删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

质量还是价格?折衷产品缺货情境下的消费者选择

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

姚卿1, 陈荣2()
1 北京科技大学东凌经济管理学院, 北京 100083
2 清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084
收稿日期:2017-11-21出版日期:2019-05-25发布日期:2019-03-20
通讯作者:陈荣E-mail:chenr@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71302165);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71531013);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71471015);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71472104);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71772104);清华大学自主科研计划

Quality or price? The effect of stock-out middle option on consumer choices

YAO Qing1, CHEN Rong2()
1 Donlinks School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2 School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Received:2017-11-21Online:2019-05-25Published:2019-03-20
Contact:CHEN Rong E-mail:chenr@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 基于情境效应和决策冲突理论, 通过三个实验探讨折衷产品选项的不可得如何影响消费者对余下可得产品的偏好。研究结果表明, 折衷商品不可得对余下商品的吸引力呈现非对称性的影响。以质量和价格产品属性的购买情境为例, 中等价格中等质量商品的不可得将显著提升低价格商品的吸引力(实验1), 其原因在于折衷方案不可得显著提高了消费者的决策冲突, 高水平的决策冲突导致决策者偏好具有确定性优势的选项, 规避优势存在模糊性的选项。随着质量属性模糊性的降低(提供专家评价, 实验2; 消费者专业知识较强, 实验3)或提高(质量存在波动范围, 实验2), 折衷商品不可得效应相应减弱或加强。



图1吸引效应
图1吸引效应



图2折衷效应
图2折衷效应



图3本文研究框架
图3本文研究框架


表1实验1折衷选项缺货对余下选项选择概率的影响
选项 %对照组
{A, C}
%折衷商品不可得组
{A, B不可得, C}
%三选组
{A, B, C}
数码相机 N = 60 N = 62 N = 60
A 46.7 66.1 13.3
B 46.7
C 53.3 33.9 40.0
租车服务 N = 58 N = 62 N = 60
A 37.9 58.1 11.7
B 48.3
C 62.1 41.9 40.0

表1实验1折衷选项缺货对余下选项选择概率的影响
选项 %对照组
{A, C}
%折衷商品不可得组
{A, B不可得, C}
%三选组
{A, B, C}
数码相机 N = 60 N = 62 N = 60
A 46.7 66.1 13.3
B 46.7
C 53.3 33.9 40.0
租车服务 N = 58 N = 62 N = 60
A 37.9 58.1 11.7
B 48.3
C 62.1 41.9 40.0


表2实验2A专家质量评分的调节作用
选项 %无专家质量评分 %有专家质量评分
{A, C} N = 60 {A, B不可得, C} N = 60 {A, B, C} N = 60 {A, C} N = 58 {A, B不可得, C} N = 58 {A, B, C} N = 56
A 36.7 65 8.3 40 36.7 13.3
B 55 36.7
C 63.3 35 36.7 60 63.3 50

表2实验2A专家质量评分的调节作用
选项 %无专家质量评分 %有专家质量评分
{A, C} N = 60 {A, B不可得, C} N = 60 {A, B, C} N = 60 {A, C} N = 58 {A, B不可得, C} N = 58 {A, B, C} N = 56
A 36.7 65 8.3 40 36.7 13.3
B 55 36.7
C 63.3 35 36.7 60 63.3 50


表3实验2B产品质量表达方式的调节作用
选项 % 模糊范围 % 精确数值
{A, C} N = 60 {A, B不可得, C} N = 60 {A, B, C} N = 60 {A, C} N = 60 {A, B不可得, C} N = 60 {A, B, C} N = 60
A 43.3 75 21.1 38.3 56.7 20
B 42.1 45
C 56.7 25 36.8 61.7 43.3 35

表3实验2B产品质量表达方式的调节作用
选项 % 模糊范围 % 精确数值
{A, C} N = 60 {A, B不可得, C} N = 60 {A, B, C} N = 60 {A, C} N = 60 {A, B不可得, C} N = 60 {A, B, C} N = 60
A 43.3 75 21.1 38.3 56.7 20
B 42.1 45
C 56.7 25 36.8 61.7 43.3 35


表4实验3消费者专业知识的调节作用
选项 %专业知识较少 %专业知识丰富
{A, C} N = 56 {A, B不可得, C} N = 57 {A, B, C} N = 46 {A, C} N = 54 {A, B不可得, C} N = 58 {A, B, C} N = 60
A 42.9 70.2 10.9 35.2 34.5 13.3
B 56.5 35
C 57.1 29.8 32.6 64.8 65.5 51.7

表4实验3消费者专业知识的调节作用
选项 %专业知识较少 %专业知识丰富
{A, C} N = 56 {A, B不可得, C} N = 57 {A, B, C} N = 46 {A, C} N = 54 {A, B不可得, C} N = 58 {A, B, C} N = 60
A 42.9 70.2 10.9 35.2 34.5 13.3
B 56.5 35
C 57.1 29.8 32.6 64.8 65.5 51.7







1 Ang S. H., Leong S. M., & Tey W. L . ( 1997). Effects of price reduction sale ads on consumer responses. Pricing Strategy and Practice, 5( 3), 116-125.
2 Armitage, C. J., & Arden, M. A . ( 2007). Felt and potential ambivalence across the stages of change. Journal of Health Psychology, 12( 1), 149-158.
3 Baumeister R. F., Sparks E. A., Stillman T. F., & Vohs K. D . ( 2008). Free will in consumer behavior: Self-control, ego depletion, and choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18( 1), 4-13.
4 Berlyne, D. E . ( 1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. McGraw-Hill series in psychology. New York, US.
5 Campo K., Gijsbrechts E., & Nisol P . ( 2000). Towards understanding consumer response to stock-outs. Journal of Retailing, 76( 2), 219-242.
6 Carmon Z., Wertenbroch K., & Zeelenberg M . ( 2003). Option attachment: When deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. Journal of Consumer Research, 30( 1), 15-29.
7 Chatterjee, S., & Heath, T. B . ( 1996). Conflict and loss aversion in multiattribute choice: The effects of trade-off size and reference dependence on decision difficulty. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 67( 2), 144-155.
8 Choplin, J. M., & Hummel, J. E . ( 2005). Comparison-induced decoy effect. Memory & Cognition, 33( 2), 332-343.
9 Chuang H. H. C., Oliva R., & Liu S . ( 2015). On-shelf availability, retail performance, and external audits: A field experiment. Production and Operations Management, 25( 5), 935-951.
10 Clarkson J. J., Janiszewski C., & Cinelli M. D . ( 2013). The desire for consumption knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 39( 6), 1313-1329.
11 d’Astous, A., & Landreville, V . ( 2003). An experimental investigation of factors affecting consumers’ perceptions of sales promotions. European Journal of Marketing, 37( 11-12), 1746-1761.
12 Dhar, R. ( 1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24( 2), 215-231.
13 Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. M . ( 1999). The effect of time pressure on consumer choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25( 4), 369-384.
14 Dhar R., Nowlis S. M., & Sherman S. J . ( 2000). Trying hard or hardly trying: An analysis of context effects in choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9 ( 4), 189-200.
15 Dhar, R., & Simonson, I . ( 1999). Making complementary choices in consumption episodes: Highlighting versus balancing. Journal of Marketing Research, 36( 1), 29-44.
16 Dhar, R., & Simonson, I . ( 2003). The effect of forced choice on choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 40( 2), 146-160.
17 Festinger, L. ( 1962). Cognitive dissonance. Scientific American, 207( 4), 93-107.
18 Fishbach, A., & Dhar, R . ( 2005). Goals as excuses or guides: The liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32( 3), 370-377.
19 Fitzsimons, G. J . ( 2000). Consumer response to stockouts. Journal of Consumer Research, 27( 2), 249-266.
20 Ge X., Messinger P. R., & Li J . ( 2009). Influence of soldout products on consumer choice. Journal of Retailing, 85( 3), 274-287.
21 Gierl, H., & Huettl, V . ( 2010). Are scarce products always more attractive? The interaction of different types of scarcity signals with products’ suitability for conspicuous consumption. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27( 3), 225-235.
22 Ha, Y. W., & Hoch, S. J . ( 1989). Ambiguity, processing strategy, and advertising-evidence interactions. Journal of Consumer Research, 16( 3), 354-360.
23 Hedgcock, W., & Rao, A. R . ( 2009). Could Ralph Nader’s entrance and exit have helped Al Gore? The impact of decoy dynamics on consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 46( 3), 330-343.
24 Hsee, C. K . ( 1996). The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67( 3), 247-257.
25 Huang Y. H., & Zhang, Y. C . ( 2016). The out-of-stock (OOS) effect on choice shares of available options. Journal of Retailing, 92( 1), 13-24.
26 Huber J., Payne J. W., & Puto C . ( 1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9( 1), 90-98.
27 Inman, J. J., & Zeelenberg, M . ( 2002). Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions: The attenuating role of decision justifiability. Journal of Consumer Research, 29( 1), 116-128.
28 Jung J. M., & Kellaris, J. J . ( 2004). Cross-national differences in proneness to scarcity effects: The moderating roles of familiarity, uncertainty avoidance, and need for cognitive closure. Psychology & Marketing, 21( 9), 739-753.
29 Khan U., Zhu M., & Kalra A . ( 2011). When trade-offs matter: The effect of choice construal on context effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 48( 1), 62-71.
30 Kim, M., & Lennon, S. J . ( 2011). Consumer response to online apparel stockouts. Psychology & Marketing, 28( 2), 115-144.
31 Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I . ( 2000). The effects of incomplete information on consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 37( 4), 427-448.
32 Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I . ( 2002). Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. Journal of Marketing Research, 39( 2), 155-170.
33 Krishna A., Briesch R., Lehmann D. R., & Yuan H . ( 2002). A meta-analysis of the impact of price presentation on perceived savings. Journal of Retailing, 78( 2), 101-118.
34 Ku H. H., Kuo C. C., Fang W. L., & Yu Y. W . ( 2014). The impact of retail out-of-stock options on preferences: The role of consumers’ desire for assimilation versus differentiation. Marketing Letters, 25( 1), 53-66.
35 Levav J., Kivetz R., & Cho C. K . ( 2010). Motivational compatibility and choice conflict. Journal of Consumer Research, 37( 3), 429-442.
36 Li D. J., Zheng J., Jin H. Z., & Zhang C. B . ( 2017). A study on phantom decoy effects of consumer decision-making context cue-based on priming strategy model in double attribute space. Management Review, 29( 6), 189-201.
[ 李东进, 郑军, 金慧贞, 张初兵 . ( 2017). 消费者决策情境线索的虚位诱导效应研究——基于双属性空间启动策略模型, 管理评论, 29( 6), 189-201.]
37 Luce M. F., Payne J. W., & Bettman J. R . ( 1999). Emotional tradeoff difficulty and choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 36( 2), 143-159.
38 Mishra S., Umesh U. N., & Stem D. E . ( 1993). Antecedents of the attraction effect: An information-processing approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 30( 3), 331-349.
39 Morimoto, M., & Chang, S . ( 2006). Consumers’ attitudes toward unsolicited commercial e-mail and postal direct mail marketing methods. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7( 1), 1-11.
40 Muthukrishnan, A. V., & Kardes, F. R . ( 2001). Persistent preferences for product attributes: The effects of the initial choice context and uninformative experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 28( 1), 89-104.
41 Muthukrishnan A. V., Wathieu L., & Xu A. J . ( 2009). Ambiguity aversion and the preference for established brands. Management Science, 55( 12), 1933-1941.
42 Pettibone, J. C., & Wedell, D. H . ( 2000). Examining models of nondominated decoy effects across judgment and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81( 2), 300-328.
43 Pettibone J. C., & Wedell, D. H . ( 2007). Testing alternative explanations of phantom decoy effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20( 3), 323-341.
44 Pratkanis A. R., & Farguhar, P. H . ( 1992). A brief history of research on phantom alternatives: Evidence for seven empirical generalizations about phantoms. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 13( 1), 103-122.
45 Preacher K. J., Rucker D. D., & Hayes A. F . ( 2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42( 1), 185-227.
46 Shafir, E., Simonson, I. & Tversky, I . ( 1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49( 1-2), 11-36.
47 Sheng S. B., Parker A. M., & Nakamoto K . ( 2005). Understanding the mechanism and determinants of compromise effects. Psychology & Marketing, 22( 7), 591-609.
48 Simonson, I. ( 1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16( 2), 158-174.
49 Simonson I., Nowlis S., & Lemon K . ( 1993). The effects of local consideration sets on global choice between lower price and higher quality. Marketing Science, 12( 4), 357-377.
50 Simonson, I., & Tversky, A . ( 1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29( 3), 281-295.
51 Sloot L. M., Verhoef P. C., & Franses P. H . ( 2005). The impact of brand equity and the hedonic level of products on consumer stock-out reactions. Journal of Retailing, 81( 1), 15-34.
52 Spiller S. A., Fitzsimons G. J., Lynch J. G., & Mcclelland G. H . ( 2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50( 2), 277-288.
53 Stafford M. R., & Stafford, T. F . ( 2000). The effectiveness of tensile pricing tactics in the advertising of services. Journal of Advertising, 29( 2), 45-60.
54 Trautmann S. T., Vieider. F. M., & Wakker P. P . ( 2008). Causes of ambiguity aversion: Known versus unknown preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36( 3), 225-243.
55 Tversky, A., & Simonson, I . ( 1993). Context-dependent preferences. Management Science, 39( 10), 1179-1189.
56 Wang J., Novemsky N., Dhar R., & Baumeister R. F . ( 2010). Trade-offs and depletion in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 47( 5), 910-919.
57 Yao Q., Chen R., & Zhao P . ( 2013). Precise versus imprecise promotional rewards at small probabilities: Moderating from purchase value and promotion budget. European Journal of Marketing, 47 ( 5-6), 1006-1021.
58 Xu J., Jiang Z. X., & Dhar R . ( 2013). Mental representation and perceived similarity: How abstract mindset aids choice from large assortments. Journal of Marketing Research, 50( 4), 548-559.
59 Zhao X. S., Lynch J. G., & Chen Q. M . ( 2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37( 2), 197-206.




[1]丁瑛;宫秀双. 社会排斥对产品触觉信息偏好的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1302-1313.
[2]李晓明;谢佳. 偶然情绪对延迟选择的影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(12): 1641-1650.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4443
相关话题/实验 质量 概率 经济管理学院 心理