删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

77%氢氧化铜水分散粒剂对6种陆生生物的毒性及环境风险评估

本站小编 Free考研考试/2021-12-30

程禹,
邵辉,
刘春艳,
杨云艳,
杨丽静,
闫琳,
林宏芳,
郭永泽
天津市农业科学院农产品质量安全与营养研究所, 农业农村部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(天津), 天津 300381
作者简介: 程禹(1990-),男,硕士研究生,农艺师,研究方向为农药环境毒理学,E-mail:cheng27617202@126.com.
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划子课题(2016YFD0200204-5);2019年国家农产品质量安全风险评估项目(GJFP2019011,GJFP2019007)


中图分类号: X171.5


Actute Toxicity and Environmental Risk Assessment of 77% Copper Hydroxide Aqueous Dispersion Granules for Six Terrestrial Organisms

Cheng Yu,
Shao Hui,
Liu Chunyan,
Yang Yunyan,
Yang Lijing,
Yan Lin,
Lin Hongfang,
Guo Yongze
Institute of Agricultural Products Quality Safety and Nutrition, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Risk Assessment Laboratory(Tianjin), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300381, China

CLC number: X171.5

-->

摘要
HTML全文
(0)(0)
参考文献(22)
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件(0)
访问统计

摘要:氢氧化铜是一种利用铜离子杀死孢子细胞的杀菌剂,对柑橘树溃疡病具有良好的防治效果。本研究依据《化学农药环境安全评价试验准则》和《农药登记环境风险评估指南》,对6种模式陆生生物:日本鹌鹑(Coturnix japonica)、蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)、家蚕(Bombyx mori)、赤眼蜂(Trichogramma dendrolimi)、七星瓢虫(Coccinella septempunctata)和蚯蚓(Eisenia foetida)进行急性毒性试验并对其进行环境风险评估。结果表明,对鹌鹑急性经口半致死剂量(7 d-LD50)为225.9 mg a.i.·(kg bw)-1,对蜜蜂急性经口48 h-LD50为6.19 μg a.i·.蜂-1。在飘移场景下评估该农药对家蚕的风险,得到最外围一行桑树上的风险商(RQ):RQfr=3.083>1,风险不可接受;该农药在农田内对寄生性天敌赤眼蜂的危害商(HQ):HQin=9.702>5,风险不可接受。对土壤生物蚯蚓急性和慢性的RQ值分别为799.8和2 666,RQ>1,因此对土壤生物蚯蚓的风险不可接受。77%氢氧化铜水分散粒剂对蜜蜂急性经口和鸟类毒性为中毒。环境风险评估结果显示,上述3项环境风险不可接受,说明农药环境风险评估方法不能只停留在对某一类型模式生物的毒性分级上。基于目前发展趋势,更新评估手段,建立风险评估模型是大势所趋。所以,更需要对农药进行全面研究,以提高农药使用的安全性和合理性。
关键词: 氢氧化铜/
陆生生物/
急性毒性/
环境风险评估

Abstract:Copper hydroxide, a fungicide that kills spore cells by copper ion, has promising control effect on citrus canker. In this study, according to Test Guidelines on Environmental Safety Assessment for Chemical Pesticides and Guidance on Environmental Risk Assessment for Pesticide Registration, the acute toxicity and environmental risk were assessed using six types of model terrestrial organisms, including Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica), honeybee (Apis mellifera L.), silkworm (Bombyx mori), Trichogrammatid (Trichogramma dendrolimi), seven-spotted ladybug (Coccinella septempunctata) and earthworm (Eisenia foetida). The acute oral median lethal dose (7 d-LD50) was 225.9 mg a.i·. (kg body weight)-1 for quail; the acute oral 48 h-LD50 for honeybees was 6.19 μg a.i.·bee-1. The copper hydroxide risk was also evaluated under drifting scenes using silkworms and mulberry trees. The obtained risk quotient (RQfr) was 3.083 in the outermost row of the mulberry plantation, which is an unacceptable risk because RQfr was greater than 1. The risk to the parasitic natural enemy Trichogramma (hazard quotient (HQin) =9. 702>5) in the field was not acceptable. The acute and chronic RQ values for earthworms were 799.8 and 2 666, respectively, leading to an unacceptable risk due to RQ>1. It is preliminarily believed that 77% copper hydroxide dispersible granule was medially toxic in acute oral toxicity test on bees and toxicity test on birds. However, three unacceptable environmental risks are found in the environmental risk assessment. Overall, the methods of evaluating environmental risks on pesticides cannot rely on the toxicity classification by using only one certain type of model organism, which is not comprehensive. Based on the recent advancements, it is necessary to update assessment methods and establish risk assessment models. Therefore, more comprehensive research on pesticides is needed to improve the safety of pesticide usage.
Key words:copper hydroxide/
terrestrial organisms/
acute toxicity/
environmental risk assessment.

加载中
唐学玉. 安全农产品生产户环境保护行为研究——以江苏无公害韭菜种植户为例[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2013:13, 155 Tang X Y. The environmental protection behavior of farm households providing safe agricultural product[D]. Yangling:Northwest A & F University, 2013:13, 155(in Chinese)
胡宗山. 柑橘溃疡病发生现状及其对柑橘产业的影响[J]. 乡村科技, 2019(23):92-93
张志标, 李月, 周玉蓉, 等. 梅州市柑橘溃疡病发生原因及综合防控技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(7):115, 118 Zhang Z B, Li Y, Zhou Y R, et al. Causes ofcitrus canker in Meizhou City and comprehensive prevention and control techniques[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(7):115, 118(in Chinese)
冯清. 30% 氢氧化铜悬浮剂防治柑橘溃疡病效果研究[J]. 科学种养, 2012(4):29-30
唐美君, 郭华伟, 姚惠明, 等. 吡唑醚菌酯和氢氧化铜对茶炭疽病的田间防效[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2015, 56(11):1877-1879
Pinto E, Sigaud-Kutner T C S, Leitao M A S, et al. Heavy metal-induced oxidative stress in algae[J]. Journal of Phycology, 2003, 39(6):1008-1018
张国军, 邱栋梁, 刘星辉. Cu对植物毒害研究进展[J]. 福建农业大学学报, 2004, 33(3):289-294Zhang G J, Qiu D L, Liu X H. Advances in copper toxicity to plants[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2004, 33(3):289-294(in Chinese)
Lewis K A, Tzilivakis J, Warner D J, et al. An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment:An International Journal, 2016, 22(4):1050-1064
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 化学农药环境安全评价试验准则 第9 部分:鸟类急性毒性试验:GB/T 31270.9-2014[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2014 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China. Test guidelines on environmental safety assessment for chemical pesticides-Part 9:Avian acute toxicity test:GB/T 31270.9-2014[S]. Beijing:General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China, 2014(in Chinese)
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 化学农药环境安全评价试验准则 第10部分:蜜蜂急性毒性试验:GB/T 31270.102014[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2014 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China. Test guidelines on environmental safety assessment for chemical pesticidesPart 10:Honeybee acute toxicity test:GB/T 31270.102014[S]. Beijing:General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China, 2014(in Chinese)
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 化学农药环境安全评价试验准则 第11部分:家蚕急性毒性试验:GB/T 31270.112014[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2014 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China. Test guidelines on environmental safety assessment for chemical pesticidesPart 11:Silkworm acute toxicity test:GB/T 31270.112014[S]. Beijing:General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China, 2014(in Chinese)
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 化学农药环境安全评价试验准则 第17部分:天敌赤眼蜂急性毒性试验:GB/T 31270. 17-2014[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2014 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China. Test guidelines on environmental safety assessment for chemical pesticidesPart 17:Trichogramma acute toxicity test:GB/T 31270. 17-2014[S]. Beijing:General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China, 2014(in Chinese)
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 化学农药环境安全评价试验准则 第15部分:蚯蚓急性毒性试验:GB/T 31270.152014[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2014 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China. Test guidelines on environmental safety assessment for chemical pesticidesPart 15:Earthworm acute toxicity test:GB/T 31270.152014[S]. Beijing:General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China, 2014(in Chinese)
中华人民共和国农业部. 化学农药天敌(瓢虫)急性接触毒性试验准则:NY/T 3088-2017[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国农业部, 2017 Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China. Chemical pesticide-Guideline for natural enemy (ladybird beetles) acute contact toxicity test:NY/T 30882017[S]. Beijing:Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China, 2017(in Chinese)
中华人民共和国农业部. 农药登记环境风险评估指南:NY/T 2882-2016[S] 北京:中华人民共和国农业部, 2016 Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China. Guidance on environmental risk assessment for pesticide registration:NY/T 2882-2016[S]. Beijing:Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China, 2016(in Chinese)
周一平. 用SPSS软件计算新药的LD50[J]. 药学进展, 2003, 27(5):314-316Zhou Y P. The calculation ofLD 50 in new drugs with software SPSS[J]. Progress in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2003, 27(5):314-316(in Chinese)
游泳, 应碧华, 赖露芳, 等. 4种烟嘧磺隆多元复配除草剂对意大利蜜蜂和玉米螟赤眼蜂的急性毒性及初级风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2018, 13(6):298-306You Y, Ying B H, Lai L F, et al. The acute toxicity and risk assessment of four multi-combination nicosulfuron to Apis mellifera and Trichogramma ostriniae[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2018, 13(6):298-306(in Chinese)
谭丽超, 程燕, 卜元卿, 等. 新烟碱类农药在我国的登记现状及对蜜蜂的初级风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2019, 14(6):292-303Tan L C, Cheng Y, Bu Y Q, et al. Registration status review and primary risk assessment to bees of neonicotinoid pesticides[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2019, 14(6):292-303(in Chinese)
于洋. 蔬菜常用农药环境风险评估及控制策略研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2018:50-182 Yu Y. Study on environmental risk assessment and control strategy of pesticides commonly used on vegetables[D]. Shenyang:Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018:50-182(in Chinese)
毛连纲, 周艳明, 张兰, 等. 基于TOP-RICE模型嘧菌酯·噻呋酰胺4% 展膜油剂稻田水溢出对水生生态系统风险评估研究[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2017, 12(4):153-163Mao L G, Zhou Y M, Zhang L, et al. Risk assessment of azoxystrobin·thifluzamide 4% spreading oil water overflow in rice paddies on aquatic ecosystem based on TOPRICE model[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2017, 12(4):153-163(in Chinese)
吴志凤, 周艳明, 周欣欣. 农药登记环境风险评估的现状及展望[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2015, 36(1):12-15Wu Z F, Zhou Y M, Zhou X X. Present situation and prospect of environment risk assessment (ERA) for pesticide registration[J]. Pesticide Science and Administration, 2015, 36(1):12-15(in Chinese)
于彩虹, 李春燕, 林荣华, 等. 农药对陆生生物的生态毒性及风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2015, 10(6):21-28Yu C H, Li C Y, Lin R H, et al. Eco-toxicity and risk assessment of pesticide on terrestrial organisms[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2015, 10(6):21-28(in Chinese)

相关话题/环境 北京 生物 生态 农业