不同COD/
Table2.Results at different COD/
反应器 | 处理对象 | COD/ | 去除率/% | 脱氮贡献率/% | 来源 | |||||
A | PD-A | PN-A | D | |||||||
ASBR | 人工配水 | 0.67 | 92 | 95 | ? | ? | ? | ? | [17] | |
EGSB | 人工配水 | 1.76 | 99 | 97 | ? | ? | ? | ? | [18] | |
ASBR | 人工配水 | 5.7 | >95 | >95 | ? | ? | ? | ? | [19] | |
UASB | 人工配水 | 1.56 | 94 | 96 | ? | ? | ? | ? | [24] | |
ASBR | 生活污水 | 4 | 96 | 98 | 68 | ? | ? | 32 | [27] | |
ASBR | 人工配水 | 4.25~5.25 | 94 | 94 | 50 | ? | ? | 50 | [28] | |
ASBR | 生活污水 | 2~3 | 78 | 99 | 94 | ? | 1.5 | 4.5 | 本研究 | |
ASBR | 生活污水 | 3~5 | 94 | 98 | 79 | 19 | ? | ? | 本研究 | |
ASBR | 生活污水 | 5~7 | 54 | 98 | 71 | 10 | ? | 17 | 本研究 | |
ASBR | 生活污水 | 7~9 | 61 | 99 | 51 | ? | ? | 49 | 本研究 | |
注:A为厌氧氨氧化对系统的脱氮贡献率;PD-A为部分反硝化-厌氧氨氧化对系统的脱氮贡献率;PN-A为短程硝化-厌氧氨氧化对系统的脱氮贡献率;D为反硝化对系统的脱氮贡献率。 |
反应器 | 处理对象 | COD/ | 去除率/% | 脱氮贡献率/% | 来源 | |||||
A | PD-A | PN-A | D | |||||||
ASBR | 人工配水 | 0.67 | 92 | 95 | ? | ? | ? | ? | [17] | |
EGSB | 人工配水 | 1.76 | 99 | 97 | ? | ? | ? | ? | [18] | |
ASBR | 人工配水 | 5.7 | >95 | >95 | ? | ? | ? | ? | [19] | |
UASB | 人工配水 | 1.56 | 94 | 96 | ? | ? | ? | ? | [24] | |
ASBR | 生活污水 | 4 | 96 | 98 | 68 | ? | ? | 32 | [27] | |
ASBR | 人工配水 | 4.25~5.25 | 94 | 94 | 50 | ? | ? | 50 | [28] | |
ASBR | 生活污水 | 2~3 | 78 | 99 | 94 | ? | 1.5 | 4.5 | 本研究 | |
ASBR | 生活污水 | 3~5 | 94 | 98 | 79 | 19 | ? | ? | 本研究 | |
ASBR | 生活污水 | 5~7 | 54 | 98 | 71 | 10 | ? | 17 | 本研究 | |
ASBR | 生活污水 | 7~9 | 61 | 99 | 51 | ? | ? | 49 | 本研究 | |
注:A为厌氧氨氧化对系统的脱氮贡献率;PD-A为部分反硝化-厌氧氨氧化对系统的脱氮贡献率;PN-A为短程硝化-厌氧氨氧化对系统的脱氮贡献率;D为反硝化对系统的脱氮贡献率。 |
下载: 导出CSV
[1] | 刘安迪, 赵凯亮, 刘宏, 等. 不同控制策略下短程硝化启动及运行工况优化[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(10): 4569-4577. |
[2] | CHEN Y Z, ZHAO Z C, LIU H, et al. Achieving stable two-stage mainstream partial-nitrification/anammox (PN/A) operation via intermittent aeration[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 245: 125650. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125650 |
[3] | 杨岚, 彭永臻, 李健伟, 等. 缺氧MBBR耦合部分厌氧氨氧化强化城市生活污水深度脱氮[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(8): 3668-3674. |
[4] | 陈小珍, 汪晓军, KARASUTA C, 等. 反硝化-高效部分亚硝化-厌氧氨氧化工艺处理老龄垃圾渗滤液[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(1): 345-352. |
[5] | 赵晴, 刘梦莹, 吕慧, 等. 耦合短程硝化反硝化的垃圾渗滤液厌氧氨氧化处理系统构建及微生物群落分析[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(9): 4195-4201. |
[6] | 王凡, 陆明羽, 殷记强, 等. 反硝化-短程硝化-厌氧氨氧化工艺处理晚期垃圾渗滤液的脱氮除碳性能[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(8): 3782-3788. |
[7] | 宋壮壮, 吕爽, 刘哲, 等. 厌氧氨氧化耦合反硝化工艺的启动及微生物群落变化特征[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(11): 5057-5065. |
[8] | 马艳红, 赵智超, 安芳娇, 等. 不同COD浓度下低基质厌氧氨氧化的启动特征[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(5): 2317-2325. |
[9] | TANG C J, ZHENG P, CHAI L Y, et al. Thermodynamic and kinetic investigation of anaerobic bioprocesses on ANAMMOX under high organic conditions[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 230: 149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.047 |
[10] | CHEN C J, SUN F Q, ZHANG H Q, et al. Evaluation of COD effect on anammox process and microbial communities in the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR)[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 216: 571-578. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.115 |
[11] | ZHANG X J, ZHANG H Z, YE C M, et al. Effect of COD/N ratio on nitrogen removal and microbial communities of CANON process in membrane bioreactors[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 189: 302-308. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.006 |
[12] | GE S J, WANG S Y, YANG X, et al. Detection of nitrifiers and evaluation of partial nitrification for wastewater treatment: A review[J]. Chemosphere, 2015, 140: 85-98. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.02.004 |
[13] | 李柏林, 任晓玲, 李晔, 等. 溶解氧对单级颗粒污泥自养脱氮系统影响的模拟[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(12): 5126-5133. |
[14] | 曹雁. 厌氧氨氧化与反硝化协同脱氮及微生物特性研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2018. |
[15] | 周同, 于德爽, 李津, 等. 温度对海洋厌氧氨氧化菌脱氮效能的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(5): 2044-2051. |
[16] | 尤永军. 游离氨(FA)对硝化菌活性的抑制影响试验研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2015. |
[17] | 朱泽沅, 于德爽, 李津. C/N比对ANAMMOX与反硝化协同脱氮性能影响及其动力学[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(6): 2813-2818. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201503158 |
[18] | SHENG S X, LIU B, HOU X Y, et al. Effects of different carbon sources and C/N ratios on the simultaneous anammox and denitrification process[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2018, 127: 26-34. |
[19] | 操沈彬, 王淑莹, 吴程程, 等. 有机物对厌氧氨氧化系统的冲击影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(12): 2164-2169. |
[20] | XU X C, XUE Y, WANG D, et al. The development of a reverse anammox sequencing partial nitrification process for simultaneous nitrogen and COD removal from wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 155: 427-431. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.111 |
[21] | LEAL C D, PEREIRA A D, NUNES F T, et al. Anammox for nitrogen removal from anaerobically pre-treated municipal wastewater: Effect of COD/N ratios on process performance and bacterial community structure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 211: 257-266. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.107 |
[22] | DING S Z, BAO P, WANG B, et al. Long-term stable simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox and denitrification (SNAD) process treating real domestic sewage using suspended activated sludge[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 339: 2193-2202. |
[23] | MACHAT H, BOUDOKHANE C, ROCHE N, et al. Effects of C/N Ratio and DO concentration on carbon and nitrogen removals in a hybrid biological reactor[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 151: 107313. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2019.107313 |
[24] | 张美雪, 李芸, 李军, 等. 低浓度乙酸盐诱导下厌氧氨氧化与异养反硝化高效耦合脱氮[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(11): 6127-6132. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201506020 |
[25] | HE S L, YANG W, QIN M, et al. Performance and microbial community of anammox in presence of micro-molecule carbon source[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 205: 545-552. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.136 |
[26] | LYU L T, ZHANG K, LI Z J, et al. Inhibition of anammox activity by phenol: Suppression effect, community analysis and mechanism simulation[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2019, 141: 30-38. |
[27] | 安芳娇, 赵智超, 黄利, 等. HRT对厌氧氨氧化协同异养反硝化脱氮的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(9): 4302-4309. |
[28] | 魏思佳, 于德爽, 李津, 等. 厌氧氨氧化与反硝化耦合脱氮除碳研究Ⅰ: COD/ |
[29] | WANG B, PENG Y Z, GUO Y Y, et al. Impact of partial nitritation degree and C/N ratio on simultaneous sludge fermentation, denitrification and anammox process[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 219: 411-419. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.114 |
[30] | WANG X J, YANG R L, GUO Y, et al. Investigation of COD and COD/N ratio for the dominance of anammox pathway for nitrogen removal via isotope labelling technique and the relevant bacteria[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 366: 606-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.036 |
[31] | LI X J, SUN Y W, WANG Z W, et al. Theoretical understanding of the optimum conditions for a mainstream granular nitritation-anammox reactor coupled with anaerobic pretreatment[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 669: 683-691. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.117 |
[32] | 俞津津. 多途径强化厌氧氨氧化工艺及其生物颗粒特性研究[D]. 杭州: 杭州师范大学, 2013. |
Turn off MathJax -->
点击查看大图
图( 7)表( 2)
计量
文章访问数:889
HTML全文浏览数:889
PDF下载数:46
施引文献:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2020-10-16
录用日期:2021-01-22
网络出版日期:2021-04-23
-->刊出日期:2021-04-10
-->
COD/${ {\rm{NH}}_4^ +} $ -N比对厌氧氨氧化耦合反硝化脱氮性能的影响
毛佩玥1,2,3,, 付雪1,2,3,
赵鑫磊1,2,3,
邢嘉伟1,2,3,
安芳娇1,2,3,
陈永志1,2,3,,
通讯作者: 陈永志,476411589@qq.com
作者简介: 毛佩玥(1996—),女,硕士研究生。研究方向:水污染控制理论与技术。E-mail:573933623@qq.com 1.兰州交通大学环境与市政工程学院,兰州 730070
2.甘肃省污水处理行业技术中心,兰州 730070
3.甘肃省黄河水环境重点实验室,兰州 730070
收稿日期: 2020-10-16
录用日期: 2021-01-22
网络出版日期: 2021-04-23
关键词: 厌氧氨氧化(anammox)/
生活污水/
COD/$ {\rm{NH}}_4^ + $-N比/
脱氮贡献率/
高斯模型
摘要:将实现半亚硝化的生活污水通入厌氧氨氧化反应器(ASBR),在室温下同步添加乙酸钠调控COD/${ {\rm{NH}}_4^ + }$ -N比分别为2~3、3~5、5~7和7~9,在此条件下考察了系统的脱氮性能。结果表明:在COD/${ {\rm{NH}}_4^ + }$ -N比为3~5时,系统出水${ {\rm{NH}}_4^ + }$ -N、${ {\rm{NO}}_2^ - }$ -N、$ {{\rm{NO}}_3^ -} $ -N和COD值分别为2.30、0.65、5.56和35.20 mg·L?1;总氮容积负荷(TNLR)和去除负荷(TNRR)分别为0.071 kg·(m3·d)?1和0.062 kg·(m3·d)?1;在典型周期内$ {{\rm{NH}}_4^ + }$ -N和COD的比反应速率分别为0.809 mg·(g·h)?1和2.098 mg·(g·h)?1;厌氧氨氧化和部分反硝化-厌氧氨氧化对脱氮的贡献率分别为78%和20%。
English Abstract
Effect of COD/${ {\bf{NH}}_4^ + }$ -N ratio on nitrogen removal by a coupling system of anaerobic ammonium oxidation and denitrification
MAO Peiyue1,2,3,, FU Xue1,2,3,
ZHAO Xinlei1,2,3,
XING Jiawei1,2,3,
AN Fangjiao1,2,3,
CHEN Yongzhi1,2,3,,
Corresponding author: CHEN Yongzhi,476411589@qq.com
1.School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China2.Technical Center of Sewage Treatment Industry in Gansu, Lanzhou 730070, China
3.Key laboratory of Yellow River Water Environment in Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China
Received Date: 2020-10-16
Accepted Date: 2021-01-22
Available Online: 2021-04-23
Keywords: anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox)/
domestic sewage/
COD/$ {\rm{NH}}_4^ + $-N ratio/
contribution rate of denitrification/
Gaussian model
Abstract:The domestic sewage which had achieved partial nitrification was treated by an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) when sodium acetate was synchronously fed to control the COD/