删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

天津市春季样方法道路扬尘碳组分特征及来源分析

本站小编 Free考研考试/2021-12-31

鎼滅储2涓囩鑰冪爺鑰冭瘉鐢靛瓙涔︼紙棰樺簱锛岃棰戯級鍏嶈垂鐢�
澶ч儴鍒嗙闉嬮兘鏄涓€娆¤€冪爺锛屽浜庡浣曟煡鎵句笓涓氳鎸囧畾鏁欐潗锛屾垨璁告湁寰堝鐤戦棶銆侳ree澹逛桨鍒嗗涔犵綉鑰冪爺娣辫€曚笓涓氳杈呭20骞达紝鎬荤粨浜嗚秴瀹炵敤鐨勬寚瀹氭暀鏉愭煡璇㈡柟娉曞強澶嶄範鏂规硶锛屾湁闇€瑕佺殑鐪嬭繃鏉�
中文关键词天津市道路扬尘PM2.5PM10碳组分来源解析 英文关键词Tianjinroad dustPM2.5PM10carbon componentssource apportionment 中文摘要 为研究天津市春季道路扬尘PM2.5和PM10中碳组分特征及来源,于2015年4月用样方法采集天津市道路扬尘样品,利用再悬浮采样器将样品悬浮到滤膜上,经热光碳分析仪测定有机碳(OC)和元素碳(EC),利用非参数检验、OC/EC比值分析、相关分析及聚类分析对其污染特征和来源进行探讨.结果表明,PM2.5ω(TC)为4.89%(次干道)~18.83%(快速路),ω(OC)为3.57%(次干道)~15.39%(快速路),ω(EC)为1.32%(次干道)~3.44%(快速路);PM10ω(TC)为8.14%(次干道)~19.71%(快速路),ω(OC)为5.91%(次干道)~16.28%(快速路),ω(EC)为1.96%(主干道)~3.43%(快速路);快速路中各碳组分质量分数均较高,次干道中各碳组分质量分数均较低,可能是由于快速路中车流量较大,机动车尾气排放量较大,而次干道车流量较小;各类型道路中ω(OC)明显大于ω(EC),ω(EC)在不同道路类型中差异不大;两相关样本非参数检验表明,各碳组分质量分数在PM2.5和PM10间均无显著性差异;相关性分析表明道路扬尘中OC、EC来源大致相同.通过OC/EC比值分析及聚类分析可知,天津市春季道路扬尘中碳组分主要来源于燃煤、机动车尾气以及生物质燃烧. 英文摘要 In order to study the characteristics and sources of carbon fractions in PM2.5 and PM10 of road dust in Tianjin, samples of road dust were collected by the quadrat sampling method in April 2015 in Tianjin, and samples were re-suspended on filters by using a NK-ZXF sampler. A Thermal Optical Carbon Analyzer (IMPROVE-TOR) was employed to measure the concentrations of organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC), and the pollution characteristics and sources were investigated by non-parametric tests and OC/EC ratio, correlation, and cluster analyses. The results showed that ω(total carbon, TC) in PM2.5 of road dust amounted to 4.89% (secondary road) -18.83% (expressway), ω(OC) amounted to 3.57% (secondary road) -15.39% (expressway), and ω(EC) amounted to 1.32% (secondary road) -3.44% (expressway); meanwhile, ω(TC) in PM10 of road dust was 8.14% (secondary road) -19.71% (expressway), ω(OC) was 5.91% (secondary road) -16.28% (expressway), and ω(EC) was 1.96% (main road) -3.43% (expressway). The mass fraction of each carbon component for the expressway was relatively high, and that for the secondary trunk road was relatively low, which may have been due to the large traffic volume on the expressway and corresponding large amounts of exhaust emissions from motor vehicles, whereas there were fewer vehicles on the secondary trunk road. Additionally, ω(OC) was significantly larger than ω(EC) for all types of roads, and ω(EC) did not vary much among the different road types. The non-parametric tests of two related samples showed that there was no significant difference in the mass fraction of each carbon component between PM2.5 and PM10. The correlation analysis showed that the sources of OC and EC in road dust were roughly the same. The OC/EC ratio analysis and cluster analysis showed that the main sources of the carbon components in the dust of roads in Tianjin in spring were coal combustion, motor vehicle exhaust, and biomass burning.

PDF全文下载地址:

https://www.hjkx.ac.cn/hjkx/ch/reader/create_pdf.aspx?file_no=20190607&flag=1&journal_id=hjkx&year_id=2019

鎴愪负璇句唬琛紝鍒嗕韩璇剧▼璧勬枡閾炬帴灏辫兘鑾峰彇40%鎻愭垚璧氶挶锛�
鎺ㄥ箍璧氶挶鏉冪泭銆傝浠h〃鍙€氳繃浜掕仈缃戠瓑閫斿緞涓烘湰绔欐帹骞垮浼犫€淰IP浼氬憳鈥濓紝鐢ㄦ埛閫氳繃璇句唬琛ㄧ殑鍒嗕韩閾炬帴鎴栨捣鎶ヨ喘涔板悗锛岃浠h〃鑾峰彇40%鎻愭垚銆傝浠h〃璐拱鏈珯浠讳綍浜у搧锛屽潎浜彈9鎶樸€傚皢鍒嗕韩閾炬帴銆佹捣鎶ュ浘鐗囩瓑锛屽彂鍒板鏍¤鍧涖€佺櫨搴﹁创鍚с€佸井鍗氥€佸井淇°€丵Q绌洪棿銆佺煡涔庛€佽眴鐡g瓑鍚勫ぇ骞冲彴銆�
相关话题/天津 工程学院 环境科学 南开大学 道路

鎼滅储2涓囩鑰冪爺鑰冭瘉鐢靛瓙涔︼紙棰樺簱锛岃棰戯級鍏嶈垂鐢�
澶ч儴鍒嗙闉嬮兘鏄涓€娆¤€冪爺锛屽浜庡浣曟煡鎵句笓涓氳鎸囧畾鏁欐潗锛屾垨璁告湁寰堝鐤戦棶銆侳ree澹逛桨鍒嗗涔犵綉鑰冪爺娣辫€曚笓涓氳杈呭20骞达紝鎬荤粨浜嗚秴瀹炵敤鐨勬寚瀹氭暀鏉愭煡璇㈡柟娉曞強澶嶄範鏂规硶锛屾湁闇€瑕佺殑鐪嬭繃鏉�