郑玉婷,
张丽丽,
高子竣,
林军
生态环境部固体废物与化学品管理技术中心, 北京 100029
作者简介: 于洋(1982-),男,博士,高级工程师,研究方向为计算毒理学模型的评估与应用以及化学物质环境风险评估技术方法等,E-mail:yuyang@meescc.cn.
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划资助项目（2017YFD0800701，2016YFD0200208）中图分类号: X171.5
Evaluation Thoughts of Computational Toxicological Models and Constructional Path for Environmental Management of Chemicals in China
Yu Yang,Zheng Yuting,
Zhang Lili,
Gao Zijun,
Lin Jun
Solid Waste and Chemicals Management Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100029, China
CLC number: X171.5
-->
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要:计算毒理学模型正逐渐成为我国化学物质环境管理的重要工具之一。为了推动建立面向我国化学物质环境管理的计算毒理学模型评估方法体系，掌握模型评估核心技术，本文分析了我国发展和评估计算毒理学模型的必要性，总结了我国计算毒理学模型评估的管理需求，系统梳理了美国、欧盟、国际经济合作与发展组织（OECD）的模型评估方法。研究发现，发达国家普遍建立了一套相对完善的计算毒理学模型评估技术，构建了包含模型开发、评估、验证和应用的模型生命周期评估体系。当前，我国尚未建立计算毒理学模型评估技术方法，借鉴发达国家的经验做法，构建具有我国国情特征的计算毒理学模型评估体系，指导我国计算毒理学模型征集与评估工作，具有重要意义。
关键词: 计算毒理学/
模型/
评估思路/
建设路径
Abstract:Computational toxicological models are gradually becoming one of the most important tools for chemical environmental management in China. In order to promote the establishment of the evaluation method system of computational toxicology models for chemical environmental management in China and master the core technology of model evaluation, this paper analyzed the necessity of developing and evaluating computational toxicology models, summarized the management requirements of computational toxicology model evaluation in China, and systematically reviewed the model evaluation methods of the United States, the European Union and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). It was found that in developed countries, a set of relatively perfect computational toxicology model assessment technology had been established, and a model life cycle assessment system including model development, assessment, validation and application had been constructed. At present, computational toxicology model evaluation techniques of China has not been established. It is of great significance to build a computational toxicology model evaluation system based on the experience of developed countries, and to guide the collection and evaluation of computational toxicology models in China.
Key words:computational toxicology/
model/
evaluation thoughts/
constructional path.
| Sizochenko N, Syzochenko M, Fjodorova N, et al. Evaluating genotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles:Application of advanced supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2019, 185:109733 |
| Joint Research Centre. JRC QSAR model databaseGuideline for authors and editors[R]. Brussel:Joint Research Centre, 2017 |
| Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The report from the expert group on (quantitative) structure-activity relationships[(Q) SARs] on the principles for the validation of (Q)SARs[R]. Paris:OECD, 2004 |
| Minerali E, Foil D H, Zorn K M, et al. Evaluation of assay central machine learning models for rat acute oral toxicity prediction[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2020, 8(42):16020-16027 |
| 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 新化学物质环境管理登记办法[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2020 |
| 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 中国现有化学物质名录[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2020 |
| Bouhedjar K, Benfenati E, Nacereddine A K. Modelling quantitative structure activity-activity relationships (QSAARs):Auto-pass-pass, a new approach to fill data gaps in environmental risk assessment under the REACH regulation[J]. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 2020, 31(10):785-801 |
| 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 新化学物质环境管理登记指南[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2020 |
| Karcher W, Hansen B G, Leeuwen C V, et al. Predictions for existing chemicals-A multilateral QSAR project[J]. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 1995, 3(3):217-221 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act[S]. Washington DC:US EPA, 2016 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidance on the development, evaluation, and application of environmental models[S]. Washington DC:US EPA, 2009 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Best modeling practices-Model development[R]. Washington DC:US EPA, 2009 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Best modeling practices-Model evaluation[R]. Washington DC:US EPA, 2009 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Best modeling practices-Model application[R]. Washington DC:US EPA, 2009 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Best modeling practices-The model life-cycle[R]. Washington DC:US EPA, 2009 |
| Jaworska J S, Comber M, Auer C, et al. Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2003, 111(10):1358-1360 |
| Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative) structure-activity relationship[(Q) SAR] models[R]. Paris:OECD, 2014 |
| Zind H, Mondamert L, Remaury Q B, et al. Occurrence of carbamazepine, diclofenac, and their related metabolites and transformation products in a French aquatic environment and preliminary risk assessment[J]. Water Research, 2021, 196:117052 |
| Joint Research Centre. JRC QSAR model databaseGuideline and protocol template for reviewers[R]. Brussel:Joint Research Centre, 2017 |
| 于洋, 左平春, 张楠, 等. 计算毒理学在农药风险评估中的应用[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2017, 38(4):24-30Yu Y, Zuo P C, Zhang N, et al. Application of computational toxicology in risk assessment of pesticide[J]. Pesticide Science and Administration, 2017, 38(4):24-30(in Chinese) |
| 于洋, 郑永权, 张楠, 等. 蔬菜常用农药在地下水中残留风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2017, 12(4):183-192Yu Y, Zheng Y Q, Zhang N, et al. Groundwater risk assessment of pesticides commonly used on vegetables[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2017, 12(4):183-192(in Chinese) |
| 左平春, 于洋, 张楠, 等. 农药环境风险评估中常用的计算毒理学模型软件[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2017, 12(4):98-109Zuo P C, Yu Y, Zhang N, et al. Commonly-used model softwares of computational toxicology in pesticide environmental risk assessment[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2017, 12(4):98-109(in Chinese) |
